SV: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Wireless Interface Groups

2013-02-15 Thread Anders Nilsson
What version are you running on jour WLC?

I know that there were hashing problems on older versions off 7.0 that
resulted in that when a client reassociated it didn’t come back to its
former subnet.

Try newer versions of 7.0 or 7.2 and I’ll guess that it will work. 

 

It solved my problem. ;)

 

 

Cheers

Anders Nilsson

Umeå university

SUNET Sweden

 

Från: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] För Vikki Cutrone
Skickat: den 15 februari 2013 20:13
Till: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Ämne: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Wireless Interface Groups

 

Hello All,

I recently configured multiple /24 subnets into a wireless interface group
on my controllers, in an effort to cut down on multicast as well as increase
the IP address space.  It seems to be working but DHCP addresses are still
being consumed at an alarming rate.  Is anyone else using the interface
group feature? and if so is it working as expected?

Thank you in advance!

-- 

Vikki Cutrone

Network Administrator

Vassar College, Box 13

124 Raymond Ave

Poughkeepsie, NY 12604-0013

 

845-437-7231

** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
http://www.educause.edu/groups/ http://www.educause.edu/groups/. 


**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.



Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] SV: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Wireless Interface Groups

2013-02-15 Thread Vikki Cutrone
Version 7.2.111.3 That seems to be exactly what is currently happening.

On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Anders Nilsson
anders.nils...@adm.umu.sewrote:

 What version are you running on jour WLC?

 I know that there were hashing problems on older versions off 7.0 that
 resulted in that when a client reassociated it didn’t come back to its
 former subnet.

 Try newer versions of 7.0 or 7.2 and I’ll guess that it will work. 

 ** **

 It solved my problem. ;)

 ** **

 ** **

 Cheers

 Anders Nilsson

 Umeå university

 SUNET Sweden

 ** **

 *Från:* The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:
 WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] *För *Vikki Cutrone
 *Skickat:* den 15 februari 2013 20:13
 *Till:* WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
 *Ämne:* [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Wireless Interface Groups

 ** **

 Hello All,

 I recently configured multiple /24 subnets into a wireless interface group
 on my controllers, in an effort to cut down on multicast as well as
 increase the IP address space.  It seems to be working but DHCP addresses
 are still being consumed at an alarming rate.  Is anyone else using the
 interface group feature? and if so is it working as expected?

 Thank you in advance!

 -- 

 Vikki Cutrone

 Network Administrator

 Vassar College, Box 13

 124 Raymond Ave

 Poughkeepsie, NY 12604-0013

  

 845-437-7231

 ** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
 Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
 http://www.educause.edu/groups/. 
 ** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
 Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
 http://www.educause.edu/groups/.




-- 
Vikki Cutrone
Network Administrator
Vassar College, Box 13
124 Raymond Ave
Poughkeepsie, NY 12604-0013

845-437-7231

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.



Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] SV: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Wireless Interface Groups

2013-02-15 Thread Jim Glassford


VLAN select feature is working good here on:  7.2.110.8, 7.4.100.0, 
7.4.103.3 and now on 7.3.112.0.  ;-)


just fyi, tried 7.4.100.0 and small issue with RRM, (running at low 
signal strength) and with the 1142 model access points. Patch for the 
RRM and all was great, seeing more 5GHz N clients with 7.4.103.3 code 
than on 7.2.x and 7.3.x. The 1142 random rebooting continued though, 
patch on its way. Went to 7.3.112.0 and all is good since, running on 
5508 controllers and AP1242, AP1252, AP1142, AP3502 access points.


jim

On 2/15/2013 2:27 PM, Hurt,Trenton W. wrote:


http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps10315/products_tech_note09186a0080bb4900.shtml 



In WLC release 7.2, the VLAN Select feature (which is supported only 
on the newer WLCs like 5508, WiSM-2, 7500, and 2500) was modified and 
now supports VLAN Select with a new modified algorithm. In the 
previous implementation, using the round robin algorithm was causing 
clients to obtain new IP addresses on every re-association, thus 
depleting IP addresses fast from the available DHCP pools.


*From:*The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] *On Behalf Of *Anders Nilsson

*Sent:* Friday, February 15, 2013 2:23 PM
*To:* WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
*Subject:* [WIRELESS-LAN] SV: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Wireless Interface 
Groups


What version are you running on jour WLC?

I know that there were hashing problems on older versions off 7.0 that 
resulted in that when a client reassociated it didn't come back to its 
former subnet.


Try newer versions of 7.0 or 7.2 and I'll guess that it will work.

It solved my problem. ;)

Cheers

Anders Nilsson

Umeå university

SUNET Sweden

*Från:*The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] *För *Vikki Cutrone

*Skickat:* den 15 februari 2013 20:13
*Till:* WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU 
mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU

*Ämne:* [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Wireless Interface Groups

Hello All,

I recently configured multiple /24 subnets into a wireless interface 
group on my controllers, in an effort to cut down on multicast as well 
as increase the IP address space.  It seems to be working but DHCP 
addresses are still being consumed at an alarming rate.  Is anyone 
else using the interface group feature? and if so is it working as 
expected?


Thank you in advance!

--

Vikki Cutrone

Network Administrator

Vassar College, Box 13

124 Raymond Ave

Poughkeepsie, NY 12604-0013

845-437-7231

** Participation and subscription information for this 
EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.


** Participation and subscription information for this 
EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.


** Participation and subscription information for this 
EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.





**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.



Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] SV: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Wireless Interface Groups

2013-02-15 Thread Mark Duling
As Anders hinted, the mac hashing feature to solve dhcp exhaustion
introduced in 7.2 was backported to later versions of 7.0 code (7.0.220.0
perhaps).  We're running vlan select happily on 5508s on 7.2 and WiSM-1s on
7.0 and it works well on both.


On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Hurt,Trenton W. trent.h...@louisville.edu
 wrote:


 http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps10315/products_tech_note09186a0080bb4900.shtml
 

 ** **

 ** **

 “In WLC release 7.2, the VLAN Select feature (which is supported only on
 the newer WLCs like 5508, WiSM-2, 7500, and 2500) was modified and now
 supports VLAN Select with a new modified algorithm. In the previous
 implementation, using the round robin algorithm was causing clients to
 obtain new IP addresses on every re-association, thus depleting IP
 addresses fast from the available DHCP pools.”

 ** **

 ** **

 *From:* The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:
 WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] *On Behalf Of *Anders Nilsson
 *Sent:* Friday, February 15, 2013 2:23 PM
 *To:* WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
 *Subject:* [WIRELESS-LAN] SV: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Wireless Interface
 Groups

 ** **

 What version are you running on jour WLC?

 I know that there were hashing problems on older versions off 7.0 that
 resulted in that when a client reassociated it didn’t come back to its
 former subnet.

 Try newer versions of 7.0 or 7.2 and I’ll guess that it will work. 

 ** **

 It solved my problem. ;)

 ** **

 ** **

 Cheers

 Anders Nilsson

 Umeå university

 SUNET Sweden

 ** **

 *Från:* The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [
 mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDUWIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU]
 *För *Vikki Cutrone
 *Skickat:* den 15 februari 2013 20:13
 *Till:* WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
 *Ämne:* [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Wireless Interface Groups

 ** **

 Hello All,

 I recently configured multiple /24 subnets into a wireless interface group
 on my controllers, in an effort to cut down on multicast as well as
 increase the IP address space.  It seems to be working but DHCP addresses
 are still being consumed at an alarming rate.  Is anyone else using the
 interface group feature? and if so is it working as expected?

 Thank you in advance!

 -- 

 Vikki Cutrone

 Network Administrator

 Vassar College, Box 13

 124 Raymond Ave

 Poughkeepsie, NY 12604-0013

  

 845-437-7231

 ** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
 Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
 http://www.educause.edu/groups/. 

 ** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
 Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
 http://www.educause.edu/groups/. ** **
  ** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
 Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
 http://www.educause.edu/groups/.



**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.