[WSG] critque

2004-06-19 Thread Ryan Smith








Hello good people,

Another newbie here. Ive
just sent my site live and wanted some constructive feedback from both
designers and developers. The xhtml validates  Im
working on getting it strict. Although there are a couple of
usability issues (like the skip to content misses the folio links) overall Im
happy with it. 

But thats not enough and Ive been too close to
it for a while. So I turn to you dear reader for your professional opinion.



Thanks in advance,

Ryan Smith,

(Melbourne AUS)



e:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

w:
www.moreofthesame.com








Re: [WSG] critque

2004-06-19 Thread Tim Lucas
Ryan Smith spoke the following wise words on 19/06/2004 3:58 PM EST:
Another newbie here. Ive just sent my site live and wanted some 
constructive feedback from both designers and developers. The xhtml 
validates  Im working on getting it strict. Although there are a 
couple of usability issues (like the skip to content misses the folio 
links) overall Im happy with it.
Good to see another designer embracing web standards =)
Clean and minimal markup and using JS to insert the decorative graphics. 
You've let a bgcolor sneak on all the pages though ;)

To guarantee no UAs get confused with the inline javascript you could 
make it less intrusive by using script src.. in the header, attach a 
function (which inserts the image using the DOM) to the body's onload event.

CSS wise you could probably move the CSS hacks into their own CSS 
file(s). You also might find it more manageable to split up normal.css 
into different stylesheets for each section then using @import.

Any reason you're using both @import *and* link?
Few things I noticed using lynx:
- There's no need for the img descriptions for 'email icon' and 'phone 
icon' as you have the text 'Email' and 'Phone' directly adjacent to them.
- XHTML link at the bottom not too descriptive. Maybe 'Valid XHTML' or 
even better 'Validate XHTML'.
- Same for 'more...'
- Confused as to why the 'It's more of the same' link goes to your folio.
- An unorder list for the bottom contact info might be clearer.
- Might want to add a 'title=home' to your logo link as a link to 
'm.ot.s. logo' isn't too accurate.

You also might want to quote the international ver of your mob number 
+61 423 ... (you never know!)

Seems to serve its purpose well. Nice work!
-- tim lucas
http://www.toolmantim.com
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



RE: [WSG] critque

2004-06-19 Thread Ryan Smith


Thanks. You'll hopefully see a lot of those alterations soon. 


e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w: www.moreofthesame.com
p: 0423 058 273


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tim Lucas
Sent: Saturday, 19 June 2004 4:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] critque

Ryan Smith spoke the following wise words on 19/06/2004 3:58 PM EST:
 Another newbie here. I've just sent my site live and wanted some 
 constructive feedback from both designers and developers. The xhtml 
 validates  I'm working on getting it 'strict'. Although there are a 
 couple of usability issues (like the skip to content misses the folio 
 links) overall I'm happy with it.

Good to see another designer embracing web standards =)

Clean and minimal markup and using JS to insert the decorative graphics.

You've let a bgcolor sneak on all the pages though ;)

To guarantee no UAs get confused with the inline javascript you could 
make it less intrusive by using script src.. in the header, attach a 
function (which inserts the image using the DOM) to the body's onload
event.

CSS wise you could probably move the CSS hacks into their own CSS 
file(s). You also might find it more manageable to split up normal.css 
into different stylesheets for each section then using @import.

Any reason you're using both @import *and* link?

Few things I noticed using lynx:
- There's no need for the img descriptions for 'email icon' and 'phone 
icon' as you have the text 'Email' and 'Phone' directly adjacent to
them.
- XHTML link at the bottom not too descriptive. Maybe 'Valid XHTML' or 
even better 'Validate XHTML'.
- Same for 'more...'
- Confused as to why the 'It's more of the same' link goes to your
folio.
- An unorder list for the bottom contact info might be clearer.
- Might want to add a 'title=home' to your logo link as a link to 
'm.ot.s. logo' isn't too accurate.

You also might want to quote the international ver of your mob number 
+61 423 ... (you never know!)

Seems to serve its purpose well. Nice work!

-- tim lucas

http://www.toolmantim.com

*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 

*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



RE: [WSG] critque

2004-06-19 Thread Alan Harrison
Hi Ryan,

Don't know if you've noticed it or not, but on the
http://www.moreofthesame.com/notes/notes.htm page, your link
http://http://www.freetranslation.com is broken !


-Alan.

*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
*