RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco LWAPP- The change from WLAN Override to AP Groups- Pain?

2009-06-15 Thread Watters, John
Strange. My 5.2.187 is not giving this problem.

And, my SHO WLAN APGROUPS shows the Interface names, *not* the SSIDs as does 
your example and the on in the bug explanation.

We are not running the WSC product (using the Airwave AMP product instead).


-jcw

-
John WattersUA: OIT  205-348-3992


From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Hector J Rios
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 8:40 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco LWAPP- The change from WLAN Override to AP 
Groups- Pain?

I've got an update on AP groups. We've had quite an interesting week. As I 
mentioned before, we are running 5.2.178 code on our WiSMs, and after applying 
the new ap groups to a more extensive number of APs we are started experiencing 
problems. The one problem that I can mention to you guys is better explained if 
I paste some output directly from one of our WiSMs' CLI (see below). The 
command show wlan summary gives you all the WLANs configured in your WiSM. 
The command show wlan apgroups should list all apgroups configured and their 
associated WLANS. The interesting thing is that the default-group is the one 
group that is not user-created, cannot be erased and therefore should contain 
all the WLANs. It is clear that is not the case for us and that's just one of 
the issues we have run into so far. We've been working with TAC hoping they can 
provide us with a solution.

This could be very specific to our setup, but I just wanted to pass it along to 
make you guys aware of this potential issue. You've been warned.

Thanks,

Hector Rios
Louisiana State University


(WiSM-slot1-1) show wlan summary

Number of WLANs.. 8

WLAN ID  WLAN Profile Name / SSID   StatusInterface Name
---  -    
1lsusecure / lsusecure  Enabled   lsusecure
2lsuwireless / lsuwireless  Enabled   grokpage
3lsuguest / lsuguestEnabled   lsuguest
4lsuregmac / lsuregmac  Enabled   lsuregmac
5geaux0wire / geaux0wireDisabled  lsuguest
6cct / cct  Enabled   lsusecure
7voip / voipEnabled   lsusecure
8lsuwpa / lsuwpaEnabled   lsuwpa

(WiSM-slot1-1) show wlan apgroups

Site Name default-group
Site Description. none

WLAN ID  Interface  Network Admission Control
--- -----
 1   lsusecureDisabled
 2   grokpage Disabled
 3   lsuguest Disabled
 4   lsuregmacDisabled
 8   lsuwpa   Disabled


** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.



RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco LWAPP- The change from WLAN Override to AP Groups- Pain?

2009-06-15 Thread Hector J Rios
We upgraded from 4.2.176 to 5.2.178. 

Hector

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.


RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco LWAPP- The change from WLAN Override to AP Groups- Pain?

2009-06-12 Thread Lee H Badman
Hector-

For clarity, if you configure an AP and simply leave it in the default group, 
are you saying that in some cases all SSIDs don't get transmitted? 

This (WLAN Override) has been the one single area I point to since the 
Airespace days that was fundamentally wrongly implemented. Was hoping that the 
new AP Groups would be the long overdue salvation. Please keep us posted, and I 
wonder if anyone is having production-quality success with the AP groups 
function? I have this in my near future, so my interest is peaked.

Lee Badman

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Hector J Rios [hr...@lsu.edu]
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 9:39 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco LWAPP- The change from WLAN Override to AP 
Groups- Pain?

I’ve got an update on AP groups. We’ve had quite an interesting week. As I 
mentioned before, we are running 5.2.178 code on our WiSMs, and after applying 
the new ap groups to a more extensive number of APs we are started experiencing 
problems. The one problem that I can mention to you guys is better explained if 
I paste some output directly from one of our WiSMs’ CLI (see below). The 
command “show wlan summary” gives you all the WLANs configured in your WiSM. 
The command “show wlan apgroups” should list all apgroups configured and their 
associated WLANS. The interesting thing is that the “default-group” is the one 
group that is not “user-created”, cannot be erased and therefore should contain 
all the WLANs. It is clear that is not the case for us and that’s just one of 
the issues we have run into so far. We’ve been working with TAC hoping they can 
provide us with a solution.

This could be very specific to our setup, but I just wanted to pass it along to 
make you guys aware of this potential issue. You’ve been warned.

Thanks,

Hector Rios
Louisiana State University


(WiSM-slot1-1) show wlan summary

Number of WLANs.. 8

WLAN ID  WLAN Profile Name / SSID   StatusInterface Name
---  -    
1lsusecure / lsusecure  Enabled   lsusecure
2lsuwireless / lsuwireless  Enabled   grokpage
3lsuguest / lsuguestEnabled   lsuguest
4lsuregmac / lsuregmac  Enabled   lsuregmac
5geaux0wire / geaux0wireDisabled  lsuguest
6cct / cct  Enabled   lsusecure
7voip / voipEnabled   lsusecure
8lsuwpa / lsuwpaEnabled   lsuwpa

(WiSM-slot1-1) show wlan apgroups

Site Name default-group
Site Description. none

WLAN ID  Interface  Network Admission Control
--- -----
 1   lsusecureDisabled
 2   grokpage Disabled
 3   lsuguest Disabled
 4   lsuregmacDisabled
 8   lsuwpa   Disabled


** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.


RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco LWAPP- The change from WLAN Override to AP Groups- Pain?

2009-06-12 Thread Hector J Rios
Correct. The WLAN exists, but since it is not in any AP-group, it is
not being transmitted. 

Hector Rios







-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Lee H Badman
Sent: Friday, June 12, 2009 6:52 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco LWAPP- The change from WLAN Override
to AP Groups- Pain?

Hector-

For clarity, if you configure an AP and simply leave it in the default
group, are you saying that in some cases all SSIDs don't get
transmitted? 

This (WLAN Override) has been the one single area I point to since the
Airespace days that was fundamentally wrongly implemented. Was hoping
that the new AP Groups would be the long overdue salvation. Please keep
us posted, and I wonder if anyone is having production-quality success
with the AP groups function? I have this in my near future, so my
interest is peaked.

Lee Badman

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Hector J Rios
[hr...@lsu.edu]
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 9:39 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco LWAPP- The change from WLAN Override
to AP Groups- Pain?

I've got an update on AP groups. We've had quite an interesting week. As
I mentioned before, we are running 5.2.178 code on our WiSMs, and after
applying the new ap groups to a more extensive number of APs we are
started experiencing problems. The one problem that I can mention to you
guys is better explained if I paste some output directly from one of our
WiSMs' CLI (see below). The command show wlan summary gives you all
the WLANs configured in your WiSM. The command show wlan apgroups
should list all apgroups configured and their associated WLANS. The
interesting thing is that the default-group is the one group that is
not user-created, cannot be erased and therefore should contain all
the WLANs. It is clear that is not the case for us and that's just one
of the issues we have run into so far. We've been working with TAC
hoping they can provide us with a solution.

This could be very specific to our setup, but I just wanted to pass it
along to make you guys aware of this potential issue. You've been
warned.

Thanks,

Hector Rios
Louisiana State University


(WiSM-slot1-1) show wlan summary

Number of WLANs.. 8

WLAN ID  WLAN Profile Name / SSID   StatusInterface Name
---  -  

1lsusecure / lsusecure  Enabled   lsusecure
2lsuwireless / lsuwireless  Enabled   grokpage
3lsuguest / lsuguestEnabled   lsuguest
4lsuregmac / lsuregmac  Enabled   lsuregmac
5geaux0wire / geaux0wireDisabled  lsuguest
6cct / cct  Enabled   lsusecure
7voip / voipEnabled   lsusecure
8lsuwpa / lsuwpaEnabled   lsuwpa

(WiSM-slot1-1) show wlan apgroups

Site Name default-group
Site Description. none

WLAN ID  Interface  Network Admission Control
--- -----
 1   lsusecureDisabled
 2   grokpage Disabled
 3   lsuguest Disabled
 4   lsuregmacDisabled
 8   lsuwpa   Disabled


** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent
Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.


RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco LWAPP- The change from WLAN Override to AP Groups- Pain?

2009-06-12 Thread Johnson, Bruce T
Hector,
 
Have you tried disabling/enabling or deleting/re-adding the missing WLANs?  Does
a new WLAN show up in the default group?
 
Bruce T. Johnson | Network Engineer | Partners Healthcare 
Network Engineering | 617.726.9662 | Pager: 31633 | bjohns...@partners.org



From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv on behalf of
Hector J Rios
Sent: Fri 6/12/2009 9:38 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco LWAPP- The change from WLAN Override to AP
Groups- Pain?



Correct. The WLAN exists, but since it is not in any AP-group, it is
not being transmitted.

Hector Rios







-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Lee H Badman
Sent: Friday, June 12, 2009 6:52 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco LWAPP- The change from WLAN Override
to AP Groups- Pain?

Hector-

For clarity, if you configure an AP and simply leave it in the default
group, are you saying that in some cases all SSIDs don't get
transmitted?

This (WLAN Override) has been the one single area I point to since the
Airespace days that was fundamentally wrongly implemented. Was hoping
that the new AP Groups would be the long overdue salvation. Please keep
us posted, and I wonder if anyone is having production-quality success
with the AP groups function? I have this in my near future, so my
interest is peaked.

Lee Badman

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Hector J Rios
[hr...@lsu.edu]
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 9:39 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco LWAPP- The change from WLAN Override
to AP Groups- Pain?

I've got an update on AP groups. We've had quite an interesting week. As
I mentioned before, we are running 5.2.178 code on our WiSMs, and after
applying the new ap groups to a more extensive number of APs we are
started experiencing problems. The one problem that I can mention to you
guys is better explained if I paste some output directly from one of our
WiSMs' CLI (see below). The command show wlan summary gives you all
the WLANs configured in your WiSM. The command show wlan apgroups
should list all apgroups configured and their associated WLANS. The
interesting thing is that the default-group is the one group that is
not user-created, cannot be erased and therefore should contain all
the WLANs. It is clear that is not the case for us and that's just one
of the issues we have run into so far. We've been working with TAC
hoping they can provide us with a solution.

This could be very specific to our setup, but I just wanted to pass it
along to make you guys aware of this potential issue. You've been
warned.

Thanks,

Hector Rios
Louisiana State University


(WiSM-slot1-1) show wlan summary

Number of WLANs.. 8

WLAN ID  WLAN Profile Name / SSID   StatusInterface Name
---  -  

1lsusecure / lsusecure  Enabled   lsusecure
2lsuwireless / lsuwireless  Enabled   grokpage
3lsuguest / lsuguestEnabled   lsuguest
4lsuregmac / lsuregmac  Enabled   lsuregmac
5geaux0wire / geaux0wireDisabled  lsuguest
6cct / cct  Enabled   lsusecure
7voip / voipEnabled   lsusecure
8lsuwpa / lsuwpaEnabled   lsuwpa

(WiSM-slot1-1) show wlan apgroups

Site Name default-group
Site Description. none

WLAN ID  Interface  Network Admission Control
--- -----
 1   lsusecureDisabled
 2   grokpage Disabled
 3   lsuguest Disabled
 4   lsuregmacDisabled
 8   lsuwpa   Disabled


** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent
Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.




The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco LWAPP- The change from WLAN Override to AP Groups- Pain?

2009-06-12 Thread Hector J Rios
Here is the bug ID: CSCsy18685

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.


RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco LWAPP- The change from WLAN Override to AP Groups- Pain?

2009-06-12 Thread Johnson, Bruce T
Thanks Hector.  That's a tough one.  Good luck with the TAC on getting this
resolved.  
 
Bruce T. Johnson | Network Engineer | Partners Healthcare 
Network Engineering | 617.726.9662 | Pager: 31633 | bjohns...@partners.org



From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv on behalf of
Hector J Rios
Sent: Fri 6/12/2009 9:58 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco LWAPP- The change from WLAN Override to AP
Groups- Pain?



Here is the bug ID: CSCsy18685

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.




The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.


Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco LWAPP- The change from WLAN Override to AP Groups- Pain?

2009-06-12 Thread Jeffrey Sessler
Hector,

What was your code path for the WiSM i.e. did you start with 4.x and go 
straight to 5.2.178, any other 5.x versions in the mix prior, etc? 

There were a few defects in older 5.x that caused some AP Group issues, so I'm 
just wondering if your problem now has to do with some lingering issue from a 
previous release. I know of one that concerned WLANs that all start with the 
same letter/numbers e.g. lsu...

Jeff  

 Hector J Rios hr...@lsu.edu 6/12/2009 6:38 AM 
Correct. The WLAN exists, but since it is not in any AP-group, it is
not being transmitted. 

Hector Rios







-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Lee H Badman
Sent: Friday, June 12, 2009 6:52 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU 
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco LWAPP- The change from WLAN Override
to AP Groups- Pain?

Hector-

For clarity, if you configure an AP and simply leave it in the default
group, are you saying that in some cases all SSIDs don't get
transmitted? 

This (WLAN Override) has been the one single area I point to since the
Airespace days that was fundamentally wrongly implemented. Was hoping
that the new AP Groups would be the long overdue salvation. Please keep
us posted, and I wonder if anyone is having production-quality success
with the AP groups function? I have this in my near future, so my
interest is peaked.

Lee Badman

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Hector J Rios
[hr...@lsu.edu] 
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 9:39 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU 
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco LWAPP- The change from WLAN Override
to AP Groups- Pain?

I've got an update on AP groups. We've had quite an interesting week. As
I mentioned before, we are running 5.2.178 code on our WiSMs, and after
applying the new ap groups to a more extensive number of APs we are
started experiencing problems. The one problem that I can mention to you
guys is better explained if I paste some output directly from one of our
WiSMs' CLI (see below). The command show wlan summary gives you all
the WLANs configured in your WiSM. The command show wlan apgroups
should list all apgroups configured and their associated WLANS. The
interesting thing is that the default-group is the one group that is
not user-created, cannot be erased and therefore should contain all
the WLANs. It is clear that is not the case for us and that's just one
of the issues we have run into so far. We've been working with TAC
hoping they can provide us with a solution.

This could be very specific to our setup, but I just wanted to pass it
along to make you guys aware of this potential issue. You've been
warned.

Thanks,

Hector Rios
Louisiana State University


(WiSM-slot1-1) show wlan summary

Number of WLANs.. 8

WLAN ID  WLAN Profile Name / SSID   StatusInterface Name
---  -  

1lsusecure / lsusecure  Enabled   lsusecure
2lsuwireless / lsuwireless  Enabled   grokpage
3lsuguest / lsuguestEnabled   lsuguest
4lsuregmac / lsuregmac  Enabled   lsuregmac
5geaux0wire / geaux0wireDisabled  lsuguest
6cct / cct  Enabled   lsusecure
7voip / voipEnabled   lsusecure
8lsuwpa / lsuwpaEnabled   lsuwpa

(WiSM-slot1-1) show wlan apgroups

Site Name default-group
Site Description. none

WLAN ID  Interface  Network Admission Control
--- -----
 1   lsusecureDisabled
 2   grokpage Disabled
 3   lsuguest Disabled
 4   lsuregmacDisabled
 8   lsuwpa   Disabled


** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent
Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.


RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco LWAPP- The change from WLAN Override to AP Groups- Pain?

2009-06-11 Thread Hector J Rios
I've got an update on AP groups. We've had quite an interesting week. As
I mentioned before, we are running 5.2.178 code on our WiSMs, and after
applying the new ap groups to a more extensive number of APs we are
started experiencing problems. The one problem that I can mention to you
guys is better explained if I paste some output directly from one of our
WiSMs' CLI (see below). The command show wlan summary gives you all
the WLANs configured in your WiSM. The command show wlan apgroups
should list all apgroups configured and their associated WLANS. The
interesting thing is that the default-group is the one group that is
not user-created, cannot be erased and therefore should contain all
the WLANs. It is clear that is not the case for us and that's just one
of the issues we have run into so far. We've been working with TAC
hoping they can provide us with a solution. 

 

This could be very specific to our setup, but I just wanted to pass it
along to make you guys aware of this potential issue. You've been
warned.

 

Thanks,

 

Hector Rios

Louisiana State University

 

 

(WiSM-slot1-1) show wlan summary

 

Number of WLANs.. 8

 

WLAN ID  WLAN Profile Name / SSID   StatusInterface Name

---  -  


1lsusecure / lsusecure  Enabled   lsusecure

2lsuwireless / lsuwireless  Enabled   grokpage

3lsuguest / lsuguestEnabled   lsuguest

4lsuregmac / lsuregmac  Enabled   lsuregmac

5geaux0wire / geaux0wireDisabled  lsuguest

6cct / cct  Enabled   lsusecure

7voip / voipEnabled   lsusecure

8lsuwpa / lsuwpaEnabled   lsuwpa

 

(WiSM-slot1-1) show wlan apgroups

 

Site Name default-group

Site Description. none

 

WLAN ID  Interface  Network Admission Control

--- -----

 1   lsusecureDisabled

 2   grokpage Disabled

 3   lsuguest Disabled

 4   lsuregmacDisabled

 8   lsuwpa   Disabled

 

 


**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.



Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco LWAPP- The change from WLAN Override to AP Groups- Pain?

2009-06-01 Thread Robert Owens
Question
  IF you create  AP groups VLAN ahead of time in the 4.x code and slowly 
migrate AP's into those groups on the controller (even though wlan override is 
still set and in use) will the upgrade retain those group settings even though 
wlan override goes away after the upgrade? If this would work it may be a way 
to do allot of the migration ahead of time so the actual upgrade is more 
seamless.

Robert Owens
Computing and Telecommunication Services
Network Group
Kansas State University
  - Original Message - 
  From: Dennis Xu 
  To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU 
  Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 12:12 PM
  Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco LWAPP- The change from WLAN Override to AP 
Groups- Pain?


  Yes after the code upgrade, all the old WLAN override settings are gone and 
all the APs are put into default-group and broadcasting all SSIDs. Then you 
need to create AP groups and move APs to appropriate  groups.

  Dennis


  Lee H Badman wrote: 
Thanks, Hector (and Jeff and others).



That restart the AP thing is a prime beef of mine. means a routine change 
can only be done during an outage window, and is one more example of the 
disparity between the WCS UI and the Controller function.



We do have several WLANs that go to different APs in different 
combinations. After the code upgrade, all of the old WLAN Override settings are 
simply gone from the controllers and all APs, correct? And at that point, are 
all APs broadcasting all SSIDs, or none?



-Lee



Lee H. Badman

Wireless/Network Engineer

Information Technology and Services

Syracuse University

315 443-3003




From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Hector J Rios
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 12:14 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco LWAPP- The change from WLAN Override to 
AP Groups- Pain?



Lee, 



We are using it and we like it. We are running 5.2.130 in WCS and 5.2.178 
in our controllers. 



If you are going to have several WLANs going to different APs, you have to 
create multiple groups and move all your APs into their appropriate groups. AP 
groups come with a default group that contains all the WLANs and all APs belong 
to that group unless you change it. So I highly recommend that you move all 
your APs off of the default group. You can create and push all your groups 
through WCS. On gotcha that we have found is that when you move an AP into a AP 
group, if you use WCS, it will restart the AP, if you use a controller, it 
doesn't. Don't know why.



Thanks, 



Hector Rios

Louisiana State University







From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Lee H Badman
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 9:49 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco LWAPP- The change from WLAN Override to AP 
Groups- Pain?



Knowing that some have already gone down this road.



We are still on stable 4.2.code, have not jumped to 5 yet. It is our 
understanding that stable 5 code will be coming out soon, and we have several 
reasons to go to the 5 train (I realize 6 is also coming out, but may be too 
bleeding edge for us out of the gate). All of that aside, when we move out of 
4.2 into 5, we will thankfully put WLAN Override behind us. But is a feature we 
use extensively out of necessity, and so we'll most certainly need to use AP 
Groups in the more current code.



I'm wondering what the pain was in transitioning from WLAN Override to AP 
Groups on a large scale during the code upgrade, and if there were any 
particular issues of note during the process.



Thanks-



Lee



Lee H. Badman

Wireless/Network Engineer

Information Technology and Services

Syracuse University

315 443-3003



** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/. 

** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/. 
** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/. 


  ** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/. 

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.



RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco LWAPP- The change from WLAN Override to AP Groups- Pain?

2009-06-01 Thread Hector J Rios
I have to correct myself. When APs are assigned to new AP groups, the
APs need to be restarted for the new changes to take effect. WCS will do
this automatically. It is a little deceiving when you do it from the
controller because when you apply the changes, there is no pop-up
alerting you that you need to restart the APs (just like when you do it
for WLAN override). Now they just have a small footnote. 

 

Hector

 


**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.



RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco LWAPP- The change from WLAN Override to AP Groups- Pain?

2009-05-29 Thread Lee Weers
Ap groups are broken in certain versions of WCS.  When you push a vlan
group from WCS to a controller I would make sure it sets the vlan
properly on the controller.  Then the aps need a reboot once they are
assigned to a group.  I have noticed that they don't always reboot
through WCS.  We have to go make a visit to the 1252's POE injector to
reboot them.

 

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Lee H Badman
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 9:49 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco LWAPP- The change from WLAN Override to AP
Groups- Pain?

 

Knowing that some have already gone down this road...

 

We are still on stable 4.2.code, have not jumped to 5 yet. It is our
understanding that stable 5 code will be coming out soon, and we have
several reasons to go to the 5 train (I realize 6 is also coming out,
but may be too bleeding edge for us out of the gate). All of that aside,
when we move out of 4.2 into 5, we will thankfully put WLAN Override
behind us. But is a feature we use extensively out of necessity, and so
we'll most certainly need to use AP Groups in the more current code.

 

I'm wondering what the pain was in transitioning from WLAN Override to
AP Groups on a large scale during the code upgrade, and if there were
any particular issues of note during the process.

 

Thanks-

 

Lee

 

Lee H. Badman

Wireless/Network Engineer

Information Technology and Services

Syracuse University

315 443-3003

 

** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
http://www.educause.edu/groups/. 


**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.



Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco LWAPP- The change from WLAN Override to AP Groups- Pain?

2009-05-29 Thread Jeffrey Sessler
Upgrade WCS to the latest version ahead of time and build new AP groups based 
on your WLAN Override settings in WCS. Upgrade the controllers to at least 
5.2.178.xx (it has the VLAN group fix). Push out VLAN groups from WCS to the 
controllers.

Jeff

 Lee H Badman lhbad...@syr.edu 05/29/09 7:49 AM 
Knowing that some have already gone down this road...

We are still on stable 4.2.code, have not jumped to 5 yet. It is our 
understanding that stable 5 code will be coming out soon, and we have several 
reasons to go to the 5 train (I realize 6 is also coming out, but may be too 
bleeding edge for us out of the gate). All of that aside, when we move out of 
4.2 into 5, we will thankfully put WLAN Override behind us. But is a feature we 
use extensively out of necessity, and so we'll most certainly need to use AP 
Groups in the more current code.

I'm wondering what the pain was in transitioning from WLAN Override to AP 
Groups on a large scale during the code upgrade, and if there were any 
particular issues of note during the process.

Thanks-

Lee

Lee H. Badman
Wireless/Network Engineer
Information Technology and Services
Syracuse University
315 443-3003


**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

/lhbad...@syr.edu

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.


RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco LWAPP- The change from WLAN Override to AP Groups- Pain?

2009-05-29 Thread Hector J Rios
Lee, 

 

We are using it and we like it. We are running 5.2.130 in WCS and
5.2.178 in our controllers. 

 

If you are going to have several WLANs going to different APs, you have
to create multiple groups and move all your APs into their appropriate
groups. AP groups come with a default group that contains all the WLANs
and all APs belong to that group unless you change it. So I highly
recommend that you move all your APs off of the default group. You can
create and push all your groups through WCS. On gotcha that we have
found is that when you move an AP into a AP group, if you use WCS, it
will restart the AP, if you use a controller, it doesn't. Don't know
why.

 

Thanks, 

 

Hector Rios

Louisiana State University

 

 

 

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Lee H Badman
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 9:49 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco LWAPP- The change from WLAN Override to AP
Groups- Pain?

 

Knowing that some have already gone down this road...

 

We are still on stable 4.2.code, have not jumped to 5 yet. It is our
understanding that stable 5 code will be coming out soon, and we have
several reasons to go to the 5 train (I realize 6 is also coming out,
but may be too bleeding edge for us out of the gate). All of that aside,
when we move out of 4.2 into 5, we will thankfully put WLAN Override
behind us. But is a feature we use extensively out of necessity, and so
we'll most certainly need to use AP Groups in the more current code.

 

I'm wondering what the pain was in transitioning from WLAN Override to
AP Groups on a large scale during the code upgrade, and if there were
any particular issues of note during the process.

 

Thanks-

 

Lee

 

Lee H. Badman

Wireless/Network Engineer

Information Technology and Services

Syracuse University

315 443-3003

 

** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
http://www.educause.edu/groups/. 


**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.



RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco LWAPP- The change from WLAN Override to AP Groups- Pain?

2009-05-29 Thread Lee H Badman
Thanks, Hector (and Jeff and others).

That restart the AP thing is a prime beef of mine... means a routine change 
can only be done during an outage window, and is one more example of the 
disparity between the WCS UI and the Controller function.

We do have several WLANs that go to different APs in different combinations. 
After the code upgrade, all of the old WLAN Override settings are simply gone 
from the controllers and all APs, correct? And at that point, are all APs 
broadcasting all SSIDs, or none?

-Lee

Lee H. Badman
Wireless/Network Engineer
Information Technology and Services
Syracuse University
315 443-3003

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Hector J Rios
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 12:14 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco LWAPP- The change from WLAN Override to AP 
Groups- Pain?

Lee,

We are using it and we like it. We are running 5.2.130 in WCS and 5.2.178 in 
our controllers.

If you are going to have several WLANs going to different APs, you have to 
create multiple groups and move all your APs into their appropriate groups. AP 
groups come with a default group that contains all the WLANs and all APs belong 
to that group unless you change it. So I highly recommend that you move all 
your APs off of the default group. You can create and push all your groups 
through WCS. On gotcha that we have found is that when you move an AP into a AP 
group, if you use WCS, it will restart the AP, if you use a controller, it 
doesn't. Don't know why.

Thanks,

Hector Rios
Louisiana State University



From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Lee H Badman
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 9:49 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco LWAPP- The change from WLAN Override to AP 
Groups- Pain?

Knowing that some have already gone down this road...

We are still on stable 4.2.code, have not jumped to 5 yet. It is our 
understanding that stable 5 code will be coming out soon, and we have several 
reasons to go to the 5 train (I realize 6 is also coming out, but may be too 
bleeding edge for us out of the gate). All of that aside, when we move out of 
4.2 into 5, we will thankfully put WLAN Override behind us. But is a feature we 
use extensively out of necessity, and so we'll most certainly need to use AP 
Groups in the more current code.

I'm wondering what the pain was in transitioning from WLAN Override to AP 
Groups on a large scale during the code upgrade, and if there were any 
particular issues of note during the process.

Thanks-

Lee

Lee H. Badman
Wireless/Network Engineer
Information Technology and Services
Syracuse University
315 443-3003

** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.



Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco LWAPP- The change from WLAN Override to AP Groups- Pain?

2009-05-29 Thread Dennis Xu




Yes after the code upgrade, all the old WLAN override settings are gone
and all the APs are put into default-group and broadcasting all SSIDs.
Then you need to create AP groups and move APs to appropriate groups.

Dennis


Lee H Badman wrote:

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  Thanks,
Hector (and Jeff and others).
  
  That
restart the AP thing is
a prime beef of mine means a routine change can only be done during an
outage
window, and is one more example of the disparity between the WCS UI and
the
Controller function.
  
  We do have
several WLANs that go to
different APs in different combinations. After the code upgrade, all of
the old
WLAN Override settings are simply gone from the controllers and all
APs,
correct? And at that point, are all APs broadcasting all SSIDs,
or none?
  
  -Lee
  
  
  Lee H. Badman
  Wireless/Network
Engineer
  Information
Technology
and Services
  Syracuse University
  315 443-3003
  
  
  
  
  From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On
Behalf Of Hector J Rios
  Sent: Friday, May 29,
2009 12:14
PM
  To:
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
  Subject: Re:
[WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco
LWAPP- The change from WLAN Override to AP Groups- Pain?
  
  
  Lee,
  
  
  We
are using it and
we like it. We are running 5.2.130 in WCS and 5.2.178 in our
controllers. 
  
  If
you are going to
have several WLANs going to different APs, you have to create multiple
groups
and move all your APs into their appropriate groups. AP groups come
with a
default group that contains all the WLANs and all APs belong to that
group
unless you change it. So I highly recommend that you move all your APs
off of
the default group. You can create and push all your groups through WCS.
On
gotcha that we have found is that when you move an AP into a AP group,
if you
use WCS, it will restart the AP, if you use a controller, it doesnt.
Dont know why.
  
  Thanks,
  
  
  Hector
Rios
  Louisiana
  State University
  
  
  
  
  
  From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On
Behalf Of Lee H Badman
  Sent: Friday, May 29,
2009 9:49 AM
  To:
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
  Subject:
[WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco
LWAPP- The change from WLAN Override to AP Groups- Pain?
  
  
  
  Knowing that some have
already gone down this road
  
  We are still on stable
4.2.code, have not
jumped to 5 yet. It is our understanding that stable 5 code will
be coming out soon, and we have several reasons to go to the 5 train (I
realize
6 is also coming out, but may be too bleeding edge for us out of the
gate). All
of that aside, when we move out of 4.2 into 5, we will thankfully put
WLAN
Override behind us. But is a feature we use extensively out of
necessity, and
so well most certainly need to use AP Groups in the more
current code.
  
  Im wondering what the
pain was in transitioning from
WLAN Override to AP Groups on a large scale during the code upgrade,
and if
there were any particular issues of note during the process.
  
  Thanks-
  
  Lee
  
  Lee H. Badman
  Wireless/Network Engineer
  Information Technology
and Services
  Syracuse University
  315 443-3003
  
  ** Participation and subscription
information for this EDUCAUSE
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
http://www.educause.edu/groups/. 
  
**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
  **
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
  
  



**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.