[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4358) Improve relationship between SharingPolicy and ReservationAgent
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15054904#comment-15054904 ] Hudson commented on YARN-4358: -- FAILURE: Integrated in Hadoop-Hdfs-trunk-Java8 #691 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Hdfs-trunk-Java8/691/]) YARN-4358 addendum patch to fix javadoc error (arun suresh: rev 7fb212e5e672b3f285493f6c7b2598ef7e61406b) * hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/yarn/server/resourcemanager/reservation/PlanView.java > Improve relationship between SharingPolicy and ReservationAgent > --- > > Key: YARN-4358 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4358 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: capacityscheduler, fairscheduler, resourcemanager >Reporter: Carlo Curino >Assignee: Carlo Curino > Fix For: 2.8.0 > > Attachments: YARN-4358.2.patch, YARN-4358.3.patch, YARN-4358.4.patch, > YARN-4358.addendum-2.patch, YARN-4358.addendum.patch, YARN-4358.patch, > mvn_package_dist.txt > > > At the moment an agent places based on available resources, but has no > visibility to extra constraints imposed by the SharingPolicy. While not all > constraints are easily represented some (e.g., max-instantaneous resources) > are easily represented. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (YARN-4307) Blacklisted nodes for AM container is not getting displayed in the Web UI
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4307?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Naganarasimha G R updated YARN-4307: Attachment: YARN-4307.v1.001.patch AppInfoPage.png RMappAttempt.png Hi [~vvasudev], Please find the attached patch i have created as per your suggestion. I have updated AppInfo & AppAttempt page, but have touched app listing page. please review > Blacklisted nodes for AM container is not getting displayed in the Web UI > - > > Key: YARN-4307 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4307 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Bug > Components: resourcemanager, webapp >Reporter: Naganarasimha G R >Assignee: Naganarasimha G R > Attachments: AppInfoPage.png, RMappAttempt.png, > YARN-4307.v1.001.patch, webpage.png, yarn-capacity-scheduler-debug.log > > > In pseudo cluster had 2 NM's and had launched app with incorrect > configuration *./hadoop org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.SleepJob > -Dmapreduce.job.node-label-expression=labelX > -Dyarn.app.mapreduce.am.env=JAVA_HOME=/no/jvm/here -m 5 -mt 1200*. > First attempt failed and 2nd attempt was launched, but the application was > hung. In the scheduler logs found that localhost was blacklisted but in the > UI (app& apps listing page) count was shown as zero and as well no hosts > listed in the app page. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (YARN-2885) Create AMRMProxy request interceptor for distributed scheduling decisions for queueable containers
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2885?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Arun Suresh updated YARN-2885: -- Attachment: YARN-2885-yarn-2877.full-3.patch As per [~leftnoteasy]'s suggestion, updating patch to move the DistributedSchedulerProtocol from yarn.api to yarn.server.common/api > Create AMRMProxy request interceptor for distributed scheduling decisions for > queueable containers > -- > > Key: YARN-2885 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2885 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: nodemanager, resourcemanager >Reporter: Konstantinos Karanasos >Assignee: Arun Suresh > Attachments: YARN-2885-yarn-2877.001.patch, > YARN-2885-yarn-2877.002.patch, YARN-2885-yarn-2877.full-2.patch, > YARN-2885-yarn-2877.full-3.patch, YARN-2885-yarn-2877.full.patch, > YARN-2885_api_changes.patch > > > We propose to add a Local ResourceManager (LocalRM) to the NM in order to > support distributed scheduling decisions. > Architecturally we leverage the RMProxy, introduced in YARN-2884. > The LocalRM makes distributed decisions for queuable containers requests. > Guaranteed-start requests are still handled by the central RM. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-2885) Create AMRMProxy request interceptor for distributed scheduling decisions for queueable containers
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2885?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15055006#comment-15055006
]
Hadoop QA commented on YARN-2885:
-
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m 0s
{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m 0s
{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s {color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 19 new or modified test
files. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 13m
29s {color} | {color:green} yarn-2877 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 1m 53s
{color} | {color:green} yarn-2877 passed with JDK v1.8.0_66 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 2m 10s
{color} | {color:green} yarn-2877 passed with JDK v1.7.0_91 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
30s {color} | {color:green} yarn-2877 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 3m 1s
{color} | {color:green} yarn-2877 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 1m
26s {color} | {color:green} yarn-2877 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 6m
22s {color} | {color:green} yarn-2877 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 2m 24s
{color} | {color:green} yarn-2877 passed with JDK v1.8.0_66 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 4m 55s
{color} | {color:green} yarn-2877 passed with JDK v1.7.0_91 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 2m
47s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 1m 57s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_66 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} cc {color} | {color:green} 1m 57s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} javac {color} | {color:red} 12m 43s
{color} | {color:red} hadoop-yarn-project_hadoop-yarn-jdk1.8.0_66 with JDK
v1.8.0_66 generated 1 new issues (was 14, now 14). {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 1m 57s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 2m 11s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_91 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} cc {color} | {color:green} 2m 12s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} javac {color} | {color:red} 14m 55s
{color} | {color:red} hadoop-yarn-project_hadoop-yarn-jdk1.7.0_91 with JDK
v1.7.0_91 generated 1 new issues (was 15, now 15). {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 2m 11s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} checkstyle {color} | {color:red} 0m 27s
{color} | {color:red} Patch generated 143 new checkstyle issues in
hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn (total was 556, now 695). {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 3m 0s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 1m
22s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} whitespace {color} | {color:red} 0m 0s
{color} | {color:red} The patch has 18 line(s) that end in whitespace. Use git
apply --whitespace=fix. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} xml {color} | {color:green} 0m 1s
{color} | {color:green} The patch has no ill-formed XML file. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} findbugs {color} | {color:red} 1m 8s
{color} | {color:red}
hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-nodemanager
introduced 3 new FindBugs issues. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} javadoc {color} | {color:red} 0m 39s
{color} | {color:red} hadoop-yarn-api in the patch failed with JDK v1.8.0_66.
{color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 4m 56s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_91 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 0m 25s
{color} | {color:green} hadoop-yarn-api in the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_66.
{color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} |
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4450) TestTimelineAuthenticationFilter and TestYarnConfigurationFields fail
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4450?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15055020#comment-15055020
]
Steve Loughran commented on YARN-4450:
--
Should I roll back YARN-4356 until this is fixed?
> TestTimelineAuthenticationFilter and TestYarnConfigurationFields fail
> -
>
> Key: YARN-4450
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4450
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: timelineserver
>Affects Versions: YARN-2928
>Reporter: Sangjin Lee
>Assignee: Sangjin Lee
>
> When I run the unit tests against the current branch,
> TestTimelineAuthenticationFilter and TestYarnConfigurationFields fail:
> {noformat}
> TestTimelineAuthenticationFilter.testDelegationTokenOperations:251 »
> NullPointer
> TestTimelineAuthenticationFilter.testDelegationTokenOperations:251 »
> NullPointer
>
> TestYarnConfigurationFields>TestConfigurationFieldsBase.testCompareConfigurationClassAgainstXml:429
> class org.apache.hadoop.yarn.conf.YarnConfiguration has 1 variables missing
> in yarn-default.xml
> {noformat}
> The latter failure is caused by YARN-4356 (when we deprecated
> RM_SYSTEM_METRICS_PUBLISHER_ENABLED), and the former an older issue that was
> caused when a later use of field {{resURI}} was added in trunk.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (YARN-4450) TestTimelineAuthenticationFilter and TestYarnConfigurationFields fail
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4450?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Steve Loughran updated YARN-4450:
-
Environment: jenkins
> TestTimelineAuthenticationFilter and TestYarnConfigurationFields fail
> -
>
> Key: YARN-4450
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4450
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: timelineserver
>Affects Versions: YARN-2928
> Environment: jenkins
>Reporter: Sangjin Lee
>Assignee: Sangjin Lee
>
> When I run the unit tests against the current branch,
> TestTimelineAuthenticationFilter and TestYarnConfigurationFields fail:
> {noformat}
> TestTimelineAuthenticationFilter.testDelegationTokenOperations:251 »
> NullPointer
> TestTimelineAuthenticationFilter.testDelegationTokenOperations:251 »
> NullPointer
>
> TestYarnConfigurationFields>TestConfigurationFieldsBase.testCompareConfigurationClassAgainstXml:429
> class org.apache.hadoop.yarn.conf.YarnConfiguration has 1 variables missing
> in yarn-default.xml
> {noformat}
> The latter failure is caused by YARN-4356 (when we deprecated
> RM_SYSTEM_METRICS_PUBLISHER_ENABLED), and the former an older issue that was
> caused when a later use of field {{resURI}} was added in trunk.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4238) createdTime and modifiedTime is not reported while publishing entities to ATSv2
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15054938#comment-15054938 ] Naganarasimha G R commented on YARN-4238: - Hi [~varun_saxena], Thanks for updating on the info. bq. Yes its used to filter rows during query at the reader side. If its used then fine, but would the query be helpful if its based on modification time ? i thought it will be based on creation time but if required then fine. bq. Modified time is only updated when we write an event. Also we do writes in a batch. Modified time is only 8 bytes. I dont think that theoretically this should cause any bottleneck. yeah theoretically should be fine but it might be little more than 8 bytes as its in hbase(Key value etc...) and for large number containers in a large cluster thought might be unnecessary. Also If its in batch then little better but would like to know the views of others here . bq. Which patch would you want ? With the checkstyle issue in JobHistoryEventHandler fixed(which would include changing unrelated code as well) or without them fixed ? As [~djp] mentioned my opinion too is to better to be *not handled* here, as as there is already one more jira and can be taken care there. > createdTime and modifiedTime is not reported while publishing entities to > ATSv2 > --- > > Key: YARN-4238 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4238 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: timelineserver >Affects Versions: YARN-2928 >Reporter: Varun Saxena >Assignee: Varun Saxena > Labels: yarn-2928-1st-milestone > Attachments: YARN-4238-YARN-2928.01.patch, > YARN-4238-feature-YARN-2928.002.patch, YARN-4238-feature-YARN-2928.02.patch, > YARN-4238-feature-YARN-2928.03.patch, YARN-4238-feature-YARN-2928.04.patch > > > While publishing entities from RM and elsewhere we are not sending created > time. For instance, created time in TimelineServiceV2Publisher class and for > other entities in other such similar classes is not updated. We can easily > update created time when sending application created event. Likewise for > modification time on every write. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (YARN-2934) Improve handling of container's stderr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2934?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Naganarasimha G R updated YARN-2934:
Attachment: YARN-2934.v1.006.patch
Hi [~vvasudev],
Have created a new patch with configuration for the tail size, please review
> Improve handling of container's stderr
> ---
>
> Key: YARN-2934
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2934
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Gera Shegalov
>Assignee: Naganarasimha G R
>Priority: Critical
> Attachments: YARN-2934.v1.001.patch, YARN-2934.v1.002.patch,
> YARN-2934.v1.003.patch, YARN-2934.v1.004.patch, YARN-2934.v1.005.patch,
> YARN-2934.v1.006.patch
>
>
> Most YARN applications redirect stderr to some file. That's why when
> container launch fails with {{ExitCodeException}} the message is empty.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4307) Blacklisted nodes for AM container is not getting displayed in the Web UI
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4307?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15055039#comment-15055039 ] Naganarasimha G R commented on YARN-4307: - Test cases are passing locally check style can take care in the next patch. > Blacklisted nodes for AM container is not getting displayed in the Web UI > - > > Key: YARN-4307 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4307 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Bug > Components: resourcemanager, webapp >Reporter: Naganarasimha G R >Assignee: Naganarasimha G R > Attachments: AppInfoPage.png, RMappAttempt.png, > YARN-4307.v1.001.patch, webpage.png, yarn-capacity-scheduler-debug.log > > > In pseudo cluster had 2 NM's and had launched app with incorrect > configuration *./hadoop org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.SleepJob > -Dmapreduce.job.node-label-expression=labelX > -Dyarn.app.mapreduce.am.env=JAVA_HOME=/no/jvm/here -m 5 -mt 1200*. > First attempt failed and 2nd attempt was launched, but the application was > hung. In the scheduler logs found that localhost was blacklisted but in the > UI (app& apps listing page) count was shown as zero and as well no hosts > listed in the app page. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4307) Blacklisted nodes for AM container is not getting displayed in the Web UI
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4307?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15054977#comment-15054977
]
Hadoop QA commented on YARN-4307:
-
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m 0s
{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m 0s
{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s {color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test
files. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 8m
6s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 30s
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK v1.8.0_66 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 32s
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK v1.7.0_91 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
14s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m 40s
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 0m
15s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 1m
19s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 24s
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK v1.8.0_66 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 28s
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK v1.7.0_91 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 0m
35s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 30s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_66 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m 30s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 33s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_91 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m 33s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} checkstyle {color} | {color:red} 0m 14s
{color} | {color:red} Patch generated 1 new checkstyle issues in
hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager
(total was 28, now 29). {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m 38s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 0m
16s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s {color} | {color:green} Patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 1m
24s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 24s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_66 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 29s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_91 {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 64m 26s {color}
| {color:red} hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager in the patch failed with JDK
v1.8.0_66. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 65m 43s {color}
| {color:red} hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager in the patch failed with JDK
v1.7.0_91. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m
26s {color} | {color:green} Patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black} 149m 11s {color}
| {color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| JDK v1.8.0_66 Failed junit tests |
hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.TestClientRMTokens |
| | hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.TestAMAuthorization |
| JDK v1.7.0_91 Failed junit tests |
hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.TestClientRMTokens |
| | hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.security.TestRMDelegationTokens |
| | hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.TestAMAuthorization |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Image:yetus/hadoop:0ca8df7 |
| JIRA Patch URL |
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4448) debug yarn jenkins
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15055096#comment-15055096
]
Hadoop QA commented on YARN-4448:
-
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m 0s
{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m 0s
{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} test4tests {color} | {color:red} 0m 0s
{color} | {color:red} The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified
tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please
list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 10m
52s {color} | {color:green} branch-2.7 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 8s
{color} | {color:green} branch-2.7 passed with JDK v1.8.0_66 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 9s
{color} | {color:green} branch-2.7 passed with JDK v1.7.0_91 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m 18s
{color} | {color:green} branch-2.7 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 0m
15s {color} | {color:green} branch-2.7 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 11s
{color} | {color:green} branch-2.7 passed with JDK v1.8.0_66 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 10s
{color} | {color:green} branch-2.7 passed with JDK v1.7.0_91 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 0m
10s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 8s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_66 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m 8s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 9s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_91 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m 9s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m 16s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 0m
10s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} whitespace {color} | {color:red} 0m 1s
{color} | {color:red} The patch has 1214 line(s) that end in whitespace. Use
git apply --whitespace=fix. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} whitespace {color} | {color:red} 0m 34s
{color} | {color:red} The patch has 192 line(s) with tabs. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} xml {color} | {color:green} 0m 0s
{color} | {color:green} The patch has no ill-formed XML file. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 9s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_66 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 11s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_91 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 0m 8s
{color} | {color:green} hadoop-yarn-site in the patch passed with JDK
v1.8.0_66. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 0m 9s
{color} | {color:green} hadoop-yarn-site in the patch passed with JDK
v1.7.0_91. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} asflicense {color} | {color:red} 0m 31s
{color} | {color:red} Patch generated 46 ASF License warnings. {color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black} 31m 48s {color}
| {color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Image:yetus/hadoop:date2015-12-13 |
| JIRA Patch URL |
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12777301/HADOOP-11820-branch-2.7.00.patch
|
| JIRA Issue | YARN-4448 |
| Optional Tests | asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall mvnsite
unit xml |
| uname | Linux 4a0b065b5fee 3.13.0-36-lowlatency #63-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT Wed
Sep 3 21:56:12 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | /testptch/hadoop/patchprocess/precommit/personality/provided.sh
|
| git revision | branch-2.7 / a023125 |
| whitespace |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/9963/artifact/patchprocess/whitespace-eol.txt
|
| whitespace |
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-2934) Improve handling of container's stderr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2934?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15055078#comment-15055078
]
Hadoop QA commented on YARN-2934:
-
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m 0s
{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m 0s
{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s {color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test
files. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 8m
6s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 8m 47s
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK v1.8.0_66 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 9m 31s
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK v1.7.0_91 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 1m
3s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 2m 43s
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 0m
55s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 5m
38s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 2m 26s
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK v1.8.0_66 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 4m 55s
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK v1.7.0_91 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 3m
10s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 8m 49s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_66 {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} javac {color} | {color:red} 20m 18s
{color} | {color:red} root-jdk1.8.0_66 with JDK v1.8.0_66 generated 5 new
issues (was 734, now 734). {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 8m 49s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 9m 29s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_91 {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} javac {color} | {color:red} 29m 47s
{color} | {color:red} root-jdk1.7.0_91 with JDK v1.7.0_91 generated 5 new
issues (was 728, now 728). {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 9m 29s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} checkstyle {color} | {color:red} 1m 2s
{color} | {color:red} Patch generated 7 new checkstyle issues in root (total
was 455, now 459). {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 2m 42s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 0m
55s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} whitespace {color} | {color:red} 0m 0s
{color} | {color:red} The patch has 1 line(s) with tabs. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} xml {color} | {color:green} 0m 0s
{color} | {color:green} The patch has no ill-formed XML file. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} findbugs {color} | {color:red} 1m 11s
{color} | {color:red}
hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-nodemanager
introduced 1 new FindBugs issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 2m 26s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_66 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 4m 57s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_91 {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 7m 38s {color}
| {color:red} hadoop-common in the patch failed with JDK v1.8.0_66. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 0m 26s
{color} | {color:green} hadoop-yarn-api in the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_66.
{color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 2m 8s
{color} | {color:green} hadoop-yarn-common in the patch passed with JDK
v1.8.0_66. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 9m 12s
{color} | {color:green} hadoop-yarn-server-nodemanager in the
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4448) debug yarn jenkins
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15055106#comment-15055106
]
Hadoop QA commented on YARN-4448:
-
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m 0s
{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m 0s
{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} test4tests {color} | {color:red} 0m 0s
{color} | {color:red} The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified
tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please
list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 6m
19s {color} | {color:green} branch-2.7 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 8s
{color} | {color:green} branch-2.7 passed with JDK v1.8.0_66 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 9s
{color} | {color:green} branch-2.7 passed with JDK v1.7.0_91 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m 17s
{color} | {color:green} branch-2.7 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 0m
10s {color} | {color:green} branch-2.7 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 10s
{color} | {color:green} branch-2.7 passed with JDK v1.8.0_66 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 10s
{color} | {color:green} branch-2.7 passed with JDK v1.7.0_91 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 0m
11s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 8s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_66 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m 8s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 10s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_91 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m 10s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m 16s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 0m
11s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} whitespace {color} | {color:red} 0m 1s
{color} | {color:red} The patch has 1469 line(s) that end in whitespace. Use
git apply --whitespace=fix. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} whitespace {color} | {color:red} 0m 34s
{color} | {color:red} The patch has 192 line(s) with tabs. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} xml {color} | {color:green} 0m 0s
{color} | {color:green} The patch has no ill-formed XML file. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 9s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_66 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 11s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_91 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 0m 8s
{color} | {color:green} hadoop-yarn-site in the patch passed with JDK
v1.8.0_66. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 0m 9s
{color} | {color:green} hadoop-yarn-site in the patch passed with JDK
v1.7.0_91. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} asflicense {color} | {color:red} 0m 28s
{color} | {color:red} Patch generated 46 ASF License warnings. {color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black} 26m 46s {color}
| {color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Image:yetus/hadoop:date2015-12-13 |
| JIRA Patch URL |
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12777301/HADOOP-11820-branch-2.7.00.patch
|
| JIRA Issue | YARN-4448 |
| Optional Tests | asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall mvnsite
unit xml |
| uname | Linux c71b66c9ec3c 3.13.0-36-lowlatency #63-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT Wed
Sep 3 21:56:12 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | /testptch/hadoop/patchprocess/precommit/personality/provided.sh
|
| git revision | branch-2.7 / a023125 |
| whitespace |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/9964/artifact/patchprocess/whitespace-eol.txt
|
| whitespace
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4224) Change the ATSv2 reader side REST interface to conform to current REST APIs' in YARN
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4224?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15055071#comment-15055071 ] Naganarasimha G R commented on YARN-4224: - Catching up with the thread and went through the existing WebService interface Hi [~gtCarrera], May be if you give some examples then could relate to the existing APIs and what modifications are being suggested. As per the description given by you, i already see some API's being existed but may be with examples will get more clarity. > Change the ATSv2 reader side REST interface to conform to current REST APIs' > in YARN > > > Key: YARN-4224 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4224 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: timelineserver >Affects Versions: YARN-2928 >Reporter: Varun Saxena >Assignee: Varun Saxena > Attachments: YARN-4224-YARN-2928.01.patch > > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (YARN-1011) [Umbrella] Schedule containers based on utilization of currently allocated containers
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1011?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Karthik Kambatla updated YARN-1011: --- Summary: [Umbrella] Schedule containers based on utilization of currently allocated containers (was: [Umbrella] RM should dynamically schedule containers based on utilization of currently allocated containers) > [Umbrella] Schedule containers based on utilization of currently allocated > containers > - > > Key: YARN-1011 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1011 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: New Feature >Reporter: Arun C Murthy > > Currently RM allocates containers and assumes resources allocated are > utilized. > RM can, and should, get to a point where it measures utilization of allocated > containers and, if appropriate, allocate more (speculative?) containers. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4224) Change the ATSv2 reader side REST interface to conform to current REST APIs' in YARN
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4224?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15055229#comment-15055229
]
Li Lu commented on YARN-4224:
-
[~vrushalic] I think the proposal is pretty close to the hRaven form, just
trying to combine the {{\{clustername\}/\{username\}}} part together with the
flow's name to form an UID, so that some front end frameworks can easily access
it. A problem here is the logic to build this UID would be better to be kept on
the server side, that why we're proposing an "uid" end point for front end
programs to build this UID when they would like to do a put (since they need to
figure out the endpoint for this flow).
[~Naganarasimha] I would not be surprised if most of the implementations of the
proposed API are already in our codebase. We can simply change the "wrapper"
layer of our reader server's WS to make this change.
> Change the ATSv2 reader side REST interface to conform to current REST APIs'
> in YARN
>
>
> Key: YARN-4224
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4224
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: timelineserver
>Affects Versions: YARN-2928
>Reporter: Varun Saxena
>Assignee: Varun Saxena
> Attachments: YARN-4224-YARN-2928.01.patch
>
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-1011) [Umbrella] RM should dynamically schedule containers based on utilization of currently allocated containers
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1011?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15055206#comment-15055206 ] Karthik Kambatla commented on YARN-1011: I have been thinking of this for a while now, and would like to drive this forward. [~elgoiri] has also expressed interest in collaborating on this. Let me work on a design doc with more details and upload here. Also, it might be prudent to work on a branch. > [Umbrella] RM should dynamically schedule containers based on utilization of > currently allocated containers > --- > > Key: YARN-1011 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1011 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: New Feature >Reporter: Arun C Murthy > > Currently RM allocates containers and assumes resources allocated are > utilized. > RM can, and should, get to a point where it measures utilization of allocated > containers and, if appropriate, allocate more (speculative?) containers. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4138) Roll back container resource allocation after resource increase token expires
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4138?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15055330#comment-15055330 ] sandflee commented on YARN-4138: Hi, [~mding], consider such situation: 1) AM request increase request to RM and received a token. 2) AM sends increase request to NM and succed (this may take a long time because of AM logic or network problem or nm restart) 3) RM token expires, and send decrease action to NM 4) NM sends increase notify to RM, since token expires, ignored by RM to AM, since there's no increase succ/expire by RM, resource are successfully increased, but to RM and NM, increase action are expired > Roll back container resource allocation after resource increase token expires > - > > Key: YARN-4138 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4138 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: api, nodemanager, resourcemanager >Reporter: MENG DING >Assignee: MENG DING > Attachments: YARN-4138-YARN-1197.1.patch, YARN-4138-YARN-1197.2.patch > > > In YARN-1651, after container resource increase token expires, the running > container is killed. > This ticket will change the behavior such that when a container resource > increase token expires, the resource allocation of the container will be > reverted back to the value before the increase. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4441) Kill application request from the webservice(ui) is showing success even for the finished applications
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4441?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15055504#comment-15055504
]
Mohammad Shahid Khan commented on YARN-4441:
Thanks [#Sunil G] and [#Rohith Sharma K S] for the analysis.
Have discussed the same with [#Rohith Sharma K S] and want to clarify that
we do not want to throw the new exception just want the avoid the killApp call
in case the application's state is already stored in the app store.
In RMWebServices updateAppState API
//currentlty we are ignoring the killAPP call for the application which are
already killed.
{code}
if (!app.getState().toString().equals(targetState.getState())) {
// user is attempting to change state. right we only
// allow users to kill the app
if
(targetState.getState().equals(YarnApplicationState.KILLED.toString())) {
return killApp(app, callerUGI, hsr);
}
throw new BadRequestException("Only '"
+ YarnApplicationState.KILLED.toString()
+ "' is allowed as a target state.");
}
{code}
#My proposal is to ignore the call also for the applications whose state's are
stored to the application store.
{code}
if (!app.getState().toString().equals(targetState.getState()) &&
!(app.isAppFinalStateStored())) {
// user is attempting to change state. right we only
// allow users to kill the app
if
(targetState.getState().equals(YarnApplicationState.KILLED.toString())) {
return killApp(app, callerUGI, hsr);
}
throw new BadRequestException("Only '"
+ YarnApplicationState.KILLED.toString()
+ "' is allowed as a target state.");
}
{code}
> Kill application request from the webservice(ui) is showing success even for
> the finished applications
> --
>
> Key: YARN-4441
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4441
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: 3.0.0
>Reporter: Mohammad Shahid Khan
>Assignee: Mohammad Shahid Khan
>
> If the application is already finished ie either failled, killed, or succeded
> the kill operation should not be logged as success.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-4383) TeraGen Application allows same output directory for multiple jobs
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4383?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15055524#comment-15055524
]
Kai Sasaki commented on YARN-4383:
--
It does not seems to be a bug. This change was done by MAPREDUCE-4879.
But we may be able to modify to exclude PARTITON_FILENAME case if we can
understand the reason
why it can be overwrite in the case only 1 child and it's PARTITION_FILENAME.
> TeraGen Application allows same output directory for multiple jobs
> ---
>
> Key: YARN-4383
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4383
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: tongshiquan
>
> When Teragen is run multiple times with the same output directory, normally
> it should validate and fail.
> But some cases it may continue and cause the exceptions which results failure
> in job later time.
> I think the reason behind it is
> {code}
> org.apache.hadoop.examples.terasort.TeraOutputFormat.checkOutputSpecs(TeraOutputFormat.java)
> have issue, it permit the output already exists if it have only 1 kid and
> it's PARTITION_FILENAME
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
