RE: [WSG] Standards Savvy Shopping Cart
Hi, Bit late, but one is certainly on the way: http://www.enlightensupport.com I have no idea about timescales though. Antony -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Web Man Walking Sent: 02 February 2006 20:28 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: (Potential Spam) [WSG] Standards Savvy Shopping Cart Hello I am looking for a web standards friendly shopping cart for an upcoming project. I have had a look but not had much luck, previously used CactusASP but the amount of spurious and unnecessary HTML will not have me calling again. Would appreciate any links and/or recommendations. Thank you. DISCLAIMER: The information in this message is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this message by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution of the message, or any action or omission taken by you in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. As a public body, Salford City Council may be required to disclose this email [or any response to it] under the Freedom of Information Act 2000, unless the information in it is covered by one of the exemptions in the Act. Please immediately contact the sender if you have received this message in error. For the full disclaimer please access http://www.salford.gov.uk/e-mail. Thank you. ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
RE: [WSG] keyboard onclick activation on Mac
Hi Grant,
Try adding the 'onclick' code into an 'onkeypress' entry also...
a href=# onclick=if(!window.print){alert('Your browser does not support
this feature.Please select print from the file
menu')}else{window.print()};return false;
onkeypress=if(!window.print){alert('Your browser does not support this
feature.Please select print from the file menu')}else{window.print()};return
false;Print/a
It's a bit of duplication but should hopefully cover both clicks and key
presses.
Antony Golding
Principal e-Government Services Officer
Salford City Council
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Telephone: 0161-793 2232
I am running the New York City Marathon 2005 on 6th November in aid of Cancer
Research UK.
Please visit my web site for more information and how to to sponsor me for this
worthy cause.
http://www.antonyonline.co.uk
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Focas, Grant
Sent: 21 September 2005 06:35
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: [WSG] keyboard onclick activation on Mac
Hi,
Can anyone enlighten me about keyboard onclick activation problems on Mac?
I have found problems when I have a link such as this:
a href=# onclick=if(!window.print){alert('Your browser does not support
this feature.Please select print from the file
menu')}else{window.print()};return false;Print/a
Mac IE 5.2 - can tab to the link but pressing return does nothing
Mac IE5.1 - can tab to the link but pressing return does nothing
Safari 1.0.3 - cannot even tab to the links
Safari 2.0 - works
Netscape 6.2 - works
Netscape 7.0 - works
Netscape 7.2 - cannot even tab to the links
Firefox 1.0.6 - works
On Windows all browsers I have tested work fine.
*
thanks in advance!
Grant
DISCLAIMER: The information in this message is confidential and may be legally
privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this message by
anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, any
disclosure, copying, or distribution of the message, or any action or omission
taken by you in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. As a public
body, Salford City Council may be required to disclose this email [or any
response to it] under the Freedom of Information Act 2000, unless the
information in it is covered by one of the exemptions in the Act. Please
immediately contact the sender if you have received this message in error. For
the full disclaimer please access http://www.salford.gov.uk/e-mail. Thank you.
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
RE: [WSG] standards in local government
---BeginMessage--- Ahem... http://www.salford.gov.uk http://www.salford.gov.uk :) All UK local government sites have a requirement to be AA rated for accessibility, so expect to see a lot more of them in the near future. Antony Antony Golding Principal e-Government Services Officer Salford City Council E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Telephone: 0161 793 2232 -Original Message- From: designer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tue 01/02/2005 21:05 To: webstandards group Cc: Subject: [WSG] standards in local government Hi All, I was surprised to find a local government web site (English) using standards and accessibility: http://www.oldham.gov.uk/ It doesn't quite validate, but it's a determined start! winmail.dat---End Message--- DISCLAIMER: The information in this message is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this message by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient,any disclosure, copying, or distribution of the message, or any action or omission taken by you in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Please immediately contact the sender if you have received this message in error. For the full disclaimer please access http://www.salford.gov.uk/e-mail Thank you.
[WSG] Drop down menu, JavaScript accessibility
Hello all, We have been operating a drop down menu system on http://www.salford.gov.uk for around a year now and in that time, the menu has changed from a pure JavaScript version to the more accessible and semantic UDM4 (http://www.udm4.com). As a local government site, we get tested for accessibility regularly, both internally and by external parties, together with our own tests. Our CMS is still in the dark ages as regards web standards and producing accessible code, but I've managed to get much of the site valid as possible (Google currently indexes 33,700 pages, minus .pdf and .doc files). However one of the more recent external tests indicated that the drop down menu was failing the site due to the way the menu appears if JavaScript is disabled. I'd be interested in any opinions on the menu, with JavaScript enabled and disabled. Also, any alternative script or recommendations would be very useful. Antony (attending @media 2005) Antony Golding Principal e-Government Services Officer Salford City Council E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Telephone: 0161 793 2232 DISCLAIMER: The information in this message is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this message by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient,any disclosure, copying, or distribution of the message, or any action or omission taken by you in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Please immediately contact the sender if you have received this message in error. For the full disclaimer please access http://www.salford.gov.uk/e-mail Thank you. ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
RE: [WSG] Drop down menu, JavaScript accessibility
Thanks for the responses, guys. The main problem with the script is when JavaScript is disabled, as Bennie mentioned. I thought I had the perfect workaround by only displaying the top level links if JavaScript was disabled, and it looked and worked perfectly, stopping the corruption of the page. Unfortunately I did this by using an additional style sheet that was embedded in a noscript tag in the head... noscriptstyle type=text/css@import url(noscript.css);/style/noscript The new CSS replaced the styles that would have been setup by the JS to make the static menu appear similar to the dropdown. However, the W3C validator reported it was invalid to embed style in noscript, so if anyone has any suggestions to get around this issue, I'd be very grateful. Antony DISCLAIMER: The information in this message is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this message by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient,any disclosure, copying, or distribution of the message, or any action or omission taken by you in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Please immediately contact the sender if you have received this message in error. For the full disclaimer please access http://www.salford.gov.uk/e-mail Thank you. ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
[WSG] DL Formatting Issue (IE again!)
Hi all,
I'm using the nifty Maxdesign definition list image gallery script
(http://www.maxdesign.com.au/presentation/definition/dl-image-gallery.htm).
I've got the page formatted as required by the web manager, but a format problem as
arisen in IE only. The development page is available here:
http://www.salford.gov.uk/ghostcam-test/ghostcam-archive.htm
In Firefox, Opera, etc the layout appears perfectly as required. In IE6 however, below
the final image some of the dd definition is repeated. At present, the final dd
contains '21/09/2004 at 13:05:02' and beneath that, '5:02' appears. The '5:02' text
isn't repeated anywhere in the source, and seems to come purely from the final dd
text. Any suggestions why would be gratefully accepted!
The CSS involved is:
dl.gallery {
border: 1px solid #000;
background-color: #eee;
width: 164px;
text-align: center;
padding: 6px;
margin-bottom: 14px;
float: left;
margin-right: 1em;
}
.gallery dt img {
border: 1px solid #000;
width: 160px;
height: 120px;
}
.gallery dd {
font-weight: bold;
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
}
Thanks in advance.
Antony Golding
Principal e-Government Services Officer
Salford City Council
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Telephone: 0161 793 2232
DISCLAIMER: The information in this message is confidential and may be legally
privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this message
by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient,any
disclosure, copying, or distribution of the message, or any action or omission
taken by you in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
Please immediately contact the sender if you have received this message in error.
For the full disclaimer please access http://www.salford.gov.uk/e-mail Thank you.
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
RE: [WSG] checkbox checked in XHTML
Shouldn't checked=checked validate? Antony Golding Principal e-Government Services Officer Salford City Council Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Telephone: 0161 793 2232 -Original Message- From: McCain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 13 August 2004 11:04 To: Webstandardsgroup Subject: [WSG] checkbox checked in XHTML Hi, I am trying to validate like XHTML 1 Strict a web page with a form. There is checkbox that it has to be checked using checked. The W3C validador gives me error constantly in this. There is no possibility of using checked in XHTML? McCain ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/ Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** DISCLAIMER: The information in this message is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this message by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient,any disclosure, copying, or distribution of the message, or any action or omission taken by you in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Please immediately contact the sender if you have received this message in error. For the full disclaimer please access http://www.salford.gov.uk/e-mail Thank you. ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/ Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
