Re: [ANNOUNCE] xorg-server 1.6.1.902

2009-07-02 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Tue, 2009-06-30 at 13:04 -0700, Ian Romanick wrote:
 
 Michel Dänzer wrote:
  On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 16:03 -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
  Thanks to Ajax for moving the DRI2 changes into the 1.6 branch, now I've
  pulled the remaining queued patches and have pushed this as 1.6.1.902
  (1.6.2 RC2). If no-one finds any catastrophic bugs, [...]
  
  How about: The DRI2 changes seem to break the video driver ABI, and
  apparently Mesa without corresponding changes (which will only be in the
  upcoming 7.5 release) as well. See Brice Goglin's report from a couple
  of days ago.
  
  You rejected backports before based on breaking ABI.
  
  Don't get me wrong, I like the functionality those DRI2 changes fix, but
  surely they could have been done without breaking about every binary
  interface involved. If the video driver ABI won't be restored, this
 
 Actually, the bug in question could not.  This was discussed quite a bit
 on the mailing list and on IRC.  The original DRI2 interface was
 deficient and could not be made to work.  So I fixed it.
 
  should be reflected by bumping its major version, and the changes
  breaking it should wait for the next major release like other such
  changes.
 
 The change is in the DRI2 interface, and that version was changed.
 Without the corresponding updates the only thing you lose is DRI2.
 Reverting to DRI1 should still work.  Since this affects only the Intel
 driver, and we will have a fixed driver release around the same time as
 the X server release, I don't think this is a catastrophic problem.

You're probably right, glad it's not really an ABI breakage after all.


-- 
Earthling Michel Dänzer   |http://www.vmware.com
Libre software enthusiast |  Debian, X and DRI developer
___
xorg mailing list
xorg@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg

Re: [ANNOUNCE] xorg-server 1.6.1.902

2009-07-02 Thread Keith Packard
On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 12:48 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:

 You're probably right, glad it's not really an ABI breakage after all.

Did you see the patch I proposed to fix the ABI breakage and provide
both interfaces? Testing would be greatly appreciated as I only have
Intel hardware these days...

-- 
keith.pack...@intel.com


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
xorg mailing list
xorg@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg

Re: [ANNOUNCE] xorg-server 1.6.1.902

2009-07-02 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 09:27 -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
 On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 12:48 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
 
  You're probably right, glad it's not really an ABI breakage after all.
 
 Did you see the patch I proposed to fix the ABI breakage and provide
 both interfaces? Testing would be greatly appreciated as I only have
 Intel hardware these days...

I'm not affected by the problem, you should ask the Debian users of your
driver for testing.


-- 
Earthling Michel Dänzer   |http://www.vmware.com
Libre software enthusiast |  Debian, X and DRI developer
___
xorg mailing list
xorg@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg

Re: [ANNOUNCE] xorg-server 1.6.1.902

2009-07-02 Thread Rémi Cardona
Le jeudi 02 juillet 2009 à 09:27 -0700, Keith Packard a écrit :
 On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 12:48 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
 
  You're probably right, glad it's not really an ABI breakage after all.
 
 Did you see the patch I proposed to fix the ABI breakage and provide
 both interfaces? Testing would be greatly appreciated as I only have
 Intel hardware these days...

I'll backport the patch to Gentoo ASAP for some wider testing.

Thanks for the patch.

Rémi

___
xorg mailing list
xorg@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg

Re: [ANNOUNCE] xorg-server 1.6.1.902

2009-06-30 Thread Keith Packard
On Tue, 2009-06-30 at 07:57 +0200, Rémi Cardona wrote:
 Le 30/06/2009 01:03, Keith Packard a écrit :
  Thanks to Ajax for moving the DRI2 changes into the 1.6 branch, now I've
  pulled the remaining queued patches and have pushed this as 1.6.1.902
  (1.6.2 RC2). If no-one finds any catastrophic bugs, I'll push this out
  as 1.6.2 shortly.
 
 This bug [1] is probably worth waiting for, as I've only been tracking 
 the nominations page with our packages. So, one of the commits since 
 Eamon's xace: Fix a bad device access hook call. seems to have broken 
 KMS somehow.

Could I get you to bisect for the problem?

(it works for me...)

-- 
keith.pack...@intel.com


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
xorg mailing list
xorg@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg

Re: [ANNOUNCE] xorg-server 1.6.1.902

2009-06-30 Thread Keith Packard
On Tue, 2009-06-30 at 07:45 +0200, Rémi Cardona wrote:
 Le 30/06/2009 01:03, Keith Packard a écrit :
  Kristian Høgsberg (1):
 Support setTexBuffer2 in AIGLX.
 
 Keith,
 
 That patch requires either some #ifdefs to make it build with mesa 7.4, 
 or mesa's minimum version needs to be pushed to 7.5 in configure.ac.

How about this (untested) patch?

commit a7a93c12f91e0de72868f17a555215f1795d9e2f
Author: Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com
Date:   Mon Jun 29 23:18:55 2009 -0700

Build against DRI_TEX_BUFFER_VERSION 1

setTexBuffer2 isn't present in this version of the structure, so don't try
to call it.

Signed-off-by: Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com

diff --git a/glx/glxdri2.c b/glx/glxdri2.c
index 0b64298..836fea4 100644
--- a/glx/glxdri2.c
+++ b/glx/glxdri2.c
@@ -222,12 +222,15 @@ __glXDRIbindTexImage(__GLXcontext *baseContext,
 if (texBuffer == NULL)
 return Success;
 
+#if __DRI_TEX_BUFFER_VERSION = 2
 if (texBuffer-base.version = 2  texBuffer-setTexBuffer2 != NULL) {
(*texBuffer-setTexBuffer2)(context-driContext,
glxPixmap-target,
glxPixmap-format,
drawable-driDrawable);
-} else {
+} else
+#endif
+{
texBuffer-setTexBuffer(context-driContext,
glxPixmap-target,
drawable-driDrawable);

-- 
keith.pack...@intel.com


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
xorg mailing list
xorg@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg

Re: [ANNOUNCE] xorg-server 1.6.1.902

2009-06-30 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 16:03 -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
 Thanks to Ajax for moving the DRI2 changes into the 1.6 branch, now I've
 pulled the remaining queued patches and have pushed this as 1.6.1.902
 (1.6.2 RC2). If no-one finds any catastrophic bugs, [...]

How about: The DRI2 changes seem to break the video driver ABI, and
apparently Mesa without corresponding changes (which will only be in the
upcoming 7.5 release) as well. See Brice Goglin's report from a couple
of days ago.

You rejected backports before based on breaking ABI.

Don't get me wrong, I like the functionality those DRI2 changes fix, but
surely they could have been done without breaking about every binary
interface involved. If the video driver ABI won't be restored, this
should be reflected by bumping its major version, and the changes
breaking it should wait for the next major release like other such
changes.


-- 
Earthling Michel Dänzer   |http://www.vmware.com
Libre software enthusiast |  Debian, X and DRI developer
___
xorg mailing list
xorg@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg

Re: [ANNOUNCE] xorg-server 1.6.1.902

2009-06-30 Thread Robby Workman
On Mon, 29 Jun 2009 23:20:03 -0700
Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com wrote:

 On Tue, 2009-06-30 at 07:45 +0200, Rémi Cardona wrote:
  Le 30/06/2009 01:03, Keith Packard a écrit :
   Kristian Høgsberg (1):
  Support setTexBuffer2 in AIGLX.
  
  Keith,
  
  That patch requires either some #ifdefs to make it build with mesa
  7.4, or mesa's minimum version needs to be pushed to 7.5 in
  configure.ac.
 
 How about this (untested) patch?
 
 commit a7a93c12f91e0de72868f17a555215f1795d9e2f
 Author: Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com
 Date:   Mon Jun 29 23:18:55 2009 -0700
 
 Build against DRI_TEX_BUFFER_VERSION 1
 
 setTexBuffer2 isn't present in this version of the structure, so
 don't try to call it.


Mail client munged it, but after hand-applying it, looks good here.
Up and running on 1.6.1.902 and intel-2.7.99.901 -- thanks!

-RW


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
xorg mailing list
xorg@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg

Re: [ANNOUNCE] xorg-server 1.6.1.902

2009-06-30 Thread Keith Packard
On Tue, 2009-06-30 at 08:46 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:

 How about: The DRI2 changes seem to break the video driver ABI, and
 apparently Mesa without corresponding changes (which will only be in the
 upcoming 7.5 release) as well. See Brice Goglin's report from a couple
 of days ago.

I've read the reports, and I'm treating this as a bug at this point -- I
need to see more information about how the ABI is broken so we can
figure out how to fix it.

 You rejected backports before based on breaking ABI.

Yup, let's figure out how to fix it. This ABI breakage is unintentional,
I believe.

-- 
keith.pack...@intel.com


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
xorg mailing list
xorg@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg

Re: [ANNOUNCE] xorg-server 1.6.1.902

2009-06-30 Thread Rémi Cardona
Keith Packard a écrit :
 Could I get you to bisect for the problem?
 
 (it works for me...)

It works for me as well unfortunately, I'll help the user to get the 
bisect ASAP.

Thanks

-- 
Rémi Cardona
LRI, INRIA
remi.card...@lri.fr
r...@gentoo.org
___
xorg mailing list
xorg@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg

Re: [ANNOUNCE] xorg-server 1.6.1.902

2009-06-30 Thread Dave Airlie
2009/6/30 Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com:
 On Tue, 2009-06-30 at 08:46 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:

 How about: The DRI2 changes seem to break the video driver ABI, and
 apparently Mesa without corresponding changes (which will only be in the
 upcoming 7.5 release) as well. See Brice Goglin's report from a couple
 of days ago.

 I've read the reports, and I'm treating this as a bug at this point -- I
 need to see more information about how the ABI is broken so we can
 figure out how to fix it.

 You rejected backports before based on breaking ABI.

 Yup, let's figure out how to fix it. This ABI breakage is unintentional,
 I believe.


I'm not sure you can easily.

The DRI2BufferRec changes size (adds a new int format), the driver
mallocs an array of these,
so you are probably pwned in that case.

I think the extension of DRI2InfoRec is probably okay, if the server
checks the version.

Dave.

 --
 keith.pack...@intel.com

 ___
 xorg mailing list
 xorg@lists.freedesktop.org
 http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg

___
xorg mailing list
xorg@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg


Re: [ANNOUNCE] xorg-server 1.6.1.902

2009-06-30 Thread Julien Cristau
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 19:09:00 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:

 The DRI2BufferRec changes size (adds a new int format), the driver
 mallocs an array of these,
 so you are probably pwned in that case.
 
 I think the extension of DRI2InfoRec is probably okay, if the server
 checks the version.
 
DRI2ScreenInit bails out if the driver was built with the old
DRI2InfoRec version, so in that case the DRI2BufferRec mallocs shouldn't
happen, unless I'm missing something.

Cheers,
Julien
___
xorg mailing list
xorg@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg


Re: [ANNOUNCE] xorg-server 1.6.1.902

2009-06-30 Thread Ian Romanick
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Michel Dänzer wrote:
 On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 16:03 -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
 Thanks to Ajax for moving the DRI2 changes into the 1.6 branch, now I've
 pulled the remaining queued patches and have pushed this as 1.6.1.902
 (1.6.2 RC2). If no-one finds any catastrophic bugs, [...]
 
 How about: The DRI2 changes seem to break the video driver ABI, and
 apparently Mesa without corresponding changes (which will only be in the
 upcoming 7.5 release) as well. See Brice Goglin's report from a couple
 of days ago.
 
 You rejected backports before based on breaking ABI.
 
 Don't get me wrong, I like the functionality those DRI2 changes fix, but
 surely they could have been done without breaking about every binary
 interface involved. If the video driver ABI won't be restored, this

Actually, the bug in question could not.  This was discussed quite a bit
on the mailing list and on IRC.  The original DRI2 interface was
deficient and could not be made to work.  So I fixed it.

 should be reflected by bumping its major version, and the changes
 breaking it should wait for the next major release like other such
 changes.

The change is in the DRI2 interface, and that version was changed.
Without the corresponding updates the only thing you lose is DRI2.
Reverting to DRI1 should still work.  Since this affects only the Intel
driver, and we will have a fixed driver release around the same time as
the X server release, I don't think this is a catastrophic problem.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkpKb7wACgkQX1gOwKyEAw8PRACfbon5CuXyDPDMfA+OHLedj7uI
I3MAn3qMXMadPzpqIoWFfeYjCJNniZAv
=Mcf5
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
xorg mailing list
xorg@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg

Re: [ANNOUNCE] xorg-server 1.6.1.902

2009-06-30 Thread Ian Romanick
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Dave Airlie wrote:
 2009/6/30 Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com:
 On Tue, 2009-06-30 at 08:46 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:

 How about: The DRI2 changes seem to break the video driver ABI, and
 apparently Mesa without corresponding changes (which will only be in the
 upcoming 7.5 release) as well. See Brice Goglin's report from a couple
 of days ago.
 I've read the reports, and I'm treating this as a bug at this point -- I
 need to see more information about how the ABI is broken so we can
 figure out how to fix it.

 You rejected backports before based on breaking ABI.
 Yup, let's figure out how to fix it. This ABI breakage is unintentional,
 I believe.
 
 I'm not sure you can easily.
 
 The DRI2BufferRec changes size (adds a new int format), the driver
 mallocs an array of these,
 so you are probably pwned in that case.
 
 I think the extension of DRI2InfoRec is probably okay, if the server
 checks the version.

The server checks the version and flat rejects drivers with the old
version.  Ditto for new drivers with an old server.  Like I said to
Michel, we discussed this quite a bit... you, Michel, and Kristian all
participated in those discussions, so I'm a little confused why everyone
is so surprised about this.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkpKcFgACgkQX1gOwKyEAw+7zACfXWfqFC3J6dhee5M/uwA+IJ0a
W9MAnAzchMvL9pJA0K8weXYzGN44ZkIS
=nx8B
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
xorg mailing list
xorg@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg


Re: [ANNOUNCE] xorg-server 1.6.1.902

2009-06-30 Thread Dave Airlie

 How about: The DRI2 changes seem to break the video driver ABI, and
 apparently Mesa without corresponding changes (which will only be in the
 upcoming 7.5 release) as well. See Brice Goglin's report from a couple
 of days ago.
 I've read the reports, and I'm treating this as a bug at this point -- I
 need to see more information about how the ABI is broken so we can
 figure out how to fix it.

 You rejected backports before based on breaking ABI.
 Yup, let's figure out how to fix it. This ABI breakage is unintentional,
 I believe.

 I'm not sure you can easily.

 The DRI2BufferRec changes size (adds a new int format), the driver
 mallocs an array of these,
 so you are probably pwned in that case.

 I think the extension of DRI2InfoRec is probably okay, if the server
 checks the version.

 The server checks the version and flat rejects drivers with the old
 version.  Ditto for new drivers with an old server.  Like I said to
 Michel, we discussed this quite a bit... you, Michel, and Kristian all
 participated in those discussions, so I'm a little confused why everyone
 is so surprised about this.

Essentially if a distro pushes out this X server, and has a KMS/DRI2
setup already working
this will break it, unless they also push out a new X driver set
(granted this is just Intel + maybe ATI)

However you look at it this is still a broken ABI from the user POV
I'm not saying its good or bad broken.

Dave.
___
xorg mailing list
xorg@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg


Re: [ANNOUNCE] xorg-server 1.6.1.902

2009-06-29 Thread Robby Workman
On Mon, 29 Jun 2009 16:03:20 -0700
Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com wrote:

 Thanks to Ajax for moving the DRI2 changes into the 1.6 branch, now
 I've pulled the remaining queued patches and have pushed this as
 1.6.1.902 (1.6.2 RC2). If no-one finds any catastrophic bugs, I'll
 push this out as 1.6.2 shortly.


Unless I missed something obvious, xf86-video-intel-2.7.99.901 won't
build on this:

i830_dri.c:66:18: error: dri2.h: No such file or directory
i830_dri.c:83: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__'
before 'I830DRI2CreateBuffers' i830_dri.c:242: error: expected
declaration specifiers or '...' before 'DRI2BufferPtr' i830_dri.c: In
function 'I830DRI2DestroyBuffers': i830_dri.c:250: error: 'buffers'
undeclared (first use in this function) i830_dri.c:250: error: (Each
undeclared identifier is reported only once i830_dri.c:250: error: for
each function it appears in.) i830_dri.c: At top level:
i830_dri.c:281: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before
'DRI2BufferPtr' i830_dri.c:281: error: expected declaration specifiers
or '...' before 'DRI2BufferPtr' i830_dri.c: In function
'I830DRI2CopyRegion': i830_dri.c:283: error: 'pSrcBuffer' undeclared
(first use in this function) i830_dri.c:284: error: 'pDstBuffer'
undeclared (first use in this function) i830_dri.c:288: error:
'DRI2BufferFrontLeft' undeclared (first use in this function)
i830_dri.c: In function 'I830DRI2ScreenInit': i830_dri.c:370: error:
'DRI2InfoRec' undeclared (first use in this function) i830_dri.c:370:
error: expected ';' before 'info' i830_dri.c:397: error: 'info'
undeclared (first use in this function) i830_dri.c:430: error:
'I830DRI2CreateBuffers' undeclared (first use in this function)
i830_dri.c:436: warning: implicit declaration of function
'DRI2ScreenInit' i830_dri.c:436: warning: nested extern declaration of
'DRI2ScreenInit' i830_dri.c: In function 'I830DRI2CloseScreen':
i830_dri.c:444: warning: implicit declaration of function
'DRI2CloseScreen' i830_dri.c:444: warning: nested extern declaration of
'DRI2CloseScreen' make[4]: *** [i830_dri.lo] Error 1 make[4]: ***
Waiting for unfinished jobs make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: *** [all] Error 2
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make: *** [all] Error 2



signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
xorg mailing list
xorg@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg

Re: [ANNOUNCE] xorg-server 1.6.1.902

2009-06-29 Thread Keith Packard
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 23:42 -0500, Robby Workman wrote:

 i830_dri.c:66:18: error: dri2.h: No such file or directory

I'll bet you have an old version of dri2 proto, which caused the server
to not build DRI2 support.

-- 
keith.pack...@intel.com


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
xorg mailing list
xorg@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg

Re: [ANNOUNCE] xorg-server 1.6.1.902

2009-06-29 Thread Robby Workman
On Mon, 29 Jun 2009 22:10:10 -0700
Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com wrote:

 On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 23:42 -0500, Robby Workman wrote:
 
  i830_dri.c:66:18: error: dri2.h: No such file or directory
 
 I'll bet you have an old version of dri2 proto, which caused the
 server to not build DRI2 support.
 

Er, oops.  I was at a conference when dri2proto-2.1 was released, so I
guess I missed it.  Sorry for the noise on that, but...  I upgraded
dri2proto, and now this happens (on mesa-7.4.4 fwiw) when building
xorg-server-1.6.1.902:

libtool: link: ( cd .libs  rm -f libglx.la  ln -s
../libglx.la libglx.la ) ../doltcompile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.
-I../include -I../hw/xfree86/os-support -I../hw/xfree86/os-support/bus
-I../hw/xfree86/common -I../hw/xfree86/dri -I../mi
-I../hw/xfree86/dri2   -DHAVE_DIX_CONFIG_H -Wall -Wpointer-arith
-Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations
-Wnested-externs -fno-strict-aliasing -D_BSD_SOURCE -DHAS_FCHOWN
-DHAS_STICKY_DIR_BIT -DDBUS_API_SUBJECT_TO_CHANGE
-I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/pixman-1 -I/usr/include/hal
-I/usr/include/dbus-1.0 -I/usr/lib64/dbus-1.0/include-I../include
-I../include -I../Xext -I../composite -I../damageext -I../xfixes
-I../Xi -I../mi -I../miext/shadow  -I../miext/damage -I../render
-I../randr -I../fb -I/tmp/package-mesa/usr/include -I/usr/include/drm
-I/usr/include/X11/dri -DXFree86Server -D__GLX_ALIGN64 -O2 -fPIC -MT
glxdri2.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/glxdri2.Tpo -c -o glxdri2.lo glxdri2.c
glxdri2.c: In function '__glXDRIbindTexImage': glxdri2.c:225: error:
'__DRItexBufferExtension' has no member named 'setTexBuffer2'
glxdri2.c:226: error: '__DRItexBufferExtension' has no member named
'setTexBuffer2' glxdri2.c: In function 'dri2FlushFrontBuffer':
glxdri2.c:456: warning: implicit declaration of function
'__glXDRIdrawableWaitGL' glxdri2.c:456: warning: nested extern
declaration of '__glXDRIdrawableWaitGL' glxdri2.c: At top level:
glxdri2.c:463: warning: excess elements in struct initializer
glxdri2.c:463: warning: (near initialization for 'loaderExtension')
make[1]: *** [glxdri2.lo] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory
`/tmp/x11-build/xorg-server-1.6.1.902/glx' make: *** [all-recursive]
Error 1

I *think* (based on ls -lRt of pub/individual) I've got the latest
(released) bits of everything this touches...

-RW


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
xorg mailing list
xorg@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg

Re: [ANNOUNCE] xorg-server 1.6.1.902

2009-06-29 Thread Rémi Cardona
Le 30/06/2009 01:03, Keith Packard a écrit :
 Kristian Høgsberg (1):
Support setTexBuffer2 in AIGLX.

Keith,

That patch requires either some #ifdefs to make it build with mesa 7.4, 
or mesa's minimum version needs to be pushed to 7.5 in configure.ac.

I have a preference for the former option, but the latter would fine 
too. Your call.

Cheers,

Rémi
___
xorg mailing list
xorg@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg

Re: [ANNOUNCE] xorg-server 1.6.1.902

2009-06-29 Thread Rémi Cardona
Le 30/06/2009 01:03, Keith Packard a écrit :
 Thanks to Ajax for moving the DRI2 changes into the 1.6 branch, now I've
 pulled the remaining queued patches and have pushed this as 1.6.1.902
 (1.6.2 RC2). If no-one finds any catastrophic bugs, I'll push this out
 as 1.6.2 shortly.

This bug [1] is probably worth waiting for, as I've only been tracking 
the nominations page with our packages. So, one of the commits since 
Eamon's xace: Fix a bad device access hook call. seems to have broken 
KMS somehow.

[1] http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22537

Thanks for the new release

Rémi
___
xorg mailing list
xorg@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg