[Zope-CMF] CMF Tests: 3 OK
Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list. Period Mon Aug 10 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Tue Aug 11 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 3 messages: 3 from CMF Tests. Tests passed OK --- Subject: OK : CMF-2.1 Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: CMF Tests Date: Mon Aug 10 21:15:12 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2009-August/011864.html Subject: OK : CMF-trunk Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.2 : Linux From: CMF Tests Date: Mon Aug 10 21:17:12 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2009-August/011865.html Subject: OK : CMF-trunk Zope-trunk Python-2.6.2 : Linux From: CMF Tests Date: Mon Aug 10 21:19:12 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2009-August/011866.html ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests
Re: [Zope-CMF] [CMF 2.1] opaque items calls make performance issue
Hi! Hanno Schlichting wrote: I don't know how such a feature removal or deprecation would be handled on the CMF level. AFAICS IWorkflowAware and IOpaqueItemManager methods (as defined in CMF 2.2) were added to CMFCatalogAware because at that time events were not available and it was easier to have all manage_after* and manage_before* methods in one place. But IWorkflowAware and IOpaqueItemManager have nothing to do with ICatalogAware and I can no longer see a good reason to keep them all in one mixin. I propose to split up CMFCatalogAware in CatalogAware, WorkflowAware and OpaqueItemManager mixins. All the interfaces provided by these base classes should be optional for CMF content. PortalFolderBase e.g. is not catalog or workflow aware, so it should not use those base classes. In a next step we can replace the OpaqueItemManager base class by an adapter and provide an alternative adapter that just looks for talkback. That makes opaque item support configurable and we can disable it by default. Cheers, Yuppie ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests
Re: [Zope-CMF] [CMF 2.1] opaque items calls make performance issue
Am 11.08.2009, 20:06 Uhr, schrieb yuppie y.2...@wcm-solutions.de: I propose to split up CMFCatalogAware in CatalogAware, WorkflowAware and OpaqueItemManager mixins. All the interfaces provided by these base classes should be optional for CMF content. PortalFolderBase e.g. is not catalog or workflow aware, so it should not use those base classes. This is an excellent idea! Finding out that the reason why my folderish objects were not being indexed because PortalFolder switches it off despire being CatalogAware was one of those aha experiences when moving towards a component architecture. Charlie -- Charlie Clark Helmholtzstr. 20 Düsseldorf D- 40215 Tel: +49-211-938-5360 GSM: +49-178-782-6226 ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests
