[yocto] meta-selinux: missing dependency on libxml2 in setools recipe

[Philip Tricca]

Mark,

I'm building meta-selinux against oe-core and found that the setools
recipe is missing a dependency on libxml2.  When building against Yocto
it looks like this dependency is satisfied by a recipe that's built
prior to setools.  Anyway, trivial patch below.

Thanks,
- Philip

diff --git a/recipes-security/setools/setools_3.3.7.bb 
b/recipes-security/setools/setools_3.3.7.bb
index 99e53af..2c0f19f 100644
--- a/recipes-security/setools/setools_3.3.7.bb
+++ b/recipes-security/setools/setools_3.3.7.bb
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = 
"file://${S}/COPYING;md5=26035c503c68ae1098177934ac0cc795 \
 
file://${S}/COPYING.GPL;md5=751419260aa954499f7abaabaa882bbe \
 
file://${S}/COPYING.LGPL;md5=fbc093901857fcd118f065f900982c24"
 
-DEPENDS += "python libsepol libselinux"
+DEPENDS += "python libsepol libselinux libxml2"
 
 PACKAGES += "${PN}-libs ${PN}-console"
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

[yocto] [Package Report System]Manual check recipes name list

[Yocto Project Package Report System]

This mail was sent out by Package Report System.
It will list all the recipes which can't check upstream version by script, and 
will show how long it is since their last mannual version check.
You can check the detail information at 
http://packages.yoctoproject.org/manuallychkinfo


PackageName  Version LastChkVersion  LastChkTime
  Maintainer  NoUpgradeReason   
lsb  4.1 4.1 179 day
  Yi Zhao  
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

[yocto] [Package Report System]Upgrade recipes name list

[Yocto Project Package Report System]

This mail was sent out by Package Report System.
This message list those recipes which need to be upgraded. If maintainers 
believe some of them needn't to upgrade this time, they can fill in 
RECIPE_NO_UPDATE_REASON_pn-"xxx" in upstream_tracking files to ignore this 
recipe remainder until newer upstream version was detected.
Example:
RECIPE_NO_UPDATE_REASON_pn-"xxx" = "Not upgrade to 2.0 because the new version 
is unstable"
You can check the detail information at 
http://packages.yoctoproject.org/upgradepkgname


PackageName   Version   UpVersion   
  MaintainerNoUpgradeReason 
  
ccache3.1.7 3.1.8   
  Wenzong Fan
xdg-utils 1.0.2 1.1.0   
  Valentin Popa
liberation-fonts  1.04  2.00.0  
  Valentin Popa
libxslt   1.1.261.1.27  
  Valentin Popa
evolution-data-server 2.30+git1+3ca578d968d097  6.0 
  Valentin Popa
puzzles   r9594 9660
  Valentin Popa
matchbox-panel-2  0.0+git1+cdf7a22716b8746  2.0 
  Valentin Popa
lttng-viewer  0.12.38   0.12.38.21032011
  Valentin Popa
sysprof   1.1.8+git1+4692f85f625f4  1.2.0   
  Tom Zanussi
shadow4.1.4.3   4.1.5.1 
  Scott Garman
sudo  1.8.5p2   1.8.6   
  Scott Garman
blktool   4-6   4   
  Scott Garman
apmd  3.2.2-14  3.2.2   
  Scott Garman
openssh   6.0p1 6.1p1   
  Scott Garman
mc4.8.4 4.8.6   
  Saul Wold
libtasn1  2.13  2.14
  Saul Wold
libnl 2.0   3.2.13  
  Saul Woldlibnl-3.2.2 is 
incompatible w...
createrepo0.4.110.9.9   
  Saul WoldVersions after 
0.9.* use YUM,...
apt   0.7.140.9.7.5 
  Saul Wold
pkgconfig 0.25  0.27.1  
  Saul Wold0.26 removes 
glib-conf, adds ...
build-appliance-image 1.0   3.2.1   
  Saul Wold
util-linux2.21.22.22
  Saul Wold
libxml2   2.8.0 2.9.0   
  Saul Wold
resolvconf1.67  1.68
  Saul Wold
dhcp  4.2.4-P1  4.2.4   
  Saul Wold
ftp://ftp.isc.org/isc/dhcp/4.2.4-P1/dhcp-4.2.4-P1.tar.gz
tiff  4.0.2 4.0.3   
  Saul Wold
logrotate 3.8.1 3.8.2   
  Robert Yang
liburcu   0.6.7 0.7.4   
  Radu Moisan
curl  7.26.07.27.0  
  Radu Moisan
js1.7.0+1.8.0rc11.60
  Radu Moisan
u-boot-mkimage2011.06   2012.07 
  Radu Moisan
valgrind  3.7.0 3.8.1   
  Radu Moisan
babeltrace0.12+git1+0d8f8c2ea27df0  1.0.0   
  Radu Moisan
udev  164   182 
  Radu Moisan
mobile-broadband-provider-info1.0.0+gitr1+d9995ef693cb  20090309
  Radu Moisan 

Re: [yocto] meta-zynq-balister: Build output

[Elvis Dowson]

Hi Philip,
  I've just sent out two patches refactoring the zc702 machine 
configuration, and adding u-boot to the rootfs image. I've built this against 
the latest poky/master branch.

Best regards,

Elvis Dowson
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

[yocto] [PATCH] documentation: kernel-concepts: fixed typo

[Andrea Galbusera]

Signed-off-by: Andrea Galbusera 
---
 documentation/kernel-manual/kernel-concepts.xml |2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/documentation/kernel-manual/kernel-concepts.xml 
b/documentation/kernel-manual/kernel-concepts.xml
index 8b9e71f..157443d 100644
--- a/documentation/kernel-manual/kernel-concepts.xml
+++ b/documentation/kernel-manual/kernel-concepts.xml
@@ -320,7 +320,7 @@
 Conceptually, configuration of a Yocto Project kernel occurs 
similarly to that needed for any
 Linux kernel.
 The build process for a Yocto Project kernel uses a 
.config file, which 
-is created through the Linux Kernel Coinfiguration (LKC) tool.
+is created through the Linux Kernel Configuration (LKC) tool.
 You can directly set various configurations in the 
 .config file by using the 
menuconfig 
 tool as built by BitBake.
-- 
1.7.9.5

___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

[yocto] meta-zynq-balister: Build output

[Elvis Dowson]

Hi Philip,
  I made the following changes to your repo, since it was 
giving a warning about apps-console-core being no longer valid, and yocto 
replacing it with splash.

diff --git a/conf/machine/zynq-zc702.conf b/conf/machine/zynq-zc702.conf
index 74a1271..d25093f 100644
--- a/conf/machine/zynq-zc702.conf
+++ b/conf/machine/zynq-zc702.conf
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+#@TYPE: Machine
+#@Name: Xilinx ZC702 FPGA Development Platform for the Zynq-7020 processor.
+#@DESCRIPTION: Machine configuration for the Xilinx ZC702 FPGA Development 
Platform.
+
+#tune for the Zynq 7020 ARM Cortex A-9 CPU
 include conf/machine/include/tune-cortexa9.inc
 
 PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/kernel ?= "linux-zynq"
diff --git a/recipes-core/images/zc702-proto-image.bb 
b/recipes-core/images/zc702-proto-image.bb
index a6e4b11..02a6af2 100644
--- a/recipes-core/images/zc702-proto-image.bb
+++ b/recipes-core/images/zc702-proto-image.bb
@@ -1,14 +1,12 @@
-DESCRIPTION = "A foundational basic image without support for X that can be \
-reasonably used for customization."
+DESCRIPTION = "A console-only image with more full-featured Linux system \
+functionality installed."
 
-IMAGE_FEATURES += "apps-console-core ssh-server-openssh tools-sdk \
+IMAGE_FEATURES += "splash ssh-server-openssh tools-sdk \
tools-debug debug-tweaks"
 
 IMAGE_INSTALL = "\
-task-core-boot \
-task-core-basic \
+packagegroup-core-boot \
+packagegroup-core-basic \
 "
 
-#${CORE_IMAGE_BASE_INSTALL} 
-
 inherit core-image


and here is the build output:

Build Configuration:
BB_VERSION= "1.16.0"
TARGET_ARCH   = "arm"
TARGET_OS = "linux-gnueabi"
MACHINE   = "zynq-zc702"
DISTRO= "poky"
DISTRO_VERSION= "1.3+snapshot-20121013"
TUNE_FEATURES = "armv7a vfp neon cortexa9"
TARGET_FPU= "vfp-neon"
meta  
meta-yocto= "master:0260bb5c6978839c068007fcff2f704937805faf"
toolchain-layer   = "master:9e701bb060325bc47509d4874bd695f039191ea8"
meta-zynq-balister = "master:61ee369f84252acaaa4a4500f08450df2648247d"

NOTE: Resolving any missing task queue dependencies
NOTE: Preparing runqueue
NOTE: Executing SetScene Tasks
NOTE: Executing RunQueue Tasks
WARNING: Failed to fetch URL 
http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/jsipek/guilt/guilt-0.33.tar.gz, 
attempting MIRRORS if available
NOTE: validating kernel configuration
cat: meta/cfg/standard/zynq-zc702/specified.cfg: No such file or directory
cat: meta/cfg/standard/zynq-zc702/specified.cfg: No such file or directory
** NOTE: There were 0 required options requested that do not
 have a corresponding value present in the final ".config" file.
 This is a violation of the policy defined by the higher level config
The full list can be found in your kernel src dir at:
meta/cfg/standard/zynq-zc702/missing_required.cfg
NOTE: Tasks Summary: Attempted 1465 tasks of which 229 didn't need to be rerun 
and all succeeded.

Summary: There was 1 WARNING message shown.

real33m58.594s
user97m0.724s
sys12m50.976s


It gives a config policy warning, haven't seen this before.

I also noticed that by default, u-boot-zynq doesn't get compiled, but it's 
trivial enough to include in the zynq-zc702.conf file.

Best regards,

Elvis Dowson



___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Re: [yocto] Any updates to meta-zynq in the pipeline?

[Bruce Ashfield]

On 12-10-13 12:05 PM, Elvis Dowson wrote:

Hi,
I just took a quick look both the repos

My initial reaction is that I think Philip's repo appears to better structured, 
and attempts to use the xilinx kernel and u-boot repos, which for these targets 
is a good thing, given the state of the development for this new board.


Xilinx sponsored the one that I've "watching over" for the moment,
and they do plan to address the issues.

I said in some older threads, but I can say it again here. It's Xilinx's
board, so their voice carries the most weight, we just need to be patient
and give them time to come up to speed.



I also think its probably good to take then best of both repos, and maintain a 
single meta-zynq layer, since both these repos are in its initial stages.


That's already the plan :) But I'm waiting on things that don't work on
a schedule that I control.

Cheers,

Bruce



I'll give more feedback, as I progress with my build and test runs on the 
target board.

Best regards,

Elvis Dowson




___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Re: [yocto] Any updates to meta-zynq in the pipeline?

[Elvis Dowson]

Hi,
   I just took a quick look both the repos

My initial reaction is that I think Philip's repo appears to better structured, 
and attempts to use the xilinx kernel and u-boot repos, which for these targets 
is a good thing, given the state of the development for this new board.

I also think its probably good to take then best of both repos, and maintain a 
single meta-zynq layer, since both these repos are in its initial stages.

I'll give more feedback, as I progress with my build and test runs on the 
target board.

Best regards,

Elvis Dowson


___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Re: [yocto] Any updates to meta-zynq in the pipeline?

[Philip Balister]

On 10/13/2012 07:48 AM, Elvis Dowson wrote:

Hi Philip,

On Oct 13, 2012, at 6:28 PM, Philip Balister  wrote:


If you are interested in a kernel built direct from the Xilinx repo look at:

https://github.com/balister/meta-zynq

I just pushed use changes yesterday and could use some help testing them.

It is setup to boot from a SD card. You have to take the output of the u-boot 
recipe and use the Xilinx tools to combine it with the fsbl to get the required 
BOOT.BIN file.


I'll help out and test your layer first, and let you know. It's going to take 
me a while to get used to this new board. I always find that I end up spending 
more than 2 to 3 months, just getting to know each platform to a good level, 
the last two ones being the Gumstix TI OMAP 3530 and the Xilinx ML507. I'm 
going to brace myself, its going to be a deep dive I think! :-)

Adrian Alonso's meta-xilinx layer had some *.bbclass files, that invoked the 
Xilinx tools to create the ace image files, so perhaps that could be modified 
to automate the process or getting the final BOOT.BIN file.


Unfortunately I do not have the Xilinx tools installed on the machine I 
do the builds on. I'd love to post a working BOOT.BIN, but 1) I haven't 
tested this on he zc702 yet, and 2) I need to work out if I can 
distribute the binary since it includes GPL u-boot and non-GPL fsbl.


I understand it will take some time to get up to speed. I am finding the 
Xilinx workflow based around planAhead to be "challenging".


Philip



Best regards,

Elvis Dowson


___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Re: [yocto] Any updates to meta-zynq in the pipeline?

[Elvis Dowson]

Hi Philip,

On Oct 13, 2012, at 6:28 PM, Philip Balister  wrote:

> If you are interested in a kernel built direct from the Xilinx repo look at:
> 
> https://github.com/balister/meta-zynq
> 
> I just pushed use changes yesterday and could use some help testing them.
> 
> It is setup to boot from a SD card. You have to take the output of the u-boot 
> recipe and use the Xilinx tools to combine it with the fsbl to get the 
> required BOOT.BIN file.

I'll help out and test your layer first, and let you know. It's going to take 
me a while to get used to this new board. I always find that I end up spending 
more than 2 to 3 months, just getting to know each platform to a good level, 
the last two ones being the Gumstix TI OMAP 3530 and the Xilinx ML507. I'm 
going to brace myself, its going to be a deep dive I think! :-)

Adrian Alonso's meta-xilinx layer had some *.bbclass files, that invoked the 
Xilinx tools to create the ace image files, so perhaps that could be modified 
to automate the process or getting the final BOOT.BIN file.

Best regards,

Elvis Dowson
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Re: [yocto] Any updates to meta-zynq in the pipeline?

[Bruce Ashfield]

On 12-10-13 10:43 AM, Elvis Dowson wrote:

Hi Bruce,

On Oct 13, 2012, at 6:21 PM, Bruce Ashfield  
wrote:


There are updates planned, but with some vacations (mine and others), since
that last update things slowed down a bit. But work is proceeding,
I expect something in the next few weeks.

In particular, as an initial item, the BSP can be bumped to the Yocto
1.3 (3.4) kernel, and complete some work on remaining issues with the
layer.

After that, SDK updates, and other enhancements would be in the
pipeline, but i don't have a complete visibility into those yet.


I'm more interested in updates to the machine configuration and tune files for 
the Zynq-7020 processor. Are there any updates planned for these? The processor 
uses a ARM Cortex A9 dual core CPU, so I was wondering where one draws on from, 
in order to get an accurate representation of the processor. e.g. use TRM for 
Zynq-7020 and then look a a TI OMAP 4430 or Freescale i.MX 6 dual core machine 
configuration, etc?


AFAIK, yes. Xilinx themselves are gearing up to take over this
work, but I can't speak for them, and haven't heard anything since
before I went on vacation. I'm hoping that this will pick up again
soon.



The kernel and u-boot recipes, I can migrate to the latest 3.5 and 2012.x 
versions, so that shouldn't be a problem for me.


ok! At some point the layer will become (hopefully) yocto BSP
compliant, and at that point we'll get some consistency in kernel
version where it will be on one of the yocto versions, LTSI, etc,
since spraying all over the map on versions doesn't help everyone :)

Cheers,

Bruce



Best regards,

Elvis Dowson




___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Re: [yocto] Any updates to meta-zynq in the pipeline?

[Elvis Dowson]

Hi Bruce,

On Oct 13, 2012, at 6:21 PM, Bruce Ashfield  
wrote:

> There are updates planned, but with some vacations (mine and others), since
> that last update things slowed down a bit. But work is proceeding,
> I expect something in the next few weeks.
> 
> In particular, as an initial item, the BSP can be bumped to the Yocto
> 1.3 (3.4) kernel, and complete some work on remaining issues with the
> layer.
> 
> After that, SDK updates, and other enhancements would be in the
> pipeline, but i don't have a complete visibility into those yet.

I'm more interested in updates to the machine configuration and tune files for 
the Zynq-7020 processor. Are there any updates planned for these? The processor 
uses a ARM Cortex A9 dual core CPU, so I was wondering where one draws on from, 
in order to get an accurate representation of the processor. e.g. use TRM for 
Zynq-7020 and then look a a TI OMAP 4430 or Freescale i.MX 6 dual core machine 
configuration, etc?

The kernel and u-boot recipes, I can migrate to the latest 3.5 and 2012.x 
versions, so that shouldn't be a problem for me.

Best regards,

Elvis Dowson


___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Re: [yocto] Any updates to meta-zynq in the pipeline?

[Philip Balister]

On 10/13/2012 07:16 AM, Elvis Dowson wrote:

Hi Bruce,
   I'm about to start with my Xilinx ZC702 development board, 
and I was wondering if there are any updates planned to the meta-zynq 
repository?

In an earlier thread, you had mentioned that a whole bunch of updates were 
pending to the meta-zynq layer:


If you are interested in a kernel built direct from the Xilinx repo look at:

https://github.com/balister/meta-zynq

I just pushed use changes yesterday and could use some help testing them.

It is setup to boot from a SD card. You have to take the output of the 
u-boot recipe and use the Xilinx tools to combine it with the fsbl to 
get the required BOOT.BIN file.


Philip




Re: [yocto] meta-zynq, was Re: any success with spartan6-lx9mb?

Best regards,

Elvis Dowson



___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto


___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Re: [yocto] Any updates to meta-zynq in the pipeline?

[Bruce Ashfield]

On 12-10-13 10:16 AM, Elvis Dowson wrote:

Hi Bruce,
I'm about to start with my Xilinx ZC702 development board, and I was
wondering if there are any updates planned to the meta-zynq repository?


There are updates planned, but with some vacations (mine and others), since
that last update things slowed down a bit. But work is proceeding,
I expect something in the next few weeks.

In particular, as an initial item, the BSP can be bumped to the Yocto
1.3 (3.4) kernel, and complete some work on remaining issues with the
layer.

After that, SDK updates, and other enhancements would be in the
pipeline, but i don't have a complete visibility into those yet.

Cheers,

Bruce




In an earlier thread, you had mentioned that a whole bunch of updates
were pending to the meta-zynq layer:

Re: [yocto] meta-zynq, was Re: any success with spartan6-lx9mb?


Best regards,

Elvis Dowson


___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

[yocto] Any updates to meta-zynq in the pipeline?

[Elvis Dowson]

Hi Bruce,
  I'm about to start with my Xilinx ZC702 development board, 
and I was wondering if there are any updates planned to the meta-zynq 
repository?

In an earlier thread, you had mentioned that a whole bunch of updates were 
pending to the meta-zynq layer:

Re: [yocto] meta-zynq, was Re: any success with spartan6-lx9mb?

Best regards,

Elvis Dowson___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto