Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][next] xen/gntdev: remove redundant non-zero check on ret

2019-11-11 Thread Colin Ian King
On 11/11/2019 13:17, Jürgen Groß wrote:
> On 11.11.19 13:31, Colin Ian King wrote:
>> On 11/11/2019 12:25, Jürgen Groß wrote:
>>> On 11.11.19 13:20, Colin King wrote:
 From: Colin Ian King 

 The non-zero check on ret is always going to be false because
 ret was initialized as zero and the only place it is set to
 non-zero contains a return path before the non-zero check. Hence
 the check is redundant and can be removed.
>>>
>>> Which version did you patch against? In current master the above
>>> statement is not true.
>>
>> against today's linux-next
> 
> Ah, okay, this is likely the result of the recent mm-notifier patch
> series. I'll put this patch on hold until the recent patches have
> hit master.

Cool, thanks!
> 
> 
> Juergen


___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][next] xen/gntdev: remove redundant non-zero check on ret

2019-11-11 Thread Jürgen Groß

On 11.11.19 13:31, Colin Ian King wrote:

On 11/11/2019 12:25, Jürgen Groß wrote:

On 11.11.19 13:20, Colin King wrote:

From: Colin Ian King 

The non-zero check on ret is always going to be false because
ret was initialized as zero and the only place it is set to
non-zero contains a return path before the non-zero check. Hence
the check is redundant and can be removed.


Which version did you patch against? In current master the above
statement is not true.


against today's linux-next


Ah, okay, this is likely the result of the recent mm-notifier patch
series. I'll put this patch on hold until the recent patches have
hit master.


Juergen

___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][next] xen/gntdev: remove redundant non-zero check on ret

2019-11-11 Thread Colin Ian King
On 11/11/2019 12:25, Jürgen Groß wrote:
> On 11.11.19 13:20, Colin King wrote:
>> From: Colin Ian King 
>>
>> The non-zero check on ret is always going to be false because
>> ret was initialized as zero and the only place it is set to
>> non-zero contains a return path before the non-zero check. Hence
>> the check is redundant and can be removed.
> 
> Which version did you patch against? In current master the above
> statement is not true.

against today's linux-next

Colin
> 
> 
> Juergen
> 
>>
>> Addresses-Coverity: ("Logically dead code")
>> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King 
>> ---
>>   drivers/xen/gntdev.c | 5 -
>>   1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/xen/gntdev.c b/drivers/xen/gntdev.c
>> index 10cc5e9e612a..07d80b176118 100644
>> --- a/drivers/xen/gntdev.c
>> +++ b/drivers/xen/gntdev.c
>> @@ -524,11 +524,6 @@ static int gntdev_open(struct inode *inode,
>> struct file *flip)
>>   }
>>   #endif
>>   -    if (ret) {
>> -    kfree(priv);
>> -    return ret;
>> -    }
>> -
>>   flip->private_data = priv;
>>   #ifdef CONFIG_XEN_GRANT_DMA_ALLOC
>>   priv->dma_dev = gntdev_miscdev.this_device;
>>
> 


___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][next] xen/gntdev: remove redundant non-zero check on ret

2019-11-11 Thread Jürgen Groß

On 11.11.19 13:20, Colin King wrote:

From: Colin Ian King 

The non-zero check on ret is always going to be false because
ret was initialized as zero and the only place it is set to
non-zero contains a return path before the non-zero check. Hence
the check is redundant and can be removed.


Which version did you patch against? In current master the above
statement is not true.


Juergen



Addresses-Coverity: ("Logically dead code")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King 
---
  drivers/xen/gntdev.c | 5 -
  1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/xen/gntdev.c b/drivers/xen/gntdev.c
index 10cc5e9e612a..07d80b176118 100644
--- a/drivers/xen/gntdev.c
+++ b/drivers/xen/gntdev.c
@@ -524,11 +524,6 @@ static int gntdev_open(struct inode *inode, struct file 
*flip)
}
  #endif
  
-	if (ret) {

-   kfree(priv);
-   return ret;
-   }
-
flip->private_data = priv;
  #ifdef CONFIG_XEN_GRANT_DMA_ALLOC
priv->dma_dev = gntdev_miscdev.this_device;




___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel