Re: [WSG] Examples of great high-school websites?

2009-01-18 Thread designer



Visitors with images switched off wont see what the main nav links are and
those with javascript off wont be able to use them!


Furthermore, those with the computers switched off won't see anything at all 
. . .


Bob




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***



RE: [WSG] Examples of great high-school websites?

2009-01-18 Thread Rick Faircloth
ROFLOL!

 -Original Message-
 From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On 
 Behalf Of designer
 Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2009 4:38 AM
 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
 Subject: Re: [WSG] Examples of great high-school websites?
 
 
  Visitors with images switched off wont see what the main nav links are and
  those with javascript off wont be able to use them!
 
 Furthermore, those with the computers switched off won't see anything at all
 . . .
 
 Bob
 
 
 
 
 ***
 List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
 Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
 ***




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***



[WSG] Microformats Accessibility

2009-01-18 Thread Ben Rowe
on microformats.org, it suggests the ABBR element and title attribute 
for machine code. however, title attribute for this element will be read 
out to a screen reader user. we are considering having an output of 
span class=namehuman valuespan class=value title=machine 
value/span/span however its an empty span. this method of empty 
spans is also suggested on microformats.org to combat accessibility 
issues, but wanted your suggestions / thoughts?


Obviously it is a clash of HTML standards VS accessibility. I've chosen 
the span option because I think accessibility is more important.


Ben


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***



Re: [WSG] Microformats Accessibility

2009-01-18 Thread Patrick H. Lauke

Ben Rowe wrote:


Obviously it is a clash of HTML standards VS accessibility.


Actually, it's a clash of microformats' misappropriation of HTML 
standards VS accessibility...


An empty span won't kill anybody though. What you lose in code purity 
you gain in a slightly more accessible solution (as long as tools that 
consume those microformats actually recognise the span solution...been a 
while since I checked if that's the case - otherwise, it's purely academic).


P
--
Patrick H. Lauke
__
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
http://redux.deviantart.com
__
Co-lead, Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force
http://webstandards.org/
__


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***



Re: [WSG] Examples of great high-school websites?

2009-01-18 Thread Alan Berman
Educational Networks has been courted our administration (for El 
Camino Real High School in southern California) for the last couple 
of years. I finally let them come to show me their stuff, intending 
to show them what I had put together for my school site as a 
discussion starter; they are not used to talking to people who have 
done this sort of work--content management is the magic wand they 
offer to the schools, so when there's something that's already set up 
that way they have a tough time getting past a solution that isn't theirs:


http://ecr.lausd.k12.ca.us

(Please note that the Student Info page, linked from the navbar, is 
entirely designed by and controlled by a former student--it is rife 
with errors and designed without any regard to consistency with the 
overall site design. I know about it and have no time to do anything 
about it except ask for forgiveness at present.)


I welcome comments, of course, but that's not the reason I'm sending 
this message.


Most of the site is content-managed (I did the PHP myself, no use of 
any sort of CMS framework or engine--for better or worse) and I have 
used Mike Cherim's contact form (although I styled it to fold in with 
the site, I think).


The rep they sent wasn't really very conversant on the technology, 
but did write down all of my issues, including these points:
1. All their sites (and they have done MANY) look exactly the same if 
you squint: fixed-width, scrolling banners, etc.

2. All their sites load slowly.
3. All their sites are invalid for HTML and CSS
4. All of their sites fare unfavorably against any accessibility guidelines
5. All of their sites weren't as good (IMHO) as what I had already made

etc.

When the rep went back to EN with her tail betwixt her legs, she must 
have talked to some tech people, then sent back a note with her 
signature; this is an excerpt from her note. Perhaps this will help 
clarify their position, at least as of last year. And one would think 
that, regarding the last comment about accessibility, if they can do 
it as a tech support request, why not just build it into ALL their 
sites? It's all part of the deep structure of the CMS, right? Well, 
it should be. . .


*** EXCERPT FROM EN'S RESPONSE***
4) CSS vs. Tables. This is a vary valid discussion and here are the 
considerations in making a decision as to what approach to take:
   - All our sites use CSS for a lot of centralization in terms of 
backgrounds, fonts, styles, it is efficient, works robustly and beautifully.
   - Most of the tables are not handled through CSS because CSS is 
not reliable across various browsers the way each renders HTML. We 
design our sites to be correctly visible from IE 5, Firefox, even on 
Mac's with IE 5 (which is no longer supported by Microsoft). Our 
public sites should operate properly even on exotic OS's or old 
browsers as in many communities people have old computers with old 
browsers. When tables are implemented one can also correctly handle 
more complex tables. CSS is fine with simple listing tables such as 
a 1 X N matrixes (like one can see on the homepage of ECR), but 
imagine a 3X3 matrix where the requirement would be to merge the 
first two cells starting from the most left column for only on the 
top row. This would be a nightmare to handle through CSS, thus the 
correct choice would be to use the Table approach.
  - The sites we built are portals with unified navigational 
structures. The header, footer, left nav bar (if there is one) would 
come from includes using a proprietary technology (a bit like 
portlets) which also works most efficiently with tables, rather than CSS.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liquid_web_design#Liquid_versus_fixed_layoutshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liquid_web_design#Liquid_versus_fixed_layouts 
has an excellent discussion about Table vs. CSS.


At Educational Networks we do follow closely all new technologies and 
implement them as they become widely available and have proven track 
records of being robust and mainstream. A good example would be RSS 
enabling most dynamic sections and ICAL compatibility of our 
calendars. There are numerous Web 2.0 technologies with lots of eye 
candy and we constantly evaluate them before reliably implementing 
them. For example, last year we AJAX enabled several applications of 
the CMS in the back-end such as Food Menu and Events Calendar, 
and Settings as it was the appropriate thing to do for ease of use. 
But with each novelty there is the risk of making the systems 
sluggish or not compatible with older computers/browsers and 
sometimes this is too high of a price to pay for eye candy and thus 
in many instances we choose to err on the conservative side.


5) Liquid vs. Fixed Pixel: Same issue, of course sites can be 
designed with liquid considerations in mind, yet, graphic design is 
also very important for schools and is one of the most important 
parameters in generating traffic. People like attractive designs. 
Fixed 

Re: [WSG] Microformats Accessibility

2009-01-18 Thread Anthony Ziebell




Hey Ben,

Just a note... for now the following should be used instead:

span class="name"human valuespan
class="value"machine value/span/span

The span class="value" title="machine value"/span is
still in brainstorming so should not be used yet.

Reference:
http://microformats.org/wiki/value-excerption-pattern-brainstorming#parsing_title_from_empty_value_elements

Cheers,
Anthony.


Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
Ben
Rowe wrote:
  
  
  Obviously it is a clash of HTML standards VS
accessibility.

  
  
Actually, it's a clash of microformats' misappropriation of HTML
standards VS accessibility...
  
  
An empty span won't kill anybody though. What you lose in code purity
you gain in a slightly more accessible solution (as long as tools that
consume those microformats actually recognise the span solution...been
a while since I checked if that's the case - otherwise, it's purely
academic).
  
  
P
  




***List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfmUnsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfmHelp: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org***



Re: [WSG] Microformats Accessibility

2009-01-18 Thread Patrick H. Lauke

Anthony Ziebell wrote:


Just a note... for now the following should be used instead:

/span class=namehuman valuespan class=valuemachine 
value/span/span/


And rely on CSS to display:none that nested span?

--
Patrick H. Lauke
__
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
http://redux.deviantart.com
__
Co-lead, Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force
http://webstandards.org/
__


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***



Re: [WSG] Microformats Accessibility

2009-01-18 Thread Anthony Ziebell




Yes, until the brainstorm is approved and made
standard. Hopefully soon, to remove the requirement of extra CSS. You
could apply a span.value style, or alternatively add 'hidden' as an
extra class style and apply it to that.

span.value style would probably be sufficient.

Regards,
Anthony.

Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
Anthony
Ziebell wrote:
  
  
  Just a note... for now the following should
be used instead:


/span class="name"human valuespan class="value"machine
value/span/span/

  
  
And rely on CSS to display:none that nested span?
  
  




***List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfmUnsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfmHelp: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org***



Re: [WSG] Microformats Accessibility

2009-01-18 Thread Patrick H. Lauke

Anthony Ziebell wrote:
Yes, until the brainstorm is approved and made standard. Hopefully soon, 


As the lord of microformats Tantek seems so vehemently opposed  to it, I 
sincerely doubt it will happen any time soon. It's now been roughly 
three years since the debate around ABBR issues first started, and 
little visible progress seems to have been made. Who knows, maybe the 
cynic in me will be pleasantly surprised, but I won't hold my breath...


P
--
Patrick H. Lauke
__
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
http://redux.deviantart.com
__
Co-lead, Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force
http://webstandards.org/
__


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***



Re: [WSG] Microformats Accessibility

2009-01-18 Thread Anthony Ziebell




Yes, well thankfully there is a workaround. The ABBR
element and title with machine code is a serious problem so far as
accessibility is concerned.

Regards,
Anthony.

Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
Anthony
Ziebell wrote:
  
  Yes, until the brainstorm is approved and
made standard. Hopefully soon, 
  
As the lord of microformats Tantek seems so vehemently opposed  to it,
I sincerely doubt it will happen any time soon. It's now been roughly
three years since the debate around ABBR issues first started, and
little visible progress seems to have been made. Who knows, maybe the
cynic in me will be pleasantly surprised, but I won't hold my breath...
  
  
P
  




***List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfmUnsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfmHelp: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org***



Re: [WSG] Examples of great high-school websites?

2009-01-18 Thread Alan Berman
And yes, all, I hadn't checked in a week or so, and I have some 
validation errors on several of my site's pages--will get to them 
when back at work Tuesday. Kind of embarrassing, but that's how it is today.


Alan

At 05:29 PM 1/18/2009, you wrote:
Educational Networks has been courted our administration (for El 
Camino Real High School in southern California) for the last couple 
of years. I finally let them come to show me their stuff, intending 
to show them what I had put together for my school site as a 
discussion starter; they are not used to talking to people who have 
done this sort of work--content management is the magic wand they 
offer to the schools, so when there's something that's already set 
up that way they have a tough time getting past a solution that isn't theirs:


http://ecr.lausd.k12.ca.us




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***



[WSG] JavaScript and Accessibility

2009-01-18 Thread Anthony Ziebell




Hey group,

Does anyone have any ideas on standards based form validation, which is
non-obtrusive, however remains accessible?

Reason I ask, is that some form validations inject an element say under
a form input, explaining the error. Now, without any alerts, how would
a blind person / screen reader pick up the fact that the element is now
there and read out this error?

Has anyone been able to cater for this requirement?

Thanks,
Anthony.




***List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfmUnsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfmHelp: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org***



Re: [WSG] JavaScript and Accessibility

2009-01-18 Thread nedlud
I'll confess my ignorance on this issue, but how do screen readers
handle DHTML type injection of content into the DOM?

Without using alerts, you could add the warning into the actual
document. But how does a screen reader know the document has changed?

L.

On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Anthony Ziebell
anth...@fatpublisher.com.au wrote:
 Hey group,

 Does anyone have any ideas on standards based form validation, which is
 non-obtrusive, however remains accessible?

 Reason I ask, is that some form validations inject an element say under a
 form input, explaining the error. Now, without any alerts, how would a blind
 person / screen reader pick up the fact that the element is now there and
 read out this error?

 Has anyone been able to cater for this requirement?

 Thanks,
 Anthony.

 ***
 List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
 Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
 ***


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***



Re: [WSG] JavaScript and Accessibility

2009-01-18 Thread Rimantas Liubertas
 Without using alerts, you could add the warning into the actual
 document. But how does a screen reader know the document has changed?

For starters: http://dev.opera.com/articles/view/introduction-to-wai-aria/

Regards,
Rimantas
--
http://rimantas.com/


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***



Re: [WSG] JavaScript and Accessibility

2009-01-18 Thread Anthony Ziebell




Isn't 'aria-required' a non-standard attribute?

Rimantas Liubertas wrote:

  
Without using alerts, you could add the warning into the actual
document. But how does a screen reader know the document has changed?

  
  
For starters: http://dev.opera.com/articles/view/introduction-to-wai-aria/

Regards,
Rimantas
--
http://rimantas.com/


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***


  




***List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfmUnsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfmHelp: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org***