Re: HTML reached "end of life"?? (Was: Re: [WSG] Sorry Link)
Sorry, I'll have to make mention of that point next time I reference it. -- Peter Mount Web Development for Business Mobile: 0411 276602 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.petermount.com On 25/11/2008, at 12:26 PM, rch lib wrote: Don't believe everything you read on the Internet! ... Things change ... yes, well, I do realise that. The point is, that a newbie was directed to this resource, and it's clearly outdated (and it made me do a double-take when I read it). I didn't want her to go there, read that, and go "what the ". So I was just making sure it was noted. lib. At 06:07 PM 24/11/2008 -0500, you wrote: On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 5:28 PM, rch lib <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I took a look at that Drew Mclellan article. He says: "Step 3: Future-proof your site with XHTML HTML has reached the end of its life and is no longer being developed as a mark-up language. Its replacement is Extensible HTML (XHTML)—an implementation of XML that works in all browsers, old and new. Even though XHTML is strict XML, its tags and attributes are so similar to HTML that old browsers do not spot the difference. Using XML is advantageous because it's a modern, future-proof standard." Is that correct?? Don't believe everything you read on the Internet! -- -- Christian Montoya christianmontoya.net *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
Re: HTML reached "end of life"?? (Was: Re: [WSG] Sorry Link)
Sorry, I'll have to take note of that point if I reference that article again. -- Peter Mount Web Development for Business Mobile: 0411 276602 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.petermount.com On 25/11/2008, at 12:26 PM, rch lib wrote: Don't believe everything you read on the Internet! ... Things change ... yes, well, I do realise that. The point is, that a newbie was directed to this resource, and it's clearly outdated (and it made me do a double-take when I read it). I didn't want her to go there, read that, and go "what the ". So I was just making sure it was noted. lib. At 06:07 PM 24/11/2008 -0500, you wrote: On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 5:28 PM, rch lib <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I took a look at that Drew Mclellan article. He says: "Step 3: Future-proof your site with XHTML HTML has reached the end of its life and is no longer being developed as a mark-up language. Its replacement is Extensible HTML (XHTML)—an implementation of XML that works in all browsers, old and new. Even though XHTML is strict XML, its tags and attributes are so similar to HTML that old browsers do not spot the difference. Using XML is advantageous because it's a modern, future-proof standard." Is that correct?? Don't believe everything you read on the Internet! -- -- Christian Montoya christianmontoya.net *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
Re: HTML reached "end of life"?? (Was: Re: [WSG] Sorry Link)
>Don't believe everything you read on the Internet! ... >Things change ... yes, well, I do realise that. The point is, that a newbie was directed to this resource, and it's clearly outdated (and it made me do a double-take when I read it). I didn't want her to go there, read that, and go "what the ". So I was just making sure it was noted. lib. At 06:07 PM 24/11/2008 -0500, you wrote: >On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 5:28 PM, rch lib <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I took a look at that Drew Mclellan article. He says: >> >> "Step 3: Future-proof your site with XHTML >> HTML has reached the end of its life and is no longer being developed as a >> mark-up language. Its replacement is Extensible HTML (XHTML)an >> implementation of XML that works in all browsers, old and new. Even though >> XHTML is strict XML, its tags and attributes are so similar to HTML that >> old browsers do not spot the difference. Using XML is advantageous because >> it's a modern, future-proof standard." >> >> Is that correct?? > >Don't believe everything you read on the Internet! > >-- >-- >Christian Montoya >christianmontoya.net > > >*** >List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm >Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm >Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >*** > > *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
Re: HTML reached "end of life"?? (Was: Re: [WSG] Sorry Link)
Quite sure this was written when xhtml seemed to be the only way forward as xhtml 2 was the only thing being developed. Things change. fry Christian Montoya wrote: On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 5:28 PM, rch lib <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I took a look at that Drew Mclellan article. He says: "Step 3: Future-proof your site with XHTML HTML has reached the end of its life and is no longer being developed as a mark-up language. Its replacement is Extensible HTML (XHTML)—an implementation of XML that works in all browsers, old and new. Even though XHTML is strict XML, its tags and attributes are so similar to HTML that old browsers do not spot the difference. Using XML is advantageous because it's a modern, future-proof standard." Is that correct?? Don't believe everything you read on the Internet! *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
Re: HTML reached "end of life"?? (Was: Re: [WSG] Sorry Link)
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 5:28 PM, rch lib <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I took a look at that Drew Mclellan article. He says: > > "Step 3: Future-proof your site with XHTML > HTML has reached the end of its life and is no longer being developed as a > mark-up language. Its replacement is Extensible HTML (XHTML)—an > implementation of XML that works in all browsers, old and new. Even though > XHTML is strict XML, its tags and attributes are so similar to HTML that > old browsers do not spot the difference. Using XML is advantageous because > it's a modern, future-proof standard." > > Is that correct?? Don't believe everything you read on the Internet! -- -- Christian Montoya christianmontoya.net *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
Re: HTML reached "end of life"?? (Was: Re: [WSG] Sorry Link)
That is most definitely incorrect. HTML5 is in development as we speak. HTML is far from the end of it's life. rch lib wrote: Hi, I took a look at that Drew Mclellan article. He says: "Step 3: Future-proof your site with XHTML HTML has reached the end of its life and is no longer being developed as a mark-up language. Its replacement is Extensible HTML (XHTML)—an implementation of XML that works in all browsers, old and new. Even though XHTML is strict XML, its tags and attributes are so similar to HTML that old browsers do not spot the difference. Using XML is advantageous because it's a modern, future-proof standard." Is that correct?? Disappointingly (and astonishingly) there is no date on the article, so perhaps it's just outdated, but isn't the existance of HTML5 evidence that HTML has in fact not reached end of life? Just a bit concerned that a newcomer might see that and be mislead. Or do I have it wrong? lib. At 10:14 PM 24/11/2008 +1100, you wrote: Hi You might want to look at this tutorial by Drew Mclellan at: http://www.adobe.com/devnet/dreamweaver/extreme/five_steps.html You don't need DreamWeaver to do it. -- Peter Mount Web Development for Business Mobile: 0411 276602 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.petermount.com On 24/11/2008, at 10:00 PM, kate wrote: http://www.jungaling.com/katalinadesigns/index.html Thanks, sorry I forgot the link in my earlier mail. Kate *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** -- Christian Snodgrass CEO - Azure Ronin http://www.arwebdesign.net http://www.htmlblox.com Phone: 859.816.7955 *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
HTML reached "end of life"?? (Was: Re: [WSG] Sorry Link)
Hi, I took a look at that Drew Mclellan article. He says: "Step 3: Future-proof your site with XHTML HTML has reached the end of its life and is no longer being developed as a mark-up language. Its replacement is Extensible HTML (XHTML)an implementation of XML that works in all browsers, old and new. Even though XHTML is strict XML, its tags and attributes are so similar to HTML that old browsers do not spot the difference. Using XML is advantageous because it's a modern, future-proof standard." Is that correct?? Disappointingly (and astonishingly) there is no date on the article, so perhaps it's just outdated, but isn't the existance of HTML5 evidence that HTML has in fact not reached end of life? Just a bit concerned that a newcomer might see that and be mislead. Or do I have it wrong? lib. At 10:14 PM 24/11/2008 +1100, you wrote: >Hi > >You might want to look at this tutorial by Drew Mclellan at: > >http://www.adobe.com/devnet/dreamweaver/extreme/five_steps.html > >You don't need DreamWeaver to do it. > >-- >Peter Mount >Web Development for Business >Mobile: 0411 276602 >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >http://www.petermount.com > >On 24/11/2008, at 10:00 PM, kate wrote: > >> http://www.jungaling.com/katalinadesigns/index.html >> >> Thanks, sorry I forgot the link in my earlier mail. >> Kate >> >> >> *** >> List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm >> Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm >> Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> *** >> > > > >*** >List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm >Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm >Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >*** > > *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***