Re: [Xen-devel] Big.LITTLE support (WAS Re: Xen ARM community call)

2016-11-24 Thread Dario Faggioli
On Thu, 2016-11-24 at 15:40 +0800, Peng Fan wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 02:28:39PM +, Julien Grall wrote:
> > Peng, would you be up to do this?
> 
> Sorry for late reply. I am a bit busy on other things. I appreciate
> if you or anyone else
> can help summarize the ideas.
>
That's ok. I'll do the summing up, as agreed during yesterday's call.

>  I may come to this big.little stuff at the beginning
> of Dec.
> 
Sure, looking forward to that! ;-P

Regards,
Dario
-- 
<> (Raistlin Majere)
-
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R Ltd., Cambridge (UK)

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel


Re: [Xen-devel] Big.LITTLE support (WAS Re: Xen ARM community call)

2016-11-23 Thread Peng Fan
Hi Julien,
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 02:28:39PM +, Julien Grall wrote:
>Hello Anastassios,
>
>On 09/11/16 22:50, Anastassios Nanos wrote:
>>Hi Julien, all,
>>
>>>I would like to start organizing a recurring community call to discuss and
>>>sync-up on upcoming features for Xen ARM.
>>
>>great idea, I'd like to join too (GMT).
>>
>>>Example of features that could be discussed:
>>>- Sharing co-processor between guests
>>>- PCI passthrough
>>
>>Another issue to discuss, at some point, could be big.LITTLE support
>>(based on 
>>https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2016-09/msg01802.html).
>
>Good point. Looking at the discussion, many ideas was suggested and I don't
>remember whether we all agreed on what to do. I would recommend to summarize
>the discussion in a mail so we can come up with an agreement.
>
>Peng, would you be up to do this?

Sorry for late reply. I am a bit busy on other things. I appreciate if you or 
anyone else
can help summarize the ideas. I may come to this big.little stuff at the 
beginning
of Dec.

Thanks,
Peng.

>
>Regards,
>
>-- 
>Julien Grall
>
>___
>Xen-devel mailing list
>Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
>https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

-- 

___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel


Re: [Xen-devel] Big.LITTLE support (WAS Re: Xen ARM community call)

2016-11-22 Thread Dario Faggioli
On Tue, 2016-11-22 at 14:28 +, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 09/11/16 22:50, Anastassios Nanos wrote:
> > > Example of features that could be discussed:
> > > - Sharing co-processor between guests
> > > - PCI passthrough
> > 
> > Another issue to discuss, at some point, could be big.LITTLE
> > support
> > (based on https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2016
> > -09/msg01802.html).
> 
> Good point. 
>
Good point indeed. If that will be on the agenda, I'd like to be in the
call, if possible.

> Looking at the discussion, many ideas was suggested and I 
> don't remember whether we all agreed on what to do. I would recommend
> to 
> summarize the discussion in a mail so we can come up with an
> agreement.
> 
> Peng, would you be up to do this?
> 
Yep, that would help a lot! :-)
> Regards,
> 
-- 
<> (Raistlin Majere)
-
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R Ltd., Cambridge (UK)

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel


[Xen-devel] Big.LITTLE support (WAS Re: Xen ARM community call)

2016-11-22 Thread Julien Grall

Hello Anastassios,

On 09/11/16 22:50, Anastassios Nanos wrote:

Hi Julien, all,


I would like to start organizing a recurring community call to discuss and
sync-up on upcoming features for Xen ARM.


great idea, I'd like to join too (GMT).


Example of features that could be discussed:
- Sharing co-processor between guests
- PCI passthrough


Another issue to discuss, at some point, could be big.LITTLE support
(based on 
https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2016-09/msg01802.html).


Good point. Looking at the discussion, many ideas was suggested and I 
don't remember whether we all agreed on what to do. I would recommend to 
summarize the discussion in a mail so we can come up with an agreement.


Peng, would you be up to do this?

Regards,

--
Julien Grall

___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel