Re: [Zope-Coders] Re: SVN: Zope/trunk/lib/python/Testing/ZopeTestCase/ transaction.commit(1) is deprecated in favor of transaction.savepoint().

2005-11-04 Thread Stefan H. Holek

Thank you for the clarification, Tim.

On 3. Nov 2005, at 16:22, Tim Peters wrote:


The full deprecation msg spells it out in more detail:

subtransactions are deprecated; instead of  transaction.commit 
(1), use
transaction.savepoint(optimistic=True) in contexts where a  
subtransaction
abort will never occur, or sp=transaction.savepoint() if later  
rollback is

possible and then sp.rollback() instead of transaction.abort(1)


Last time *I* saw it, it said "subtransactions are deprecated; use  
transaction.savepoint() instead of transaction.commit(1)" ;-)



So, either way, the current code is a bit off target.  Best guess is
that you're not interested in *sub*transaction aborts here, so that
you do want to pass optimistic=True.


This is correct. I will pass True then.

Stefan

--
Anything that happens, happens.  --Douglas Adams


___
Zope-Coders mailing list
Zope-Coders@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-coders


Re: [Zope-Coders] Re: SVN: Zope/trunk/lib/python/Testing/ZopeTestCase/ transaction.commit(1) is deprecated in favor of transaction.savepoint().

2005-11-03 Thread Tim Peters
>>> Log message for revision 39807:
>>>   transaction.commit(1) is deprecated in favor of transaction.savepoint().

[Tres Seaver]
>> This likely needs to be 'savepoint(optimistic=True)' (see collector
>> #1860 for rationale).

[Stefan H. Holek]
> Perhaps. However, these tests specifically check interactions between
> persistent objects, their attributes, and transaction commit/abort.
> If things break there, I want to know about it.

The full deprecation msg spells it out in more detail:

subtransactions are deprecated; instead of  transaction.commit(1), use
transaction.savepoint(optimistic=True) in contexts where a subtransaction
abort will never occur, or sp=transaction.savepoint() if later rollback is
possible and then sp.rollback() instead of transaction.abort(1)

If you're not testing *sub*transaction aborts (you only mention
"transaction abort" above, and that's not the same thing), then
there's no reason to avoid passing optimistic=True.

The only effect _not_ passing True has then is to raise a nuisance
exception if some data manager involved in the transaction doesn't
support the new ISavepoint interface.  But if you're never going to do
a subtransaction abort, then there's no need for any data manager to
support ISavepoint.  That's why optimistic= exists.  If you _are_
going to do a subtransaction abort, then just calling
"transaction.savepoint()" is inadequate:  you would need also to
assign the result of that to a variable, in order to call its
rollback) method later (at the point where you used to do
transaction.abort(1)).

So, either way, the current code is a bit off target.  Best guess is
that you're not interested in *sub*transaction aborts here, so that
you do want to pass optimistic=True.
___
Zope-Coders mailing list
Zope-Coders@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-coders


Re: [Zope-Coders] Re: SVN: Zope/trunk/lib/python/Testing/ZopeTestCase/ transaction.commit(1) is deprecated in favor of transaction.savepoint().

2005-11-03 Thread Stefan H. Holek
Perhaps. However, these tests specifically check interactions between  
persistent objects, their attributes, and transaction commit/abort.  
If things break there, I want to know about it.


Stefan


On 3. Nov 2005, at 01:10, Tres Seaver wrote:


Stefan H. Holek wrote:

Log message for revision 39807:
  transaction.commit(1) is deprecated in favor of  
transaction.savepoint().


This likely needs to be 'savepoint(optimistic=True)' (see collector
#1860 for rationale).


--
Anything that happens, happens.  --Douglas Adams


___
Zope-Coders mailing list
Zope-Coders@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-coders


[Zope-Coders] Re: SVN: Zope/trunk/lib/python/Testing/ZopeTestCase/ transaction.commit(1) is deprecated in favor of transaction.savepoint().

2005-11-02 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Stefan H. Holek wrote:
> Log message for revision 39807:
>   transaction.commit(1) is deprecated in favor of transaction.savepoint().

This likely needs to be 'savepoint(optimistic=True)' (see collector
#1860 for rationale).


Tres.
- --
===
Tres Seaver  +1 202-558-7113  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Palladion Software   "Excellence by Design"http://palladion.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFDaVWC+gerLs4ltQ4RAgXvAKDOXY4mj+i3OQPBiIvFIITqcaF1EwCfW0vx
FffUmrPQGyXvugGQia+SsJ4=
=ZtKT
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
Zope-Coders mailing list
Zope-Coders@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-coders


[Zope-Coders] Re: SVN: Zope/trunk/lib/python/Testing/ZopeTestCase/ transaction.commit(1) is deprecated in favor of transaction.savepoint().

2005-11-02 Thread Florent Guillaume

Stefan H. Holek wrote:

Log message for revision 39807:
  transaction.commit(1) is deprecated in favor of transaction.savepoint().


Actually, in favor of transaction.savepoint(optimistic=True).

Florent



Changed:
  U   Zope/trunk/lib/python/Testing/ZopeTestCase/doc/CHANGES.txt
  U   Zope/trunk/lib/python/Testing/ZopeTestCase/testZODBCompat.py

-=-
Modified: Zope/trunk/lib/python/Testing/ZopeTestCase/doc/CHANGES.txt
===
--- Zope/trunk/lib/python/Testing/ZopeTestCase/doc/CHANGES.txt  2005-11-01 
12:55:46 UTC (rev 39806)
+++ Zope/trunk/lib/python/Testing/ZopeTestCase/doc/CHANGES.txt  2005-11-01 
13:00:43 UTC (rev 39807)
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
 Unreleased
+- transaction.commit(1) is deprecated in favor of transaction.savepoint().
 - Don't break if Python distros ship without profile support (Debian, Ubuntu).
 - Functional.publish() would hang if it got a request_method argument other
   than GET or HEAD while omitting the stdin argument.

Modified: Zope/trunk/lib/python/Testing/ZopeTestCase/testZODBCompat.py
===
--- Zope/trunk/lib/python/Testing/ZopeTestCase/testZODBCompat.py
2005-11-01 12:55:46 UTC (rev 39806)
+++ Zope/trunk/lib/python/Testing/ZopeTestCase/testZODBCompat.py
2005-11-01 13:00:43 UTC (rev 39807)
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@
 self.folder.addDTMLMethod('doc', file='foo')
 # _p_oids are None until we commit a subtransaction
 self.assertEqual(self.folder._p_oid, None)
-transaction.commit(1)
+transaction.savepoint()
 self.failIfEqual(self.folder._p_oid, None)
 
 def testCutPaste(self):

@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@
 self.folder.addDTMLMethod('doc', file='foo')
 # _p_oids are None until we commit a subtransaction
 self.assertEqual(self.folder._p_oid, None)
-transaction.commit(1)
+transaction.savepoint()
 self.failIfEqual(self.folder._p_oid, None)
 
 def testExport(self):

@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@
 def testSubTransactionAbort(self):
 self.folder.foo = 1
 self.failUnless(hasattr(self.folder, 'foo'))
-transaction.commit(1)
+transaction.savepoint()
 transaction.abort()
 # This time the abort nukes the foo attribute...
 self.failIf(hasattr(self.folder, 'foo'))
@@ -330,7 +330,7 @@
 def testSubTransactionAbortPersistent(self):
 self.folder._p_foo = 1
 self.failUnless(hasattr(self.folder, '_p_foo'))
-transaction.commit(1)
+transaction.savepoint()
 transaction.abort()
 # This time the abort nukes the _p_foo attribute...
 self.failIf(hasattr(self.folder, '_p_foo'))
@@ -345,7 +345,7 @@
 def testSubTransactionAbortVolatile(self):
 self.folder._v_foo = 1
 self.failUnless(hasattr(self.folder, '_v_foo'))
-transaction.commit(1)
+transaction.savepoint()
 transaction.abort()
 # This time the abort nukes the _v_foo attribute...
 self.failIf(hasattr(self.folder, '_v_foo'))

___
Zope-Checkins maillist  -  Zope-Checkins@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-checkins




--
Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France)   Director of R&D
+33 1 40 33 71 59   http://nuxeo.com   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Zope-Coders mailing list
Zope-Coders@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-coders