[jira] [Updated] (YARN-8693) Add signalToContainer REST API for RMWebServices
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-8693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Prabhu Joseph updated YARN-8693: Parent: YARN-445 Issue Type: Sub-task (was: Improvement) > Add signalToContainer REST API for RMWebServices > > > Key: YARN-8693 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-8693 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: restapi >Reporter: Tao Yang >Assignee: Tao Yang >Priority: Major > Fix For: 3.3.0 > > Attachments: YARN-8693.001.patch, YARN-8693.002.patch, > YARN-8693.003.patch > > > Currently YARN has a RPC command which is "yarn container -signal ID [signal command]>" to signal > OUTPUT_THREAD_DUMP/GRACEFUL_SHUTDOWN/FORCEFUL_SHUTDOWN commands to container. > That is not enough and we need to add signalToContainer REST API for better > management from cluster administrators or management system. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Assigned] (YARN-1806) webUI update to allow end users to request thread dump
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1806?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Siddharth Ahuja reassigned YARN-1806: - Assignee: Siddharth Ahuja > webUI update to allow end users to request thread dump > -- > > Key: YARN-1806 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1806 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: nodemanager >Reporter: Ming Ma >Assignee: Siddharth Ahuja >Priority: Major > > Both individual container gage and containers page will support this. After > end user clicks on the request link, they can follow to get to stdout page > for the thread dump content. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Comment Edited] (YARN-10310) YARN Service - User is able to launch a service with same name
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17130066#comment-17130066
]
Bilwa S T edited comment on YARN-10310 at 6/10/20, 4:51 AM:
Hi [~eyang]
Testing done for this with username hdfs/had...@hadoop.com. Getting below
exception
{code:java}
Exception in thread "main" org.apache.hadoop.yarn.exceptions.YarnException:
Failed to create service sleeper-service, because it already exists.
at
org.apache.hadoop.yarn.service.client.ServiceClient.verifyNoLiveAppInRM(ServiceClient.java:947)
at
org.apache.hadoop.yarn.service.client.ServiceClient.actionCreate(ServiceClient.java:540)
at
org.apache.hadoop.yarn.service.client.ServiceClient.actionLaunch(ServiceClient.java:531)
at
org.apache.hadoop.yarn.client.cli.ApplicationCLI.run(ApplicationCLI.java:574)
at org.apache.hadoop.util.ToolRunner.run(ToolRunner.java:76)
at org.apache.hadoop.util.ToolRunner.run(ToolRunner.java:90)
at
org.apache.hadoop.yarn.client.cli.ApplicationCLI.main(ApplicationCLI.java:125)
{code}
was (Author: bilwast):
Testing done for this. Getting below exception
{code:java}
Exception in thread "main" org.apache.hadoop.yarn.exceptions.YarnException:
Failed to create service sleeper-service, because it already exists.
at
org.apache.hadoop.yarn.service.client.ServiceClient.verifyNoLiveAppInRM(ServiceClient.java:947)
at
org.apache.hadoop.yarn.service.client.ServiceClient.actionCreate(ServiceClient.java:540)
at
org.apache.hadoop.yarn.service.client.ServiceClient.actionLaunch(ServiceClient.java:531)
at
org.apache.hadoop.yarn.client.cli.ApplicationCLI.run(ApplicationCLI.java:574)
at org.apache.hadoop.util.ToolRunner.run(ToolRunner.java:76)
at org.apache.hadoop.util.ToolRunner.run(ToolRunner.java:90)
at
org.apache.hadoop.yarn.client.cli.ApplicationCLI.main(ApplicationCLI.java:125)
{code}
> YARN Service - User is able to launch a service with same name
> --
>
> Key: YARN-10310
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10310
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Bilwa S T
>Assignee: Bilwa S T
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: YARN-10310.001.patch
>
>
> As ServiceClient uses UserGroupInformation.getCurrentUser().getUserName() to
> get user whereas ClientRMService#submitApplication uses
> UserGroupInformation.getCurrentUser().getShortUserName() to set application
> username.
> In case of user with name hdfs/had...@hadoop.com. below condition fails
> ClientRMService#getApplications()
> {code:java}
> if (users != null && !users.isEmpty() &&
> !users.contains(application.getUser())) {
> continue;
> }
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Comment Edited] (YARN-10310) YARN Service - User is able to launch a service with same name
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17130066#comment-17130066
]
Bilwa S T edited comment on YARN-10310 at 6/10/20, 4:50 AM:
Testing done for this. Getting below exception
{code:java}
Exception in thread "main" org.apache.hadoop.yarn.exceptions.YarnException:
Failed to create service sleeper-service, because it already exists.
at
org.apache.hadoop.yarn.service.client.ServiceClient.verifyNoLiveAppInRM(ServiceClient.java:947)
at
org.apache.hadoop.yarn.service.client.ServiceClient.actionCreate(ServiceClient.java:540)
at
org.apache.hadoop.yarn.service.client.ServiceClient.actionLaunch(ServiceClient.java:531)
at
org.apache.hadoop.yarn.client.cli.ApplicationCLI.run(ApplicationCLI.java:574)
at org.apache.hadoop.util.ToolRunner.run(ToolRunner.java:76)
at org.apache.hadoop.util.ToolRunner.run(ToolRunner.java:90)
at
org.apache.hadoop.yarn.client.cli.ApplicationCLI.main(ApplicationCLI.java:125)
{code}
was (Author: bilwast):
Testing done for this.
> YARN Service - User is able to launch a service with same name
> --
>
> Key: YARN-10310
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10310
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Bilwa S T
>Assignee: Bilwa S T
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: YARN-10310.001.patch
>
>
> As ServiceClient uses UserGroupInformation.getCurrentUser().getUserName() to
> get user whereas ClientRMService#submitApplication uses
> UserGroupInformation.getCurrentUser().getShortUserName() to set application
> username.
> In case of user with name hdfs/had...@hadoop.com. below condition fails
> ClientRMService#getApplications()
> {code:java}
> if (users != null && !users.isEmpty() &&
> !users.contains(application.getUser())) {
> continue;
> }
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-10310) YARN Service - User is able to launch a service with same name
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17130066#comment-17130066
]
Bilwa S T commented on YARN-10310:
--
Testing done for this.
> YARN Service - User is able to launch a service with same name
> --
>
> Key: YARN-10310
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10310
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Bilwa S T
>Assignee: Bilwa S T
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: YARN-10310.001.patch
>
>
> As ServiceClient uses UserGroupInformation.getCurrentUser().getUserName() to
> get user whereas ClientRMService#submitApplication uses
> UserGroupInformation.getCurrentUser().getShortUserName() to set application
> username.
> In case of user with name hdfs/had...@hadoop.com. below condition fails
> ClientRMService#getApplications()
> {code:java}
> if (users != null && !users.isEmpty() &&
> !users.contains(application.getUser())) {
> continue;
> }
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-10251) Show extended resources on legacy RM UI.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17129796#comment-17129796
]
Hadoop QA commented on YARN-10251:
--
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 1m
23s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} dupname {color} | {color:green} 0m
1s{color} | {color:green} No case conflicting files found. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} branch-3.2 Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 3m
21s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for branch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 26m
10s{color} | {color:green} branch-3.2 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 2m
38s{color} | {color:green} branch-3.2 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
51s{color} | {color:green} branch-3.2 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 1m
23s{color} | {color:green} branch-3.2 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
16m 5s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
56s{color} | {color:green} branch-3.2 passed {color} |
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} spotbugs {color} | {color:blue} 1m
34s{color} | {color:blue} Used deprecated FindBugs config; considering
switching to SpotBugs. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 2m
41s{color} | {color:green} branch-3.2 passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 0m
20s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for patch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 1m
22s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 2m
21s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 2m
21s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:orange}-0{color} | {color:orange} checkstyle {color} | {color:orange}
0m 48s{color} | {color:orange}
hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server: The patch generated 1 new +
44 unchanged - 0 fixed = 45 total (was 44) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 1m
11s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
14m 33s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
49s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 2m
50s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 2m
35s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-yarn-server-common in the patch passed.
{color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red}311m 7s{color}
| {color:red} hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m
34s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black}393m 30s{color} |
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| Failed junit tests |
hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.TestFairScheduler |
| | hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.TestNodeBlacklistingOnAMFailures |
| |
hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.metrics.TestSystemMetricsPublisherForV2 |
| | hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.TestApplicationACLs |
| |
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-10300) appMasterHost not set in RM ApplicationSummary when AM fails before first heartbeat
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17129725#comment-17129725
]
Hudson commented on YARN-10300:
---
SUCCESS: Integrated in Jenkins build Hadoop-trunk-Commit #18342 (See
[https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-trunk-Commit/18342/])
YARN-10300: appMasterHost not set in RM ApplicationSummary when AM fails
(ericp: rev 56247db3022705635580c4d2f8b0abde109f954f)
* (edit)
hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/yarn/server/resourcemanager/TestApplicationMasterLauncher.java
* (edit)
hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/yarn/server/resourcemanager/RMAppManager.java
* (edit)
hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/yarn/server/resourcemanager/TestAppManager.java
> appMasterHost not set in RM ApplicationSummary when AM fails before first
> heartbeat
> ---
>
> Key: YARN-10300
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10300
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Eric Badger
>Assignee: Eric Badger
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: YARN-10300.001.patch, YARN-10300.002.patch,
> YARN-10300.003.patch
>
>
> {noformat}
> 2020-05-23 14:09:10,086 INFO resourcemanager.RMAppManager$ApplicationSummary:
> appId=application_1586003420099_12444961,name=job_name,user=username,queue=queuename,state=FAILED,trackingUrl=https
>
> ://cluster:port/applicationhistory/app/application_1586003420099_12444961,appMasterHost=N/A,startTime=1590241207309,finishTime=1590242950085,finalStatus=FAILED,memorySeconds=13750,vcoreSeconds=67,preemptedMemorySeconds=0,preemptedVcoreSeconds=0,preemptedAMContainers=0,preemptedNonAMContainers=0,preemptedResources= vCores:0>,applicationType=MAPREDUCE
> {noformat}
> {{appMasterHost=N/A}} should have the AM hostname instead of N/A
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-10300) appMasterHost not set in RM ApplicationSummary when AM fails before first heartbeat
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17129700#comment-17129700
]
Eric Payne commented on YARN-10300:
---
+1
Thanks [~ebadger]. I will commit this afternoon or tomorrow morning.
> appMasterHost not set in RM ApplicationSummary when AM fails before first
> heartbeat
> ---
>
> Key: YARN-10300
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10300
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Eric Badger
>Assignee: Eric Badger
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: YARN-10300.001.patch, YARN-10300.002.patch,
> YARN-10300.003.patch
>
>
> {noformat}
> 2020-05-23 14:09:10,086 INFO resourcemanager.RMAppManager$ApplicationSummary:
> appId=application_1586003420099_12444961,name=job_name,user=username,queue=queuename,state=FAILED,trackingUrl=https
>
> ://cluster:port/applicationhistory/app/application_1586003420099_12444961,appMasterHost=N/A,startTime=1590241207309,finishTime=1590242950085,finalStatus=FAILED,memorySeconds=13750,vcoreSeconds=67,preemptedMemorySeconds=0,preemptedVcoreSeconds=0,preemptedAMContainers=0,preemptedNonAMContainers=0,preemptedResources= vCores:0>,applicationType=MAPREDUCE
> {noformat}
> {{appMasterHost=N/A}} should have the AM hostname instead of N/A
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-10308) Update javadoc and variable names for keytab in yarn services as it supports filesystems other than hdfs and local file system
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17129696#comment-17129696
]
Hadoop QA commented on YARN-10308:
--
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m
35s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} dupname {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} No case conflicting files found. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} test4tests {color} | {color:red} 0m
0s{color} | {color:red} The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified
tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please
list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} trunk Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 19m
15s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
33s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
26s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m
35s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
14m 55s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
25s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} spotbugs {color} | {color:blue} 1m
0s{color} | {color:blue} Used deprecated FindBugs config; considering switching
to SpotBugs. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 0m
58s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 0m
29s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
25s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m
25s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
17s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m
27s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
13m 51s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
19s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 0m
59s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 19m
39s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-yarn-services-core in the patch passed.
{color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m
33s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black} 75m 10s{color} |
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | ClientAPI=1.40 ServerAPI=1.40 base:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/26142/artifact/out/Dockerfile
|
| JIRA Issue | YARN-10308 |
| JIRA Patch URL |
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/13005258/YARN-10308.001.patch |
| Optional Tests | dupname asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall mvnsite
unit shadedclient findbugs checkstyle |
| uname | Linux 023d639938c0 4.15.0-60-generic #67-Ubuntu SMP Thu Aug 22
16:55:30 UTC 2019 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | personality/hadoop.sh |
| git revision | trunk / ac5d899d40d |
| Default Java | Private Build-1.8.0_252-8u252-b09-1~18.04-b09 |
| Test Results |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/26142/testReport/ |
| Max. process+thread count | 836 (vs. ulimit of 5500) |
| modules |
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-9460) QueueACLsManager and ReservationsACLManager should not use instanceof checks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9460?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17129680#comment-17129680
]
Hadoop QA commented on YARN-9460:
-
| (/) *{color:green}+1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 1m
23s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} dupname {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} No case conflicting files found. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} trunk Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 21m
45s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
47s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
35s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m
50s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
16m 38s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
31s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} spotbugs {color} | {color:blue} 1m
41s{color} | {color:blue} Used deprecated FindBugs config; considering
switching to SpotBugs. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 1m
40s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 0m
48s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
42s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m
42s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:orange}-0{color} | {color:orange} checkstyle {color} | {color:orange}
0m 31s{color} | {color:orange}
hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager:
The patch generated 4 new + 81 unchanged - 0 fixed = 85 total (was 81) {color}
|
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m
43s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
15m 13s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
29s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 1m
46s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 91m
14s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager in the patch
passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m
28s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black}155m 59s{color} |
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | ClientAPI=1.40 ServerAPI=1.40 base:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/26141/artifact/out/Dockerfile
|
| JIRA Issue | YARN-9460 |
| JIRA Patch URL |
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/13005257/YARN-9460.004.patch |
| Optional Tests | dupname asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall mvnsite
unit shadedclient findbugs checkstyle |
| uname | Linux 775a6fa5c65b 4.15.0-101-generic #102-Ubuntu SMP Mon May 11
10:07:26 UTC 2020 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | personality/hadoop.sh |
| git revision | trunk / ac5d899d40d |
| Default Java | Private Build-1.8.0_252-8u252-b09-1~18.04-b09 |
| checkstyle |
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-10308) Update javadoc and variable names for keytab in yarn services as it supports filesystems other than hdfs and local file system
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17129655#comment-17129655
]
Bilwa S T commented on YARN-10308:
--
Thanks [~eyang] for taking a look at patch. I will test with viewfs and confirm
. I agree with changing it to Hadoop supported filesystem types. will update
patch
> Update javadoc and variable names for keytab in yarn services as it supports
> filesystems other than hdfs and local file system
> --
>
> Key: YARN-10308
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10308
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Bilwa S T
>Assignee: Bilwa S T
>Priority: Minor
> Attachments: YARN-10308.001.patch
>
>
> 1. Below description should be updated
> {code:java}
> @ApiModelProperty(value = "The URI of the kerberos keytab. It supports two " +
> "schemes \"hdfs\" and \"file\". If the URI starts with \"hdfs://\" " +
> "scheme, it indicates the path on hdfs where the keytab is stored. The
> " +
> "keytab will be localized by YARN and made available to AM in its
> local" +
> " directory. If the URI starts with \"file://\" scheme, it indicates a
> " +
> "path on the local host where the keytab is presumbaly installed by " +
> "admins upfront. ")
> public String getKeytab() {
> return keytab;
> }
> {code}
> 2. Variables below are still named on hdfs which is confusing
> {code:java}
> if ("file".equals(keytabURI.getScheme())) {
> LOG.info("Using a keytab from localhost: " + keytabURI);
> } else {
> Path keytabOnhdfs = new Path(keytabURI);
> if (!fileSystem.getFileSystem().exists(keytabOnhdfs)) {
> LOG.warn(service.getName() + "'s keytab (principalName = "
> + principalName + ") doesn't exist at: " + keytabOnhdfs);
> return;
> }
> LocalResource keytabRes = fileSystem.createAmResource(keytabOnhdfs,
> LocalResourceType.FILE);
> localResource.put(String.format(YarnServiceConstants.KEYTAB_LOCATION,
> service.getName()), keytabRes);
> LOG.info("Adding " + service.getName() + "'s keytab for "
> + "localization, uri = " + keytabOnhdfs);
> }
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-10308) Update javadoc and variable names for keytab in yarn services as it supports filesystems other than hdfs and local file system
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17129645#comment-17129645
]
Eric Yang commented on YARN-10308:
--
{quote}It supports all filesystems like "hdfs", "file", "viewfs", "s3"
etc.{quote}
"All filesystems" maybe claiming more than implementations that support this.
Have you tested with viewfs, httpfs, and s3? How about changing it to Hadoop
supported filesystem types. e.g. hdfs? This will bring expectation closer to
reality.
> Update javadoc and variable names for keytab in yarn services as it supports
> filesystems other than hdfs and local file system
> --
>
> Key: YARN-10308
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10308
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Bilwa S T
>Assignee: Bilwa S T
>Priority: Minor
> Attachments: YARN-10308.001.patch
>
>
> 1. Below description should be updated
> {code:java}
> @ApiModelProperty(value = "The URI of the kerberos keytab. It supports two " +
> "schemes \"hdfs\" and \"file\". If the URI starts with \"hdfs://\" " +
> "scheme, it indicates the path on hdfs where the keytab is stored. The
> " +
> "keytab will be localized by YARN and made available to AM in its
> local" +
> " directory. If the URI starts with \"file://\" scheme, it indicates a
> " +
> "path on the local host where the keytab is presumbaly installed by " +
> "admins upfront. ")
> public String getKeytab() {
> return keytab;
> }
> {code}
> 2. Variables below are still named on hdfs which is confusing
> {code:java}
> if ("file".equals(keytabURI.getScheme())) {
> LOG.info("Using a keytab from localhost: " + keytabURI);
> } else {
> Path keytabOnhdfs = new Path(keytabURI);
> if (!fileSystem.getFileSystem().exists(keytabOnhdfs)) {
> LOG.warn(service.getName() + "'s keytab (principalName = "
> + principalName + ") doesn't exist at: " + keytabOnhdfs);
> return;
> }
> LocalResource keytabRes = fileSystem.createAmResource(keytabOnhdfs,
> LocalResourceType.FILE);
> localResource.put(String.format(YarnServiceConstants.KEYTAB_LOCATION,
> service.getName()), keytabRes);
> LOG.info("Adding " + service.getName() + "'s keytab for "
> + "localization, uri = " + keytabOnhdfs);
> }
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-10308) Update javadoc and variable names for keytab in yarn services as it supports filesystems other than hdfs and local file system
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17129497#comment-17129497
]
Bilwa S T commented on YARN-10308:
--
cc [~eyang]
> Update javadoc and variable names for keytab in yarn services as it supports
> filesystems other than hdfs and local file system
> --
>
> Key: YARN-10308
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10308
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Bilwa S T
>Assignee: Bilwa S T
>Priority: Minor
> Attachments: YARN-10308.001.patch
>
>
> 1. Below description should be updated
> {code:java}
> @ApiModelProperty(value = "The URI of the kerberos keytab. It supports two " +
> "schemes \"hdfs\" and \"file\". If the URI starts with \"hdfs://\" " +
> "scheme, it indicates the path on hdfs where the keytab is stored. The
> " +
> "keytab will be localized by YARN and made available to AM in its
> local" +
> " directory. If the URI starts with \"file://\" scheme, it indicates a
> " +
> "path on the local host where the keytab is presumbaly installed by " +
> "admins upfront. ")
> public String getKeytab() {
> return keytab;
> }
> {code}
> 2. Variables below are still named on hdfs which is confusing
> {code:java}
> if ("file".equals(keytabURI.getScheme())) {
> LOG.info("Using a keytab from localhost: " + keytabURI);
> } else {
> Path keytabOnhdfs = new Path(keytabURI);
> if (!fileSystem.getFileSystem().exists(keytabOnhdfs)) {
> LOG.warn(service.getName() + "'s keytab (principalName = "
> + principalName + ") doesn't exist at: " + keytabOnhdfs);
> return;
> }
> LocalResource keytabRes = fileSystem.createAmResource(keytabOnhdfs,
> LocalResourceType.FILE);
> localResource.put(String.format(YarnServiceConstants.KEYTAB_LOCATION,
> service.getName()), keytabRes);
> LOG.info("Adding " + service.getName() + "'s keytab for "
> + "localization, uri = " + keytabOnhdfs);
> }
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-10274) Merge QueueMapping and QueueMappingEntity
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10274?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17129501#comment-17129501
]
Hadoop QA commented on YARN-10274:
--
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 25m
21s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} dupname {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} No case conflicting files found. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 3 new or modified test
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} branch-3.3 Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 20m
36s{color} | {color:green} branch-3.3 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
49s{color} | {color:green} branch-3.3 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
38s{color} | {color:green} branch-3.3 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m
50s{color} | {color:green} branch-3.3 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
15m 34s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
34s{color} | {color:green} branch-3.3 passed {color} |
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} spotbugs {color} | {color:blue} 1m
53s{color} | {color:blue} Used deprecated FindBugs config; considering
switching to SpotBugs. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 1m
50s{color} | {color:green} branch-3.3 passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 0m
51s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
42s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m
42s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:orange}-0{color} | {color:orange} checkstyle {color} | {color:orange}
0m 30s{color} | {color:orange}
hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager:
The patch generated 5 new + 63 unchanged - 0 fixed = 68 total (was 63) {color}
|
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m
47s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
13m 22s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
32s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 1m
52s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red}106m 45s{color}
| {color:red} hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m
32s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black}192m 10s{color} |
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| Failed junit tests |
hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.TestFairScheduler |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | ClientAPI=1.40 ServerAPI=1.40 base:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/26138/artifact/out/Dockerfile
|
| JIRA Issue | YARN-10274 |
| JIRA Patch URL |
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/13005227/YARN-10274.branch-3.3.002.patch
|
| Optional Tests | dupname asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall mvnsite
unit shadedclient findbugs checkstyle |
| uname | Linux 16e7491ed0ab 4.15.0-58-generic #64-Ubuntu SMP Tue Aug 6
11:12:41 UTC 2019 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | personality/hadoop.sh |
| git revision | branch-3.3 / 890617c |
| Default Java | Private
[jira] [Updated] (YARN-10308) Update javadoc and variable names for keytab in yarn services as it supports filesystems other than hdfs and local file system
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bilwa S T updated YARN-10308:
-
Attachment: YARN-10308.001.patch
> Update javadoc and variable names for keytab in yarn services as it supports
> filesystems other than hdfs and local file system
> --
>
> Key: YARN-10308
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10308
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Bilwa S T
>Assignee: Bilwa S T
>Priority: Minor
> Attachments: YARN-10308.001.patch
>
>
> 1. Below description should be updated
> {code:java}
> @ApiModelProperty(value = "The URI of the kerberos keytab. It supports two " +
> "schemes \"hdfs\" and \"file\". If the URI starts with \"hdfs://\" " +
> "scheme, it indicates the path on hdfs where the keytab is stored. The
> " +
> "keytab will be localized by YARN and made available to AM in its
> local" +
> " directory. If the URI starts with \"file://\" scheme, it indicates a
> " +
> "path on the local host where the keytab is presumbaly installed by " +
> "admins upfront. ")
> public String getKeytab() {
> return keytab;
> }
> {code}
> 2. Variables below are still named on hdfs which is confusing
> {code:java}
> if ("file".equals(keytabURI.getScheme())) {
> LOG.info("Using a keytab from localhost: " + keytabURI);
> } else {
> Path keytabOnhdfs = new Path(keytabURI);
> if (!fileSystem.getFileSystem().exists(keytabOnhdfs)) {
> LOG.warn(service.getName() + "'s keytab (principalName = "
> + principalName + ") doesn't exist at: " + keytabOnhdfs);
> return;
> }
> LocalResource keytabRes = fileSystem.createAmResource(keytabOnhdfs,
> LocalResourceType.FILE);
> localResource.put(String.format(YarnServiceConstants.KEYTAB_LOCATION,
> service.getName()), keytabRes);
> LOG.info("Adding " + service.getName() + "'s keytab for "
> + "localization, uri = " + keytabOnhdfs);
> }
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-10310) YARN Service - User is able to launch a service with same name
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17129454#comment-17129454
]
Bilwa S T commented on YARN-10310:
--
Thanks [~eyang] for reviewing.
> YARN Service - User is able to launch a service with same name
> --
>
> Key: YARN-10310
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10310
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Bilwa S T
>Assignee: Bilwa S T
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: YARN-10310.001.patch
>
>
> As ServiceClient uses UserGroupInformation.getCurrentUser().getUserName() to
> get user whereas ClientRMService#submitApplication uses
> UserGroupInformation.getCurrentUser().getShortUserName() to set application
> username.
> In case of user with name hdfs/had...@hadoop.com. below condition fails
> ClientRMService#getApplications()
> {code:java}
> if (users != null && !users.isEmpty() &&
> !users.contains(application.getUser())) {
> continue;
> }
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-9930) Support max running app logic for CapacityScheduler
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9930?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17129422#comment-17129422
]
Peter Bacsko commented on YARN-9930:
The relevant config entries which were used during the test:
{noformat}
yarn.scheduler.capacity.root.default.max-parallel-apps
2
yarn.scheduler.capacity.root.users.user1.max-parallel-apps
1
yarn.scheduler.capacity.root.users.user2.max-parallel-apps
2
yarn.scheduler.capacity.root.users.user3.max-parallel-apps
3
{noformat}
> Support max running app logic for CapacityScheduler
> ---
>
> Key: YARN-9930
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9930
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: capacity scheduler, capacityscheduler
>Affects Versions: 3.1.0, 3.1.1
>Reporter: zhoukang
>Assignee: Peter Bacsko
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: YARN-9930-001.patch, YARN-9930-002.patch,
> YARN-9930-003.patch, YARN-9930-POC01.patch, YARN-9930-POC02.patch,
> YARN-9930-POC03.patch, YARN-9930-POC04.patch, YARN-9930-POC05.patch,
> screenshot-1.png
>
>
> In FairScheduler, there has limitation for max running which will let
> application pending.
> But in CapacityScheduler there has no feature like max running app.Only got
> max app,and jobs will be rejected directly on client.
> This jira i want to implement this semantic for CapacityScheduler.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (YARN-9460) QueueACLsManager and ReservationsACLManager should not use instanceof checks
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9460?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bilwa S T updated YARN-9460: Attachment: YARN-9460.004.patch > QueueACLsManager and ReservationsACLManager should not use instanceof checks > > > Key: YARN-9460 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9460 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Szilard Nemeth >Assignee: Bilwa S T >Priority: Major > Attachments: YARN-9460.001.patch, YARN-9460.002.patch, > YARN-9460.003.patch, YARN-9460.004.patch > > > QueueACLsManager and ReservationsACLManager should not use instanceof checks > for the scheduler type. > Rather, we should abstract this into two classes: Capacity and Fair variants > of these ACL classes. > QueueACLsManager and ReservationsACLManager could be abstract classes, but > the implementation is the decision of one who will work on this jira. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-10281) Redundant QueuePath usage in UserGroupMappingPlacementRule and AppNameMappingPlacementRule
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10281?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17129397#comment-17129397
]
Hadoop QA commented on YARN-10281:
--
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 1m
44s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} dupname {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} No case conflicting files found. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} trunk Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 22m
2s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
47s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
36s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m
50s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
16m 42s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
31s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} spotbugs {color} | {color:blue} 1m
46s{color} | {color:blue} Used deprecated FindBugs config; considering
switching to SpotBugs. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 1m
44s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 0m
47s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
42s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m
42s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:orange}-0{color} | {color:orange} checkstyle {color} | {color:orange}
0m 32s{color} | {color:orange}
hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager:
The patch generated 3 new + 69 unchanged - 0 fixed = 72 total (was 69) {color}
|
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m
46s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
15m 52s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
28s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 1m
44s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 93m 37s{color}
| {color:red} hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m
27s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black}159m 52s{color} |
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| Failed junit tests |
hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.TestFairSchedulerPreemption |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | ClientAPI=1.40 ServerAPI=1.40 base:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/26137/artifact/out/Dockerfile
|
| JIRA Issue | YARN-10281 |
| JIRA Patch URL |
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/13005226/YARN-10281.003.patch |
| Optional Tests | dupname asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall mvnsite
unit shadedclient findbugs checkstyle |
| uname | Linux da08ba94d99a 4.15.0-101-generic #102-Ubuntu SMP Mon May 11
10:07:26 UTC 2020 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | personality/hadoop.sh |
| git revision | trunk / fbb87754306 |
| Default Java | Private Build-1.8.0_252-8u252-b09-1~18.04-b09 |
|
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-9930) Support max running app logic for CapacityScheduler
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9930?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17129395#comment-17129395 ] Peter Bacsko commented on YARN-9930: I did some testing with the patch - not with the upstream version, but backported to a certain Cloudera distro version then created a cluster. Results are very promising. Apps stay in ACCEPTED state as long as the number of running apps > maxParallelApps. Also, I stopped the active RM instance to activate the standby and the state of the applications was restored successfully, so RM/CS did not end up in an inconsistent state. !screenshot-1.png! Will do some more testing tomorrow, including max-parallel-apps settings for a particular user. > Support max running app logic for CapacityScheduler > --- > > Key: YARN-9930 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9930 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: capacity scheduler, capacityscheduler >Affects Versions: 3.1.0, 3.1.1 >Reporter: zhoukang >Assignee: Peter Bacsko >Priority: Major > Attachments: YARN-9930-001.patch, YARN-9930-002.patch, > YARN-9930-003.patch, YARN-9930-POC01.patch, YARN-9930-POC02.patch, > YARN-9930-POC03.patch, YARN-9930-POC04.patch, YARN-9930-POC05.patch, > screenshot-1.png > > > In FairScheduler, there has limitation for max running which will let > application pending. > But in CapacityScheduler there has no feature like max running app.Only got > max app,and jobs will be rejected directly on client. > This jira i want to implement this semantic for CapacityScheduler. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (YARN-9930) Support max running app logic for CapacityScheduler
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9930?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Peter Bacsko updated YARN-9930: --- Attachment: screenshot-1.png > Support max running app logic for CapacityScheduler > --- > > Key: YARN-9930 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9930 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: capacity scheduler, capacityscheduler >Affects Versions: 3.1.0, 3.1.1 >Reporter: zhoukang >Assignee: Peter Bacsko >Priority: Major > Attachments: YARN-9930-001.patch, YARN-9930-002.patch, > YARN-9930-003.patch, YARN-9930-POC01.patch, YARN-9930-POC02.patch, > YARN-9930-POC03.patch, YARN-9930-POC04.patch, YARN-9930-POC05.patch, > screenshot-1.png > > > In FairScheduler, there has limitation for max running which will let > application pending. > But in CapacityScheduler there has no feature like max running app.Only got > max app,and jobs will be rejected directly on client. > This jira i want to implement this semantic for CapacityScheduler. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (YARN-10251) Show extended resources on legacy RM UI.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eric Payne updated YARN-10251: -- Attachment: YARN-10251.branch-3.2.005.patch > Show extended resources on legacy RM UI. > > > Key: YARN-10251 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10251 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Eric Payne >Assignee: Eric Payne >Priority: Major > Attachments: Legacy RM UI With Not All Resources Shown.png, Updated > NodesPage UI With GPU columns.png, Updated RM UI With All Resources > Shown.png.png, YARN-10251.003.patch, YARN-10251.004.patch, > YARN-10251.005.patch, YARN-10251.branch-2.10.001.patch, > YARN-10251.branch-2.10.002.patch, YARN-10251.branch-2.10.003.patch, > YARN-10251.branch-3.2.004.patch, YARN-10251.branch-3.2.005.patch > > > It would be great to update the legacy RM UI to include GPU resources in the > overview and in the per-app sections. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-9355) RMContainerRequestor#makeRemoteRequest has confusing log message
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17129293#comment-17129293
]
Hadoop QA commented on YARN-9355:
-
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 1m
10s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} dupname {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} No case conflicting files found. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} test4tests {color} | {color:red} 0m
0s{color} | {color:red} The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified
tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please
list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} trunk Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 23m
47s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
28s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
24s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m
31s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
16m 17s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
23s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} spotbugs {color} | {color:blue} 0m
57s{color} | {color:blue} Used deprecated FindBugs config; considering
switching to SpotBugs. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 0m
55s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 0m
30s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
24s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m
24s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:orange}-0{color} | {color:orange} checkstyle {color} | {color:orange}
0m 17s{color} | {color:orange}
hadoop-mapreduce-project/hadoop-mapreduce-client/hadoop-mapreduce-client-app:
The patch generated 2 new + 31 unchanged - 0 fixed = 33 total (was 31) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m
26s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
15m 12s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
20s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 1m
0s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 7m
59s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-mapreduce-client-app in the patch passed.
{color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m
31s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black} 70m 59s{color} |
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | ClientAPI=1.40 ServerAPI=1.40 base:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/26136/artifact/out/Dockerfile
|
| JIRA Issue | YARN-9355 |
| JIRA Patch URL |
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/13005225/YARN-9355.002.patch |
| Optional Tests | dupname asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall mvnsite
unit shadedclient findbugs checkstyle |
| uname | Linux 4065a4c78add 4.15.0-101-generic #102-Ubuntu SMP Mon May 11
10:07:26 UTC 2020 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | personality/hadoop.sh |
| git revision | trunk / fbb87754306 |
| Default Java | Private Build-1.8.0_252-8u252-b09-1~18.04-b09 |
| checkstyle |
[jira] [Updated] (YARN-10274) Merge QueueMapping and QueueMappingEntity
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10274?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gergely Pollak updated YARN-10274: -- Attachment: YARN-10274.branch-3.3.002.patch > Merge QueueMapping and QueueMappingEntity > - > > Key: YARN-10274 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10274 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Task > Components: yarn >Reporter: Gergely Pollak >Assignee: Gergely Pollak >Priority: Major > Fix For: 3.4.0 > > Attachments: YARN-10274.001.patch, YARN-10274.002.patch, > YARN-10274.003.patch, YARN-10274.branch-3.3.001.patch, > YARN-10274.branch-3.3.002.patch > > > The role, usage and internal behaviour of these classes are almost identical, > but it makes no sense to keep both of them. One is used by UserGroup > placement rule definitions the other is used by Application placement rules. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (YARN-10281) Redundant QueuePath usage in UserGroupMappingPlacementRule and AppNameMappingPlacementRule
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10281?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gergely Pollak updated YARN-10281: -- Attachment: YARN-10281.003.patch > Redundant QueuePath usage in UserGroupMappingPlacementRule and > AppNameMappingPlacementRule > -- > > Key: YARN-10281 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10281 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Task >Reporter: Gergely Pollak >Assignee: Gergely Pollak >Priority: Major > Attachments: YARN-10281.001.patch, YARN-10281.002.patch, > YARN-10281.003.patch > > > We use the QueuePath and QueueMapping (or QueueMappingEntity) objects in the > aforementioned classes, but these technically store the same kind of > information, yet we keep converting between them, let's examine if we can use > only the QueueMapping(Entity) instead, since that holds more information. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-10304) Create an endpoint for remote application log directory path query
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10304?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17129228#comment-17129228
]
Hadoop QA commented on YARN-10304:
--
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 1m
49s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} dupname {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} No case conflicting files found. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} trunk Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 0m
42s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for branch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 26m
59s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 22m
29s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 3m
12s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 2m
20s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
23m 34s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 2m
16s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} spotbugs {color} | {color:blue} 1m
4s{color} | {color:blue} Used deprecated FindBugs config; considering switching
to SpotBugs. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 4m
43s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 0m
28s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for patch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 2m
2s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 22m
33s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 22m
33s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:orange}-0{color} | {color:orange} checkstyle {color} | {color:orange}
3m 5s{color} | {color:orange} root: The patch generated 5 new + 12 unchanged -
0 fixed = 17 total (was 12) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 2m
14s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
15m 34s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 2m
2s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 4m
30s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 4m
1s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-yarn-common in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 2m
43s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-yarn-server-common in the patch passed.
{color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 3m 49s{color}
| {color:red} hadoop-mapreduce-client-hs in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} asflicense {color} | {color:red} 0m
48s{color} | {color:red} The patch generated 2 ASF License warnings. {color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black}149m 18s{color} |
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| Failed junit tests | hadoop.mapreduce.v2.hs.webapp.TestHsWebServicesLogs |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | ClientAPI=1.40 ServerAPI=1.40 base:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/26135/artifact/out/Dockerfile
|
| JIRA Issue | YARN-10304 |
| JIRA Patch URL |
[jira] [Comment Edited] (YARN-9355) RMContainerRequestor#makeRemoteRequest has confusing log message
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17129105#comment-17129105
]
Umesh Mittal edited comment on YARN-9355 at 6/9/20, 12:39 PM:
--
[~snemeth]
Updated the code to use "{}" syntax.
was (Author: umittal):
[~snemeth]
Sure I will update the code to use "{}" syntax.
> RMContainerRequestor#makeRemoteRequest has confusing log message
>
>
> Key: YARN-9355
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9355
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Szilard Nemeth
>Assignee: Umesh Mittal
>Priority: Trivial
> Labels: newbie, newbie++
> Attachments: YARN-9355.001.patch, YARN-9355.002.patch
>
>
> org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.v2.app.rm.RMContainerRequestor#makeRemoteRequest
> has this log:
> {code:java}
> if (ask.size() > 0 || release.size() > 0) {
> LOG.info("getResources() for " + applicationId + ":" + " ask="
> + ask.size() + " release= " + release.size() + " newContainers="
> + allocateResponse.getAllocatedContainers().size()
> + " finishedContainers=" + numCompletedContainers
> + " resourcelimit=" + availableResources + " knownNMs="
> + clusterNmCount);
> }
> {code}
> The reason why "getResources()" is printed because
> org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.v2.app.rm.RMContainerAllocator#getResources
> invokes makeRemoteRequest. This is not too informative and error-prone as
> name of getResources could change over time and the log will be outdated.
> Moreover, it's not a good idea to print a method name from a method below the
> current one in the stack.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (YARN-9355) RMContainerRequestor#makeRemoteRequest has confusing log message
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Umesh Mittal updated YARN-9355:
---
Attachment: YARN-9355.002.patch
> RMContainerRequestor#makeRemoteRequest has confusing log message
>
>
> Key: YARN-9355
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9355
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Szilard Nemeth
>Assignee: Umesh Mittal
>Priority: Trivial
> Labels: newbie, newbie++
> Attachments: YARN-9355.001.patch, YARN-9355.002.patch
>
>
> org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.v2.app.rm.RMContainerRequestor#makeRemoteRequest
> has this log:
> {code:java}
> if (ask.size() > 0 || release.size() > 0) {
> LOG.info("getResources() for " + applicationId + ":" + " ask="
> + ask.size() + " release= " + release.size() + " newContainers="
> + allocateResponse.getAllocatedContainers().size()
> + " finishedContainers=" + numCompletedContainers
> + " resourcelimit=" + availableResources + " knownNMs="
> + clusterNmCount);
> }
> {code}
> The reason why "getResources()" is printed because
> org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.v2.app.rm.RMContainerAllocator#getResources
> invokes makeRemoteRequest. This is not too informative and error-prone as
> name of getResources could change over time and the log will be outdated.
> Moreover, it's not a good idea to print a method name from a method below the
> current one in the stack.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (YARN-10279) Avoid unnecessary QueueMappingEntity creations
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hudáky Márton Gyula updated YARN-10279: --- Attachment: YARN-10279.001.patch > Avoid unnecessary QueueMappingEntity creations > -- > > Key: YARN-10279 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10279 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Task >Reporter: Gergely Pollak >Assignee: Hudáky Márton Gyula >Priority: Minor > Attachments: YARN-10279.001.patch > > > In CS UserGroupMappingPlacementRule and AppNameMappingPlacementRule classes > we create new instances of QueueMappingEntity class. In some cases we simply > copy the already received class, so we just duplicate it, which is > unnecessary since the class is immutable. > This is just a minor improvement, probably doesn't have much impact, but > still puts some unnecessary load on GC. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-9355) RMContainerRequestor#makeRemoteRequest has confusing log message
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17129105#comment-17129105
]
Umesh Mittal commented on YARN-9355:
[~snemeth]
Sure I will update the code to use "{}" syntax.
> RMContainerRequestor#makeRemoteRequest has confusing log message
>
>
> Key: YARN-9355
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9355
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Szilard Nemeth
>Assignee: Umesh Mittal
>Priority: Trivial
> Labels: newbie, newbie++
> Attachments: YARN-9355.001.patch
>
>
> org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.v2.app.rm.RMContainerRequestor#makeRemoteRequest
> has this log:
> {code:java}
> if (ask.size() > 0 || release.size() > 0) {
> LOG.info("getResources() for " + applicationId + ":" + " ask="
> + ask.size() + " release= " + release.size() + " newContainers="
> + allocateResponse.getAllocatedContainers().size()
> + " finishedContainers=" + numCompletedContainers
> + " resourcelimit=" + availableResources + " knownNMs="
> + clusterNmCount);
> }
> {code}
> The reason why "getResources()" is printed because
> org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.v2.app.rm.RMContainerAllocator#getResources
> invokes makeRemoteRequest. This is not too informative and error-prone as
> name of getResources could change over time and the log will be outdated.
> Moreover, it's not a good idea to print a method name from a method below the
> current one in the stack.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-8631) YARN RM fails to add the application to the delegation token renewer on recovery
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-8631?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17129103#comment-17129103
]
Umesh Mittal commented on YARN-8631:
[~snemeth]
Thanks for looking into this, initially I only added JUNIT to reproduce this
issue, so for the solution I can start mangaing the renewal tasks internally
and stop them at transition, I can create a patch for you to have a look or
kindly suggest any better way to handle this?
> YARN RM fails to add the application to the delegation token renewer on
> recovery
>
>
> Key: YARN-8631
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-8631
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: yarn
>Affects Versions: 3.1.0
>Reporter: Sanjay Divgi
>Assignee: Umesh Mittal
>Priority: Blocker
> Attachments: YARN-8631.001.patch,
> hadoop-yarn-resourcemanager-ctr-e138-1518143905142-429059-01-04.log
>
>
> On HA cluster we have observed that yarn resource manager fails to add the
> application to the delegation token renewer on recovery.
> Below is the error:
> {code:java}
> 2018-08-07 08:41:23,850 INFO security.DelegationTokenRenewer
> (DelegationTokenRenewer.java:renewToken(635)) - Renewed delegation-token=
> [Kind: TIMELINE_DELEGATION_TOKEN, Service: 172.27.84.192:8188, Ident:
> (TIMELINE_DELEGATION_TOKEN owner=hrt_qa_hive_spark, renewer=yarn, realUser=,
> issueDate=1533624642302, maxDate=1534229442302, sequenceNumber=18,
> masterKeyId=4);exp=1533717683478; apps=[application_1533623972681_0001]]
> 2018-08-07 08:41:23,855 WARN security.DelegationTokenRenewer
> (DelegationTokenRenewer.java:handleDTRenewerAppRecoverEvent(955)) - Unable to
> add the application to the delegation token renewer on recovery.
> java.lang.NullPointerException
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.security.DelegationTokenRenewer.handleAppSubmitEvent(DelegationTokenRenewer.java:522)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.security.DelegationTokenRenewer.handleDTRenewerAppRecoverEvent(DelegationTokenRenewer.java:953)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.security.DelegationTokenRenewer.access$700(DelegationTokenRenewer.java:79)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.security.DelegationTokenRenewer$DelegationTokenRenewerRunnable.run(DelegationTokenRenewer.java:912)
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-10304) Create an endpoint for remote application log directory path query
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10304?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17129100#comment-17129100 ] Andras Gyori commented on YARN-10304: - Thank you [~adam.antal] for the thorough feedback. I completely agree with you, as enclosing the more complex path assembler logic would be way out of scope, and probably will be a massive undertaking. For now, I have removed the new class, as the logic of path assembly is minimal, and the rest of the code is just boilerplate. That being said, I have only made one test case to prove that the endpoint is working, because the logic of creating the path is tested elsewhere. I have addressed each of your concerns and uploaded a new patch set. > Create an endpoint for remote application log directory path query > -- > > Key: YARN-10304 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10304 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task >Reporter: Andras Gyori >Assignee: Andras Gyori >Priority: Minor > Attachments: YARN-10304.001.patch, YARN-10304.002.patch > > > The logic of the aggregated log directory path determination (currently based > on configuration) is scattered around the codebase and duplicated multiple > times. By providing a separate class for creating the path for a specific > user, it allows for an abstraction over this logic. This could be used in > place of the previously duplicated logic, moreover, we could provide an > endpoint to query this path. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (YARN-10304) Create an endpoint for remote application log directory path query
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10304?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andras Gyori updated YARN-10304: Attachment: YARN-10304.002.patch > Create an endpoint for remote application log directory path query > -- > > Key: YARN-10304 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10304 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task >Reporter: Andras Gyori >Assignee: Andras Gyori >Priority: Minor > Attachments: YARN-10304.001.patch, YARN-10304.002.patch > > > The logic of the aggregated log directory path determination (currently based > on configuration) is scattered around the codebase and duplicated multiple > times. By providing a separate class for creating the path for a specific > user, it allows for an abstraction over this logic. This could be used in > place of the previously duplicated logic, moreover, we could provide an > endpoint to query this path. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-10293) Reserved Containers not allocated from available space of other nodes in CandidateNodeSet in MultiNodePlacement (YARN-10259)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17129091#comment-17129091
]
Tao Yang commented on YARN-10293:
-
Thanks [~prabhujoseph] for updating the patch.
LGTM now, [~wangda], do you have some comments or suggestions about the patch?
> Reserved Containers not allocated from available space of other nodes in
> CandidateNodeSet in MultiNodePlacement (YARN-10259)
>
>
> Key: YARN-10293
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10293
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: 3.3.0
>Reporter: Prabhu Joseph
>Assignee: Prabhu Joseph
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: YARN-10293-001.patch, YARN-10293-002.patch,
> YARN-10293-003-WIP.patch, YARN-10293-004.patch, YARN-10293-005.patch
>
>
> Reserved Containers not allocated from available space of other nodes in
> CandidateNodeSet in MultiNodePlacement. YARN-10259 has fixed two issues
> related to it
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10259?focusedCommentId=17105987=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#comment-17105987
> Have found one more bug in the CapacityScheduler.java code which causes the
> same issue with slight difference in the repro.
> *Repro:*
> *Nodes : Available : Used*
> Node1 - 8GB, 8vcores - 8GB. 8cores
> Node2 - 8GB, 8vcores - 8GB. 8cores
> Node3 - 8GB, 8vcores - 8GB. 8cores
> Queues -> A and B both 50% capacity, 100% max capacity
> MultiNode enabled + Preemption enabled
> 1. JobA submitted to A queue and which used full cluster 24GB and 24 vcores
> 2. JobB Submitted to B queue with AM size of 1GB
> {code}
> 2020-05-21 12:12:27,313 INFO
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.RMAuditLogger: USER=systest
> IP=172.27.160.139 OPERATION=Submit Application Request
> TARGET=ClientRMService RESULT=SUCCESS APPID=application_1590046667304_0005
> CALLERCONTEXT=CLI QUEUENAME=dummy
> {code}
> 3. Preemption happens and used capacity is lesser than 1.0f
> {code}
> 2020-05-21 12:12:48,222 INFO
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.rmapp.attempt.RMAppAttemptMetrics:
> Non-AM container preempted, current
> appAttemptId=appattempt_1590046667304_0004_01,
> containerId=container_e09_1590046667304_0004_01_24,
> resource=
> {code}
> 4. JobB gets a Reserved Container as part of
> CapacityScheduler#allocateOrReserveNewContainer
> {code}
> 2020-05-21 12:12:48,226 INFO
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.rmcontainer.RMContainerImpl:
> container_e09_1590046667304_0005_01_01 Container Transitioned from NEW to
> RESERVED
> 2020-05-21 12:12:48,226 INFO
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.common.fica.FiCaSchedulerApp:
> Reserved container=container_e09_1590046667304_0005_01_01, on node=host:
> tajmera-fullnodes-3.tajmera-fullnodes.root.hwx.site:8041 #containers=8
> available= used= with
> resource=
> {code}
> *Why RegularContainerAllocator reserved the container when the used capacity
> is <= 1.0f ?*
> {code}
> The reason is even though the container is preempted - nodemanager has to
> stop the container and heartbeat and update the available and unallocated
> resources to ResourceManager.
> {code}
> 5. Now, no new allocation happens and reserved container stays at reserved.
> After reservation the used capacity becomes 1.0f, below will be in a loop and
> no new allocate or reserve happens. The reserved container cannot be
> allocated as reserved node does not have space. node2 has space for 1GB,
> 1vcore but CapacityScheduler#allocateOrReserveNewContainers not getting
> called causing the Hang.
> *[INFINITE LOOP] CapacityScheduler#allocateContainersOnMultiNodes ->
> CapacityScheduler#allocateFromReservedContainer -> Re-reserve the container
> on node*
> {code}
> 2020-05-21 12:13:33,242 INFO
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.capacity.CapacityScheduler:
> Trying to fulfill reservation for application application_1590046667304_0005
> on node: tajmera-fullnodes-3.tajmera-fullnodes.root.hwx.site:8041
> 2020-05-21 12:13:33,242 INFO
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.capacity.LeafQueue:
> assignContainers: partition= #applications=1
> 2020-05-21 12:13:33,242 INFO
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.common.fica.FiCaSchedulerApp:
> Reserved container=container_e09_1590046667304_0005_01_01, on node=host:
> tajmera-fullnodes-3.tajmera-fullnodes.root.hwx.site:8041 #containers=8
> available= used= with
> resource=
> 2020-05-21 12:13:33,243 INFO
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.capacity.CapacityScheduler:
> Allocation proposal accepted
> {code}
