Re: [zeromq-dev] RFC citation format
On 12/19/22 22:51, Arnaud Loonstra wrote: Can't you us the full URL or am I missing something here? I could. Visually I like the short syntax of number/name that the specification in the repo use but if I go with my own numbering scheme then I need some way to resolve collisions. > The site collects more then libzmq. It's not libzmq specific. My project is a multi-blockchain client library and what I'm implementing now is a zeromq-based transport that will let the library multiplex the native p2p protocol messages for more than one blockchain over a single tcp port. Then I expect to extend that protocol with zeromq-specific replacements for many of the native messages. All these specifications should be made public in a suitable way. In total there might be one or two dozen of them at the end of this project which is why I was initially thinking they should be in their own "namespace", but if that kind of thing fits in rfc.zeromq.org then I could publish them there as well. ___ zeromq-dev mailing list zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
Re: [zeromq-dev] RFC citation format
Can't you us the full URL or am I missing something here? Suggestions are welcomed! The site collects more then libzmq. It's not libzmq specific. Rg, Arnaud On 15-12-2022 18:04, Justus Ranvier wrote: The specifications on https://rfc.zeromq.org/ internally refer to themselves using only the domain-specific index number (e.g. 27/ZAP) Is there a canonical citation format defined which a document in a different project with its own identification scheme could use to refer to ZeroMQ specifications? As an alternate question, I noticed that the description on the site itself is pretty open ended stating, "We collect specifications for APIs, file formats, wire protocols, and processes" even though unless I missed something the only specifications present are the ones implemented by libzmq. Was that site intended to be a general collection point for ZeroMQ-related specifications? Is that the best place to publish the specification for a ZeroMQ-based wire protocols that won't be implemented by libzmq itself? ___ zeromq-dev mailing list zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev ___ zeromq-dev mailing list zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
[zeromq-dev] RFC citation format
The specifications on https://rfc.zeromq.org/ internally refer to themselves using only the domain-specific index number (e.g. 27/ZAP) Is there a canonical citation format defined which a document in a different project with its own identification scheme could use to refer to ZeroMQ specifications? As an alternate question, I noticed that the description on the site itself is pretty open ended stating, "We collect specifications for APIs, file formats, wire protocols, and processes" even though unless I missed something the only specifications present are the ones implemented by libzmq. Was that site intended to be a general collection point for ZeroMQ-related specifications? Is that the best place to publish the specification for a ZeroMQ-based wire protocols that won't be implemented by libzmq itself? ___ zeromq-dev mailing list zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev