Re: [XeTeX] Wacky behavior of XeLaTeX in TeXLive 2011
Hi everybody So, no one here has got problems with TeXWorks? Or am I the only user of it around? Greetings -- /Alessandro Ceschini/ -- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
Re: [XeTeX] Wacky behavior of XeLaTeX in TeXLive 2011
Hi Taylor OK, you're right, it's a combo: fake fontspec errors in XeLaTeX and the breakdown of go-to functions in TeXWorks, are they related? I don't know. I cannot discern which one is to be blamed, for I typeset stuff in XeTeX through TeXWorks, I don't know how to use raw XeTeX nor do I use other LaTeX flavors in TeXWorks. What's for sure, that's that TeXWorks is not the chief culprit here, the developers told me so: http://code.google.com/p/texworks/issues/detail?id=550#makechanges Yet, no one has apparently been able to reproduce my error. Greetings -- /Alessandro Ceschini/ -- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
Re: [XeTeX] Wacky behavior of XeLaTeX in TeXLive 2011
I used to... but moved to Mac so don't anymore. I can't remember the nature of the difficulties, though, it's been a while. K On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:13 AM, in message 4ec3d301.2050...@gmail.com, Alessandro Ceschini alessandroceschini...@gmail.com wrote: Hi everybody So, no one here has got problems with TeXWorks? Or am I the only user of it around? Greetings -- /Alessandro Ceschini/ -- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
Re: [XeTeX] Wacky behavior of XeLaTeX in TeXLive 2011
On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 16:01, Alessandro Ceschini wrote: Le 31/10/2011 19:47, Alessandro Ceschini a écrit : Hi My problem is kind of complicated: 1. After processing a XeLaTeX source file the yellow lines the cross-reference between pdf and source file and vice versa is completely broken. 2. This happens after I updated to Ubuntu 11.10, TexLive 2011 and texWorks 0.5, previously I was using Ubuntu 11.04, TexLive 2010 and texWorks something before 0.5. 3. I don't know if this has something to do with that, but I also get fake fontspec errors, I mean I don't see any problem in the output, even though, according to the output panel, there should be some. At first I thought this had something to do with TeXWorks: http://code.google.com/p/texworks/issues/detail?id=550#makechanges but then they told me the SyncTeX code is to be blamed for that. Greetings -- Alessandro Ceschini Hello So, am I the only one down here to have experienced problems with TeXLive and XeLaTeX after having updated to TexLive 2011? No, probably you are not. There are known problems that have been fixed in branch 2011: http://tug.org/svn/texlive/branches/branch2011/ http://tug.org/svn/texlive/branches/branch2011/Build/source/README.branch2011?revision=24461view=markup But Ubuntu probably just took the released version and not the branch with fixes. Also, unless I'm mistaken, I'm not aware of official TL distribution shipping patched binaries either and I don't exactly understand why since the mechanism to ship new binaries is in place. Mojca -- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
Re: [XeTeX] Wacky behavior of XeLaTeX in TeXLive 2011
Hi To Mojca: No, the version I'm running is NOT the one bundled with Ubuntu 11.10 (that's TL 2009), I just downloaded a dvd of TL 2011 and installed it manually via tl-install. Installation is complete (every package), and nothing of the TL 2009 package bundled with Ubuntu is installed. I checked this. To Ross: So, are you suggesting I should downgrade to TL 2010? Previously I was using just that version, without any apparent problem, all started when I upgraded to TL 2011 (but after a fresh install, so no remnants of TL 2010 on my hard disk). Regards -- /Alessandro Ceschini/ -- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
Re: [XeTeX] Wacky behavior of XeLaTeX in TeXLive 2011
So, are you suggesting I should downgrade to TL 2010? Previously I was using just that version, without any apparent problem, all started when I upgraded to TL 2011 (but after a fresh install, so no remnants of TL 2010 on my hard disk). I do not think there has been major changes in XeTeX from TeXLive 2010 to 2011. As I understand, your problem has to do with texworks and not with xetex so I do not see how downgrading your TeX distribution can help here. I am also using Ubuntu 11.10 and have not experienced any problem with XeTeX binary. For instance, can you test if you have problem with pdflatex in TeXWorks too? if you do not, then obviously TeXWorks is faulty and not your XeTeX binary. About your problem with fontspec, it may be a fontspec bug but if you send a minimal working example, we can look at it. -- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
Re: [XeTeX] Wacky behavior of XeLaTeX in TeXLive 2011
On Nov 7, 2011, at 5:28 AM, Vafa Khalighi wrote: So, are you suggesting I should downgrade to TL 2010? Previously I was using just that version, without any apparent problem, all started when I upgraded to TL 2011 (but after a fresh install, so no remnants of TL 2010 on my hard disk). I do not think there has been major changes in XeTeX from TeXLive 2010 to 2011. As I understand, your problem has to do with texworks and not with xetex so I do not see how downgrading your TeX distribution can help here. I am also using Ubuntu 11.10 and have not experienced any problem with XeTeX binary. For instance, can you test if you have problem with pdflatex in TeXWorks too? if you do not, then obviously TeXWorks is faulty and not your XeTeX binary. About your problem with fontspec, it may be a fontspec bug but if you send a minimal working example, we can look at it. Howdy, I haven't been following the complete discussion but did you get all of the latest updates using tlmgr after installing TL2011? Good Luck, Herb Schulz (herbs at wideopenwest dot com) -- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
Re: [XeTeX] Wacky behavior of XeLaTeX in TeXLive 2011
Hi
To Vafa:
I uploaded a minimal working example, it's a stripped down version of a
book, text removed apart from a stub using greek text (Unicode
capabilities), the prologue is intact, the default font is Tinos, a
freely downloadable font, but if you want you can substitute it with
LiberationSerif or any other font that supports polytonic Greek.
Please provide me with an example for pdflatex, I don't know how to use
it :)
The developers of TexWorks told me their program has nothing to do with
it: http://code.google.com/p/texworks/issues/detail?id=550#makechanges
To Schulz:
Of course I did update, I actually run sudo tlmgr update --all every day.
Greetings
--
/Alessandro Ceschini/
\documentclass[a4paper, 12pt, openany, draft]{book}
\usepackage{a4wide}
\usepackage{fontspec}
\usepackage{paralist}
\defaultfontfeatures{Mapping=tex-text}
\setmainfont{Tinos}
\usepackage{polyglossia}
\setmainlanguage{french}
\setotherlanguages{dutch, english, german, latin, italian, spanish}
\setotherlanguage[variant=ancient]{greek}
\usepackage{xunicode}
\usepackage{xltxtra}
\usepackage{bookmark}
\setcounter{tocdepth}{1}
\raggedbottom
\usepackage{soul}
\newfontfamily\greekfont[Script=Greek]{Tinos}
\newcommand{\og}{\guillemotleft}
\newcommand{\fg}{\guillemotright}
\usepackage{enumitem}
\setenumerate{nolistsep}
\setitemize{nolistsep, label=$-$}
\usepackage{footmisc}
\makeatletter
\long \def \@makefntext #1%
{%
\noindent
\makebox [25pt][r]{\@thefnmark.\,}#1%
}
\makeatother
\renewcommand*\thesection{\arabic{section}}
\usepackage{fancyhdr}
\renewcommand{\sectionmark}[1]{\markright{#1}}
\begin{document}
\tableofcontents
\frontmatter
\chapter{Prologue}
\textgreek{οἱ Ïολλοὶ}
\end{document}
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
Re: [XeTeX] Wacky behavior of XeLaTeX in TeXLive 2011
I uploaded a minimal working example, it's a stripped down version of a book, text removed apart from a stub using greek text (Unicode capabilities), the prologue is intact, the default font is Tinos, a freely downloadable font, but if you want you can substitute it with LiberationSerif or any other font that supports polytonic Greek. Thanks for this. I used LiberationSerif font which is by default shipped with Ubuntu. These are the warnings, I get: LaTeX Font Warning: Font shape `EU1/LiberationSerif(0)/m/sl' undefined (Font) using `EU1/LiberationSerif(0)/m/n' instead on input line 43 . LaTeX Font Warning: Some font shapes were not available, defaults substituted. Which I believe is perfectly normal and you ought to get the same warnings with TeXLive 2010. This happens because Italic or oblique version of LiberationSerif does not exist and so fontspec uses the regular shape of the font for slanted shape (produced by \textsl, etc). Please provide me with an example for pdflatex, I don't know how to use it :) What I meant was that you produce a similar example with pdflatex (no polyglossia, no fontspec, no xelatex specific packages) and see if the same issue happens. Please download this version of fontspec (from 2010) and put it in your current directory, does the problem still exists? http://tug.org/svn/texlive/trunk/Master/texmf-dist/tex/latex/fontspec/fontspec.sty?revision=18558view=co -- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
Re: [XeTeX] Wacky behavior of XeLaTeX in TeXLive 2011
Hi To Vafa: Wait, there exists a Liberation Serif Italic, just look in your \usr\share\fonts directory, it's not normal to get such an error, and no, I didn't get it back in TexLive 2010. Have you also noticed something like this in your output console? * * fontspec warning: script-not-exist * * Font 'Tinos' does not contain script 'Greek'. * That too is new for me, it's a fake error since Greek letters are correctly displayed and Tinos DOES contain Greek letters. So, what's wrong with fontspec? To Chandra The reality is I just don't subscribe to the mailing list in order to avoid getting my box flooded with issues I don't bother with, I just answer by clicking on the address at tug.org/pipemail/xetex etc... I understand that's rude and selfish so if that's really strictly necessary, I'll ultimately subscribe to the mailing list. Just let me know. Greetings -- /Alessandro Ceschini/ -- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
Re: [XeTeX] Wacky behavior of XeLaTeX in TeXLive 2011
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 11:54 PM, Alessandro Ceschini
alessandroceschini...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
To Vafa:
Wait, there exists a Liberation Serif Italic, just look in your
\usr\share\fonts directory, it's not normal to get such an error, and no, I
didn't get it back in TexLive 2010.
Right. There is an italic version there. I am not sure what kind of font,
fontspec expects to load when using slanted shape. I thought it would use
Italic if slanted shape does not exist.
How about:
\setmainfont[SlantedFont={Liberation Serif Italic}]{Liberation Serif}
Have you also noticed something like this in your output console?
***
* fontspec warning: script-not-exist
*
* Font 'Tinos' does not contain script 'Greek'.
***
That too is new for me, it's a fake error since Greek letters are
correctly displayed and Tinos DOES contain Greek letters. So, what's wrong
with fontspec?
I do not get that with Liberation serif but I believe that is a fontspec
bug.
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
Re: [XeTeX] Wacky behavior of XeLaTeX in TeXLive 2011
Hi, my Liberation Serif (from CentOS 5) contains italic but not greek. I processed the file by TL 2009, 2010, 2011, the results are at http://hroch486.icpf.cas.cz/stripped-down/ 2011/11/7 Alessandro Ceschini alessandroceschini...@gmail.com: Hi To Vafa: Wait, there exists a Liberation Serif Italic, just look in your \usr\share\fonts directory, it's not normal to get such an error, and no, I didn't get it back in TexLive 2010. Have you also noticed something like this in your output console? * * fontspec warning: script-not-exist * * Font 'Tinos' does not contain script 'Greek'. * That too is new for me, it's a fake error since Greek letters are correctly displayed and Tinos DOES contain Greek letters. So, what's wrong with fontspec? To Chandra The reality is I just don't subscribe to the mailing list in order to avoid getting my box flooded with issues I don't bother with, I just answer by clicking on the address at tug.org/pipemail/xetex etc... I understand that's rude and selfish so if that's really strictly necessary, I'll ultimately subscribe to the mailing list. Just let me know. Greetings -- /Alessandro Ceschini/ -- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex -- Zdeněk Wagner http://hroch486.icpf.cas.cz/wagner/ http://icebearsoft.euweb.cz -- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
Re: [XeTeX] Wacky behavior of XeLaTeX in TeXLive 2011
Hi guys, Why should fontspec try to load a crappy slanted shape in the first place? I just don't understand why! Slanted shapes are a last-resort stuff, not first-choice. So why loading a slanted shape when the italic is available? I will take a look at your output files, but the real issues is not fontspec errors, it's the broken go-to functions in TeXWorks, none of you use TeXWorks, right? We also don't know if those fontspec errors are related with go-to functions in TeXWorks, maybe it's just a coincidence that they happen to occur together. Greetings -- /Alessandro Ceschini/ -- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
Re: [XeTeX] Wacky behavior of XeLaTeX in TeXLive 2011
2011/11/7 Alessandro Ceschini alessandroceschini...@gmail.com: Hi guys, Why should fontspec try to load a crappy slanted shape in the first place? I At my computer Liberation Serif Italic (and Bold Italic) is found and used. just don't understand why! Slanted shapes are a last-resort stuff, not first-choice. So why loading a slanted shape when the italic is available? I will take a look at your output files, but the real issues is not fontspec errors, it's the broken go-to functions in TeXWorks, none of you use TeXWorks, right? No, I edit my files mostly in vim, sometimes in gedit and oXygen/ and run tex from a command line, sometimes from a Makefile, sometimes from an ant file. We also don't know if those fontspec errors are related with go-to functions in TeXWorks, maybe it's just a coincidence that they happen to occur together. Greetings -- Alessandro Ceschini -- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex -- Zdeněk Wagner http://hroch486.icpf.cas.cz/wagner/ http://icebearsoft.euweb.cz -- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
Re: [XeTeX] Wacky behavior of XeLaTeX in TeXLive 2011
I can't help with the original problem, but I would like to comment on a question that came up as an aside: Quoting Alessandro Ceschini (alessandroceschini...@gmail.com): Why should fontspec try to load a crappy slanted shape in the first place? I just don't understand why! Slanted shapes are a last-resort stuff, not first-choice. So why loading a slanted shape when the italic is available? I think that's a point of personal preference. With the fonts I use I often prefer slanted over italic, because the slanted is different enough from upright to stick in the eye, but closer to the main font than italic, thus not as much a disturbance. I'm no typesetting expert though... Susan -- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
Re: [XeTeX] Wacky behavior of XeLaTeX in TeXLive 2011
Am 07.11.2011 um 12:50 schrieb Alessandro Ceschini:
I uploaded a minimal working example
Slanted text font can be made like this with fontspec:
\newfontface\slanted[RawFeature={slant=0.194}]{Lucida Bright}
\DeclareRobustCommand{\textsl}[1]{{\slanted #1}}
--
Greetings
Pete
Klingons do not believe in indentation - except perhaps in the skulls of their
project managers.
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
Re: [XeTeX] Wacky behavior of XeLaTeX in TeXLive 2011
On Monday 07 November 2011 06:24 PM, Alessandro Ceschini wrote: To Chandra The reality is I just don't subscribe to the mailing list in order to avoid getting my box flooded with issues I don't bother with, I just answer by clicking on the address at tug.org/pipemail/xetex etc... I understand that's rude and selfish so if that's really strictly necessary, I'll ultimately subscribe to the mailing list. Just let me know. I made that comment because the thread appeared split when viewed on Thunderbird in my PC. Viewing the archive at: http://tug.org/pipermail/xetex/2011-November/thread.html using a web browser shows that thread integrity is preserved. So, there is no need to change your methods for communicating with this list. Sorry for the false alarm. Chandra -- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
Re: [XeTeX] Wacky behavior of XeLaTeX in TeXLive 2011
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 08:48, Alessandro Ceschini alessandroceschini...@gmail.com wrote: Why should fontspec try to load a crappy slanted shape in the first place? Slanted =/= crappy. You have have optically adjusted obliques for sans serif typefaces. You can even have slanted serif fonts. Computer Modern had a set of them. It ultimately comes down to using them properly. But to actually answer your question, fontspec tries to load it because the command exists. It's designed to provide a working font setup, which means populating all the font commands. -Andy -- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
Re: [XeTeX] Wacky behavior of XeLaTeX in TeXLive 2011
Hi everybody Chadra, I took a look at your log file and you get this: LaTeX Font Warning: Font shape `EU1/LiberationSerif(0)/m/sl' undefined (Font) using `EU1/LiberationSerif(0)/m/n' instead on input line 44 But no fontspec error related to Greek, actually the output is positive: . . fontspec info: defining-font . . Font family 'LiberationSerif(1)' created for font 'LiberationSerif' with . options [Mapping=tex-text,Script=Greek]. . . This font family consists of the following shapes: . . * 'normal' with NFSS spec.: .-LiberationSerif/ICU:script=grek;language=DFLT;mapping=tex-text; . . * 'bold' with NFSS spec.: .-LiberationSerif/B/ICU:script=grek;language=DFLT;mapping=tex-text; . . * 'italic' with NFSS spec.: .-LiberationSerif/I/ICU:script=grek;language=DFLT;mapping=tex-text; . . * 'bold italic' with NFSS spec.: .-LiberationSerif/BI/ICU:script=grek;language=DFLT;mapping=tex-text; . It's pretty much possible I incurred in the LaTeX Font Warning back in TL 2010's days, that's a minor issue but for certain, no fontspec error. Zdenek, on the other hand, you do get the fontspec warning on both 2010 2011 (I didn't consider 2009 as it's not relevant in my case): * * fontspec warning: script-not-exist * * Font 'LiberationSerif' does not contain script 'Greek'. * And, what's more, you do have a mess in both (2010 2011) pdf's instead of the expected Greek letters, while I can see them correctly. Again, the question is: is all this correlated to the breakdown of go-to function in TeXWorks? Greetings -- /Alessandro Ceschini/ -- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
Re: [XeTeX] Wacky behavior of XeLaTeX in TeXLive 2011
Am 07.11.2011 um 13:54 schrieb Alessandro Ceschini: That too is new for me, it's a fake error since Greek letters are correctly displayed and Tinos DOES contain Greek letters. So, what's wrong with fontspec? The existence of (some) Greek letters does not preclude the font's support for that script/language – or I would be able to speak and read Greek because I know the letters. The fontspec manual has a bit of explanation (and the XeTeX distribution has test sheets, AAT-info.tex, OpenType-info.tex, which check a font's features support), more can be found on the OTF documentation site at MS. -- Greetings Pete Almost anything is easier to get into than out of. – Allen's Law -- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
Re: [XeTeX] Wacky behavior of XeLaTeX in TeXLive 2011
To Peter: Hi Those warnings appear with practically every stuff that involves Unicode or Opentype issues, from polytonic Greek to ligatures, to localized glyphs, everything revolving around fontspec with whichever font, gives me such warnings. Greetings -- /Alessandro Ceschini/ -- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
Re: [XeTeX] Wacky behavior of XeLaTeX in TeXLive 2011
Hi Alessandro, On 07/11/2011, at 10:14 PM, Alessandro Ceschini wrote: Hi To Mojca: No, the version I'm running is NOT the one bundled with Ubuntu 11.10 (that's TL 2009), I just downloaded a dvd of TL 2011 and installed it manually via tl-install. Installation is complete (every package), and nothing of the TL 2009 package bundled with Ubuntu is installed. I checked this. To Ross: So, are you suggesting I should downgrade to TL 2010? No. I was responding to Mojca's comment: But Ubuntu probably just took the released version and not the branch with fixes. Also, unless I'm mistaken, I'm not aware of official TL distribution shipping patched binaries either and I don't exactly understand why since the mechanism to ship new binaries is in place. which seems to be advocating that since patched binaries are available then everyone (!) should be getting them, more or less automatically. That is most certainly not the case. By all means get them if you want to, realising that you could be on the cutting edge, and it is entirely your own responsibility --- but you'll find people on this list (and others) who are willing to help when/if you run into trouble. Ubuntu and other package managers must decide when it is appropriate to update. This decision will be made in accordance with what they know about a large number of their users, or maybe a small number of very important users. As for myself, I would never advise anyone to update onto the cutting edge, unless I was confident that they knew how to handle it. This does *not* mean that I am advocating against updating, nor to downgrading. You must work out what is appropriate for yourself, in whatever are your circumstances, then act accordingly. Previously I was using just that version, without any apparent problem, all started when I upgraded to TL 2011 (but after a fresh install, so no remnants of TL 2010 on my hard disk). Regards -- /Alessandro Ceschini/ Hope this helps, (and apologies to Mojca if I've just mis-represented him) Ross Ross Moore ross.mo...@mq.edu.au Mathematics Department office: E7A-419 Macquarie University tel: +61 (0)2 9850 8955 Sydney, Australia 2109 fax: +61 (0)2 9850 8114 -- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
Re: [XeTeX] Wacky behavior of XeLaTeX in TeXLive 2011
Am 07.11.2011 um 23:31 schrieb Ross Moore: (and apologies to Mojca if I've just mis-represented him) Ross, do you mean Mojca with him? (I'm confident she is still a woman. In which case a her would be appropriate. But I also wonder why Mail chose this signature…) -- Greetings Pete Typography exists to honor content. – Robert Bringhurst -- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
Re: [XeTeX] Wacky behavior of XeLaTeX in TeXLive 2011
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 23:31, Ross Moore wrote: But Ubuntu probably just took the released version and not the branch with fixes. Also, unless I'm mistaken, I'm not aware of official TL distribution shipping patched binaries either and I don't exactly understand why since the mechanism to ship new binaries is in place. which seems to be advocating that since patched binaries are available then everyone (!) should be getting them, more or less automatically. No. Only patched sources are available, patched binaries are not. That is most certainly not the case. By all means get them if you want to, realising that you could be on the cutting edge, and it is entirely your own responsibility Updating binaries would not mean living on cutting edge, but rather getting bug fixes. I'm sorry. I was already wondering how one could have TL 2011 on Ubuntu (I have never heard of Ubuntu switching to TL 2011), but as I already said: even if one is using original TeX Live 2011, the synctex bugs leading to non-working synchronisation in TeXworks are still present. (I don't understand why binaries are not rebuilt.) Mojca -- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
Re: [XeTeX] Wacky behavior of XeLaTeX in TeXLive 2011
Hi Peter, On 08/11/2011, at 9:50 AM, Peter Dyballa wrote: Am 07.11.2011 um 23:31 schrieb Ross Moore: (and apologies to Mojca if I've just mis-represented him) Ross, do you mean Mojca with him? (I'm confident she is still a woman. In which case a her would be appropriate. Ooops. My mistake, definitely. Sorry. But I also wonder why Mail chose this signature…) -- Greetings Pete Typography exists to honor content. – Robert Bringhurst very apt! Cheers Ross Ross Moore ross.mo...@mq.edu.au Mathematics Department office: E7A-419 Macquarie University tel: +61 (0)2 9850 8955 Sydney, Australia 2109 fax: +61 (0)2 9850 8114 -- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
Re: [XeTeX] Wacky behavior of XeLaTeX in TeXLive 2011
Le 31/10/2011 19:47, Alessandro Ceschini a écrit : Hi My problem is kind of complicated: 1. After processing a XeLaTeX source file the yellow lines the cross-reference between pdf and source file and vice versa is completely broken. 2. This happens after I updated to Ubuntu 11.10, TexLive 2011 and texWorks 0.5, previously I was using Ubuntu 11.04, TexLive 2010 and texWorks something before 0.5. 3. I don't know if this has something to do with that, but I also get fake fontspec errors, I mean I don't see any problem in the output, even though, according to the output panel, there should be some. At first I thought this had something to do with TeXWorks: http://code.google.com/p/texworks/issues/detail?id=550#makechanges but then they told me the SyncTeX code is to be blamed for that. Greetings -- /Alessandro Ceschini/ Hello So, am I the only one down here to have experienced problems with TeXLive and XeLaTeX after having updated to TexLive 2011? Greetings -- /Alessandro Ceschini/ -- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
Re: [XeTeX] Wacky behavior of XeLaTeX in TeXLive 2011
I don't use Ubuntu, but if you have both TL2010 and 2011, I'd check the directories that are in fontconfig (or run fc-cache -v and see which directories it's looking in). It may be that fontspec is complaining because it finds duplicate sets of fonts between the two installations. Your PDFs would be OK because the font files are otherwise identical, but you'll likely notice problems if you had different versions of the same font. As for the other problem with SyncTeX... I can only imagine it's somehow related. Possibly a PATH error? HTH, Andy -- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
Re: [XeTeX] Wacky behavior of XeLaTeX in TeXLive 2011
To Andy: Hi No, I only have TL2011 and nothing of the bundled version (2009) is installed, and no, there's no duplicate of the font, actually this happens with every font, it's a bit weird for every font to be duplicated. The directories are the standard ones: \usr\share\fonts and ~\.fonts\ As far as PATH is concerned, I can run tlmgr update --all from my home path, I think that means PATH works fine. Right? But the real problem is in TeXWorks, the go to pdf and go to source files functions are completely broken, that's the real issue. Greetings -- /Alessandro Ceschini/ -- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
Re: [XeTeX] Wacky behavior of XeLaTeX in TeXLive 2011
Hmm, according to that ticket on the texwork site, someone else has the same problem, so it doesn't seem to be something unique to your set up. I'm surprised that it's SyncTeX that's the culprit, since the project page hasn't been updated since 2008, unless it's moved. Unfortunately, I can't help you further with this, as I don't have an Ubuntu box to test on. Hopefully someone else will come up with a solution. -Andy -- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
[XeTeX] Wacky behavior of XeLaTeX in TeXLive 2011
Hi My problem is kind of complicated: 1. After processing a XeLaTeX source file the yellow lines the cross-reference between pdf and source file and vice versa is completely broken. 2. This happens after I updated to Ubuntu 11.10, TexLive 2011 and texWorks 0.5, previously I was using Ubuntu 11.04, TexLive 2010 and texWorks something before 0.5. 3. I don't know if this has something to do with that, but I also get fake fontspec errors, I mean I don't see any problem in the output, even though, according to the output panel, there should be some. At first I thought this had something to do with TeXWorks: http://code.google.com/p/texworks/issues/detail?id=550#makechanges but then they told me the SyncTeX code is to be blamed for that. Greetings -- /Alessandro Ceschini/ -- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
