Re: [zones-discuss] Solaris 8/9 branded zones on ZFS root?
Le 26 févr. 09 à 15:47, Timothy Kennedy a écrit : Timothy Kennedy wrote: Nicolas Dorfsman wrote: Which ACL model is then used ? From: System Administration Guide: Solaris 8 Containers ( http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/820-2914/gfjbk?a=view ) Using ZFS Although the zone cannot use a delegated ZFS dataset, the zone can reside on a ZFS file system. You can add a ZFS file system to share with the global zone through the zonecfg fs resource. See Step 7 in How to Configure a solaris8 Branded Zone. Note that the setfacl and getfacl commands cannot be used with ZFS. When a cpio or a tar archive with ACLs set on the files is unpacked, the archive will receive warnings about not being able to set the ACLs, although the files will be unpacked successfully. These commands can be used with UFS. Thanks Timothy ! Nico ___ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [zones-discuss] Solaris 8/9 branded zones on ZFS root?
Timothy Kennedy wrote: Nicolas Dorfsman wrote: Which ACL model is then used ? From: System Administration Guide: Solaris 8 Containers ( http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/820-2914/gfjbk?a=view ) Using ZFS Although the zone cannot use a delegated ZFS dataset, the zone can reside on a ZFS file system. You can add a ZFS file system to share with the global zone through the zonecfg fs resource. See Step 7 in How to Configure a solaris8 Branded Zone. Note that the setfacl and getfacl commands cannot be used with ZFS. When a cpio or a tar archive with ACLs set on the files is unpacked, the archive will receive warnings about not being able to set the ACLs, although the files will be unpacked successfully. These commands can be used with UFS. -Tim -- Timothy Kennedy SDE Infrastructure Operations Manager Email: timothy.kenn...@sun.com Phone: +1-703-636-0531 / x53151 AIM/Skype: tkSUNW ___ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [zones-discuss] Solaris 8/9 branded zones on ZFS root?
Nicolas Dorfsman wrote: Which ACL model is then used ? It would seem that neither works from within the sol8 zone, although you do have access to ZFS style ACLs from the global zone. Trivial ACLs set through the global zone seem to be honored by the sol8 zone. I have not tried setting any non-trivial ACLs on the underlying ZFS, so I can't say whether they work as expected. -Tim -- Timothy Kennedy SDE Infrastructure Operations Manager Email: timothy.kenn...@sun.com Phone: +1-703-636-0531 / x53151 AIM/Skype: tkSUNW ___ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [zones-discuss] Solaris 8/9 branded zones on ZFS root?
On Wed, 25 Feb 2009, Timothy Kennedy wrote: > That's correct. I have some solaris 8 zones running under cluster > control, where zonepath is zfs, and they're doing just fine. > Nothing special had to be done. Excellent! Just the news I was hoping for. Thanks again, -- Rich Teer, SCSA, SCNA, SCSECA URLs: http://www.rite-group.com/rich http://www.linkedin.com/in/richteer ___ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [zones-discuss] Solaris 8/9 branded zones on ZFS root?
Le 25 févr. 09 à 23:12, Timothy Kennedy a écrit : Rich Teer wrote: I have a situation where I need to consolidate a few servers running Solaris 9 and 8. If the application doesn't run natively on Solaris 10 or Nevada, I was thinking of using Solars 9 or 8 branded zones. My intent would be for the global zone to use ZFS boot/root; would I be correct in thinking that this will be OK for the branded zones? That's correct. I have some solaris 8 zones running under cluster control, where zonepath is zfs, and they're doing just fine. Nothing special had to be done. Which ACL model is then used ? Nico ___ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [zones-discuss] Solaris 8/9 branded zones on ZFS root?
Rich Teer wrote: I have a situation where I need to consolidate a few servers running Solaris 9 and 8. If the application doesn't run natively on Solaris 10 or Nevada, I was thinking of using Solars 9 or 8 branded zones. My intent would be for the global zone to use ZFS boot/root; would I be correct in thinking that this will be OK for the branded zones? That's correct. I have some solaris 8 zones running under cluster control, where zonepath is zfs, and they're doing just fine. Nothing special had to be done. -Tim -- Timothy Kennedy SDE Infrastructure Operations Manager Email: timothy.kenn...@sun.com Phone: +1-703-636-0531 / x53151 AIM/Skype: tkSUNW ___ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
[zones-discuss] Solaris 8/9 branded zones on ZFS root?
Hi all, I have a situation where I need to consolidate a few servers running Solaris 9 and 8. If the application doesn't run natively on Solaris 10 or Nevada, I was thinking of using Solars 9 or 8 branded zones. My intent would be for the global zone to use ZFS boot/root; would I be correct in thinking that this will be OK for the branded zones? That is, they don't care about the underlying file system type? Or am I stuck with using UFS for the root file systems of Solaris 8 and 9 branded zones? (I sure hpoe not!) Many TIA, -- Rich Teer, SCSA, SCNA, SCSECA URLs: http://www.rite-group.com/rich http://www.linkedin.com/in/richteer ___ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org