[Xfce-bugs] [Bug 16686] Option to rename a file when existing copy conflicts
https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16686 alexxcons changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugme...@mailinator.com --- Comment #19 from alexxcons --- *** Bug 10751 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Xfce-bugs mailing list Xfce-bugs@xfce.org https://mail.xfce.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce-bugs
[Xfce-bugs] [Bug 14706] Option to rename on "create new file/folder" if name already exists
https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14706 alexxcons changed: What|Removed |Added CC||alexxc...@xfce.org Summary|[Feature Request] Auto |Option to rename on "create |rename the file which is|new file/folder" if name |exist |already exists --- Comment #1 from alexxcons --- Thanks for reporting, and sorry for the late reply ! Patches would be very welcome ! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Xfce-bugs mailing list Xfce-bugs@xfce.org https://mail.xfce.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce-bugs
[Xfce-bugs] [Bug 13868] Easy to hide the menubar, tricky to get it back if the shortcut key is not known
https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13868 alexxcons changed: What|Removed |Added CC||khazar...@fastmail.in --- Comment #21 from alexxcons --- *** Bug 10250 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Xfce-bugs mailing list Xfce-bugs@xfce.org https://mail.xfce.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce-bugs
[Xfce-bugs] [Bug 15379] Change order of menu items on Show menu
https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15379 alexxcons changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED --- Comment #3 from alexxcons --- closing this bug .. actualy I would rather keep the current menu order. Not worth to change things for unknown benefit while confusing existing users. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Xfce-bugs mailing list Xfce-bugs@xfce.org https://mail.xfce.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce-bugs
[Xfce-bugs] [Bug 11650] Remember bulk renamer dialog and columns size
https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11650 --- Comment #7 from alexxcons --- There is already a bug for "dont close after rename": Bug #6777 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Xfce-bugs mailing list Xfce-bugs@xfce.org https://mail.xfce.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce-bugs
[Xfce-bugs] [Bug 14271] Stack rename operations
https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14271 alexxcons changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||alexxc...@xfce.org --- Comment #1 from alexxcons --- Sorry for the late reply ! Already possible when starting thunar with -B as argument .. closing aas it is a dup *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 6777 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Xfce-bugs mailing list Xfce-bugs@xfce.org https://mail.xfce.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce-bugs
[Xfce-bugs] [Bug 13868] Easy to hide the menubar, tricky to get it back if the shortcut key is not known
https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13868 alexxcons changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktnpGFgGQx8kD5LU@evil.trill ||ianpro.com --- Comment #20 from alexxcons --- *** Bug 9806 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Xfce-bugs mailing list Xfce-bugs@xfce.org https://mail.xfce.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce-bugs
[Xfce-bugs] [Bug 13969] Buttons randomly stop working. Rest of application works.
https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13969 alexxcons changed: What|Removed |Added CC||alexxc...@xfce.org Status|NEW |NEEDINFO --- Comment #11 from alexxcons --- Did you take a try for thunar 1.8.x meanwhile ? Can you still reproduce the bug there ? (Because for me it works fine there) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Xfce-bugs mailing list Xfce-bugs@xfce.org https://mail.xfce.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce-bugs
[Xfce-bugs] [Bug 15528] Unmount operation not allowed for shares mounted with 'sudo mount'
https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15528 alexxcons changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Unmount operation not |Unmount operation not |allowed |allowed for shares mounted ||with 'sudo mount' Priority|Medium |Very Low Severity|normal |enhancement CC||alexxc...@xfce.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Xfce-bugs mailing list Xfce-bugs@xfce.org https://mail.xfce.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce-bugs
[Xfce-bugs] [Bug 12635] gvfsd-trash 50% cpu usage for minutes, even hours after trashing many files
https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12635 --- Comment #6 from alexxcons --- In Bug #15871 trashing files only seems to be slow when tree-view is enabled. @ unhammer+d...@mm.st Can you confirm that ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Xfce-bugs mailing list Xfce-bugs@xfce.org https://mail.xfce.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce-bugs
[Xfce-bugs] [Bug 12635] gvfsd-trash 50% cpu usage for minutes, even hours after trashing many files
https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12635 alexxcons changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gr...@yahoo.com.sg --- Comment #5 from alexxcons --- *** Bug 15871 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Xfce-bugs mailing list Xfce-bugs@xfce.org https://mail.xfce.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce-bugs
[Xfce-bugs] [Bug 12461] g_file_info_get_attribute_uint32 assertion error on rename
https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12461 alexxcons changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX --- Comment #2 from alexxcons --- closing, since no further information from the reporter was provided -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Xfce-bugs mailing list Xfce-bugs@xfce.org https://mail.xfce.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce-bugs
[Xfce-bugs] [Bug 12461] g_file_info_get_attribute_uint32 assertion error on rename
https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12461 alexxcons changed: What|Removed |Added URL||WONTFIX -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Xfce-bugs mailing list Xfce-bugs@xfce.org https://mail.xfce.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce-bugs
[Xfce-bugs] [Bug 16520] Mark invalid file names in red
https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16520 alexxcons changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #2 from alexxcons --- Closing the bug, since there is no further notice from the reporter on how exactly the proposed feature could look like -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Xfce-bugs mailing list Xfce-bugs@xfce.org https://mail.xfce.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce-bugs
[Xfce-bugs] [Bug 12024] Strange character in location bar
https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12024 alexxcons changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME --- Comment #6 from alexxcons --- closing the bug, since not possible to reproduce, and no further reply from reporter -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Xfce-bugs mailing list Xfce-bugs@xfce.org https://mail.xfce.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce-bugs
[Xfce-bugs] [Bug 15233] thunar does not play nice with huge rclone remotes
https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15233 alexxcons changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED --- Comment #7 from alexxcons --- Closing, since it looks like the bug is not thunar-specific -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Xfce-bugs mailing list Xfce-bugs@xfce.org https://mail.xfce.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce-bugs
[Xfce-bugs] [Bug 14625] UDF formated partion not detected
https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14625 alexxcons changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME CC||alexxc...@xfce.org --- Comment #2 from alexxcons --- closing as "works for me", since there is no further info from reporter which could help to reproduce the bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Xfce-bugs mailing list Xfce-bugs@xfce.org https://mail.xfce.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce-bugs
[Xfce-bugs] [Bug 16824] New: crash in bulk renamer on repeated rename
https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16824
Bug ID: 16824
Summary: crash in bulk renamer on repeated rename
Classification: Xfce Core
Product: Thunar
Version: git
Hardware: Other
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: Medium
Component: Renamer
Assignee: xfce-bugs@xfce.org
Reporter: alexxc...@xfce.org
Target Milestone: 1.8.13
Repeated rename via bulk renamer only works when it is launched via console:
gdb --args /thunar/.libs/thunar -B
In order to trigger the crash, add two files to the bulk renamer and rename
then. Than rename then again.
The way of renaming (numbering, date, etc.) does not matter.
I can reproduce the bug on master, and on 1.8.0, so it is not related to recent
commits.
I got the following Error/Backtrace :
thunar:ERROR:thunar-renamer-progress.c:262:thunar_renamer_progress_next_idle:
assertion failed: (g_list_length (renamer_progress->pairs_done) ==
renamer_progress->n_pairs_done)
Bail out!
thunar:ERROR:thunar-renamer-progress.c:262:thunar_renamer_progress_next_idle:
assertion failed: (g_list_length (renamer_progress->pairs_done) ==
renamer_progress->n_pairs_done)
Thread 1 "thunar" received signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
__GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:50
50 ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c: Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht
gefunden.
(gdb) bt
#0 __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:50
#1 0x7696355b in __GI_abort () at abort.c:79
#2 0x76b40de3 in () at /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
#3 0x76b9c77b in g_assertion_message_expr () at
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
#4 0x555df748 in thunar_renamer_progress_next_idle
(user_data=) at thunar-renamer-progress.c:262
#5 0x76b744de in g_main_context_dispatch () at
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
#6 0x76b74890 in () at /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
#7 0x76b74b63 in g_main_loop_run () at
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
#8 0x555dfb81 in thunar_renamer_progress_run
(renamer_progress=0x55f3f9c0, pairs=0x558da240 = {...}) at
thunar-renamer-progress.c:376
#9 0x555dc452 in thunar_renamer_dialog_response
(dialog=0x5592a300, response=) at
thunar-renamer-dialog.c:804
#10 0x76c6118e in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__BOOLEANv () at
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#11 0x76c5f206 in () at /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#12 0x76c7d8d4 in g_signal_emit_valist () at
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
I dumped the reimaining backtrace ... only alot of internal g_signal
stuff and the main / g_application_run
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Xfce-bugs mailing list
Xfce-bugs@xfce.org
https://mail.xfce.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce-bugs
[Xfce-bugs] [Bug 16688] Freeze new copy where source or target device is shared with another running one
https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16688 --- Comment #13 from alexxcons --- I just played a bit with the new feature, very nice ! IMO it fixes what was requested in Bug #12123 / is a duplicate, though I dont want to close it as a dup. since there is a bounty of 100$ on it: https://www.bountysource.com/issues/25667178-feature-request-queued-file-transfer ... after pushing it, it's up to Beron to decide if Bug #12123 got fixed by it / you get that reward :) I am a bit unhappy with the preferences: If I copy some files from my ssd to my ssd, I would like to have parallel copy as default --> untick both If I copy some big files from my flashdrive to my ssd, I would need t tick "one transfer per source device" If I copy some big files from my ssd to my flashdrive, I would need t tick "one transfer per target device" So I would need to toggle these bits very often, whenever I copy many files to/from my USB drive. That's not very comfortable. The author of Bug #12577 mentioned that he would like to have queued file transfer only for block devices ... while I am not so sure what exactly is a block-device, and what is not, I can get his point. Possibly we could use "thunar_file_is_local" to identify if it makes sense to enable queued mode. We could have a nice preferences setting with it by using an enum: Transfer files in parallel: [ Always | only for local files | Never ] ... actually the same like for "show thumbnails". You probably can copy the code. You think that would make sense ? Or possibly there is some gain to separate sources from targets, which I dont get ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Xfce-bugs mailing list Xfce-bugs@xfce.org https://mail.xfce.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce-bugs
[Xfce-bugs] [Bug 12577] Serialize operations when copying from/to the same device.
https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12577 alexxcons changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||alexxc...@xfce.org --- Comment #1 from alexxcons --- Sorry for the very late reply ! Thunar was lacking a maintainer for long time. There is already a Bug for that; Bug #16688 If you can, please take a try for the attached patch (I still have to review/test it myself) Not sure yet if serialization only is done for block devices using that patch *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 16688 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Xfce-bugs mailing list Xfce-bugs@xfce.org https://mail.xfce.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce-bugs
[Xfce-bugs] [Bug 16688] Freeze new copy where source or target device is shared with another running one
https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16688 alexxcons changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lve...@gmail.com --- Comment #12 from alexxcons --- *** Bug 12577 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Xfce-bugs mailing list Xfce-bugs@xfce.org https://mail.xfce.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce-bugs
[Xfce-bugs] [Bug 16685] Allow to pause a job
https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16685 alexxcons changed: What|Removed |Added CC||moraveczby...@gmail.com --- Comment #13 from alexxcons --- *** Bug 10282 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Xfce-bugs mailing list Xfce-bugs@xfce.org https://mail.xfce.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce-bugs
[Xfce-bugs] [Bug 13547] [Multiple separate X11 screens] [Multiple WMs] Thunar spawns applications on current active tag of wrong X11 screen
https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13547 alexxcons changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX CC||alexxc...@xfce.org --- Comment #2 from alexxcons --- Thanks for reporting, and sorry for the very late reply. First I dont think that thunar can do anything about that. Its the window manager, which decides which application will be placed on which screen. Second, I can confirm that "ZaphoMode" will be out of support when it comes to gtk3 .. at least that's what I heard from oliver fourdan, regarding xfwm4. Afaik in gtk3 the philosophy is, there is only one "screen", .. so sorry, I guess you will need a different multi-screen config which uses one screen and multiple displays I'll just close it as wontfix. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Xfce-bugs mailing list Xfce-bugs@xfce.org https://mail.xfce.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce-bugs
[Xfce-bugs] [Bug 16823] New: crash in gtk_menu_set_reserve_toggle_size
https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16823
Bug ID: 16823
Summary: crash in gtk_menu_set_reserve_toggle_size
Classification: Xfce Core
Product: Xfce4-panel
Version: Unspecified
Hardware: PC (x86_64)
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: Medium
Component: Launcher
Assignee: xfce-bugs@xfce.org
Reporter: o...@aepfle.de
Target Milestone: Panel 4.14
The current git.xfce.org#master crashes, even after 'mv ~/.config/xfce{,.old} ;
reboot' ( 20200501T001541.c06df30f ):
Core was generated by `xfce4-panel'.
Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
#0 gtk_menu_set_reserve_toggle_size (menu=0x0,
reserve_toggle_size=reserve_toggle_size@entry=0) at gtkmenu.c:6210
6210 GtkMenuPrivate *priv = menu->priv;
[Current thread is 1 (Thread 0x7fce6222f2c0 (LWP 2442))]
(gdb) bt
#0 0x7fce609b8fea in gtk_menu_set_reserve_toggle_size (menu=0x0,
reserve_toggle_size=reserve_toggle_size@entry=0) at gtkmenu.c:6210
#1 0x7fce43dee47e in launcher_plugin_button_update_action_menu
(plugin=0x558a2728a420 [XfceLauncherPlugin]) at launcher.c:1905
#2 0x7fce43def5cd in launcher_plugin_set_property (object=0x558a2728a420
[XfceLauncherPlugin], prop_id=, value=,
pspec=) at launcher.c:881
#3 0x7fce5f6e272e in object_set_property (nqueue=0x558a270bc310,
value=, pspec=0x558a2732a5f0 [GParamBoxed],
object=0x558a2728a420 [XfceLauncherPlugin])
at gobject.c:1439
#4 0x7fce5f6e272e in g_object_setv (object=0x558a2728a420
[XfceLauncherPlugin], n_properties=, names=,
values=) at gobject.c:2245
#5 0x7fce5f6e36be in g_object_set_property (object=,
property_name=, value=value@entry=0x7fffae1bc2f0) at
gobject.c:2529
#6 0x7fce6160d508 in xfconf_g_property_channel_notify
(channel=channel@entry=0x558a27135380 [XfconfChannel],
property=property@entry=0x7fce4402d430 "/plugins/plugin-17/items",
value=value@entry=0x7fffae1bc340, user_data=user_data@entry=0x558a273270c0) at
xfconf-binding.c:333
#7 0x7fce6160d756 in xfconf_g_property_init
(channel=channel@entry=0x558a27135380 [XfconfChannel],
xfconf_property=xfconf_property@entry=0x7fce4402d430
"/plugins/plugin-17/items", xfconf_property_type=94051848071376,
object=object@entry=0x558a2728a420 [XfceLauncherPlugin],
object_property=, object_property_type=94051848071376) at
xfconf-binding.c:392
#8 0x7fce6160da66 in IA__xfconf_g_property_bind
(channel=channel@entry=0x558a27135380 [XfconfChannel],
xfconf_property=xfconf_property@entry=0x7fce4402d430
"/plugins/plugin-17/items", xfconf_property_type=,
object=object@entry=0x558a2728a420, object_property=) at
xfconf-binding.c:509
#9 0x7fce43df33d6 in panel_properties_bind
(channel=0x558a27135380 [XfconfChannel], object=0x558a2728a420
[XfceLauncherPlugin], property_base=0x558a270ca630 "/plugins/plugin-17",
properties=, save_properties=0)
at panel-xfconf.c:135
#10 0x7fce43ded1db in launcher_plugin_construct
(panel_plugin=0x558a2728a420 [XfceLauncherPlugin]) at launcher.c:1073
#11 0x7fce5f6dab06 in _g_closure_invoke_va (closure=0x558a2708ade0,
return_value=0x0, instance=0x558a2728a420, args=0x7fffae1bc720, n_params=0,
param_types=0x0) at gclosure.c:867
#12 0x7fce5f6f6744 in g_signal_emit_valist (instance=0x558a2728a420,
signal_id=, detail=0, var_args=var_args@entry=0x7fffae1bc720) at
gsignal.c:3300
#13 0x7fce5f6f6c8f in g_signal_emit
(instance=instance@entry=0x558a2728a420, signal_id=,
detail=detail@entry=0) at gsignal.c:3447
#14 0x7fce60aff606 in gtk_widget_realize
(widget=widget@entry=0x558a2728a420 [XfceLauncherPlugin]) at gtkwidget.c:5471
#15 0x7fce60b040f8 in gtk_widget_set_parent
(widget=widget@entry=0x558a2728a420 [XfceLauncherPlugin],
parent=parent@entry=0x558a2723e560 [PanelItembar]) at gtkwidget.c:9595
#16 0x558a2598f9ac in panel_itembar_insert (itembar=0x558a2723e560
[PanelItembar], widget=widget@entry=0x558a2728a420 [XfceLauncherPlugin],
position=position@entry=-1)
at panel-itembar.c:1027
#17 0x558a25986f0f in panel_application_plugin_insert
(application=application@entry=0x558a27155a30 [PanelApplication],
window=window@entry=0x558a27199380 [XfcePanelWindow],
name=name@entry=0x558a2722d030 "launcher", unique_id=unique_id@entry=17,
arguments=arguments@entry=0x0, position=position@entry=-1) at
panel-application.c:805
#18 0x558a2598827b in panel_application_load_real
(application=0x558a27155a30 [PanelApplication]) at panel-application.c:424
#19 0x7fce604963e8 in gdk_threads_dispatch_free (data=0x7fce44001980) at
gdk.c:756
#20 0x7fce5f3fd8c8 in g_source_callback_unref (cb_data=0x558a271c1140) at
gmain.c:1547
#21 0x7fce5f3ff104 in g_source_destroy_internal (source=0x558a270f5d50,
context=0x558a26fad470, have_lock=1) at gmain.c:1236
#22 0x7fce5f400f30 in g_main_dispatch (context=0x558a26fad470) at
gmain.c:3166
#23 0x7fce5f400f30 in g_main_context_dispatch
(context=con
[Xfce-bugs] [Bug 10295] Shutting down or logging off improperly closes everything
https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10295 --- Comment #8 from Theo Linkspfeifer --- Can this report be closed then? Testing with SLiM (last release was 2013) would not make much sense anymore. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Xfce-bugs mailing list Xfce-bugs@xfce.org https://mail.xfce.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce-bugs
[Xfce-bugs] [Bug 15919] login / logout race condition with dbus error
https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15919 Theo Linkspfeifer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lastonestand...@tutanota.co ||m Status|NEW |NEEDINFO --- Comment #1 from Theo Linkspfeifer --- I tried to reproduce this issue, but without success. In a second test I even used an autostart launcher to immediately trigger the logout. xfce4-session 4.14.2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Xfce-bugs mailing list Xfce-bugs@xfce.org https://mail.xfce.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce-bugs
[Xfce-bugs] [Bug 16807] Upon resume my audio is redirected to a different output.
https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16807 Theo Linkspfeifer changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |NEEDINFO CC||lastonestand...@tutanota.co ||m --- Comment #1 from Theo Linkspfeifer --- Is xfce4-session to blame for this? We have xfce4-pulseaudio-plugin which allows you to control the volume via a panel indicator, and that is all there is when it comes to Xfce and sound. I assume that the bug is in pulseaudio or the kernel. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Xfce-bugs mailing list Xfce-bugs@xfce.org https://mail.xfce.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce-bugs
[Xfce-bugs] [Bug 15404] crash in xfsm_manager_get_shutdown_type
https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15404 Theo Linkspfeifer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pmenzel+bugzilla.xfce.org@m ||olgen.mpg.de --- Comment #7 from Theo Linkspfeifer --- *** Bug 16657 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Xfce-bugs mailing list Xfce-bugs@xfce.org https://mail.xfce.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce-bugs
[Xfce-bugs] [Bug 16657] SIGSEGV in `xfsm_manager_get_shutdown_type()`
https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16657 Theo Linkspfeifer changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Theo Linkspfeifer --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 15404 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Xfce-bugs mailing list Xfce-bugs@xfce.org https://mail.xfce.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce-bugs
[Xfce-bugs] [Bug 14122] Deadlock during loading of folder contents
https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14122 alexxcons changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW |RESOLVED --- Comment #15 from alexxcons --- Pushed to master and 4.14 branch. To be released in 1.9.0 and 1.8.15 So I gues the thunar part is fine now. Thank alot for working on it, afdw ! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Xfce-bugs mailing list Xfce-bugs@xfce.org https://mail.xfce.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce-bugs
[Xfce-bugs] [Bug 14122] Deadlock during loading of folder contents
https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14122 --- Comment #14 from Git Bot --- Anton Danilkin referenced this bugreport in commit 480c0663af64753131182a37c7896988586b607c Add checks for 0 handles (Bug #14122) https://gitlab.xfce.org/xfce/thunar/commit/480c0663af64753131182a37c7896988586b607c -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Xfce-bugs mailing list Xfce-bugs@xfce.org https://mail.xfce.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce-bugs
[Xfce-bugs] [Bug 14122] Deadlock during loading of folder contents
https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14122 --- Comment #13 from Git Bot --- Anton Danilkin referenced this bugreport in commit 98394ef960884af83b801824757a9a69b9bd8da0 Add checks for 0 handles (Bug #14122) https://gitlab.xfce.org/xfce/thunar/commit/98394ef960884af83b801824757a9a69b9bd8da0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Xfce-bugs mailing list Xfce-bugs@xfce.org https://mail.xfce.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce-bugs
[Xfce-bugs] [Bug 14122] Deadlock during loading of folder contents
https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14122 --- Comment #12 from alexxcons --- (In reply to afdw from comment #11) > Merge Request: https://gitlab.xfce.org/xfce/thunar/-/merge_requests/4 Thanks alot, much appreciated ! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Xfce-bugs mailing list Xfce-bugs@xfce.org https://mail.xfce.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce-bugs
[Xfce-bugs] [Bug 16759] No overshoot effect when scrolling in exo-icon-view
https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16759 --- Comment #7 from Theo Linkspfeifer --- Interestingly, the effect is missing in Nemo's compact (list) view too. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Xfce-bugs mailing list Xfce-bugs@xfce.org https://mail.xfce.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce-bugs
[Xfce-bugs] [Bug 16759] No overshoot effect when scrolling in exo-icon-view
https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16759 --- Comment #6 from Theo Linkspfeifer --- > #if GTK_CHECK_VERSION (3, 0, 0) Not really important, but small mistake here. This second check should check for 3.4.0 also. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Xfce-bugs mailing list Xfce-bugs@xfce.org https://mail.xfce.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce-bugs
[Xfce-bugs] [Bug 16759] No overshoot effect when scrolling in exo-icon-view
https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16759 --- Comment #5 from alexxcons --- (In reply to Theo Linkspfeifer from comment #4) > Created attachment 9843 [details] > quick diff Thanks Theo ! Afaik Sean is currently working on dropping all gtk2 dependencies, having gtk3 as requirement. Possibly best to wait until he is finished, so the #if GTK_CHECK_VERSION (3, 0, 0) can be dropped, and possibly the complete method can be simplified > Note that the overshoot effect is not present in list view (yet). Works for me for icon and detailed view. Only compact view does not have it yet .. (would require overshoot event on the left/right) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Xfce-bugs mailing list Xfce-bugs@xfce.org https://mail.xfce.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce-bugs
