[WSG] CSS validator updated?

[Bert Doorn]

Has the CSS validator (the W3C one) just become a whole lot more pedantic?

Sites that previously came out with a clean slate now throw up lots of 
warnings.


I mean..   You'd expect sites made by people in the Features section of 
the WSG site to be perfect.   I checked a few of them at random.  All 
had warnings, some only a dozen or so, others had a long long list.  Not 
that I want to single anyone out, but one would have thought Westciv 
would be OK.  Or maxdesign.   But no, even the W3C site gets a long list 
of warnings.


Has the validator become too pedantic all of a sudden or was it too 
lenient before?   Should we ignore the warnings? 

Regards 
--

Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
Fast-loading, user-friendly websites 



**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**

Re: [WSG] CSS validator updated?

[Kenny Graham]

The CSS validator has a few new bugs mentioned recently on here.  It's
throwing errors where it shouldn't be, like on some integers that
don't have .0 after them.  Hopefully it'll get fixed soon.
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**