RE: [WSG] list heading - best practice?

2012-03-07 Thread Steve Green
Where do I start? There is nothing right about it. Definition lists are 
primarily intended for specifying the relationship between a term and its 
definition. However, the list items following a heading do not define it. 
Definition lists can also be used for other purposes such as marking up dialog, 
but none of those purposes apply in this case.

An   heading is all that is required, as others have previously said.

Steve

-Original Message-
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On 
Behalf Of coder
Sent: 07 March 2012 12:42
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] list heading - best practice?

Come on Steve, tell us why not then?

Bob

- Original Message - 
From: "Steve Green" 
To: 
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2012 12:31 PM
Subject: RE: [WSG] list heading - best practice?


-Original Message-
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On 
Behalf Of Oliver Boermans
Sent: 07 March 2012 11:20
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] list heading - best practice?

On 6 March 2012 09:20, Dan Freeman  wrote:
> How about in HTML5?
>
> 
> Some Title
> 
> Item 1
> Item 2
> Item 3
> 
> 
>
> OR:
>
> 
> Some Title
> 
> Item 1
> Item 2
> Item 3
> 
> 

How do people feel about a definition list instead for this?


Some title
Item 1
Item 2
Item 3


Ollie
--

Nooo!!!


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***



Re: [WSG] list heading - best practice?

2012-03-07 Thread coder

Come on Steve, tell us why not then?

Bob

- Original Message - 
From: "Steve Green" 

To: 
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2012 12:31 PM
Subject: RE: [WSG] list heading - best practice?


-Original Message-
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On 
Behalf Of Oliver Boermans

Sent: 07 March 2012 11:20
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] list heading - best practice?

On 6 March 2012 09:20, Dan Freeman  wrote:

How about in HTML5?


Some Title

Item 1
Item 2
Item 3



OR:


Some Title

Item 1
Item 2
Item 3




How do people feel about a definition list instead for this?


Some title
Item 1
Item 2
Item 3


Ollie
--

Nooo!!!


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***



RE: [WSG] list heading - best practice?

2012-03-07 Thread Steve Green
-Original Message-
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On 
Behalf Of Oliver Boermans
Sent: 07 March 2012 11:20
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] list heading - best practice?

On 6 March 2012 09:20, Dan Freeman  wrote:
> How about in HTML5?
>
> 
>     Some Title
>     
>     Item 1
>     Item 2
>     Item 3
>     
> 
>
> OR:
>
> 
>     Some Title
>     
>     Item 1
>     Item 2
>     Item 3
>     
> 

How do people feel about a definition list instead for this?


Some title
Item 1
Item 2
Item 3


Ollie
--

Nooo!!!


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***



Re: [WSG] list heading - best practice?

2012-03-07 Thread Oliver Boermans
On 6 March 2012 09:20, Dan Freeman  wrote:
> How about in HTML5?
>
> 
>     Some Title
>     
>     Item 1
>     Item 2
>     Item 3
>     
> 
>
> OR:
>
> 
>     Some Title
>     
>     Item 1
>     Item 2
>     Item 3
>     
> 

How do people feel about a definition list instead for this?


Some title
Item 1
Item 2
Item 3


Ollie
--
@ollicle

***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***

RE: [WSG] list heading - best practice?

2012-03-05 Thread Dan Freeman
How about in HTML5?

 



Some Title



Item 1

Item 2

Item 3





 

OR:

 



Some Title



Item 1

Item 2

Item 3





 

-Dan

 

From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On
Behalf Of Mathew Robertson
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2012 5:22 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] list heading - best practice?

 

For this example:

 

some title



  blah

  boo



 

... any ARIA attributes are completely not required...   tag, by
definition, already titles the following content, simply by being in the
same proximity, aka  preceding some other content.

 

The primary purpose of "labelled-by" appears to be to semantically link an
given element to another; since proximity already gives you that
behaviour, this use-case for this attribute would be when proximity isn't
available, for example, say when something within a footer which
references content from within the body.

 

Aside... I never understood why "labelled-by" came into existence... there
is already an attribute "for" which has essentially the same semantics...
just promote "for" to be a global attribute.  Thoughts?

 

Mathew Robertson

 

On 5 March 2012 20:51, Steve Faulkner  wrote:

Hi, agree with Russ here, 

for example does


change the semantics? I think not, use of aria-labelledby is another way
of doing the same thing.

note in practice for the majority case neither is announced by user agents
such as assitive technology at the moment.
Also if it was then you would get a situation where if the user was
reading through the content they would hear the heading announced then
here the same text announced when they encountered the list straight
after.

regards
stevef

 

On 4 March 2012 21:46, Russ Weakley  wrote:

> The list title
> 
> ...
> 
> That way the semantic connection between the list and the heading is
kept which I think is the purpose of what you're wanting, yes?
> Cheers,
> S
>

I hate to nit-pick, but I'd argue that the aria-labelledby does not really
change the semantics of an element. The "semantics" of an element is about
defining the element's "core meaning". The core meaning of an  is that
it is a level 1 heading.

In the case above, the labelledby attribute "exposes" the content inside
the heading (via the accessibility API) and associating this content with
the unordered list.

So, these elements will now have additional meaning for Assistive Devices
that support ARIA. However, the attribute does not change the "core
meaning" of either of the elements.

Does this make sense?
Russ




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***





-- 
with regards

Steve Faulkner
Technical Director - TPG

www.paciellogroup.com | www.HTML5accessibility.com |
www.twitter.com/stevefaulkner
HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives -
dev.w3.org/html5/alt-techniques/
Web Accessibility Toolbar -
www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html
<http://www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html> 




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
*** 

 


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
*** 


LEXI-COMP CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
The information in this electronic mail is intended for the named 
recipients only.  Any use of this information by anyone other than 
the intended receiver is prohibited.  If the reader of this message is
not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any 
dissemination, distribution, copying, or other use of this message 
or its attachments is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this 
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying 
to this electronic e-mail or by calling 330-650-6506.  Please delete 
it from your computer.  Thank you.


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***

Re: [WSG] list heading - best practice?

2012-03-05 Thread Mathew Robertson
For this example:

some title

  blah
  boo


... any ARIA attributes are completely not required...   tag, by
definition, already titles the following content, simply by being in the
same proximity, aka  preceding some other content.

The primary purpose of "labelled-by" appears to be to semantically link an
given element to another; since proximity already gives you that behaviour,
this use-case for this attribute would be when proximity isn't available,
for example, say when something within a footer which references content
from within the body.

Aside... I never understood why "labelled-by" came into existence... there
is already an attribute "for" which has essentially the same semantics...
just promote "for" to be a global attribute.  Thoughts?

Mathew Robertson

On 5 March 2012 20:51, Steve Faulkner  wrote:

> Hi, agree with Russ here,
>
> for example does
> 
>
> change the semantics? I think not, use of aria-labelledby is another way
> of doing the same thing.
>
> note in practice for the majority case neither is announced by user agents
> such as assitive technology at the moment.
> Also if it was then you would get a situation where if the user was
> reading through the content they would hear the heading announced then here
> the same text announced when they encountered the list straight after.
>
> regards
> stevef
>
>
> On 4 March 2012 21:46, Russ Weakley  wrote:
>
>> > The list title
>> > 
>> > ...
>> > 
>> > That way the semantic connection between the list and the heading is
>> kept which I think is the purpose of what you're wanting, yes?
>> > Cheers,
>> > S
>> >
>>
>> I hate to nit-pick, but I'd argue that the aria-labelledby does not
>> really change the semantics of an element. The "semantics" of an element is
>> about defining the element's "core meaning". The core meaning of an  is
>> that it is a level 1 heading.
>>
>> In the case above, the labelledby attribute "exposes" the content inside
>> the heading (via the accessibility API) and associating this content with
>> the unordered list.
>>
>> So, these elements will now have additional meaning for Assistive Devices
>> that support ARIA. However, the attribute does not change the "core
>> meaning" of either of the elements.
>>
>> Does this make sense?
>> Russ
>>
>>
>>
>> ***
>> List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
>> Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
>> Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
>> ***
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> with regards
>
> Steve Faulkner
> Technical Director - TPG
>
> www.paciellogroup.com | www.HTML5accessibility.com |
> www.twitter.com/stevefaulkner
> HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives -
> dev.w3.org/html5/alt-techniques/
> Web Accessibility Toolbar - www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html
>
>
>
> ***
> List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
> Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
> ***
>


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***

Re: [WSG] list heading - best practice?

2012-03-05 Thread Steve Faulkner
hi again,

maybe i missed something but whats the issue with using heading in a list?

regards
stevef

On 5 March 2012 01:51, Steve Faulkner  wrote:

> Hi, agree with Russ here,
>
> for example does
> 
>
> change the semantics? I think not, use of aria-labelledby is another way
> of doing the same thing.
>
> note in practice for the majority case neither is announced by user agents
> such as assitive technology at the moment.
> Also if it was then you would get a situation where if the user was
> reading through the content they would hear the heading announced then here
> the same text announced when they encountered the list straight after.
>
> regards
> stevef
>
> On 4 March 2012 21:46, Russ Weakley  wrote:
>
>> > The list title
>> > 
>> > ...
>> > 
>> > That way the semantic connection between the list and the heading is
>> kept which I think is the purpose of what you're wanting, yes?
>> > Cheers,
>> > S
>> >
>>
>> I hate to nit-pick, but I'd argue that the aria-labelledby does not
>> really change the semantics of an element. The "semantics" of an element is
>> about defining the element's "core meaning". The core meaning of an  is
>> that it is a level 1 heading.
>>
>> In the case above, the labelledby attribute "exposes" the content inside
>> the heading (via the accessibility API) and associating this content with
>> the unordered list.
>>
>> So, these elements will now have additional meaning for Assistive Devices
>> that support ARIA. However, the attribute does not change the "core
>> meaning" of either of the elements.
>>
>> Does this make sense?
>> Russ
>>
>>
>>
>> ***
>> List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
>> Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
>> Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
>> ***
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> with regards
>
> Steve Faulkner
> Technical Director - TPG
>
> www.paciellogroup.com | www.HTML5accessibility.com |
> www.twitter.com/stevefaulkner
> HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives -
> dev.w3.org/html5/alt-techniques/
> Web Accessibility Toolbar - www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html
>
>
>
> ***
> List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
> Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
> ***
>



-- 
with regards

Steve Faulkner
Technical Director - TPG

www.paciellogroup.com | www.HTML5accessibility.com |
www.twitter.com/stevefaulkner
HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives -
dev.w3.org/html5/alt-techniques/
Web Accessibility Toolbar - www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***

Re: [WSG] list heading - best practice?

2012-03-05 Thread Steve Faulkner
Hi, agree with Russ here,

for example does


change the semantics? I think not, use of aria-labelledby is another way of
doing the same thing.

note in practice for the majority case neither is announced by user agents
such as assitive technology at the moment.
Also if it was then you would get a situation where if the user was reading
through the content they would hear the heading announced then here the
same text announced when they encountered the list straight after.

regards
stevef

On 4 March 2012 21:46, Russ Weakley  wrote:

> > The list title
> > 
> > ...
> > 
> > That way the semantic connection between the list and the heading is
> kept which I think is the purpose of what you're wanting, yes?
> > Cheers,
> > S
> >
>
> I hate to nit-pick, but I'd argue that the aria-labelledby does not really
> change the semantics of an element. The "semantics" of an element is about
> defining the element's "core meaning". The core meaning of an  is that
> it is a level 1 heading.
>
> In the case above, the labelledby attribute "exposes" the content inside
> the heading (via the accessibility API) and associating this content with
> the unordered list.
>
> So, these elements will now have additional meaning for Assistive Devices
> that support ARIA. However, the attribute does not change the "core
> meaning" of either of the elements.
>
> Does this make sense?
> Russ
>
>
>
> ***
> List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
> Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
> ***
>
>


-- 
with regards

Steve Faulkner
Technical Director - TPG

www.paciellogroup.com | www.HTML5accessibility.com |
www.twitter.com/stevefaulkner
HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives -
dev.w3.org/html5/alt-techniques/
Web Accessibility Toolbar - www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***

RE: [WSG] list heading - best practice?

2012-03-04 Thread Sam Dwyer
I do get what you're saying but I think you're using a much too narrowly 
defined definition of semantics when you describe it as defining "core meaning".
This is going to just sound like so much bike shedding but semantics is more 
than just the core meaning and semantics also doesn't mean that an element's 
meaning is carved in immutable stone. Semantics is actually about deriving the 
intended meaning using the available rules of a given language. One to the sets 
of rules we have to clarify intended meaning of an HTML element is the WAI-ARIA 
specification. In the same way that Microdata may alter or refine the "core 
meaning" (or, initial meaning) so too can we use wai-aria to bring greater 
clarity to our intended usage for a given element. That it's implemented 
primarily by assistive technologies doesn't alter the fact that it's a clearly 
defined specification that does alter the semantic meaning of its element. 
In fact refining "core meaning" of different elements is exactly what wai-aria 
roles are designed to do. 

Using the standardised toolsets for the jobs they are designed to do is exactly 
the point of having these new toolsets in the first place. 

See also: Microdata.

Cheers,
S


-Original Message-
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On 
Behalf Of Russ Weakley
Sent: Monday, 5 March 2012 4:47 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] list heading - best practice?

> The list title 
> 
> ...
> 
> That way the semantic connection between the list and the heading is kept 
> which I think is the purpose of what you're wanting, yes?
> Cheers,
> S
> 

I hate to nit-pick, but I'd argue that the aria-labelledby does not really 
change the semantics of an element. The "semantics" of an element is about 
defining the element's "core meaning". The core meaning of an  is that it 
is a level 1 heading.

In the case above, the labelledby attribute "exposes" the content inside the 
heading (via the accessibility API) and associating this content with the 
unordered list. 

So, these elements will now have additional meaning for Assistive Devices that 
support ARIA. However, the attribute does not change the "core meaning" of 
either of the elements.

Does this make sense?
Russ



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***


 -

Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

The information contained in this email and any attachment is confidential and 
may contain legally privileged or copyright material.   It is intended only for 
the use of the addressee(s).  If you are not the intended recipient of this 
email, you are not permitted to disseminate, distribute or copy this email or 
any attachments.  If you have received this message in error, please notify the 
sender immediately and delete this email from your system.  The ABC does not 
represent or warrant that this transmission is secure or virus free. Before 
opening any attachment you should check for viruses. The ABC's liability is 
limited to resupplying any email and attachments.


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***



Re: [WSG] list heading - best practice?

2012-03-04 Thread Russ Weakley
> The list title 
> 
> ...
> 
> That way the semantic connection between the list and the heading is kept 
> which I think is the purpose of what you're wanting, yes?
> Cheers,
> S
> 

I hate to nit-pick, but I'd argue that the aria-labelledby does not really 
change the semantics of an element. The "semantics" of an element is about 
defining the element's "core meaning". The core meaning of an  is that it 
is a level 1 heading.

In the case above, the labelledby attribute "exposes" the content inside the 
heading (via the accessibility API) and associating this content with the 
unordered list. 

So, these elements will now have additional meaning for Assistive Devices that 
support ARIA. However, the attribute does not change the "core meaning" of 
either of the elements.

Does this make sense?
Russ



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***



RE: [WSG] list heading - best practice?

2012-03-04 Thread Sam Dwyer
Nesting h1 inside the ul like that is invalid markup so that's a problem..
Children of  have to be 
In relation to marking up a title for lists I would probably use the aria tag 
aria-labelledby
IE:
The list title 

...

That way the semantic connection between the list and the heading is kept which 
I think is the purpose of what you're wanting, yes?
Cheers,
S


-Original Message-
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On 
Behalf Of Simon Josephson
Sent: Monday, 5 March 2012 2:07 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] list heading - best practice?

Is there good reason NOT to use -

#UL H1

... so - 
...
...


rather than what I read here as 

..

.. 



Simon Josephson
si...@artatwork.com.au






On 05/03/2012, at 11:24 AM, Mathew Robertson wrote:

> Interesting... who said that H? has document scope only?
> 
> http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#the-h1-h2-h3-h4-h5-and-h6-elements
> 
> Show examples of multiple H1's...  H? is indeed suitable as a heading to a 
> list.
> 
> cheers,
> Mathew Robertson
> 
> 
> On 3 March 2012 04:38, Hanspeter Kadel  wrote:
> >  before the list.
> 
> thats the way i do it, but it doesn't feel right.
> 
> in most of my cases the  is more secondary content, like menus etc.
> 
> i want to keep  to  for structuring the main content.
> 
> 
> ***
> List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
> Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
> ***
> 
> 
> 
> ***
> List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
> Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
> ***



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***


 -

Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

The information contained in this email and any attachment is confidential and 
may contain legally privileged or copyright material.   It is intended only for 
the use of the addressee(s).  If you are not the intended recipient of this 
email, you are not permitted to disseminate, distribute or copy this email or 
any attachments.  If you have received this message in error, please notify the 
sender immediately and delete this email from your system.  The ABC does not 
represent or warrant that this transmission is secure or virus free. Before 
opening any attachment you should check for viruses. The ABC's liability is 
limited to resupplying any email and attachments.


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***



Re: [WSG] list heading – best practice?

2012-03-04 Thread Simon Josephson
Is there good reason NOT to use -

#UL H1

... so - 
...
...


rather than what I read here as 

..

.. 



Simon Josephson
si...@artatwork.com.au






On 05/03/2012, at 11:24 AM, Mathew Robertson wrote:

> Interesting... who said that H? has document scope only?
> 
> http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#the-h1-h2-h3-h4-h5-and-h6-elements
> 
> Show examples of multiple H1's...  H? is indeed suitable as a heading to a 
> list.
> 
> cheers,
> Mathew Robertson
> 
> 
> On 3 March 2012 04:38, Hanspeter Kadel  wrote:
> >  before the list.
> 
> thats the way i do it, but it doesn't feel right.
> 
> in most of my cases the  is more secondary content, like menus etc.
> 
> i want to keep  to  for structuring the main content.
> 
> 
> ***
> List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
> Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
> ***
> 
> 
> 
> ***
> List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
> Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
> ***



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***



Re: [WSG] list heading – best practice?

2012-03-04 Thread Mathew Robertson
Interesting... who said that H? has document scope only?

http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#the-h1-h2-h3-h4-h5-and-h6-elements

Show examples of multiple H1's...  H? is indeed suitable as a heading to a
list.

cheers,
Mathew Robertson


On 3 March 2012 04:38, Hanspeter Kadel  wrote:

> >  before the list.
>
> thats the way i do it, but it doesn't feel right.
>
> in most of my cases the  is more secondary content, like menus etc.
>
> i want to keep  to  for structuring the main content.
>
>
> ***
> List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
> Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
> ***
>
>


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***

Re: [WSG] list heading - best practice?

2012-03-04 Thread Joshua Street
I'd argue that headings after the content they 'head' fails the "how
it will appear without style sheets" test.

If styling's an issue, dig into your CSS selector toolbox for things
like adjacent selectors (depending on browser support requirements)
or, failing that, give it a 'listhead' class and style that directly –
boring, I know!

>From a purely pragmatic standpoint you could probably cheat and stick
the heading inside a ul/ol but expect issues in various IEs, where
even white space in lists can cause problems. Better off going the
adjacent selector route, methinks.

Josh Street
+61 (0) 425 808 469

On 05/03/2012, at 6:55, Elizabeth Spiegel  wrote:

> Lists are usually preceded by either a heading or a lead-in sentence.
>
> Characteristics of a well-formed list
> 
> List items have parallel forms.
> ...
> 
>
> Well-formed lists have:
> 
> parallel forms
> ...
> 
>
> Think about how the list will appear with style sheets off: if you make the
> title/heading the first item in the list, then you've turned what's
> semantically a list of n items into a list of n+1 items.
>
> It's semantically appropriate to mark up the heading with  even though
> it may mess with your structure in the sense of grading headings nicely (h1,
> h2 etc). Perhaps not so much of a problem if you place your menu after your
> content and use style sheets to place it.
>
> Regards,
>
> Elizabeth Spiegel
> Web editing
>
> 0409 986 158
> GPO Box 729, Hobart TAS 7001
> www.spiegelweb.com.au
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On
> Behalf Of Dan Freeman
> Sent: Saturday, 3 March 2012 6:12 AM
> To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
> Subject: RE: [WSG] list heading - best practice?
>
> I wouldn't recommend that.  It may look OK stylistically, but not
> semantically.  I believe H? before the list makes the most sense.
>
> - Dan Freeman
>
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On
> Behalf Of coder
> Sent: Friday, March 02, 2012 1:23 PM
> To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
> Subject: Re: [WSG] list heading - best practice?
>
>
>
>Quick links
>
>
>
>Noticeboard
>
>
>
>
>Sitemap
>
>
>
>
>Site policy
>
>        
>    
>
>Useful links
>
>
>??  Works for me!Bob- Original Message -
> From: "David Dorward" 
> To: 
> Sent: Friday, March 02, 2012 5:28 PM
> Subject: Re: [WSG] list heading - best practice?
>
>
>
> On 2 Mar 2012, at 17:07, Hanspeter Kadel wrote:
>
>> looks like back in 1984 people could use  for the job.
>
> No, they couldn't. It was proposed for HTML 3, but that spec was ditched in
> favour of documenting the then current state of the browser wars.
>
>> how to do it in 2012?
>
>
>  before the list.
>
> --
> David Dorward
> http://dorward.me.uk
>
>
>
> ***
> List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
> Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
> ***
>
>
>
>
> ***
> List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
> Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
> ***
>
>
> LEXI-COMP CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> The information in this electronic mail is intended for the named recipients
> only.  Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended
> receiver is prohibited.  If the reader of this message is not the intended
> recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution,
> copying, or other use of this message or its attachments is strictly
> prohibited.  If you have received this message in error, please notify the
> sender immediately by replying to this electronic e-mail or by calling
> 330-650-6506.  Please delete it from your computer.  Thank you.
>
>
&g

RE: [WSG] list heading - best practice?

2012-03-04 Thread Elizabeth Spiegel
Lists are usually preceded by either a heading or a lead-in sentence.

Characteristics of a well-formed list

List items have parallel forms.
...


Well-formed lists have:

parallel forms
...


Think about how the list will appear with style sheets off: if you make the
title/heading the first item in the list, then you've turned what's
semantically a list of n items into a list of n+1 items. 

It's semantically appropriate to mark up the heading with  even though
it may mess with your structure in the sense of grading headings nicely (h1,
h2 etc). Perhaps not so much of a problem if you place your menu after your
content and use style sheets to place it.

Regards,

Elizabeth Spiegel
Web editing

0409 986 158
GPO Box 729, Hobart TAS 7001
www.spiegelweb.com.au

 

-Original Message-
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On
Behalf Of Dan Freeman
Sent: Saturday, 3 March 2012 6:12 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE: [WSG] list heading - best practice?

I wouldn't recommend that.  It may look OK stylistically, but not
semantically.  I believe H? before the list makes the most sense.

- Dan Freeman


-Original Message-
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On
Behalf Of coder
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2012 1:23 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] list heading - best practice?



Quick links



Noticeboard




Sitemap




Site policy




Useful links


??  Works for me!Bob- Original Message -
From: "David Dorward" 
To: 
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2012 5:28 PM
Subject: Re: [WSG] list heading - best practice?



On 2 Mar 2012, at 17:07, Hanspeter Kadel wrote:

> looks like back in 1984 people could use  for the job.

No, they couldn't. It was proposed for HTML 3, but that spec was ditched in
favour of documenting the then current state of the browser wars.

> how to do it in 2012?


 before the list.

--
David Dorward
http://dorward.me.uk



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***


LEXI-COMP CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
The information in this electronic mail is intended for the named recipients
only.  Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended
receiver is prohibited.  If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution,
copying, or other use of this message or its attachments is strictly
prohibited.  If you have received this message in error, please notify the
sender immediately by replying to this electronic e-mail or by calling
330-650-6506.  Please delete it from your computer.  Thank you.



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***



RE: [WSG] list heading - best practice?

2012-03-02 Thread Dan Freeman
I wouldn't recommend that.  It may look OK stylistically, but not
semantically.  I believe H? before the list makes the most sense.

- Dan Freeman


-Original Message-
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On
Behalf Of coder
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2012 1:23 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] list heading - best practice?



Quick links



Noticeboard




Sitemap




Site policy




Useful links


??  Works for me!Bob- Original Message -
From: "David Dorward" 
To: 
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2012 5:28 PM
Subject: Re: [WSG] list heading - best practice?



On 2 Mar 2012, at 17:07, Hanspeter Kadel wrote:

> looks like back in 1984 people could use  for the job.

No, they couldn't. It was proposed for HTML 3, but that spec was ditched
in
favour of documenting the then current state of the browser wars.

> how to do it in 2012?


 before the list.

--
David Dorward
http://dorward.me.uk



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***


LEXI-COMP CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
The information in this electronic mail is intended for the named 
recipients only.  Any use of this information by anyone other than 
the intended receiver is prohibited.  If the reader of this message is
not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any 
dissemination, distribution, copying, or other use of this message 
or its attachments is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this 
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying 
to this electronic e-mail or by calling 330-650-6506.  Please delete 
it from your computer.  Thank you.



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***



Re: [WSG] list heading - best practice?

2012-03-02 Thread coder

   
   
   Quick links
   
   
   
   Noticeboard
   
   
   
   

   Sitemap
   
   
   
   
   Site policy
   
   
   
   
   Useful links
   
   
   ??  Works for me!Bob- Original Message - 
From: "David Dorward" 

To: 
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2012 5:28 PM
Subject: Re: [WSG] list heading - best practice?



On 2 Mar 2012, at 17:07, Hanspeter Kadel wrote:


looks like back in 1984 people could use  for the job.


No, they couldn't. It was proposed for HTML 3, but that spec was ditched in 
favour of documenting the then current state of the browser wars.



how to do it in 2012?



 before the list.

--
David Dorward
http://dorward.me.uk



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***



Re: [WSG] list heading – best practice?

2012-03-02 Thread Hanspeter Kadel
>  before the list.

thats the way i do it, but it doesn't feel right. 

in most of my cases the  is more secondary content, like menus etc.

i want to keep  to  for structuring the main content.


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***



Re: [WSG] list heading – best practice?

2012-03-02 Thread David Dorward
 
On 2 Mar 2012, at 17:07, Hanspeter Kadel wrote:

> looks like back in 1984 people could use  for the job. 

No, they couldn't. It was proposed for HTML 3, but that spec was ditched in 
favour of documenting the then current state of the browser wars.

> how to do it in 2012?


 before the list.

-- 
David Dorward
http://dorward.me.uk



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***