[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7057) FSAppAttempt#getResourceUsage doesn't need to consider resources queued for preemption
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7057?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16168166#comment-16168166 ] Yufei Gu commented on YARN-7057: Committed to branch-3.0. > FSAppAttempt#getResourceUsage doesn't need to consider resources queued for > preemption > -- > > Key: YARN-7057 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7057 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fairscheduler >Affects Versions: 2.9.0 >Reporter: Karthik Kambatla >Assignee: Karthik Kambatla > Fix For: 2.9.0, 3.0.0-beta1, 3.1.0 > > Attachments: YARN-7057.001.patch, YARN-7057.002.patch > > > FSAppAttempt#getResourceUsage excludes resources that are currently allocated > to the app but are about to be preempted. This inconsistency shows in the UI > and can affect scheduling of containers. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7057) FSAppAttempt#getResourceUsage doesn't need to consider resources queued for preemption
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7057?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16163876#comment-16163876 ] Hudson commented on YARN-7057: -- SUCCESS: Integrated in Jenkins build Hadoop-trunk-Commit #12854 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-trunk-Commit/12854/]) YARN-7057. FSAppAttempt#getResourceUsage doesn't need to consider (yufei: rev 82c5dd1d508292ed88eda0f5356776437ba67d4c) * (edit) hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/yarn/server/resourcemanager/scheduler/fair/FSAppAttempt.java > FSAppAttempt#getResourceUsage doesn't need to consider resources queued for > preemption > -- > > Key: YARN-7057 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7057 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fairscheduler >Affects Versions: 2.9.0 >Reporter: Karthik Kambatla >Assignee: Karthik Kambatla > Fix For: 2.9.0, 3.0.0-beta1 > > Attachments: YARN-7057.001.patch, YARN-7057.002.patch > > > FSAppAttempt#getResourceUsage excludes resources that are currently allocated > to the app but are about to be preempted. This inconsistency shows in the UI > and can affect scheduling of containers. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7057) FSAppAttempt#getResourceUsage doesn't need to consider resources queued for preemption
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7057?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16163832#comment-16163832 ] Yufei Gu commented on YARN-7057: Committed to trunk and branch-2. Thanks for the patch, [~kasha]. Thanks for the review, [~templedf]. > FSAppAttempt#getResourceUsage doesn't need to consider resources queued for > preemption > -- > > Key: YARN-7057 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7057 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fairscheduler >Affects Versions: 2.9.0 >Reporter: Karthik Kambatla >Assignee: Karthik Kambatla > Fix For: 2.9.0, 3.0.0-beta1 > > Attachments: YARN-7057.001.patch, YARN-7057.002.patch > > > FSAppAttempt#getResourceUsage excludes resources that are currently allocated > to the app but are about to be preempted. This inconsistency shows in the UI > and can affect scheduling of containers. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7057) FSAppAttempt#getResourceUsage doesn't need to consider resources queued for preemption
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7057?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16163824#comment-16163824
]
Hadoop QA commented on YARN-7057:
-
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m
22s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} test4tests {color} | {color:red} 0m
0s{color} | {color:red} The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified
tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please
list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} trunk Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 17m
21s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
37s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
26s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m
39s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 1m
0s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
21s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 0m
33s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
32s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m
32s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
23s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m
34s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 1m
6s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
19s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 44m 22s{color}
| {color:red} hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m
15s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black} 70m 5s{color} |
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| Failed junit tests |
hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.capacity.TestContainerAllocation |
| | hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.TestAbstractYarnScheduler |
| | hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.reservation.TestCapacityOverTimePolicy
|
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Image:yetus/hadoop:71bbb86 |
| JIRA Issue | YARN-7057 |
| JIRA Patch URL |
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12886728/YARN-7057.002.patch |
| Optional Tests | asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall mvnsite
unit findbugs checkstyle |
| uname | Linux a58ccdecbf9a 3.13.0-119-generic #166-Ubuntu SMP Wed May 3
12:18:55 UTC 2017 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | /testptch/hadoop/patchprocess/precommit/personality/provided.sh
|
| git revision | trunk / 86f4d1c |
| Default Java | 1.8.0_144 |
| findbugs | v3.1.0-RC1 |
| unit |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/17425/artifact/patchprocess/patch-unit-hadoop-yarn-project_hadoop-yarn_hadoop-yarn-server_hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager.txt
|
| Test Results |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/17425/testReport/ |
| modules | C:
hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager
U:
hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager
|
| Console output |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/17425/console |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.6.0-SNAPSHOT http://yetus.apache.org |
This
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7057) FSAppAttempt#getResourceUsage doesn't need to consider resources queued for preemption
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7057?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16162085#comment-16162085 ] Yufei Gu commented on YARN-7057: Thanks [~templedf] for the review. [~kasha], this patch doesn't apply to trunk. Can you rebase? or I can do the rebase if you are OK with that. > FSAppAttempt#getResourceUsage doesn't need to consider resources queued for > preemption > -- > > Key: YARN-7057 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7057 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fairscheduler >Affects Versions: 2.9.0 >Reporter: Karthik Kambatla >Assignee: Karthik Kambatla > Attachments: YARN-7057.001.patch > > > FSAppAttempt#getResourceUsage excludes resources that are currently allocated > to the app but are about to be preempted. This inconsistency shows in the UI > and can affect scheduling of containers. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7057) FSAppAttempt#getResourceUsage doesn't need to consider resources queued for preemption
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7057?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16159983#comment-16159983
]
Daniel Templeton commented on YARN-7057:
OK, I double-check the uses of {{getResourceUsage()}}, and I agree. The change
ranges from benign to necessary, depending on the caller. The only one that's
a little suspicious is {{isStarvedForFairShare()}}, where it seems we might now
be penalizing the app for the to-be-preempted resources. [~yufeigu], if you're
happy with it, I think it's OK to commit.
> FSAppAttempt#getResourceUsage doesn't need to consider resources queued for
> preemption
> --
>
> Key: YARN-7057
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7057
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: fairscheduler
>Affects Versions: 2.9.0
>Reporter: Karthik Kambatla
>Assignee: Karthik Kambatla
> Attachments: YARN-7057.001.patch
>
>
> FSAppAttempt#getResourceUsage excludes resources that are currently allocated
> to the app but are about to be preempted. This inconsistency shows in the UI
> and can affect scheduling of containers.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7057) FSAppAttempt#getResourceUsage doesn't need to consider resources queued for preemption
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7057?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16142512#comment-16142512 ] Karthik Kambatla commented on YARN-7057: [~templedf] - good questions. Reasons why getResourceUsage() needs change: # Subtracting resources queued for preemption before returning current allocation is plain incorrect, both to users who see this information through UI and other calculations in the scheduler. It is possible that the application gives up another container, and the current container queued for preemption is never preempted. Or, more resources are added to the cluster. Basically, I just feel we shouldn't count our chicken before they hatch. # Acquiring the lock is an unnecessary overhead all calls to getResourceUsage incur. This gets called, recursively, so frequently that this can easily add up. Remember the frequency of calls is the reason we added an if-check in the first place. I did manually check exhaustively all places getResourceUsage is called. In fact, my first patch (have not posted) was to have two methods getResourceUsage and getEffectiveResourceUsage. While working on that version, I carefully considered every call and realized there is only one place calling getEffectiveResourceUsage. That is when it dawned on me that I could just change that one caller. That said, I do appreciate another pair of eyes validate my claim. :) > FSAppAttempt#getResourceUsage doesn't need to consider resources queued for > preemption > -- > > Key: YARN-7057 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7057 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fairscheduler >Affects Versions: 2.9.0 >Reporter: Karthik Kambatla >Assignee: Karthik Kambatla > Attachments: YARN-7057.001.patch > > > FSAppAttempt#getResourceUsage excludes resources that are currently allocated > to the app but are about to be preempted. This inconsistency shows in the UI > and can affect scheduling of containers. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7057) FSAppAttempt#getResourceUsage doesn't need to consider resources queued for preemption
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7057?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16142247#comment-16142247
]
Daniel Templeton commented on YARN-7057:
There are a lot of consumers of {{getResourceUsage()}} though one channel or
another. Have we exhaustively checked to make sure none are negatively
impacted? Passing unit tests isn't proof enough.
> FSAppAttempt#getResourceUsage doesn't need to consider resources queued for
> preemption
> --
>
> Key: YARN-7057
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7057
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: fairscheduler
>Affects Versions: 2.9.0
>Reporter: Karthik Kambatla
>Assignee: Karthik Kambatla
> Attachments: YARN-7057.001.patch
>
>
> FSAppAttempt#getResourceUsage excludes resources that are currently allocated
> to the app but are about to be preempted. This inconsistency shows in the UI
> and can affect scheduling of containers.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7057) FSAppAttempt#getResourceUsage doesn't need to consider resources queued for preemption
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7057?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16142233#comment-16142233
]
Yufei Gu commented on YARN-7057:
Looking around the code, {{getPendingDemand()}} shouldn't be affected in a bad
way, it will actually be affect in a good way. One of callers of
{{getPendingDemand()}} decides which application is starve. Without this
change, {{updateStarvedApps}} looks fishy.
> FSAppAttempt#getResourceUsage doesn't need to consider resources queued for
> preemption
> --
>
> Key: YARN-7057
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7057
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: fairscheduler
>Affects Versions: 2.9.0
>Reporter: Karthik Kambatla
>Assignee: Karthik Kambatla
> Attachments: YARN-7057.001.patch
>
>
> FSAppAttempt#getResourceUsage excludes resources that are currently allocated
> to the app but are about to be preempted. This inconsistency shows in the UI
> and can affect scheduling of containers.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7057) FSAppAttempt#getResourceUsage doesn't need to consider resources queued for preemption
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7057?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16140723#comment-16140723
]
Daniel Templeton commented on YARN-7057:
Yep, capacity scheduler failure is unrelated. Looks like a generally sane
change to me. Quick question, though: why the change to
{{getResourceUsage()}}? That change would seem to have a pretty large impact.
For example, also in {{FSAppAttempt}}:{code} Resource getPendingDemand() {
return Resources.subtract(demand, getResourceUsage());
}{code} Are we sure that change isn't going to cause problems?
> FSAppAttempt#getResourceUsage doesn't need to consider resources queued for
> preemption
> --
>
> Key: YARN-7057
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7057
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: fairscheduler
>Affects Versions: 2.9.0
>Reporter: Karthik Kambatla
>Assignee: Karthik Kambatla
> Attachments: YARN-7057.001.patch
>
>
> FSAppAttempt#getResourceUsage excludes resources that are currently allocated
> to the app but are about to be preempted. This inconsistency shows in the UI
> and can affect scheduling of containers.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7057) FSAppAttempt#getResourceUsage doesn't need to consider resources queued for preemption
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7057?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16138061#comment-16138061 ] Yufei Gu commented on YARN-7057: +1 > FSAppAttempt#getResourceUsage doesn't need to consider resources queued for > preemption > -- > > Key: YARN-7057 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7057 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fairscheduler >Affects Versions: 2.9.0 >Reporter: Karthik Kambatla >Assignee: Karthik Kambatla > Attachments: YARN-7057.001.patch > > > FSAppAttempt#getResourceUsage excludes resources that are currently allocated > to the app but are about to be preempted. This inconsistency shows in the UI > and can affect scheduling of containers. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7057) FSAppAttempt#getResourceUsage doesn't need to consider resources queued for preemption
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7057?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16134487#comment-16134487 ] Karthik Kambatla commented on YARN-7057: The test failure in CapacityScheduler should be unrelated. Existing tests should verify both the behavior of getResourceUsage and canContainerBePreempted. Hence, no new tests. > FSAppAttempt#getResourceUsage doesn't need to consider resources queued for > preemption > -- > > Key: YARN-7057 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7057 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fairscheduler >Affects Versions: 2.9.0 >Reporter: Karthik Kambatla >Assignee: Karthik Kambatla > Attachments: YARN-7057.001.patch > > > FSAppAttempt#getResourceUsage excludes resources that are currently allocated > to the app but are about to be preempted. This inconsistency shows in the UI > and can affect scheduling of containers. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-7057) FSAppAttempt#getResourceUsage doesn't need to consider resources queued for preemption
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7057?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16134290#comment-16134290
]
Hadoop QA commented on YARN-7057:
-
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m
19s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} test4tests {color} | {color:red} 0m
0s{color} | {color:red} The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified
tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please
list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} trunk Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 15m
27s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
39s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
26s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m
38s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 1m
13s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
24s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 0m
35s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
35s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m
35s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
24s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m
40s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 1m
13s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
21s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 44m 51s{color}
| {color:red} hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m
14s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black} 69m 18s{color} |
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| Failed junit tests |
hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.capacity.TestContainerAllocation |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Image:yetus/hadoop:14b5c93 |
| JIRA Issue | YARN-7057 |
| JIRA Patch URL |
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12882757/YARN-7057.001.patch |
| Optional Tests | asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall mvnsite
unit findbugs checkstyle |
| uname | Linux 0f6334c7e31b 3.13.0-119-generic #166-Ubuntu SMP Wed May 3
12:18:55 UTC 2017 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | /testptch/hadoop/patchprocess/precommit/personality/provided.sh
|
| git revision | trunk / 436c263 |
| Default Java | 1.8.0_144 |
| findbugs | v3.1.0-RC1 |
| unit |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/17017/artifact/patchprocess/patch-unit-hadoop-yarn-project_hadoop-yarn_hadoop-yarn-server_hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager.txt
|
| Test Results |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/17017/testReport/ |
| modules | C:
hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager
U:
hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager
|
| Console output |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/17017/console |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.6.0-SNAPSHOT http://yetus.apache.org |
This message was automatically generated.
> FSAppAttempt#getResourceUsage doesn't need to consider resources queued for
> preemption
>
