Re: [WSG] Site check: color.rdpdesign.com
I expected the manual inputs to accept hex values since that's typically how we work with colors on the web. Perhaps you could offer the option of using hex or decimal?Steve Ferguson - Illumit L.L.C. http://illumit.comOn Oct 8, 2005, at 6:25 PM, Christian Montoya wrote:Hey all, Thanks for the checks. The problems come from the page being sized in em's, and the ads being absolutely positioned with ems... I've decided that's too difficult. I'll probably put the ads back in, but in a more robust way, so they don't risk covering content. -- - C Montoyardpdesign.com ... liquid.rdpdesign.com ... montoya.rdpdesign.com
Re: [WSG] Site check: color.rdpdesign.com
On 10/9/05, Steve Ferguson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I expected the manual inputs to accept hex values since that's typically how we work with colors on the web. Perhaps you could offer the option of using hex or decimal?Steve Ferguson - Illumit L.L.C. http://illumit.com I will, later. -- - C Montoyardpdesign.com ... liquid.rdpdesign.com ... montoya.rdpdesign.com
[WSG] Site check: color.rdpdesign.com
Hello all. I just finished a site and it looks ok in IE 6 / FF / Opera. I'm not too concerned about compatibility with older browsers, just wondering if it works ok in Mac and Linux. The site is here: http://color.rdpdesign.com Any advice is also welcome. Thanks!-- - C Montoyardpdesign.com ... liquid.rdpdesign.com ... montoya.rdpdesign.com
RE: [WSG] Site check: color.rdpdesign.com
Hi Christian, I checked out your site in Safari 1.3.1, Firefox (Mac) 1.0.6, IE 5.2 Camino 0.8.2 on 1024 x 768. The page renders nicely in all browser except for IE 5.2. The layout is shot in this browser. I wouldnt be too concerned about this, as IE 5.2 is a real pig to design for, and has very few users, (less than 2% market share I believe). The only slight difference I noticed between my Windows machine on 1280 x 1024 the Mac was that the line Complementary Color jumps onto two lines when viewed in the lower resolution, (1024 x 768). Not a big issue, but you may want to address it by reducing the font slightly. Other than that, nice job! (It validates fine too). Regards, Nick Lazar 8bits Web Technology Sunshine Coast, QLD http://8bits.com.au From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christian Montoya Sent: Sunday, October 09, 2005 9:14 AM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: [WSG] Site check: color.rdpdesign.com Hello all. I just finished a site and it looks ok in IE 6 / FF / Opera. I'm not too concerned about compatibility with older browsers, just wondering if it works ok in Mac and Linux. The site is here: http://color.rdpdesign.com Any advice is also welcome. Thanks! -- - C Montoya rdpdesign.com ... liquid.rdpdesign.com ... montoya.rdpdesign.com
Re: [WSG] Site check: color.rdpdesign.com
Christian Montoya wrote: I just finished a site and it looks ok in IE 6 / FF / Opera. I'm not too concerned about compatibility with older browsers, just wondering if it works ok in Mac and Linux. The site is here: http://color.rdpdesign.com The ads are overlaying the content on FF 1.0.5 and Konqueror 3.2.1 both (Linux/SuSE 9.1) -- http://webtuitive.com/samples/montoya.png FWIW! -- Hassan Schroeder - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Webtuitive Design === (+1) 408-938-0567 === http://webtuitive.com dream. code. ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Site check: color.rdpdesign.com
Hey all, Thanks for the checks. The problems come from the page being sized in em's, and the ads being absolutely positioned with ems... I've decided that's too difficult. I'll probably put the ads back in, but in a more robust way, so they don't risk covering content. -- - C Montoyardpdesign.com ... liquid.rdpdesign.com ... montoya.rdpdesign.com
