Re: [x265] issue 139

2018-02-04 Thread Andrey Semashev

On 02/05/18 02:31, John Comeau wrote:

https://bitbucket.org/multicoreware/x265/issues/139 was solved over a
year ago by rmous...@us.ibm.com when he wrote
source/common/ppc/pixel_altivec.cpp.

the issue should be closed and the bounty awarded as appropriate.

I've done some testing to prove that the altivec code is indeed being
used by the binary when built on the PPC architecture, and produces an
hevc video that plays the same as one produced on an x86_64 system. I
can provide access to the PPC instance to anyone who wishes to verify
before closing the issue.

this is my 3rd attempt to send the email. since this mailman list
doesn't seem to have archives, I can't tell if it went out or not; but
I never got the email from the list, and I checked both that and the
option to get a confirmation, and neither arrived.


FWIW, I can see all three of your messages.
___
x265-devel mailing list
x265-devel@videolan.org
https://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/x265-devel


[x265] issue 139

2018-02-04 Thread John Comeau
https://bitbucket.org/multicoreware/x265/issues/139 was solved over a
year ago by rmous...@us.ibm.com when he wrote
source/common/ppc/pixel_altivec.cpp.

the issue should be closed and the bounty awarded as appropriate.

I've done some testing to prove that the altivec code is indeed being
used by the binary when built on the PPC architecture, and produces an
hevc video that plays the same as one produced on an x86_64 system. I
can provide access to the PPC instance to anyone who wishes to verify
before closing the issue.

this is my 3rd attempt to send the email. since this mailman list
doesn't seem to have archives, I can't tell if it went out or not; but
I never got the email from the list, and I checked both that and the
option to get a confirmation, and neither arrived.
-- 
John Comeau  http://jc.unternet.net/
"A place for everything, and everything
all over the place"
___
x265-devel mailing list
x265-devel@videolan.org
https://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/x265-devel


[x265] issue 139

2018-02-02 Thread John Comeau
https://bitbucket.org/multicoreware/x265/issues/139 was solved over a
year ago by rmous...@us.ibm.com when he wrote
source/common/ppc/pixel_altivec.cpp. the issue should be closed and
the bounty awarded as appropriate.

I've done some testing to prove that the altivec code is indeed being
used by the binary when built on the PPC architecture, and produces an
hevc video that plays the same as one produced on an x86_64 system. I
can provide access to the PPC instance to anyone who wishes to verify
before closing the issue.
-- 
John Comeau KE5TFZ j...@unternet.net http://jc.unternet.net/
"A place for everything, and everything all over the place"
___
x265-devel mailing list
x265-devel@videolan.org
https://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/x265-devel