Re: [wsjt-devel] S+P operation
Joe -- > I think you'll get what you want (for contesting) if you check only > these (top to bottom) on the Settings -> Colors tab: > > X My Call in message > X New DXCC > X New Call on Band > Thanks, yes, that does it. > No guarantees that we are maintaining our sanity! Would you like to > volunteer to organize and operate such a system? :-) > Ah, probably not; too busy being retired :). Sourceforge has its native bug ticket system https://sourceforge.net/p/forge/documentation/Tickets/ and since you are already hosting the project there, that might be the easiest way to go. Personally I like Bugzilla https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bugzilla. Set it up on one of your Princeton machines; it's pretty lightweight https://www.bugzilla.org/. Or run it in Amazon's cloud https://aws.amazon.com/marketplace/pp/B007I8OOJ0. But anything will have startup costs and you might not find that worth it. 73, Paul K6PO ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
Re: [wsjt-devel] S+P operation
Hi Paul, On 5/2/2019 8:43 PM, Paul Kube K6PO wrote: The documentation http://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/k1jt/FT4_Protocol.pdf says, re S+P: "Here “best potential QSO partner” means “New Multiplier” (1st priority) or “New Call on Band” (2nd priority)." Now it seems to me that "New Call" implies "New Call on Band", and so should qualify as a potential QSO partner. However, in my setup, it does not. (That is, a new call on the band can trigger the S+P response; while entirely new call, i.e. new on all bands, doesn't.) I think you'll get what you want (for contesting) if you check only these (top to bottom) on the Settings -> Colors tab: X My Call in message X New DXCC X New Call on Band Probably the documentation could be made clearer. 73, Paul K6PO P.S. I'm posting this as a reply to George's note, since its topic fits his subject line. Just doing my part to try to keep comments here organized a bit. I do not know how the developers continue to maintain their sanity without a proper bug reporting and tracking system. No guarantees that we are maintaining our sanity! Would you like to volunteer to organize and operate such a system? :-) -- Joe, K1JT ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
Re: [wsjt-devel] S+P operation
The documentation http://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/k1jt/FT4_Protocol.pdf says, re S+P: "Here “best potential QSO partner” means “New Multiplier” (1st priority) or “New Call on Band” (2nd priority)." Now it seems to me that "New Call" implies "New Call on Band", and so should qualify as a potential QSO partner. However, in my setup, it does not. (That is, a new call on the band can trigger the S+P response; while entirely new call, i.e. new on all bands, doesn't.) 73, Paul K6PO P.S. I'm posting this as a reply to George's note, since its topic fits his subject line. Just doing my part to try to keep comments here organized a bit. I do not know how the developers continue to maintain their sanity without a proper bug reporting and tracking system. On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 7:45 AM WB5JJJ wrote: > Trying new features with FT4 and noticed that when S+P is active during > non-CQ (receive only) operation, it will pounce on stations using directed > calls such as CQ DX WB5JJJ EM35. In a contest situation, which FT4 is > designed for, this would be fine since there will not be any directed CQ's > typically. So, should this option not be shown on the main UI unless a > contest is selected since it can cause frustration to some operators that > don't want to be bothered by local stations pouncing on their directed CQ? > > Judging from some comments, it appears that FT4 may be the new norm for > those seeking their first WAS, DXCC and not just contests. > > WB5JJJ - George > ___ > wsjt-devel mailing list > wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel > ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
[wsjt-devel] S+P operation
Trying new features with FT4 and noticed that when S+P is active during non-CQ (receive only) operation, it will pounce on stations using directed calls such as CQ DX WB5JJJ EM35. In a contest situation, which FT4 is designed for, this would be fine since there will not be any directed CQ's typically. So, should this option not be shown on the main UI unless a contest is selected since it can cause frustration to some operators that don't want to be bothered by local stations pouncing on their directed CQ? Judging from some comments, it appears that FT4 may be the new norm for those seeking their first WAS, DXCC and not just contests. WB5JJJ - George ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
