Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs lists discrepancy after added a new vdev to pool
On Saturday, August 28, 2010 06:04:17 am Mattias Pantzare wrote: On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 02:54, Darin Perusich darin.perus...@cognigencorp.com wrote: Hello All, I'm sure this has been discussed previously but I haven't been able to find an answer to this. I've added another raidz1 vdev to an existing storage pool and the increased available storage isn't reflected in the 'zfs list' output. Why is this? The system in question is runnning Solaris 10 5/09 s10s_u7wos_08, kernel Generic_139555-08. The system does not have the lastest patches which might be the cure. Thanks! I think you have to explain your problem more, 392G is more than 196G? This is actually the wrong output, it was the end of a LONG day. Here's the correct output. zpool create datapool raidz1 c1t50060E800042AA70d0 c1t50060E800042AA70d1 zpool list NAME SIZE USED AVAILCAP HEALTH ALTROOT datapool 398G 191K 398G 0% ONLINE - zfs list NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT datapool91K 196G 1K /datapool zpool add datapool raidz c1t50060E800042AA70d2 c1t50060E800042AA70d3 zpool list NAME SIZE USED AVAILCAP HEALTH ALTROOT datapool 796G 231K 796G 0% ONLINE - zfs list NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT datapool 111K 392G18K /datapool -- Darin Perusich Unix Systems Administrator Cognigen Corporation 395 Youngs Rd. Williamsville, NY 14221 Phone: 716-633-3463 Email: darin...@cognigencorp.com ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs lists discrepancy after added a new vdev to pool
On Saturday, August 28, 2010 12:27:36 am Edho P Arief wrote: On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 7:54 AM, Darin Perusich darin.perus...@cognigencorp.com wrote: Hello All, I'm sure this has been discussed previously but I haven't been able to find an answer to this. I've added another raidz1 vdev to an existing storage pool and the increased available storage isn't reflected in the 'zfs list' output. Why is this? you must do zpool export followed by zpool import I tried this but it didn't have any effect. -- Darin Perusich Unix Systems Administrator Cognigen Corporation 395 Youngs Rd. Williamsville, NY 14221 Phone: 716-633-3463 Email: darin...@cognigencorp.com ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs lists discrepancy after added a new vdev to pool
On Saturday, August 28, 2010 05:56:27 am Tomas Ögren wrote: On 27 August, 2010 - Darin Perusich sent me these 2,1K bytes: Hello All, I'm sure this has been discussed previously but I haven't been able to find an answer to this. I've added another raidz1 vdev to an existing storage pool and the increased available storage isn't reflected in the 'zfs list' output. Why is this? The system in question is runnning Solaris 10 5/09 s10s_u7wos_08, kernel Generic_139555-08. The system does not have the lastest patches which might be the cure. Thanks! Here's what I'm seeing. zpool create datapool raidz1 c1t50060E800042AA70d0 c1t50060E800042AA70d1 Just fyi, this is an inefficient variant of a mirror. More cpu required and lower performance. This is a testing setup, the production pool is currently 1 raidz1 vdev split across 6 disks. Thanks for the heads up though. -- Darin Perusich Unix Systems Administrator Cognigen Corporation 395 Youngs Rd. Williamsville, NY 14221 Phone: 716-633-3463 Email: darin...@cognigencorp.com ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs lists discrepancy after added a new vdev to pool
This is a FAQ Why doesn't the space that is reported by the zpool list command and the zfs list command match? http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/view/Community+Group+zfs/faq -- richard On Aug 30, 2010, at 5:47 AM, Darin Perusich wrote: On Saturday, August 28, 2010 06:04:17 am Mattias Pantzare wrote: On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 02:54, Darin Perusich darin.perus...@cognigencorp.com wrote: Hello All, I'm sure this has been discussed previously but I haven't been able to find an answer to this. I've added another raidz1 vdev to an existing storage pool and the increased available storage isn't reflected in the 'zfs list' output. Why is this? The system in question is runnning Solaris 10 5/09 s10s_u7wos_08, kernel Generic_139555-08. The system does not have the lastest patches which might be the cure. Thanks! I think you have to explain your problem more, 392G is more than 196G? This is actually the wrong output, it was the end of a LONG day. Here's the correct output. zpool create datapool raidz1 c1t50060E800042AA70d0 c1t50060E800042AA70d1 zpool list NAME SIZE USED AVAILCAP HEALTH ALTROOT datapool 398G 191K 398G 0% ONLINE - zfs list NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT datapool91K 196G 1K /datapool zpool add datapool raidz c1t50060E800042AA70d2 c1t50060E800042AA70d3 zpool list NAME SIZE USED AVAILCAP HEALTH ALTROOT datapool 796G 231K 796G 0% ONLINE - zfs list NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT datapool 111K 392G18K /datapool -- Darin Perusich Unix Systems Administrator Cognigen Corporation 395 Youngs Rd. Williamsville, NY 14221 Phone: 716-633-3463 Email: darin...@cognigencorp.com ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss -- OpenStorage Summit, October 25-27, Palo Alto, CA http://nexenta-summit2010.eventbrite.com ZFS and performance consulting http://www.RichardElling.com ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs lists discrepancy after added a new vdev to pool
On 27 August, 2010 - Darin Perusich sent me these 2,1K bytes:
Hello All,
I'm sure this has been discussed previously but I haven't been able to find
an
answer to this. I've added another raidz1 vdev to an existing storage pool
and
the increased available storage isn't reflected in the 'zfs list' output. Why
is this?
The system in question is runnning Solaris 10 5/09 s10s_u7wos_08, kernel
Generic_139555-08. The system does not have the lastest patches which might
be
the cure.
Thanks!
Here's what I'm seeing.
zpool create datapool raidz1 c1t50060E800042AA70d0 c1t50060E800042AA70d1
Just fyi, this is an inefficient variant of a mirror. More cpu required
and lower performance.
/Tomas
--
Tomas Ögren, st...@acc.umu.se, http://www.acc.umu.se/~stric/
|- Student at Computing Science, University of Umeå
`- Sysadmin at {cs,acc}.umu.se
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs lists discrepancy after added a new vdev to pool
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 02:54, Darin Perusich darin.perus...@cognigencorp.com wrote: Hello All, I'm sure this has been discussed previously but I haven't been able to find an answer to this. I've added another raidz1 vdev to an existing storage pool and the increased available storage isn't reflected in the 'zfs list' output. Why is this? The system in question is runnning Solaris 10 5/09 s10s_u7wos_08, kernel Generic_139555-08. The system does not have the lastest patches which might be the cure. Thanks! Here's what I'm seeing. zpool create datapool raidz1 c1t50060E800042AA70d0 c1t50060E800042AA70d1 zpool status pool: datapool state: ONLINE scrub: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM datapool ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t50060E800042AA70d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t50060E800042AA70d1 ONLINE 0 0 0 zfs list NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT datapool 108K 196G 18K /datapool zpool add datapool raidz1 c1t50060E800042AA70d2 c1t50060E800042AA70d3 zpool status pool: datapool state: ONLINE scrub: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM datapool ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t50060E800042AA70d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t50060E800042AA70d1 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t50060E800042AA70d2 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t50060E800042AA70d3 ONLINE 0 0 0 zfs list NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT datapool 112K 392G 18K /datapool I think you have to explain your problem more, 392G is more than 196G? ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs lists discrepancy after added a new vdev to pool
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 02:54, Darin Perusich darin.perus...@cognigencorp.com wrote: Hello All, I'm sure this has been discussed previously but I haven't been able to find an answer to this. I've added another raidz1 vdev to an existing storage pool and the increased available storage isn't reflected in the 'zfs list' output. Why is this? The system in question is runnning Solaris 10 5/09 s10s_u7wos_08, kernel Generic_139555-08. The system does not have the lastest patches which might be the cure. Thanks! Here's what I'm seeing. zpool create datapool raidz1 c1t50060E800042AA70d0 c1t50060E800042AA70d1 zpool status pool: datapool state: ONLINE scrub: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM datapool ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t50060E800042AA70d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t50060E800042AA70d1 ONLINE 0 0 0 zfs list NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT datapool 108K 196G18K /datapool zpool add datapool raidz1 c1t50060E800042AA70d2 c1t50060E800042AA70d3 zpool status pool: datapool state: ONLINE scrub: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM datapool ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t50060E800042AA70d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t50060E800042AA70d1 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t50060E800042AA70d2 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t50060E800042AA70d3 ONLINE 0 0 0 zfs list NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT datapool 112K 392G18K /datapool Darin, you created 'pool'-vdev from the two 'raid-z'-vdev: result you have size_of_pool = 2 * 'raid-z' ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
[zfs-discuss] zfs lists discrepancy after added a new vdev to pool
Hello All, I'm sure this has been discussed previously but I haven't been able to find an answer to this. I've added another raidz1 vdev to an existing storage pool and the increased available storage isn't reflected in the 'zfs list' output. Why is this? The system in question is runnning Solaris 10 5/09 s10s_u7wos_08, kernel Generic_139555-08. The system does not have the lastest patches which might be the cure. Thanks! Here's what I'm seeing. zpool create datapool raidz1 c1t50060E800042AA70d0 c1t50060E800042AA70d1 zpool status pool: datapool state: ONLINE scrub: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM datapool ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t50060E800042AA70d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t50060E800042AA70d1 ONLINE 0 0 0 zfs list NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT datapool 108K 196G18K /datapool zpool add datapool raidz1 c1t50060E800042AA70d2 c1t50060E800042AA70d3 zpool status pool: datapool state: ONLINE scrub: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM datapool ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t50060E800042AA70d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t50060E800042AA70d1 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t50060E800042AA70d2 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t50060E800042AA70d3 ONLINE 0 0 0 zfs list NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT datapool 112K 392G18K /datapool zpool list NAME SIZE USED AVAILCAP HEALTH ALTROOT datapool 796G 471K 796G 0% ONLINE - -- Darin Perusich Unix Systems Administrator Cognigen Corporation 395 Youngs Rd. Williamsville, NY 14221 Phone: 716-633-3463 Email: darin...@cognigencorp.com ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs lists discrepancy after added a new vdev to pool
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 7:54 AM, Darin Perusich darin.perus...@cognigencorp.com wrote: Hello All, I'm sure this has been discussed previously but I haven't been able to find an answer to this. I've added another raidz1 vdev to an existing storage pool and the increased available storage isn't reflected in the 'zfs list' output. Why is this? you must do zpool export followed by zpool import -- O ascii ribbon campaign - stop html mail - www.asciiribbon.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
