Re: [WSG] Multiple Firefox on Mac

2008-07-24 Thread Tim Snadden

On 25/07/2008, at 2:33 AM, Paul Collins wrote:


Does anyone have a link to a decent reference on running Firefox 2  3
simultaneously on Mac? I can't seem to find a decent one out there.


Multifirefox works for me. 
http://www.dangerouslyawesome.com/category/multifirefox/

It allows you to choose a version of firefox as well as a profile so  
that you can keep them separate if you need different extensions or  
different versions of extensions.


Tim


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] free screen reader friendly web hosting

2009-06-17 Thread Tim Snadden


On 17/06/2009, at 11:46 PM, Ted Drake wrote:


Are you looking for a host which has a screen-reader friendly admin
interface?


He is. Marvin is blind.



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***



Re: [WSG] website fonts

2009-06-21 Thread Tim Snadden


On 22/06/2009, at 3:58 PM, Marvin Hunkin wrote:


hi.
just looked at my fonts.
need the following fonts:

arial, helvitica, sans-serif and verdana.
do not have these fonts for windows vista.
think that was the problem, why not saying the name.
can you help?


Hi Marvin - I'm going to assume that you are running Windows. If this  
is the case then it is *highly* unlikely that you don't have at least  
arial from that list. The other thing to bear in mind is that 'sans- 
serif' is not a font but is a style or family of fonts that share a  
particular look (they don't have 'serifs' which are little flicks at  
the end of letter forms).


I haven't seen your actual code but if your HTML is correctly pointing  
to a CSS file and your CSS is using a valid font declaration then it  
should work. If it doesn't then there may be something up with your  
operating system thinking that fonts are in a different place to where  
they really are or maybe something up with your Jaws setup.


When you specify fonts with CSS the usual pattern is to list your  
fonts in the order that you prefer. Each one is a fallback position if  
the prior one doesn't exist on the system. Normally the last one in  
the list is 'sans-serif' (or 'serif' etc.). This is essentially saying  
that if you don't have *any* of the listed fonts on the system then  
use whatever is the default 'sans-serif' font.


I hope that helps. Tim


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***



Re: [WSG] INTERNET EXPLORER FORMATTING PROBLEMS

2009-06-26 Thread Tim Snadden


On 27/06/2009, at 12:07 AM, Marvin Hunkin wrote:


HI.
CAN ANYONE HELP ME WITH THE MESSAGE I POSTED ABOUT MY FORMATTING  
PROBLEMS

WITH MY STYLE SHEET IN INTERNET EXPLORER 8.
CHEERS MARVIN.
PS: DO I ROLL BACK TO VERSION 7.


Hi Marvin - I noticed that you've taken to writing in all caps. On the  
web this is considered 'shouting'. You might want to hit the caps lock  
key.


It seems like are were insinuating that there may be a bug in various  
browsers because your stylesheet isn't showing up. That's a really  
improbably supposition. What you need to do is to create a completely  
basic test case. It seems as if you are having some problems with your  
directory structure so my advice would be to initially put a single  
html file and a single css file in the same directory. Reference the  
css from the html. In the HTML there should be just the basic  
structure you need to test your issue (tables?). And in your CSS file  
you may only need a basic font-family declaration on the body. I seem  
to remember that IE used to have problems with inheritance of font  
styles in tables so you may want to check by styling the td element  
with a font as well.


The other thing is to always remember to validate your code. Do you  
know how to do this? This will ensure that what you have written is  
correct and may help to pick up any little typos that may have crept in.


I'm afraid I don't know whether Internet Explorer 8 has any problems  
with Jaws. If I were you I would check with the Jaws people or on a  
Jaws forum.


Cheers, Tim


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***



Re: [WSG] Fieldset and Legend

2009-07-02 Thread Tim Snadden


On 3/07/2009, at 8:48 AM, CK wrote:


Hi,

After reading the specification, it appears that the elements  
fieldset and legend are used to denote groups of related form  
fields. However, I can across the following code
at surf the channel which appears to use it as a decorative element.  
Does the following usage, contradict the CSS specification?


fieldset and legend are form elements so yes, unless they are used to  
differentiate sections of a form they are being misused.



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***



Re: [WSG] position relative or margin?

2009-08-10 Thread Tim Snadden


On 10/08/2009, at 10:35 PM, Naveen Bhaskar wrote:


Hi,

Which is the right method to position a logo in the  header.

with

 position :relative;top:10px; left:10px;
or

margin:10px 0 0 10px;

pls rell me the pros and cons


With 'position: relative' the element takes up the space in the  
document where it originally would have been and is then shifted  
'relative' to that original position. Margins can be used to push an  
element around but the space it takes up in the document is where it  
is visually.


This is particularly noticeable with negative margins. If you set a  
negative top margin on an element then the element that follows it in  
the document will also move up the page and the gap between them will  
be the same as what it would have been originally. If you use relative  
positioning and set 'top' to a negative value there will be a bigger  
gap between the positioned element and the following element. This is  
because the following element will set its position in relation to  
where the positioned element would have been before positioning.


http://snadden.com/sandbox/relative.html

***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***