Re: [WSG] [OT] NZ vs Aust

2004-08-25 Thread t94xr.net.nz webmaster
WE ARE NOT AUSSIES
WE ARE CLEARLY DIFFERENT/SUPERIOR TO THE AUSSIES
KIWI'S RULE!!!
For someone to say we are one in the same, its an unsult.
___
Cameron W (aka t94xr)
http://www.t94xr.net.nz/
XHTML  CSS Compliant.
Taupo, NZ.
- Original Message - 
From: Mike Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 4:31 PM
Subject: [WSG] [OT] NZ vs Aust


Natalie Yeah, but the Kiwis are not Australians, they are New Zealanders, 
so
Natalie we have an excuse ;p

ok, I know this is waaay off-topic, and I *do* promise no more posts
on it, but trash talking is trash talking :)
So, to use a couple of pertinent title tags from Natalie's site
http://www.pixelkitty.net/ ...
No, Kiwis are not Australians - Love it or Shove it
and as for Australians .. hmmm ... - all talk, no walk springs to
mind :)
Mike Brown
(ducking and running in NZ)
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/
Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge
To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/
Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge
To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


Re: [WSG] [OT] NZ vs Aust

2004-08-25 Thread t94xr.net.nz webmaster
Guys,
To put a final end to this topic 

You Aussies will never have us Kiwis. 
We would rather bring our country down to get 
away from yours.

Its embarrasing when people mix us up when
they mention down under.
And besides, theres a clear line between us Kiwis
and you aussies. We are a much superior people.
:D 

___
Cameron W (aka t94xr)
http://www.t94xr.net.nz/
XHTML  CSS Compliant.
Taupo, NZ.
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/
Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge
To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


Re: [WSG] HTML CSS references

2004-08-06 Thread t94xr.net.nz webmaster
http://www.forumimages.com/ref/html/index.php
heres one :D
___
Cameron W (aka t94xr)
http://www.t94xr.net.nz/
XHTML  CSS Compliant.
Taupo, NZ.
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/
Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge
To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


Re: [WSG] Ikon

2004-07-31 Thread t94xr.net.nz webmaster
From: Peter Firminger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [WSG] Ikon

You go to bed for a few hours and look what happens!
Ikon has left the building!
P
yeah i know what you mean.
I just purchased a 6pk of Ikon energy drinks couple of nights ago and 
they've disappeared aswell.

hmm
_
Cameron W (aka t94xr)
http://freelance.t94xr.net.nz/
XHTML  CSS Compliant Webdesigner.
Taupo, NZ.
Mob: 021 050-7304 

*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



Re: [WSG] After CSS?

2004-07-23 Thread t94xr.net.nz webmaster
Well done.
Sadly there are alot of webdesigners unlike you who are still in the 
Photoshop phase and dont seem to be leaving it anytime soon.

I would say if you know all that, learn how to setup a domain, and get 
yourself up.
Then you can play at ur hearts content.

If you love CSS - use Topstyle - it enters you into another kind of phase.
Dreamweaver MX 2004 for your XHTML coding and PHP coding.
Localhost (convert your computer into a makeshift HTTP server and run ur 
sites with PHP. Small HTTP Server is recommended for a small one.

___
Cameron W (aka t94xr)
http://www.t94xr.net.nz/
XHTML  CSS Compliant.
Taupo, NZ. 

*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



Re: [WSG] Re:

2004-07-21 Thread t94xr.net.nz webmaster



Yes i agree highly - im glad you brought tho my 
attention.

We should discuss this to the highest level of WSG 
discussion.

_Cameron W 
(aka t94xr)http://freelance.t94xr.net.nz/XHTML 
 CSS Compliant Webdesigner.Taupo, NZ.Mob: 021 050-7304

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Russ 
  
  To: Wsg 
  Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 7:16 
  PM
  Subject: [WSG] Re:
  PredatorsPassword: 


Re: [WSG] Brisbane July Meeting - Report

2004-07-16 Thread t94xr.net.nz webmaster
From: Lea de Groot [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A very interesting and detailed open forum followed - for those who 
were unable to attend, you *really* missed something!

Next meeting should be Wed September 8 - put it in your diary now! :)
And what do we do if we are in New Zealand?
Can you have a meeting here and let us join?
___
Cameron W (aka t94xr)
http://www.t94xr.net.nz/
XHTML  CSS Compliant.
Taupo, NZ.
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



Re: [WSG] CSS based redesign of http://www.mckinseyquarterly.com/

2004-07-14 Thread t94xr.net.nz webmaster
/* @import url(template.css); */
/* @import url(article-tools.css); */
/* @import url(article-list.css); */

/* @import url(store.css); */
/* @import url(TOC.css); */
OMG
theres organisational skills but then theres organisational skills.
imports are now generally used for IE css bug fixes.
but thats a bit overboard.
_
Cameron W (aka t94xr)
http://freelance.t94xr.net.nz/
XHTML  CSS Compliant Webdesigner.
Taupo, NZ.
Mob: 021 050-7304
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



Re: [WSG] CSS based redesign of http://www.mckinseyquarterly.com/

2004-07-14 Thread t94xr.net.nz webmaster
imports are now generally used for IE css bug fixes.
but thats a bit overboard.
Could you qualify this statement please? @import is used to import
stylesheets. We don't want to give members who might be new to CSS the
wrong idea here.
thats one valid point. 
but its a trend to put IE CSS fixes and hacks in a file imported by IE

!--[if IE]--
Conditional comments have slowly been the new IE import.
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



Re: [WSG] Does anybody know an expandable vertical css/js menu based on uls?

2004-07-12 Thread t94xr.net.nz webmaster
I found this expandable CSS div with JS when i was working at ForumImages.
http://www.forumimages.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=324highlight=FICodeExpand
___
Cameron W (aka t94xr)
http://www.t94xr.net.nz/
XHTML  CSS Compliant.
Taupo, NZ.
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



Re: [WSG] Does anybody know an expandable vertical css/js menu based on uls?

2004-07-12 Thread t94xr.net.nz webmaster
I found this expandable CSS div with JS when i was working at ForumImages.
http://www.forumimages.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=324highlight=FICodeExpand
___
Cameron W (aka t94xr)
http://www.t94xr.net.nz/
XHTML  CSS Compliant.
Taupo, NZ.
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 

*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



Re: [WSG] Hiding email address from spambots with CSS

2004-07-06 Thread t94xr.net.nz webmaster
thats actually very good :)
Thanks :)
___
Cameron W (aka t94xr)
http://www.t94xr.net.nz/
XHTML  CSS Compliant.
Taupo, NZ.
- Original Message - 
From: Neerav [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WSG [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 12:50 AM
Subject: [WSG] Hiding email address from spambots with CSS


I havent tried this, but it sounds interesting
http://www.phoenity.com/newtedge/hide_email_spambots/
--
Neerav Bhatt
http://www.bhatt.id.au
Web Development  IT consultancy
Mobile: +61 (0)403 8000 27
http://www.bookcrossing.com/mybookshelf/neerav
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



Re: [WSG] Hiding email address from spambots with CSS

2004-07-06 Thread t94xr.net.nz webmaster
- Original Message - 
From: Ted Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I use the following javascript. It works well for me.
Ted
-

the downside beign they dont use a JS enabled browser? They cant contact 
you.
Better is a PHP Contact Form
John Wyles has one - a very good one indeed.
___
Cameron W (aka t94xr)
http://www.t94xr.net.nz/
XHTML  CSS Compliant.
Taupo, NZ. 

*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



[WSG] webstandards.org.nz - taken!! :O

2004-07-02 Thread t94xr.net.nz webmaster
Well here was just about to register webstandards.org.nz with my
domain agency  to my suprise it was taken!!
http://www.webstandards.org.nz/
Moral: Always check to see if the URL is valid in a browser,
before you try and register it!
___
Cameron W (aka t94xr)
http://www.t94xr.net.nz/
XHTML  CSS Compliant webdesigner.
Taupo, NZ.
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



Re: [WSG] What do browsers download?

2004-06-30 Thread t94xr.net.nz webmaster
this may sound like a stupid answer but wouldnt it be like an html page of 
somesort.

t94xr
http://www.t94xr.net.nz/ 

*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



Re: [WSG] 508??

2004-06-29 Thread t94xr.net.nz webmaster

Sure, if you explain what on earth you're talking about.
-- tim
508 is this,
http://www.contentquality.com/mynewtester/cynthia.exe?rptmode=-1runcr=1url1=http://www.t94xr.net.nz/
Conformance to web accessability standards produced by the W3C.
Basically those ponts there tell you wats required for 508 compliance.
Its a first and simple step.
t94xr
http://www.t94xr.net.nz/
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



Re: [WSG] 508??

2004-06-29 Thread t94xr.net.nz webmaster

Sure, if you explain what on earth you're talking about.
-- tim
508 is this,
http://www.contentquality.com/mynewtester/cynthia.exe?rptmode=-1runcr=1url1=http://www.t94xr.net.nz/
Conformance to web accessability standards produced by the W3C.
Basically those ponts there tell you wats required for 508 compliance.
Its a first and simple step.
t94xr
http://www.t94xr.net.nz/
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 

*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



Re: [WSG] Unsubscribe

2004-06-23 Thread t94xr.net.nz webmaster



He has a good  valid point.

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Paulo 
  Rodrigo Teixeira 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 3:14 
  AM
  Subject: [Norton AntiSpam] [WSG] 
  Unsubscribe
  
  
  
  
  
  
  Yahoo! 
  Mail - Participe da pesquisa global sobre o Yahoo! Mail. Clique 
  aqui!


Re: [WSG] Free presentation for Sydney WSG members and their bosses

2004-06-23 Thread t94xr.net.nz webmaster
I hate asking this :P

Can you setup a couple of nights over here in NZ and do it aswell
I know plenty of people who would love to go see it.

Camz (aka t94xr)
http://www.t94xr.net.nz/
Taupo NZ
XHTML  CSS Webdevelper (PHP Newbie)

- Original Message - 
From: russ - maxdesign [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Web Standards Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 12:59 AM
Subject: [WSG] Free presentation for Sydney WSG members and their bosses


 As a preview to WE04, Web Essentials and the Web Standards Group will be
 hosting a free briefing in Sydney for executives and decision makers,
 addressing the business issues associated with web standards and
 accessibility.

 In other words, we want you to bring your bosses along for a short
 presentation - so we can help persuade them of the importance of web
 standards.

 Roger Hudson (Web Usability) and John Allsopp (Westciv) will cover the
core
 aspects of web development best practice from the perspective of the
 decision maker. Roger, John, Peter Ottery (F2) and others will then be
 available for questions - over a drink and a bite to eat.

 We will also be giving away 1 pass to the Web Essentials conference, 3
 copies of Style Master and more... anything to get your boss to come  :)

 Cost: Free
 Date: Thursday July 1, 2004
 Time: 6:00pm for 6.30pm start (refreshments supplied)
 Venue: Red Square. 49 Greek Street Glebe 2037 Australia
 RSVP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 More: http://www.we04.com/briefing.cfm

 Thanks
 Russ

 *
 The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
 *






*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



Re: [WSG] OT - Standards Compliant Websites Directory

2004-06-23 Thread t94xr.net.nz webmaster
HELL YEAH!!!

- Original Message - 
From: Razvan Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 5:58 AM
Subject: [WSG] OT - Standards Compliant Websites Directory


 Hello.
 
 I've started to build a Standards Compliant Websites Directory. A Web 
 Directory where only Valid W3C sites will be accepted. What do you 
 think? Should I continue?
 *
 The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
 * 
 
 
 
 

*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



Re: [WSG] Recommended Books

2004-06-22 Thread t94xr.net.nz webmaster

HTML  XHTML - The Definitive Guide 5th Edition (O'Reilly-2002)
O'Reilly Cascading Style Sheets The Definitive Guide
New Riders -  Speed Up Your Site- 1st Ed 2003 [CHM]
Website Analysis  Reporting

Generally anything  I mean ANYTHING of Eric Meyers

Camz

*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



Re: [WSG] Mac testers please

2004-06-22 Thread t94xr.net.nz webmaster
  Hi all,
 
  I was wondering if anyone could be so kind as to test my site using IE
  for
  Mac 5+ and Safari
 
  http://www.v2.shockmedia.com.au
 
  Thanks.

Damn, forget the rest of the site - put her as the only thing on the page
and you'll have everyone still agreeing its a great site.


*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



Re: [WSG] XHTML Transitional - Strict

2004-06-17 Thread t94xr.net.nz webmaster
Title: XHTML Transitional -> Strict



Strict isnt much different from Trrans

no a target="_blank" 
theres a _javascript_ replacement.

other than theres a cuopkle of things but W3C will 
tell you about them.
Simple.

Camz
www.t94xr.net.nz

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Jamie Mason 
  To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' 
  
  Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 9:00 
  PM
  Subject: [WSG] XHTML Transitional - 
  Strict
  
  Hello all, I was hoping one of you 
  could tell me, or know any url's that would be helpful on moving from XHTML 
  Transitional to Strict. 
  What are the main things to look out for when moving over? 
  What is allowed in Transitional that has to be removed for strict?
  Thanks a lot, 
  Jamie Mason: Design T: (01423) 
  700849 


Re: [WSG] ALPHA Testers Needed

2004-06-16 Thread t94xr.net.nz webmaster
I agree  I think Topstyle is the program you should have a go to try and
beat mate.

Although its pretty hard, it has a cult following
the guys talented
And Macromedia was focrced to put heaps of focus on Dreamweavers CSS
capabilites cuz TS is the CSS GOD.

Its pretty hard to beat.
You prepared for that level of programming?

Just being honest - but it is hard to move a cult followed application.

Camz.

- Original Message - 
From: Kay Smoljak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2004 11:03 PM
Subject: Re: [WSG] ALPHA Testers Needed


  BTW - IF there are any programs out there that do this - please let
  me know!

 I think I can do most, if not all of that with TopStyle Stylesweepers.
 You can save the parameters ton run them again - I have a
 super-compressed stylesweeper, and an ultra-readable one.


 -- 
 Kay Smoljak
 http://kay.smoljak.com
 *
 The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
 *






*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



Re: [WSG] Have stared too long

2004-06-16 Thread t94xr.net.nz webmaster
I wouldnt bother with Netscape 7.1 Valdiation.

Rebuild your site somewhat so it works in Opera IE  Mozilla 1.6+
Netscape hasnt got long left till it passes on.

Camz.
www.t94xr.net.nz
- Original Message - 
From: Veine K Vikberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 8:36 AM
Subject: [WSG] Have stared too long


 and I am probably missing something really simple;

 This is the page in question:

 http://nrotc.mainemaritime.edu/goals.html

 (css in separate file)

 This Page Is Valid XHTML 1.0 Strict and before jigsaw went down, the CSS
 was having no errors as well. It also passes as Section 508 (which are the
 goals for the site)

 The page looks kind of intended in Netscape 7.1, but no where else (IE,
 Opera etc) My main problem is the blasted unordered list where the bullets
 disappear in IE, and the picture going off to the left in Opera.

 Any help would is appreciated as I have spent the last 5 hours trying to
 get this one to work.

 Disclaimer: the css file is huge and probably have a lot of extras that
 needs to be taken out, but as long as I can't get it to work as intended I
 am not prone to cut anything out ..

TIA
  ~Veine

 Veine K Vikberg




*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



Re: [WSG] overflow: auto;

2004-06-15 Thread t94xr.net.nz webmaster
Title: Re: [WSG] overflow: auto;



Doesnt it?!

http://www.danvine.com/icapture/detail/51923.html
works ok on iCapture?




Re: [WSG] Interesting reading

2004-06-14 Thread t94xr.net.nz webmaster
 I can't believe y'all are taking this guy seriously enough to even
comment -
 it's pretty obvious to this newbie to css  standards, he's trolling - 
he
 got you ~ I think enough has been said about his dubious commentaries ~
let
 it go - please

 Marie
 About Certified XHTML Developer - Level 1

I agree, where all equals, but within ourselves - we'll never argue if Eric
Meyer happened to look in and have his comment first.
Theres a point where you become somewhat superior petty things like that.

Camz
www.t94xr.net.nz
http://freelance.t94xr.net.nz/


*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



Re: [WSG] new layout/design

2004-06-12 Thread t94xr.net.nz webmaster
Source code and accessibility:
 - Do you really need all those nested div's?
I have it because IE wont center the DIV, so I need the nested DIV to have a
text-align:center in there...


Have you tried using margin: 0px auto; for cetering divs?


Camz
www.t94xr.net.nz


*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



Re: [WSG] First table-free site

2004-06-11 Thread t94xr.net.nz webmaster
 I'm new to this list and this is my first post. I'm trying to produce
 my first table-free website - tables have been my very dear friends in
 the past!

Yes, leaving tables behind gratefuly comes with the knowledge that you've
reached a level of CSS knowledge and skill to achieve that.

I did mine only a couple of months ago.
www.t94xr.net.nz

Camz


*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



Re: [WSG] KHTML ??

2004-06-10 Thread t94xr.net.nz webmaster
just in the art of humur? 

What is Google?

Camz :D
- Original Message - 
From: Michael Zeltner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 6:26 AM
Subject: Re: [WSG] KHTML ??


 Am 10.06.2004 um 15:10 schrieb Jad Madi:
 
  guys what is KHTML ?
 
 please use google before you post to the list 
 (http://www.google.com/search?q=khtmlie=UTF-8oe=UTF-8). it's the 
 rendering engine from konqueror 
 (http://www.konqueror.org/features/browser.php) which is also used in 
 apples rendering engine WebCore 
 (http://developer.apple.com/darwin/projects/webcore/) and their browser 
 safari (http://www.apple.com/safari/).
 
 konqueror had very bad css support but apple cleaned khtml quite well 
 it up so konquerors support is better now as well. at least afaik :) 
 however i haven't tested/tried it in the last few months.
 
 regards, michael
 -- 
 Michael Zeltner
 Netalley Networks LLP
 http://www.netalleynetworks.com/
 
 *
 The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
 * 
 
 
 

*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



Re: [WSG] KHTML ??

2004-06-10 Thread t94xr.net.nz webmaster
LOL

- Original Message - 
From: Nick Gleitzman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 7:12 AM
Subject: Re: [WSG] KHTML ??


 On Friday, June 11, 2004, at 06:56  PM, t94xr.net.nz webmaster wrote:
 
  just in the art of humur?
 
  What is Google?
 
  Camz :D
 
 www.fuckingkhtmlit.com
 
 N
 ___
 Omnivision. Websight.
 http://www.omnivision.com.au/
 
 *
 The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
 * 
 
 
 
 

*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



Re: [WSG] KHTML ??

2004-06-10 Thread t94xr.net.nz webmaster
RE: [WSG] KHTML ??*shakes head* I bet you guys are among the few that find
Steve Martin films funny, right?
:)

Well we do try :D
And whos Steve Martin?

Camz


*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



Re: [WSG] Standard Hacks?

2004-06-09 Thread t94xr.net.nz webmaster
 Hacks are for the Cowbot webdesigner who hasnt done his job right in the
first
 place! ( or for a client thats given too much hassle and not enough cash
to make
 the recode cost effective! ;] )

quite true - but there are hacks that are used to counteract behavours in
browsers.

Camz
www.t94xr.net.nz


*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



Re: [WSG] Many Browers in one place

2004-06-07 Thread t94xr.net.nz webmaster
VMware is my second bet 
or Virtual PC

Camz
- Original Message - 
From: Amit Karmakar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 12:19 AM
Subject: [WSG] Many Browers in one place


 People,
 
 My apologoes in advance if this has been discussed earlier.
 
 I know there are sites that let you test your sites on different
 browsers(browsers, version, OS).
 
 Something like http://browsers.evolt.org/, www.danvine.com/iecapture/
 but are there softwares (online or offline) that lets users test a site
 offline for free?
 
 Regards, 
 Amit Karmakar
 www.karmakars.com
 
 *
 The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
 * 
 
 
 
 

*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



Re: [WSG] IE 7 Promo Images

2004-06-07 Thread t94xr.net.nz webmaster
Title: [WSG] IE 7 Promo Images



Im having trouble understanding how you think IE7 
would be broken?!
I wouldnt abuse IE7 to be broken without it 
actually being released yet. It might shock you ;)

Microsoft have said their putting more time and 
manpower into IE7 than previous versions...


Camz


  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Sean M. Hall 
  (Dante) 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 3:39 
PM
  Subject: [WSG] IE 7 Promo Images
  Hey guys. Yerba 
  Buena Web Design (my own small design agency, which hasn't even officially 
  opened yet) has created two IE 7 Promo Images. Dean Edwards modified the first 
  one (to fit his layout and design) and made it the official IE 7 Logo. 
  http://www.geocities.com/seanmhall2003/ie7.html 
  I'd like your opinion on these two images (please remember that 
  I'm a beginner at design). I hope you like them :) 



Re: [WSG] Centering a liquid grid of image thumbs and captions

2004-06-06 Thread t94xr.net.nz webmaster

- Original Message - 
From: Nick Gleitzman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 06, 2004 9:42 PM
Subject: Re: [WSG] Centering a liquid grid of image thumbs and captions


 I have a 400MHz iMac you can have for $300 - that's less than a 
 software upgrade. I'll even load all the browsers on it for you.
 
 Damn. No self contol. Sorry. I'm off for a Bex and a good lie down.
 
 Nick
 ___
 Omnivision. Websight.
 http://www.omnivision.com.au/
 On Sunday, June 6, 2004, at 07:18  PM, Bert Doorn wrote:
 
  I believe this is heading off-topic, but in a nutshell...  Wasting 
  money for
  me is to buy a system I won't use.
 
 *
 The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
 * 
 
 
 
 

*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



Re: [WSG] What Editors do you guys use?

2004-06-06 Thread t94xr.net.nz webmaster
Subject: Re: [WSG] What Editors do you guys use?

hmm 
Topstyle Pro 3.10 - CSS
Dreamweaver MX 2004 7.01 - XHTML/PHP

Browsers
Mozilla 1.7 RC1
IE 6 SP1
Opera 7.50

http://www.danvine.com/icapture/
Safari testing...

http://www.danvine.com/iecapture/
IE 6/5.5/5/4, Firefox  Opera 7.23 testing.

Camz
www.t94xr.net.nz

*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



Re: RE:[WSG] Standards Compliance -vs- User Enjoyment

2004-06-05 Thread t94xr.net.nz webmaster
Title: RE:[WSG] Standards Compliance -vs- User Enjoyment



I played around with flash - in a wk i made blue 
box move from one side to another :D!!

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Sean M. Hall AKA 
  Dante 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Sent: Saturday, June 05, 2004 6:14 
  PM
  Subject: RE:[WSG] Standards Compliance 
  -vs- User Enjoyment
  "Use to force 
  [of Web Standards]" And if that doesn't work there's always good 
  ol "eennie meenie miney mo" Standards-based sites can be flashy, 
  personally I wouldn't mess around with that "Flash Satay" stuff - I'll take 
  the embed tag, thank you very much (that is assuming I ever use Flash - I 
  probably never will, I wasn't never good with animation). 



Re: RE:[WSG] Standards Compliance -vs- User Enjoyment

2004-06-05 Thread t94xr.net.nz webmaster
Title: RE:[WSG] Standards Compliance -vs- User Enjoyment



Wooops the link in the other email is 
actually...
http://www.taupowebdesigns.co.nz/

sorry :$

Camz
www.t94xr.net.nz


Re: [WSG] Standards Compliance -vs- User Enjoyment

2004-06-04 Thread t94xr.net.nz webmaster



I would recommend you do both - have a standards 
compliant accessable site, but include an interactive area.
A xhtml/css  php/mysql"photobook" with 
the club at certian nights - preferably the peak holiday periods.

Give them the best of both worlds. a quick loading 
site with an area where they can have alot more interactive with the site. 
A guestbook would be excellent aswell. runnnig 
off a db accessed both by the interactive area and the xhtml css 
area.

Camz

- Original Message - 

  From: 
  Chris 
  Stratford 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Sent: Saturday, June 05, 2004 5:28 
  PM
  Subject: [WSG] Standards Compliance -vs- 
  User Enjoyment
  Hey list,I have something 
  which has been a major topic of discussion between a friend and I.I am 
  currently working on a promotions website - promoting for Sydney Nightclubs 
  (RB Scene)To knuckle down and get to the point - Do I use 
  webstandards and efficent coding to make the website...Or do I use Flash, 
  Verbose Table Layouts, Lots of Images  Animations etc... To get people 
  interested.Really it is a question of - do I make the website for 
  viewer enjoyment, or for the widest viewer spectrum.I am not sure if 
  many of you would be in the same situation, but I can imagine it has come up 
  at least once with us all before.Whether its a news website, or a Hosting 
  companies website...My situation is a very sticky one - Clubbers dont 
  want web standards, they want to see - what they can't have - lots of pictures 
  help, and sounds are good (ambient music, on/off switch of course).My 
  website hasn't begun yet, although I have some rough ideas, one which my 
  friend came up with:http://www.equicom.net/chris/test.htmlI 
  think its great, doesnt use flash or anything.It was an eye opener 
  thinking it was as simple as it was.It works in FireFox (exept sound) 
  which is good...But the fact that it looks good with such a simply 
  design.What are your opinions - and can you lend me any 
  assistance.Web Standars are very important to me, and I would much rather 
  use standards compliant code, than make 10 extra people per 100 happy because 
  there is a boxed layout (like the demo website)...I could code that in 
  CSS, but it wouldn't be as solid as it is with Tables.Anyway!Let 
  me know what you all think!Cheers!Chris 
Stratford.


Re: [WSG] SkillSwap

2004-06-03 Thread t94xr.net.nz webmaster
can you get it in New Zealand?

Camz

- Original Message - 
From: Mark Harwood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2004 11:55 PM
Subject: Re: [WSG] SkillSwap


 Still kinda Useful info!
 
 Phunky
 
 
 
 *
 The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
 * 
 
 
 
 

*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



Re: [WSG] Page causes win IE4 to crash

2004-06-02 Thread t94xr.net.nz webmaster
http://www.danvine.com/iecapture/
does this help?

Camz 
- Original Message - 
From: Neerav [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WSG [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2004 10:06 PM
Subject: [WSG] Page causes win IE4 to crash


 Hi
 
 I was just testing http://www.bhatt.id.au/test.php on the standalone 
 windows versions of Internet explorer that you can get from 
 http://www.quirksmode.org/browsers/multipleie.html , all worked fine 
 except IE4 which froze immediately after displaying the page and took up 
 100% of cpu time until i killed its process
 
 Does anyone have a real Win IE4 they could test 
 http://www.bhatt.id.au/test.php on to see if it still crashes ?
 
 thanks
 
 -- 
 Neerav Bhatt
 http://www.bhatt.id.au
 Web Development  IT consultancy
 Mobile: +61 403 8000 27
 *
 The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
 * 
 
 
 

*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



Re: [WSG] Page causes win IE4 to crash

2004-06-02 Thread t94xr.net.nz webmaster
:O lmfao
email the guy apologising just incase! :D!!
Hes pretty sweet...

- Original Message -
From: Neerav [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2004 10:46 PM
Subject: Re: [WSG] Page causes win IE4 to crash


 Oh dear ... now his IEcapture page isnt responding for newly entered
 pages to test ... hope I didnt do anything to it.

 t94xr.net.nz webmaster wrote:
  http://www.danvine.com/iecapture/
  does this help?
 
  Camz
  - Original Message -
  From: Neerav [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: WSG [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2004 10:06 PM
  Subject: [WSG] Page causes win IE4 to crash
 
 
 
 Hi
 
 I was just testing http://www.bhatt.id.au/test.php on the standalone
 windows versions of Internet explorer that you can get from
 http://www.quirksmode.org/browsers/multipleie.html , all worked fine
 except IE4 which froze immediately after displaying the page and took up
 100% of cpu time until i killed its process
 
 Does anyone have a real Win IE4 they could test
 http://www.bhatt.id.au/test.php on to see if it still crashes ?
 
 thanks
 
 --
 Neerav Bhatt
 http://www.bhatt.id.au
 Web Development  IT consultancy
 Mobile: +61 403 8000 27
 *
 The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
 *
 
 
 
 
 
  *
  The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
  See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
  for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
  *


 --
 Neerav Bhatt
 http://www.bhatt.id.au
 Web Development  IT consultancy
 Mobile: +61 403 8000 27
 *
 The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
 *






*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



Re: [WSG] accessibility feedback

2004-06-02 Thread t94xr.net.nz webmaster




  Andreas Boehmer wrote: Hi guys,I was wondering whether you could 
  give me some feedback on a website we havecreated: http://www.jet.org.au.We have tried to make it as 
  accessible as possible, but better than anyBobby or W3C validation is 
  probably going through your critique. We arestill working on improving it, 
  but please feel free to be tough critics!
Nice layout 
Login box perfectly placed - rendering time is 
ofvery goodstandards ( im on a 28k connection ha! fkd 56k 
modem)
Would be good if there was a different random quote 
from a different profession, different image and quote with "" and a name giving 
a bit of their story on how they got the job thru your website. Gives the 
impression that you've actually reached those numbers you claim to 
have.

The general site design is well highly perfected, 
the designer has alot of talent.

Camz


Re: [WSG] At last - here are the dollars in web standards.

2004-06-02 Thread t94xr.net.nz webmaster
 If this doesn't convince a web professional to take a serious look at
these
 standards nothing will.

and MACCAWS ( www.MACCAWS.org ) doesnt do this?

Camz


*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



Re: [WSG] At last - here are the dollars in web standards.

2004-06-02 Thread t94xr.net.nz webmaster



I found it quite a good read...

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Mordechai 
  Peller 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2004 1:04 
  PM
  Subject: Re: [WSG] At last - here are the 
  dollars in web standards.
  t94xr.net.nz webmaster wrote:
  
If this doesn't convince a web professional to take a serious look at
these
  
standards nothing will.

and MACCAWS ( www.MACCAWS.org ) doesnt do this?
  Not the same way. maccaws' argument is an intellectual 
  argument, while Robinson's is an emotional one. While maccaws' the better 
  argument, in this generation of 30 second attention spans (if that long), 
  Robinson's has a better chance of working.Ultimately the best argument 
  is the result of a combination of both.


Re: [WSG] At last - here are the dollars in web standards.

2004-06-02 Thread t94xr.net.nz webmaster
their site is what you call a white paper its like a government report but
on the net.
Governments around the world have read it. Its fairly simple ot navigate.

- Original Message -
From: Michael Kear [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2004 1:20 PM
Subject: RE: [WSG] At last - here are the dollars in web standards.


 I don't know I've never read it.  You go to Maccaws.org and you have to go
 off to another link to read anything useful.   Like the old days of the
 portals.   No one had any content, only links to more sites that are
 themselves just pages of more links.

 I can't be bothered going from link to link to link to link to find
 something worth reading. If a poster cant be bothered putting a link to
 actual content, why should I have to bother?  Why would I have to hunt out
 what on earth Maccaws.org means in order to find out if I want to read it
or
 not.

 If you see my post about the other article, you'll see in my post why I
 think it's worth reading.   You don't have to go any further to decide if
 you want to follow it up yourself.

 Maccaws.org tells me nothing except that it's perhaps a site about South
 American parrots.


 Cheers
 Mike Kear
 Windsor, NSW, Australia
 AFP Webworks
 http://afpwebworks.com


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of t94xr.net.nz webmaster
 Sent: Thursday, 3 June 2004 10:22 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [WSG] At last - here are the dollars in web standards.

  If this doesn't convince a web professional to take a serious look at
 these
  standards nothing will.

 and MACCAWS ( www.MACCAWS.org ) doesnt do this?

 Camz


 *
 The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
 *



 *
 The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
 *






*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



Re: [WSG] Safe Web colors

2004-06-01 Thread t94xr.net.nz webmaster

 Greetings
 Useing a safe web colors, is it a standard? is it a Must?

No, as most users have full high color resolutions.

But if your website is primarily visiited by computers that cant reach high
color levels, then yeah. but otherwise its accessability shoshing over with
design issues.
the web safe color scheme is a good idea, pratical in some situations.

I've never bothered with it.

Camz
www.t94xr.net.nz


*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



Re: [WSG] Safe Web colors

2004-06-01 Thread t94xr.net.nz webmaster
no its ok - but Web Safe colors is for users who cant see higher 256colors.

- Original Message -
From: Jad Madi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2004 12:26 AM
Subject: Re: [WSG] Safe Web colors


 please check http://www.easyhttp.com/design/site
 I'v used alot of colors might be hmm bright
 is it considered to be out of accessability ?


 On Wed, 2 Jun 2004 00:12:39 +1200, t94xr.net.nz webmaster
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
   Greetings
   Useing a safe web colors, is it a standard? is it a Must?
 
  No, as most users have full high color resolutions.
 
  But if your website is primarily visiited by computers that cant reach
high
  color levels, then yeah. but otherwise its accessability shoshing over
with
  design issues.
  the web safe color scheme is a good idea, pratical in some situations.
 
  I've never bothered with it.
 
  Camz
  www.t94xr.net.nz
 
 
 
 
  *
  The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
  See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
  for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
  *
 
 
 *
 The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
 *






*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



Re: [WSG] Should web standards cost more?

2004-05-31 Thread t94xr.net.nz webmaster
www.MACCAWS.org

Thats a good reason to produce standards compliant websites.
I recently had one job which the coding was easy, the actual complexity of
the detail which was so high it was just a to big a job for me to do :(
But the person who offered me the job, saw my site and emailed me.

What was the significant factor, have you seen my site? www.t94xr.net.nz

Camz

- Original Message -
From: Nan Zhong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 2:00 PM
Subject: Re: [WSG] Should web standards cost more?


 Hello,

 Well I have. I'm still a high school student and therefore have no real
 qualifications other than experience. However people have seen my work
 and still come to me for design jobs. I charge less (again due to
 qualifications) but one of the main reasons people still contact me for
 design contracts even though they know my age and such is that I design
 by web standards.

 Nan Zhong

 Neerav wrote:

  Hi
 
  The slightly OT thread [WSG] Budget Design, made me think of an idea
  which is very relevent to all members of WSG ..
 
  My premise is that any sensible business person should try to
  differentiate from competitors by showing they have skills that no one
  else has, vast experience etc and justify charging more than the
  competition because of that
 
  So has any member of the WSG done that, justifying charging $X more
  than eg: the design agency down the road which makes webpages by
  putting sliced photoshop images into tables by saying something along
  the lines of
 
  I design to Web Standards and can show my product validates against
  these standards, this is like an industrial business getting ISO
  Quality certification for their processes and means my product/service
  satisfies web industry standards for quality of code, can other
  companies with proposals for your project do the same ?
 

 *
 The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
 *






*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



Re: [WSG] Should web standards cost more?

2004-05-31 Thread t94xr.net.nz webmaster
www.MACCAWS.org

Thats a good reason to produce standards compliant websites.
I recently had one job which the coding was easy, the actual complexity of
the detail which was so high it was just a to big a job for me to do :(
But the person who offered me the job, saw my site and emailed me.

What was the significant factor, have you seen my site? www.t94xr.net.nz

Camz

*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



Re: [WSG] CSS editor

2004-05-28 Thread t94xr.net.nz webmaster
 Not free, but you could do a lot worse than Top Style 3. It combines HTML
 editing and CSS. Wriiten by the creator of Homsite.

Topstyle Pro 3.10 Pro is a better bet.
Even tho there are copies floating around the net - one even on FOSIs site
where ever that is.

I purchased mine, I strongly recommend it for CSS editing.

The free ones dont even come close.

Camz


*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



[WSG] finally a mailing list thats perfect!

2004-05-27 Thread t94xr.net.nz webmaster



Awesome a mailing list that i wanted.

Hi, - im t94xr
www.t94xr.net.nz