Re: [WSG] Article: Vocalize Firefox (text-to-speech extensions for Firefox)

2007-12-06 Thread Steven Faulkner
To get an idea of how screen readers vocalise content (it also many
other features) I would recommend trying adesigner
(http://www.alphaworks.ibm.com/tech/adesigner)

On 06/12/2007, Jixor - Stephen I [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 That said how would it compare for a developer that is making an effort
 to correctly mark up their html just to get an impression of how it
 would work for a screen reader user?

 Steve Green wrote:
  A year ago I started to evaluate FireVox 2.6 and had a dialog with Charles
  Chen, its creator. At that time there is no way I would describe it as
  full-fledged screen reader as it had many shortcomings. I got the
  impression it was really just a hobby project, and Charles said he had
  pretty much abandoned it in order to work on more interesting stuff. I see
  it is now up to version 3.4 so it will be interesting to see how it has
  progressed.
 
  It was certainly usable, but it bears no comparison with a professional
  screen reader like JAWS, which is a far superior product. OK, it should be
  for $1500 but people should not think that they're getting a $1500 product
  for free when they install FireVox. It's more akin to products in the $200
  price bracket.
 
  One example of the difference is in forms where label elements have not
  been used, and let's face it, that's 99% of all forms. JAWS applies
  heuristics to identify the text that is most likely to be the label, and
  associates it with the form control as if a label element had been used. 9
  times out of 10 it gets it right. FireVox does not do this.
 
  Steve
 
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
  Behalf Of Nick Lo
  Sent: 05 December 2007 04:25
  To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
  Subject: [WSG] Article: Vocalize Firefox (text-to-speech extensions for
  Firefox)
 
  I'm wondering if anyone has tried/tested the following potentially useful
  extensions and if so what their opinion was/is:
 
  Two recently released text-to-speech extensions can transform Firefox into
  a talking Web browser suitable for users with visual impairments -- and
  anyone else who can use a speech interface to the Web. Fire Vox is designed
  to be a full-fledged screen reader in a browser, usable for daily browsing
  even for unsighted users. CLiCk, Speak provides point-and-click screen
  reading, which can be helpful for partially-sighted users or sighted users
  who have written language difficulties (such as dyslexia).
 
  http://www.linux.com/feature/122197
 
  Nick
 
 
  ***
  List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
  Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
  Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  ***
 
 
 
  ***
  List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
  Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
  Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  ***
 
 
 
 
  ***
  List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
  Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
  Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  ***
 
 
 



 ***
 List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
 Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ***




-- 
with regards

Steve Faulkner
Technical Director - TPG Europe
Director - Web Accessibility Tools Consortium

www.paciellogroup.com | www.wat-c.org
Web Accessibility Toolbar -
http://www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] Article: Vocalize Firefox (text-to-speech extensions for Firefox)

2007-12-05 Thread Steven Faulkner

Firevox also implemts much of WAI-ARIA, so it is useful for testing
and demos of ARIA functionality.



On 05/12/2007, Steve Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 A year ago I started to evaluate FireVox 2.6 and had a dialog with Charles
 Chen, its creator. At that time there is no way I would describe it as
 full-fledged screen reader as it had many shortcomings. I got the
 impression it was really just a hobby project, and Charles said he had
 pretty much abandoned it in order to work on more interesting stuff. I see
 it is now up to version 3.4 so it will be interesting to see how it has
 progressed.

 It was certainly usable, but it bears no comparison with a professional
 screen reader like JAWS, which is a far superior product. OK, it should be
 for $1500 but people should not think that they're getting a $1500 product
 for free when they install FireVox. It's more akin to products in the $200
 price bracket.

 One example of the difference is in forms where label elements have not
 been used, and let's face it, that's 99% of all forms. JAWS applies
 heuristics to identify the text that is most likely to be the label, and
 associates it with the form control as if a label element had been used. 9
 times out of 10 it gets it right. FireVox does not do this.

 Steve



 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of Nick Lo
 Sent: 05 December 2007 04:25
 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
 Subject: [WSG] Article: Vocalize Firefox (text-to-speech extensions for
 Firefox)

 I'm wondering if anyone has tried/tested the following potentially useful
 extensions and if so what their opinion was/is:

 Two recently released text-to-speech extensions can transform Firefox into
 a talking Web browser suitable for users with visual impairments -- and
 anyone else who can use a speech interface to the Web. Fire Vox is designed
 to be a full-fledged screen reader in a browser, usable for daily browsing
 even for unsighted users. CLiCk, Speak provides point-and-click screen
 reading, which can be helpful for partially-sighted users or sighted users
 who have written language difficulties (such as dyslexia).

 http://www.linux.com/feature/122197

 Nick


 ***
 List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
 Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ***



 ***
 List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
 Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ***




 ***
 List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
 Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ***




-- 
with regards

Steve Faulkner
Technical Director - TPG Europe
Director - Web Accessibility Tools Consortium

www.paciellogroup.com | www.wat-c.org
Web Accessibility Toolbar -
http://www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] Article: Vocalize Firefox (text-to-speech extensions for Firefox)

2007-12-05 Thread Steven Faulkner
Firevox also implemts much of WAI-ARIA, so it is useful for testing
and demos of ARIA functionality.



On 05/12/2007, Steve Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 A year ago I started to evaluate FireVox 2.6 and had a dialog with Charles
 Chen, its creator. At that time there is no way I would describe it as
 full-fledged screen reader as it had many shortcomings. I got the
 impression it was really just a hobby project, and Charles said he had
 pretty much abandoned it in order to work on more interesting stuff. I see
 it is now up to version 3.4 so it will be interesting to see how it has
 progressed.

 It was certainly usable, but it bears no comparison with a professional
 screen reader like JAWS, which is a far superior product. OK, it should be
 for $1500 but people should not think that they're getting a $1500 product
 for free when they install FireVox. It's more akin to products in the $200
 price bracket.

 One example of the difference is in forms where label elements have not
 been used, and let's face it, that's 99% of all forms. JAWS applies
 heuristics to identify the text that is most likely to be the label, and
 associates it with the form control as if a label element had been used. 9
 times out of 10 it gets it right. FireVox does not do this.

 Steve



 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of Nick Lo
 Sent: 05 December 2007 04:25
 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
 Subject: [WSG] Article: Vocalize Firefox (text-to-speech extensions for
 Firefox)

 I'm wondering if anyone has tried/tested the following potentially useful
 extensions and if so what their opinion was/is:

 Two recently released text-to-speech extensions can transform Firefox into
 a talking Web browser suitable for users with visual impairments -- and
 anyone else who can use a speech interface to the Web. Fire Vox is designed
 to be a full-fledged screen reader in a browser, usable for daily browsing
 even for unsighted users. CLiCk, Speak provides point-and-click screen
 reading, which can be helpful for partially-sighted users or sighted users
 who have written language difficulties (such as dyslexia).

 http://www.linux.com/feature/122197

 Nick


 ***
 List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
 Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ***



 ***
 List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
 Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ***




 ***
 List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
 Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ***




-- 
with regards

Steve Faulkner
Technical Director - TPG Europe
Director - Web Accessibility Tools Consortium

www.paciellogroup.com | www.wat-c.org
Web Accessibility Toolbar -
http://www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



RE: [WSG] Article: Vocalize Firefox (text-to-speech extensions for Firefox)

2007-12-05 Thread Steve Green

A year ago I started to evaluate FireVox 2.6 and had a dialog with Charles
Chen, its creator. At that time there is no way I would describe it as
full-fledged screen reader as it had many shortcomings. I got the
impression it was really just a hobby project, and Charles said he had
pretty much abandoned it in order to work on more interesting stuff. I see
it is now up to version 3.4 so it will be interesting to see how it has
progressed.

It was certainly usable, but it bears no comparison with a professional
screen reader like JAWS, which is a far superior product. OK, it should be
for $1500 but people should not think that they're getting a $1500 product
for free when they install FireVox. It's more akin to products in the $200
price bracket.

One example of the difference is in forms where label elements have not
been used, and let's face it, that's 99% of all forms. JAWS applies
heuristics to identify the text that is most likely to be the label, and
associates it with the form control as if a label element had been used. 9
times out of 10 it gets it right. FireVox does not do this.

Steve

 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Nick Lo
Sent: 05 December 2007 04:25
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: [WSG] Article: Vocalize Firefox (text-to-speech extensions for
Firefox)

I'm wondering if anyone has tried/tested the following potentially useful
extensions and if so what their opinion was/is:

Two recently released text-to-speech extensions can transform Firefox into
a talking Web browser suitable for users with visual impairments -- and
anyone else who can use a speech interface to the Web. Fire Vox is designed
to be a full-fledged screen reader in a browser, usable for daily browsing
even for unsighted users. CLiCk, Speak provides point-and-click screen
reading, which can be helpful for partially-sighted users or sighted users
who have written language difficulties (such as dyslexia).

http://www.linux.com/feature/122197

Nick


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



RE: [WSG] Article: Vocalize Firefox (text-to-speech extensions for Firefox)

2007-12-05 Thread Steve Green
A year ago I started to evaluate FireVox 2.6 and had a dialog with Charles
Chen, its creator. At that time there is no way I would describe it as
full-fledged screen reader as it had many shortcomings. I got the
impression it was really just a hobby project, and Charles said he had
pretty much abandoned it in order to work on more interesting stuff. I see
it is now up to version 3.4 so it will be interesting to see how it has
progressed.

It was certainly usable, but it bears no comparison with a professional
screen reader like JAWS, which is a far superior product. OK, it should be
for $1500 but people should not think that they're getting a $1500 product
for free when they install FireVox. It's more akin to products in the $200
price bracket.

One example of the difference is in forms where label elements have not
been used, and let's face it, that's 99% of all forms. JAWS applies
heuristics to identify the text that is most likely to be the label, and
associates it with the form control as if a label element had been used. 9
times out of 10 it gets it right. FireVox does not do this.

Steve

 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Nick Lo
Sent: 05 December 2007 04:25
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: [WSG] Article: Vocalize Firefox (text-to-speech extensions for
Firefox)

I'm wondering if anyone has tried/tested the following potentially useful
extensions and if so what their opinion was/is:

Two recently released text-to-speech extensions can transform Firefox into
a talking Web browser suitable for users with visual impairments -- and
anyone else who can use a speech interface to the Web. Fire Vox is designed
to be a full-fledged screen reader in a browser, usable for daily browsing
even for unsighted users. CLiCk, Speak provides point-and-click screen
reading, which can be helpful for partially-sighted users or sighted users
who have written language difficulties (such as dyslexia).

http://www.linux.com/feature/122197

Nick


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] Article: Vocalize Firefox (text-to-speech extensions for Firefox)

2007-12-05 Thread Christian Snodgrass


I haven't tried them before but they sound very interesting. I'll have 
to give them a look.


Nick Lo wrote:
I'm wondering if anyone has tried/tested the following potentially 
useful extensions and if so what their opinion was/is:


Two recently released text-to-speech extensions can transform Firefox 
into a talking Web browser suitable for users with visual impairments 
-- and anyone else who can use a speech interface to the Web. Fire Vox 
is designed to be a full-fledged screen reader in a browser, usable 
for daily browsing even for unsighted users. CLiCk, Speak provides 
point-and-click screen reading, which can be helpful for 
partially-sighted users or sighted users who have written language 
difficulties (such as dyslexia).


http://www.linux.com/feature/122197

Nick


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***





--

Christian Snodgrass
Azure Ronin Web Design
http://www.arwebdesign.net/ http://www.arwebdesign.net
Phone: 859.816.7955



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] Article: Vocalize Firefox (text-to-speech extensions for Firefox)

2007-12-04 Thread Christian Snodgrass
I haven't tried them before but they sound very interesting. I'll have 
to give them a look.


Nick Lo wrote:
I'm wondering if anyone has tried/tested the following potentially 
useful extensions and if so what their opinion was/is:


Two recently released text-to-speech extensions can transform Firefox 
into a talking Web browser suitable for users with visual impairments 
-- and anyone else who can use a speech interface to the Web. Fire Vox 
is designed to be a full-fledged screen reader in a browser, usable 
for daily browsing even for unsighted users. CLiCk, Speak provides 
point-and-click screen reading, which can be helpful for 
partially-sighted users or sighted users who have written language 
difficulties (such as dyslexia).


http://www.linux.com/feature/122197

Nick


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***





--

Christian Snodgrass
Azure Ronin Web Design
http://www.arwebdesign.net/ http://www.arwebdesign.net
Phone: 859.816.7955



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***