VLAN select feature is working good here on: 7.2.110.8, 7.4.100.0,
7.4.103.3 and now on 7.3.112.0. ;-)
just fyi, tried 7.4.100.0 and small issue with RRM, (running at low
signal strength) and with the 1142 model access points. Patch for the
RRM and all was great, seeing more 5GHz N clients with 7.4.103.3 code
than on 7.2.x and 7.3.x. The 1142 random rebooting continued though,
patch on its way. Went to 7.3.112.0 and all is good since, running on
5508 controllers and AP1242, AP1252, AP1142, AP3502 access points.
jim
On 2/15/2013 2:27 PM, Hurt,Trenton W. wrote:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps10315/products_tech_note09186a0080bb4900.shtml
"In WLC release 7.2, the VLAN Select feature (which is supported only
on the newer WLCs like 5508, WiSM-2, 7500, and 2500) was modified and
now supports VLAN Select with a new modified algorithm. In the
previous implementation, using the round robin algorithm was causing
clients to obtain new IP addresses on every re-association, thus
depleting IP addresses fast from the available DHCP pools."
*From:*The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Anders Nilsson
*Sent:* Friday, February 15, 2013 2:23 PM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* [WIRELESS-LAN] SV: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Wireless Interface
Groups
What version are you running on jour WLC?
I know that there were hashing problems on older versions off 7.0 that
resulted in that when a client reassociated it didn't come back to its
former subnet.
Try newer versions of 7.0 or 7.2 and I'll guess that it will work.
It solved my problem. ;)
Cheers
Anders Nilsson
Umeå university
SUNET Sweden
*Från:*The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:[email protected]] *För *Vikki Cutrone
*Skickat:* den 15 februari 2013 20:13
*Till:* [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
*Ämne:* [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Wireless Interface Groups
Hello All,
I recently configured multiple /24 subnets into a wireless interface
group on my controllers, in an effort to cut down on multicast as well
as increase the IP address space. It seems to be working but DHCP
addresses are still being consumed at an alarming rate. Is anyone
else using the interface group feature? and if so is it working as
expected?
Thank you in advance!
--
Vikki Cutrone
Network Administrator
Vassar College, Box 13
124 Raymond Ave
Poughkeepsie, NY 12604-0013
845-437-7231
********** Participation and subscription information for this
EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
********** Participation and subscription information for this
EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
********** Participation and subscription information for this
EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
**********
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
