[xmail] Re: Another question.

2003-01-24 Thread slackl


- Original Message -
From: Brandon Wittenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 6:08 PM
Subject: [xmail] Re: Another question.



 slackl wrote:

 I have setted up an XMail and it is not generating confirmation receipts
and delivery notifications upon receiving an emails, which request them.
 
 Is this normal and how should I enable this feature if it possible ?
 
 
 This is a feature of a mail client, not a mail server. When you send an
 email that request confirmation of delivery, it is the person to whom
 you are sending's mail client software that will send the delivery
 notification -- and only then if that person decides to send the
 confirmation (depending on the software).

 So your XMail is operating normally.

You are not right up to the end.
There are two confirmation types:
One is Read Confirmation and is generated by the mail client.
You are right at this point.
But another is Delivery Confirmation and is hanlded by MTA.
It is generated by MTA when it relayed a message to a destination and done
it successful.

My problem is that XMail seems to be fully ignorant to the second type of
confirmation requests.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




[xmail] Re: imap roadmap

2003-01-24 Thread Liron Newman



Davide Libenzi wrote:

On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, [iso-8859-1] S=F6nke Ruempler wrote:

  

hello davide,

just wondered when you plan to add imap support. just a question :-)



I started by trying to do a separate module but became a mess and required
also the standard XMail to be heavily changed. About 4 months ago a
changed route towards a single package. I can't give you an ETA because
the time I can dedicate in doing so widely changes. The fact that I have
reports of users that successfully integrated othe IMAP servers do not
force me to sweat to hit a given release date.

  

Hmm.. Don't forget these successes are only on Linux! Don't forget us 
Windows users.. :)

  


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




[xmail] psync features

2003-01-24 Thread Martin Schmid

Hello all, hello Davide


I'm using psync to download mail from external mailboxes. Some of them 
are mail drops for nultiple users and multiple domains.

In the pop3links.tab I placed a line like this:

?local.mydomain.org,myfirstdomain.org,myseconddomain.org,mythirddomain.org
user .

which works fine as long as the destination addresses are correct. But 
it happens that there arrive mail that won't be accepted by xmail. They 
fill the mailbox but never get deleted. I tried to use the pop3links.tab 
entry with no accepted domain name specified, hoping that xmail would 
then load just any mail, but it didn't work. Is it already possible to 
handle a multi-domain mail drop or wouldn't it make a nice feature?



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




[xmail] Re: psync features

2003-01-24 Thread Martin Schmid

 or should I set up pop3links.tab with something like .local and 
use aliasdomains.tab to forward the messages to the local domain's mail 
drops?



Martin Schmid schrieb:

Hello all, hello Davide


I'm using psync to download mail from external mailboxes. Some of them 
are mail drops for nultiple users and multiple domains.

In the pop3links.tab I placed a line like this:

?local.mydomain.org,myfirstdomain.org,myseconddomain.org,mythirddomain.org
user .

which works fine as long as the destination addresses are correct. But 
it happens that there arrive mail that won't be accepted by xmail. They 
fill the mailbox but never get deleted. I tried to use the pop3links.tab 
entry with no accepted domain name specified, hoping that xmail would 
then load just any mail, but it didn't work. Is it already possible to 
handle a multi-domain mail drop or wouldn't it make a nice feature?



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


  



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




[xmail] Re: Another question.

2003-01-24 Thread Brandon Wittenburg



You are not right up to the end.
There are two confirmation types:
One is Read Confirmation and is generated by the mail client.
You are right at this point.
But another is Delivery Confirmation and is hanlded by MTA.
It is generated by MTA when it relayed a message to a destination and done
it successful.

My problem is that XMail seems to be fully ignorant to the second type of
confirmation requests.

  

It seems I am ingnorant of the second type as well.

http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1891.txt   (section 5)
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2532.txt (section 2)

Thank you for enlightening me. :)

Regards,

Brandon

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




[xmail] Re: Another question.

2003-01-24 Thread slackl

[skip]

 My problem is that XMail seems to be fully ignorant to the second type of
 confirmation requests.

 It seems I am ingnorant of the second type as well.

 http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1891.txt   (section 5)
 http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2532.txt (section 2)

 Thank you for enlightening me. :)

You are welcome. :)
So, now we know, that those notifications are existing (at least in the wild
form [:-} ).
Are there implemented in xmail ? And how should I enable their generation ?



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




[xmail] little help needed

2003-01-24 Thread Jim
A few of my users are getting emails sent back to them with this message:

Failed !
SMTP-Error = 550 66.99.120.227 must be verifiable in DNS



I run the latest xmail and there is a forward  reverse hostname attached to that IP.

Full message == 

ErrCode   = -41
ErrString = Bad server response
ErrInfo   = 550 66.99.120.227 must be verifiable in DNS
SMAIL SMTP-Send MX = gateway2.worldnet.att.net. SMTP = berwynlibrary.net From = 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] To = [EMAIL PROTECTED] Failed !
SMTP-Error = 550 66.99.120.227 must be verifiable in DNS


Any ideas?  It just started popping up.  Was fine and i havent rebooted or restarted 
any process either bind or xmail in weeks.

Jim



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




[xmail] Re: little help needed

2003-01-24 Thread Jim

I have all ICMP including pings turned off.  It's odd though.. I just tried
sending to another worldnet.att.net user and it seems to have worked.


- Original Message -
From: Aaron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 2:44 PM
Subject: [xmail] Re: little help needed



 On Fri, 2003-01-24 at 15:16, Jim wrote:
  A few of my users are getting emails sent back to them with this
message:
 
  Failed !
  SMTP-Error = 550 66.99.120.227 must be verifiable in DNS
  
 

 berwynlibrary.net seems to have a DNS issue, at least when I try to ping
 it from my machine.  Set SMTP-RDNSCheck to 0 in your server.tab file if
 you want to not do a reverse DNS lookup on a domain.

 Aaron
 
  I run the latest xmail and there is a forward  reverse hostname
attached to that IP.
 
  Full message ==
 
  ErrCode   = -41
  ErrString = Bad server response
  ErrInfo   = 550 66.99.120.227 must be verifiable in DNS
  SMAIL SMTP-Send MX = gateway2.worldnet.att.net. SMTP =
berwynlibrary.net From = [EMAIL PROTECTED] To =
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Failed !
  SMTP-Error = 550 66.99.120.227 must be verifiable in DNS
  
 
  Any ideas?  It just started popping up.  Was fine and i havent rebooted
or restarted any process either bind or xmail in weeks.
 
  Jim
 
 
 
  -
  To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
  the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 

 -
 To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
 the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




[xmail] Re: little help needed

2003-01-24 Thread Jim

Thanks for the info Don, you're always there to help :)

Jim
- Original Message -
From: Don Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 2:51 PM
Subject: [xmail] Re: little help needed




 A search on Usenet found 2 other people who had the same problem today.
 Keep an eye there for any suggestions.

 It appears there's something strange with Worldnet.


http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=enlr=ie=ISO-8859-1q=%22must+be+verifia
 ble+in+DNS%22btnG=Google+Search

 -Don

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jim
 Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 2:49 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [xmail] Re: little help needed



 I have all ICMP including pings turned off.  It's odd though.. I just
tried
 sending to another worldnet.att.net user and it seems to have worked.


 - Original Message -
 From: Aaron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 2:44 PM
 Subject: [xmail] Re: little help needed


 
  On Fri, 2003-01-24 at 15:16, Jim wrote:
   A few of my users are getting emails sent back to them with this
 message:
  
   Failed !
   SMTP-Error = 550 66.99.120.227 must be verifiable in DNS
   
  
 
  berwynlibrary.net seems to have a DNS issue, at least when I try to ping
  it from my machine.  Set SMTP-RDNSCheck to 0 in your server.tab file if
  you want to not do a reverse DNS lookup on a domain.
 
  Aaron
  
   I run the latest xmail and there is a forward  reverse hostname
 attached to that IP.
  
   Full message ==
  
   ErrCode   = -41
   ErrString = Bad server response
   ErrInfo   = 550 66.99.120.227 must be verifiable in DNS
   SMAIL SMTP-Send MX = gateway2.worldnet.att.net. SMTP =
 berwynlibrary.net From = [EMAIL PROTECTED] To =
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Failed !
   SMTP-Error = 550 66.99.120.227 must be verifiable in DNS
   
  
   Any ideas?  It just started popping up.  Was fine and i havent
rebooted
 or restarted any process either bind or xmail in weeks.
  
   Jim
  
  
  
   -
   To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
   the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
  
 
  -
  To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
  the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

 -
 To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
 the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 -
 To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
 the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




[xmail] internal spoolfile delivered as mail

2003-01-24 Thread Michael Schwarz

Hello Davide and list

in the last few days i become some mails from a sourceforge-list
as i append below.

It seems that it is a spooled file from xmail, as it has the internal
spoolheader included at the top.

Is there an error on the server or what else???

Bye
Michael


-
HEADER:

Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from sc8-sf-list2.sourceforge.net (66.35.250.206)
by blackhost.net (217.160.106.201) with [XMail 1.11 (Linux/Ix86)
ESMTP Server]
id S1A05 for [EMAIL PROTECTED] from
[EMAIL PROTECTED];
Thu, 23 Jan 2003 17:08:45 +0100
sc8-sf-list2.sourceforge.net;66.35.250.206;blackhost.net;217.160.106.201;=
Thu
, 23 Jan 2003 17: 08:45 +0100;[XMail 1.11 (Linux/Ix86) ESMTP Server]


-Original Message-
From: Michael Schwarz=20
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 9:47 PM
Subject:=20
Importance: Low


blackhost.net
S1A05
MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SIZE=3D6656
RCPT TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MAIL-DATA
Received: from sc8-sf-list1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.13]
helo=3Dsc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net)
by sc8-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1
(Debian))
id 18bjkw-0003o7-00; Thu, 23 Jan 2003 07:59:06 -0800
Received: from qmail.colloquium.co.uk ([195.206.197.46]
helo=3Dterrapin.colloquium.co.uk)
by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1
(Debian))
id 18bjjz-0004lO-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 23 Jan 2003 07:58:07
-0800
Received: from sbs2000.jacksondicklaw.com (ms.jacksondicklaw.com
[195.206.194.33])
by terrapin.colloquium.co.uk (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id
h0NFvNo10348
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 23 Jan 2003 15:57:23
GMT
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=3Diso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: =
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-MS-Has-Attach:=20
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:=20
Thread-Topic: Port Forwarding from Router
Thread-Index: AcLC+Ed/u0mVbi7hEdei8QBgl47q/A=3D=3D
From: Neil Fraser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [IPCop-user] Port Forwarding from Router
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9-sf.net
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: =
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=3Dhelp
List-Post: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Subscribe: =
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ipcop-user,
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=3Dsubscribe
List-Id: User mailinglist for the IPCop project.
ipcop-user.lists.sourceforge.net
List-Unsubscribe: =
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ipcop-user,
=09
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=3Dunsubscribe
List-Archive:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=3Dipcop-user
X-Original-Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 15:58:32 -
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 15:58:32 -

I am using IPcop 0.1.1, together with a Alcatel Speedtouch 530 - which =
=3D
acts as a router and an ADSL connection.
I can access the internet with no problems at all.  My server (running =
=3D
SBS2000) is still connecting to my ISP through another router and ISDN, =
=3D
in order to received emails by SMTP.  Having got the ADSL up and =3D
running, I'd like to now switch over to the ADSL for everything and shut =
=3D
down the ISDN. =3D20
To test that this was going to work before I instructed both ISPs I have =
=3D
been trying to get the Router/IPcop to port forward SMTP to the server.  =
=3D
It hasn't been working - hence the email.  IP's:-
Router external:  213.xxx.yyy.zzz
Router internal:  10.0.0.138
IPcop Red:  10.0.0.1
IPcop Green: 195.xxx.yyy.zzz
Server:  195.xxx.yyy.zzz
Router set alternately to port forward to a default server (10.0.0.1) or =
=3D
specifically Port 25 requests to 10.0.0.1:25, and Port 80 requests to =
=3D
10.0.0.1:80.
IPcop told to forward Port 25 to 195.xxx.yyy.zzz:25 (and similarly with =
=3D
80).
I then tried to telnet to 213.xxx.yyy.zzz:25.  (From external and =3D
internal networks).  No joy.
Having done my research I knew that my ISP may have blocked Port 25 so I =
=3D
tried 80 as well, having set up a web server.  I also tried Port 2525 - =
=3D
IPcop - 213.xxx.yyy.zzz:25.  Nada.
IPcop's IDS logs look a bit weird to me:-

Date: 01/23 15:15:58 Name: BAD TRAFFIC same SRC/DST=3D20
Priority: 2 Type: Potentially Bad Traffic=3D20
IP info: 10.0.0.1:64233 - 10.0.0.1:2525=3D20
References: none found=3D20
=3D20
Date: 01/23 15:15:58 Name: ICMP redirect host=3D20
Priority: 2 Type: Potentially Bad Traffic=3D20
IP info: 10.0.0.138:n/a - 10.0.0.1:n/a=3D20
References: none found=3D20
=3D20
Date: 01/23 15:33:01 Name: BAD TRAFFIC same SRC/DST=3D20
Priority: 2 Type: Potentially Bad Traffic=3D20
IP info: 10.0.0.1:3048 - 10.0.0.1:80=3D20
References: none found=3D20
=3D20
Date: 01/23 15:33:01 Name: ICMP redirect host=3D20
Priority: 2 Type: Potentially Bad Traffic=3D20
IP info: 10.0.0.138:n/a - 10.0.0.1:n/a=3D20

[xmail] Re: imap roadmap

2003-01-24 Thread Liron Newman
Davide Libenzi wrote:

On Fri, 24 Jan 2003, Liron Newman wrote:

  

Hmm.. Don't forget these successes are only on Linux! Don't forget us
Windows users.. :)



I thought you all migrated to Linux, didn't you ? :)

  

Don't stop compiling those Win32 binaries just yet. :)

Anyway, do you have any tips on such combinations (XMail+other IMAP 
server) for Win32?



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




[xmail] Re: internal spoolfile delivered as mail

2003-01-24 Thread Michael Schwarz

Hello Davide

thanks for the quick answer.

I am only using the 'AntiVirus Filter 1.3' from Peter Lindeman
with F-Prot and AntiVir.

But in the script, if infection was found, the mail was rejected
without notice (DOMAIN MESSAGE FILTERS, returncode 98).

Any ideas?

Bye
Michael

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Davide Libenzi
 Sent: Saturday, January 25, 2003 4:27 AM
 To: XMail mailing list
 Subject: [xmail] Re: internal spoolfile delivered as mail
 
 
 
 On Sat, 25 Jan 2003, Michael Schwarz wrote:
 
 
  Hello Davide and list
 
  in the last few days i become some mails from a sourceforge-list
  as i append below.
 
  It seems that it is a spooled file from xmail, as it has 
 the internal
  spoolheader included at the top.
 
  Is there an error on the server or what else???
 
 Are you using external programs to treat messages ? This is the XMail
 internal message format and you should never see this 
 outside. You have to
 remember to use econv/rbuild when you pass XMail messages to external
 programs.
 
 
 
 - Davide
 
 -
 To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
 the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




[xmail] FW: Re: internal spoolfile delivered as mail

2003-01-24 Thread Michael Schwarz

Ups...



without notice (DOMAIN MESSAGE FILTERS, returncode 98).

And NEW message is send to the sender, receipient and the admin
with a warning.

Michael

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of Michael Schwarz
Sent: Saturday, January 25, 2003 4:36 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: internal spoolfile delivered as mail



Hello Davide

thanks for the quick answer.

I am only using the 'AntiVirus Filter 1.3' from Peter Lindeman
with F-Prot and AntiVir.

But in the script, if infection was found, the mail was rejected
without notice (DOMAIN MESSAGE FILTERS, returncode 98).

Any ideas?

Bye
Michael


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




[xmail] Re: internal spoolfile delivered as mail

2003-01-24 Thread Andrew Joakimsen

And the message shows up without a subject and such? For some reason I USED
to have the problem. I dont remember when it stopped doing it, it was either
between chaning from RH 8.0 to 7.3 and using the version I compliled or
something having to do with using the antivirus scripts.

-Mensaje original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]En
nombre de Michael Schwarz
Enviado el: Friday, January 24, 2003 10:15 PM
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Asunto: [xmail] internal spoolfile delivered as mail
Importancia: Baja



Hello Davide and list

in the last few days i become some mails from a sourceforge-list
as i append below.

It seems that it is a spooled file from xmail, as it has the internal
spoolheader included at the top.

Is there an error on the server or what else???

Bye
Michael


-
HEADER:

Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from sc8-sf-list2.sourceforge.net (66.35.250.206)
by blackhost.net (217.160.106.201) with [XMail 1.11 (Linux/Ix86)
ESMTP Server]
id S1A05 for [EMAIL PROTECTED] from
[EMAIL PROTECTED];
Thu, 23 Jan 2003 17:08:45 +0100
sc8-sf-list2.sourceforge.net;66.35.250.206;blackhost.net;217.160.106.201;=
Thu
, 23 Jan 2003 17: 08:45 +0100;[XMail 1.11 (Linux/Ix86) ESMTP Server]


-Original Message-
From: Michael Schwarz=20
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 9:47 PM
Subject:=20
Importance: Low


blackhost.net
S1A05
MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SIZE=3D6656
RCPT TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MAIL-DATA
Received: from sc8-sf-list1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.13]
helo=3Dsc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net)
by sc8-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1
(Debian))
id 18bjkw-0003o7-00; Thu, 23 Jan 2003 07:59:06 -0800
Received: from qmail.colloquium.co.uk ([195.206.197.46]
helo=3Dterrapin.colloquium.co.uk)
by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1
(Debian))
id 18bjjz-0004lO-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 23 Jan 2003 07:58:07
-0800
Received: from sbs2000.jacksondicklaw.com (ms.jacksondicklaw.com
[195.206.194.33])
by terrapin.colloquium.co.uk (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id
h0NFvNo10348
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 23 Jan 2003 15:57:23
GMT
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=3Diso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: =
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-MS-Has-Attach:=20
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:=20
Thread-Topic: Port Forwarding from Router
Thread-Index: AcLC+Ed/u0mVbi7hEdei8QBgl47q/A=3D=3D
From: Neil Fraser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [IPCop-user] Port Forwarding from Router
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9-sf.net
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: =
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=3Dhelp
List-Post: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Subscribe: =
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ipcop-user,
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=3Dsubscribe
List-Id: User mailinglist for the IPCop project.
ipcop-user.lists.sourceforge.net
List-Unsubscribe: =
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ipcop-user,
=09
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=3Dunsubscribe
List-Archive:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=3Dipcop-user
X-Original-Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 15:58:32 -
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 15:58:32 -

I am using IPcop 0.1.1, together with a Alcatel Speedtouch 530 - which =
=3D
acts as a router and an ADSL connection.
I can access the internet with no problems at all.  My server (running =
=3D
SBS2000) is still connecting to my ISP through another router and ISDN, =
=3D
in order to received emails by SMTP.  Having got the ADSL up and =3D
running, I'd like to now switch over to the ADSL for everything and shut =
=3D
down the ISDN. =3D20
To test that this was going to work before I instructed both ISPs I have =
=3D
been trying to get the Router/IPcop to port forward SMTP to the server.  =
=3D
It hasn't been working - hence the email.  IP's:-
Router external:  213.xxx.yyy.zzz
Router internal:  10.0.0.138
IPcop Red:  10.0.0.1
IPcop Green: 195.xxx.yyy.zzz
Server:  195.xxx.yyy.zzz
Router set alternately to port forward to a default server (10.0.0.1) or =
=3D
specifically Port 25 requests to 10.0.0.1:25, and Port 80 requests to =
=3D
10.0.0.1:80.
IPcop told to forward Port 25 to 195.xxx.yyy.zzz:25 (and similarly with =
=3D
80).
I then tried to telnet to 213.xxx.yyy.zzz:25.  (From external and =3D
internal networks).  No joy.
Having done my research I knew that my ISP may have blocked Port 25 so I =
=3D
tried 80 as well, having set up a web server.  I also tried Port 2525 - =
=3D
IPcop - 213.xxx.yyy.zzz:25.  Nada.
IPcop's IDS logs look a bit weird to me:-

Date: 01/23 15:15:58 Name: BAD TRAFFIC same SRC/DST=3D20
Priority: 2 Type: Potentially Bad Traffic=3D20
IP info: 10.0.0.1:64233 - 10.0.0.1:2525=3D20