[x265] Fwd: issue 139
this apparently didn't get sent due to (I'm guessing) mailman's using the envelope 'from' address. so I changed my subscription email to the gmail address and am trying again. apologies if you get this twice. -- Forwarded message -- From: John Comeau <j...@unternet.net> Date: Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 11:42 AM Subject: issue 139 To: x265-devel@videolan.org https://bitbucket.org/multicoreware/x265/issues/139 was solved over a year ago by rmous...@us.ibm.com when he wrote source/common/ppc/pixel_altivec.cpp. the issue should be closed and the bounty awarded as appropriate. I've done some testing to prove that the altivec code is indeed being used by the binary when built on the PPC architecture, and produces an hevc video that plays the same as one produced on an x86_64 system. I can provide access to the PPC instance to anyone who wishes to verify before closing the issue. -- John Comeau KE5TFZ j...@unternet.net http://jc.unternet.net/ "A place for everything, and everything all over the place" ___ x265-devel mailing list x265-devel@videolan.org https://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/x265-devel
[x265] issue 139
https://bitbucket.org/multicoreware/x265/issues/139 was solved over a year ago by rmous...@us.ibm.com when he wrote source/common/ppc/pixel_altivec.cpp. the issue should be closed and the bounty awarded as appropriate. I've done some testing to prove that the altivec code is indeed being used by the binary when built on the PPC architecture, and produces an hevc video that plays the same as one produced on an x86_64 system. I can provide access to the PPC instance to anyone who wishes to verify before closing the issue. -- John Comeau KE5TFZ j...@unternet.net http://jc.unternet.net/ "A place for everything, and everything all over the place" ___ x265-devel mailing list x265-devel@videolan.org https://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/x265-devel
[x265] issue 139
https://bitbucket.org/multicoreware/x265/issues/139 was solved over a year ago by rmous...@us.ibm.com when he wrote source/common/ppc/pixel_altivec.cpp. the issue should be closed and the bounty awarded as appropriate. I've done some testing to prove that the altivec code is indeed being used by the binary when built on the PPC architecture, and produces an hevc video that plays the same as one produced on an x86_64 system. I can provide access to the PPC instance to anyone who wishes to verify before closing the issue. this is my 3rd attempt to send the email. since this mailman list doesn't seem to have archives, I can't tell if it went out or not; but I never got the email from the list, and I checked both that and the option to get a confirmation, and neither arrived. -- John Comeau <j...@unternet.net> http://jc.unternet.net/ "A place for everything, and everything all over the place" ___ x265-devel mailing list x265-devel@videolan.org https://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/x265-devel
