RE: [WSG] Usability for downloading documents

2008-01-28 Thread Patrick Lauke
 Should we be making this decision for the user though? If, by 
 default, 
 PDFs open within the browser, then won't we be changing their user 
 experience by forcing them to open/save?

In principle yes, but because so many other sites have worked around this 
issue (usually by opening new windows, or forcing download), there is no real 
default that users are accustomed to. I've resorted to forcing download (yes, 
thus perpetuating the erosion of default myself...a vicious circle).

P

Patrick H. Lauke
Web Editor
Enterprise  Development
University of Salford
Room 113, Faraday House
Salford, Greater Manchester
M5 4WT
UK

T +44 (0) 161 295 4779
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

www.salford.ac.uk

A GREATER MANCHESTER UNIVERSITY  


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] Usability for downloading documents

2008-01-28 Thread Rochester oliveira
I think that you should make 2 buttons. The user will choice for download or
just read the documment
[]'s

-
Rochester Oliveira
http://webbemfeita.com/
Viva a Web-Bem-Feita
Web Designer
Curitiba - PR - Brasil


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***

Re: [WSG] Usability for downloading documents

2008-01-28 Thread Rochester oliveira
Doesn't have a way to force the don't download? Or you may force download
as pdf and make a jpg() for the preview :)
2 buttons for the same action will be a problem for sure.

2008/1/28, Christian Snodgrass [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 Wording that would be really tricky, because if they're default action
 is to download it, when they hit Read they'd expect it to just open,
 not offer them a download prompt. There are a lot of people that would
 be agitated that both buttons do the same thing.

 Rochester oliveira wrote:
  I think that you should make 2 buttons. The user will choice for
  download or just read the documment
  []'s
 
  -
  Rochester Oliveira
  http://webbemfeita.com/
  Viva a Web-Bem-Feita
  Web Designer
  Curitiba - PR - Brasil
  ***
  List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
  Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
  Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  ***


 --

 Christian Snodgrass
 Azure Ronin Web Design
 http://www.arwebdesign.net/ http://www.arwebdesign.net
 Phone: 859.816.7955



 ***
 List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
 Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ***




-- 
[]'s

-
Rochester Oliveira
http://webbemfeita.com/
Viva a Web-Bem-Feita
Web Designer
Curitiba - PR - Brasil


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***

Re: [WSG] Usability for downloading documents

2008-01-28 Thread Christian Snodgrass
Wording that would be really tricky, because if they're default action 
is to download it, when they hit Read they'd expect it to just open, 
not offer them a download prompt. There are a lot of people that would 
be agitated that both buttons do the same thing.


Rochester oliveira wrote:
I think that you should make 2 buttons. The user will choice for 
download or just read the documment

[]'s

-
Rochester Oliveira
http://webbemfeita.com/
Viva a Web-Bem-Feita
Web Designer
Curitiba - PR - Brasil
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*** 



--

Christian Snodgrass
Azure Ronin Web Design
http://www.arwebdesign.net/ http://www.arwebdesign.net
Phone: 859.816.7955



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] Conflict between Mime Type and Document Type

2008-01-28 Thread Christian Snodgrass
Usually, it is something simple like trying to use a DOCTYPE of XHTML, 
with the extension html or whatever, and your server is, in reality, 
serving it up as text/html. Basically, you need to make sure that your 
server either: a) assumes no MIME type, or b) use an extension like 
.xhtml and tell it to serve it as text/xhtml+xml. However, be warned 
that IE7 (and all before, and likely IE8) do not actually support 
text/xhtml+xml, so it will completely fail when presented to the end-user.


If it is some other DOCTYPE you are using that is getting the error 
(other then XHTML) let us know.


Andrew Freedman wrote:

G'day,

I see this warning often when using the W3C validator and figured I 
must be doing something wrong, but as it is a warning I never bothered 
looking into it.


Now I've seen it on the results from this site so it has roused my 
curiosity.


Can some explain to me why this is occurring and how it is overcome.

Thanks.
Andrew


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***





--

Christian Snodgrass
Azure Ronin Web Design
http://www.arwebdesign.net/ http://www.arwebdesign.net
Phone: 859.816.7955



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] Usability for downloading documents

2008-01-28 Thread James Ellis
Hi Tony

On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 12:07:06 am Tony wrote:
 Hello,

 If, by default,
 PDFs open within the browser, then won't we be changing their user
 experience by forcing them to open/save?

 Regards,

 Tony

Not really, the current position of inline PDF and other documents in 
probably due to the way the browser ships. I know a lot of people who dislike 
the inline thing and change it straight away, especially PDF's as it can slow 
or crash certain browsers (especially those beginning with F and ending in 
x).

The other thing to consider is that people will generally save a document 
presented inline any way (it won't stay in their cache forever) and that 
a Save As... dialogue box will generally have an open option.

So, the best usability is to allow the user to define what they want to do 
(either by allowing the user to select inline or downloadable files, or put 
it back in their hands and they can fiddle with their browser settings).

To force download certain types of files (content-disposition: attachment), 
changes can be made at the web server level or in the middleware (PHP etc). 
How to do this is off topic for the list but I would quickly mention two 
gotchas that are:
 * only allow downloads from a certain directory lest you end up with 
downloader.php?file=/etc/passwd or even 
downloader.php?file=/path/to/databaseconnection.config
 * define the mime type properly when downloading as a lot of browsers use it 
to determine how to open a file.


HTH
James


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



[WSG] Conflict between Mime Type and Document Type

2008-01-28 Thread Andrew Freedman

G'day,

I see this warning often when using the W3C validator and figured I must 
be doing something wrong, but as it is a warning I never bothered 
looking into it.


Now I've seen it on the results from this site so it has roused my 
curiosity.


Can some explain to me why this is occurring and how it is overcome.

Thanks.
Andrew


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



[WSG] Explorer woes with list dropdowns

2008-01-28 Thread Shane Helm

Hello fellow web standard groupies.

I have built a dropdown menu using lists.  It works in Firefox and  
Safari but doesn't seem to work in IE6 or 7.  Any suggestions?

http://www.treasurehillskihomes.com/TESTING/navtest.html

Greatly appreciated!

Shane Helm
www.sonze.com



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***

Re: [WSG] Explorer woes with list dropdowns

2008-01-28 Thread Shane Helm
Seems I got it working in IE 6.  The background color cannot be the  
same for the css from

.menus a, .menus :visited
and from
.menus :hover

the two values must be different, or the script wont work.

Can anyone confirm it is working in IE 7?

http://www.treasurehillskihomes.com/TESTING/navtest.html



Thanks!
Shane


On Jan 28, 2008, at 8:52 PM, Shane Helm wrote:


Hello fellow web standard groupies.

I have built a dropdown menu using lists.  It works in Firefox and  
Safari but doesn't seem to work in IE6 or 7.  Any suggestions?

http://www.treasurehillskihomes.com/TESTING/navtest.html

Greatly appreciated!

Shane Helm
www.sonze.com


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***

Re: [WSG] Explorer woes with list dropdowns

2008-01-28 Thread Karl Lurman
IE6 doesn't respect the *:hover pseudo selector if I remember
rightly... It only supports it for anchors, e.g a:hover

You may have to look at a small bit of javascript to 'activate' this behavior.

Im pretty sure this is your problem for IE browsers.

Karl

On Jan 29, 2008 2:52 PM, Shane Helm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hello fellow web standard groupies.

 I have built a dropdown menu using lists.  It works in Firefox and Safari
 but doesn't seem to work in IE6 or 7.  Any suggestions?
 http://www.treasurehillskihomes.com/TESTING/navtest.html

 Greatly appreciated!

 Shane Helm
 www.sonze.com


 ***
 List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
 Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ***


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] Explorer woes with list dropdowns

2008-01-28 Thread John Faulds

IE6 doesn't respect the *:hover pseudo selector if I remember
rightly... It only supports it for anchors, e.g a:hover
You may have to look at a small bit of javascript to 'activate' this  
behavior.


No, because he's using one of Stu Nicholl's js-free menus. The trade off  
is a lot of IE conditional comments wrapped around table tags. :/


--
Tyssen Design
http://www.tyssendesign.com.au
Ph: (07) 3300 3303
Mb: 0405 678 590


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] Explorer woes with list dropdowns

2008-01-28 Thread Matt Fellows
A JavaScript function that you might be interested in is called the
'Suckerfish' technique. It is a well known problem that IE is difficult at
best in these situations so to avoid lots of css hacks etc. you can use a
little bit of JS instead. It's accessible, standards compliant and easy to
use.

There is a nice article about it here:
http://www.alistapart.com/articles/dropdowns


On 1/29/08, Karl Lurman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 IE6 doesn't respect the *:hover pseudo selector if I remember
 rightly... It only supports it for anchors, e.g a:hover

 You may have to look at a small bit of javascript to 'activate' this
 behavior.

 Im pretty sure this is your problem for IE browsers.

 Karl

 On Jan 29, 2008 2:52 PM, Shane Helm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Hello fellow web standard groupies.
 
  I have built a dropdown menu using lists.  It works in Firefox and
 Safari
  but doesn't seem to work in IE6 or 7.  Any suggestions?
  http://www.treasurehillskihomes.com/TESTING/navtest.html
 
  Greatly appreciated!
 
  Shane Helm
  www.sonze.com
 
 
  ***
  List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
  Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
  Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  ***


 ***
 List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
 Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ***




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***

Re: [WSG] Explorer woes with list dropdowns

2008-01-28 Thread Karl Lurman
http://www.techeblog.com/index.php/tech-gadget/video-digital-cloud-invades-british-airways-first-class-lounge-at-heathrow


On Jan 29, 2008 3:40 PM, Karl Lurman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 IE6 doesn't respect the *:hover pseudo selector if I remember
 rightly... It only supports it for anchors, e.g a:hover

 You may have to look at a small bit of javascript to 'activate' this behavior.

 Im pretty sure this is your problem for IE browsers.

 Karl

 On Jan 29, 2008 2:52 PM, Shane Helm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Hello fellow web standard groupies.
 
  I have built a dropdown menu using lists.  It works in Firefox and Safari
  but doesn't seem to work in IE6 or 7.  Any suggestions?
  http://www.treasurehillskihomes.com/TESTING/navtest.html
 
  Greatly appreciated!
 
  Shane Helm
  www.sonze.com
 
 
  ***
  List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
  Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
  Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  ***


 ***
 List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
 Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ***




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] Explorer woes with list dropdowns

2008-01-28 Thread Karl Lurman
Oops * 2

1st oops for sending the link to the WSG instead of my IM conversation
(Damn Google Talk!!!) - Its a pretty cool video though...
2nd oops for looking at Shanes code in Firebug instead of by viewing the source!

Karl


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] Usability for downloading documents

2008-01-28 Thread Chris Knowles

Tony wrote:


Should we be making this decision for the user though? If, by default, 
PDFs open within the browser, then won't we be changing their user 
experience by forcing them to open/save?




Yes, I think we should make this decision. It's in the users best 
interests IMO. And by doing this maybe we can make that the new default 
(if there is one as others suggest).


By not directly opening a resource in the browser, you delegate the 
downloading to the application assigned to it by the OS, which is 
separate to the browser. That way you avoid freezing your browser if 
it's a large resource and takes a while to download or if it's a slow 
connection, or potentially crashing your browser if it freezes and you 
start hitting the back button etc in an attempt to undo your action.



--
Chris Knowles


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] Usability for downloading documents

2008-01-28 Thread David Dorward


On 28 Jan 2008, at 18:04, Rochester oliveira wrote:


Doesn't have a way to force the don't download?


It is difficult to make a PDF open in a plugin if the user doesn't  
have that plugin installed.



--
David Dorward
http://dorward.me.uk/
http://blog.dorward.me.uk/




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***

Re: [WSG] Conflict between Mime Type and Document Type

2008-01-28 Thread David Dorward

On 28 Jan 2008, at 23:22, Andrew Freedman wrote:
I see this warning often when using the W3C validator and figured I  
must be doing something wrong, but as it is a warning I never  
bothered looking into it.


Now I've seen it on the results from this site so it has roused my  
curiosity.


Can some explain to me why this is occurring and how it is overcome.


URLs make things easier to debug, but most likely you are serving a  
document that:


(a) Is XHTML
(b) As text/html
(c) Is not a version of XHTML that may be served as text/html (i.e.  
XHTML 1.0)


It is generally best to just stick to HTML 4.01.

--
David Dorward
http://dorward.me.uk/
http://blog.dorward.me.uk/




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***