Re: [Zope-dev] Verbose security for Zope 2.8 or 2.9
Shane Hathaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Florent Guillaume wrote: What is the dependency on the python implementation, is it just _embed_permission_in_roles ? Didn't you succeed in patching the C version too in some earlier versions of VerboseSecurity ? Currently, the C code makes no attempt to raise verbose errors. I've never patched the C code, although I doubt it would be very difficult. (Perhaps you're referring to previous monkey patches that replaced a method implemented in C with a Python version.) Yes that must have been that. Florent Anyone familiar with the security machinery is welcome to give it a shot. :-) -- Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France) CTO, Director of RD +33 1 40 33 71 59 http://nuxeo.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
[Zope-dev] BTree vs dictionary
Now that I know how to use BTrees I grew fond of it and the features it offers. While the advantages of using BTrees are obvious when using it in a database context, I was wondering if it makes sense to use it instead of a dictionary routinely, just so I can take advantage of commands such as t(min=1, max=4). As I have no idea about the code that make the BTree tick, I was wondering: does anybody advise against it? Should I be extra careful about some things? Thanks for the help, Yair -- Yair Benita Utrecht University The Netherlands ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] BTree vs dictionary
--On 16. Juni 2005 17:32:15 +0200 Yair Benita [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Now that I know how to use BTrees I grew fond of it and the features it offers. While the advantages of using BTrees are obvious when using it in a database context, I was wondering if it makes sense to use it instead of a dictionary routinely, just so I can take advantage of commands such as t(min=1, max=4). If you need BTree features then use BTrees. If you don't need any of them better use dictionaries. Dicts are somehwat faster than BTrees but BTrees should be used in any way when working with the ZODB. -aj pgpAgIHIR2IsH.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] BTree vs dictionary
[Yair Benita] Now that I know how to use BTrees I grew fond of it and the features it offers. Yup, they're very cool. While the advantages of using BTrees are obvious when using it in a database context, I was wondering if it makes sense to use it instead of a dictionary routinely, just so I can take advantage of commands such as t(min=1, max=4). As I have no idea about the code that make the BTree tick, I was wondering: does anybody advise against it? Should I be extra careful about some things? They're generally slower than dicts. Other than that, there are gotchas (surprises, pitfalls) in using BTrees, and in using dicts, but they're generally different gotchas. See the section on BTrees in the ZODB Programming Guide for some hideous details, section 5.3: http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/FrontPage/guide/index.html ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
[Zope-dev] Nuxeo supports Zope Corp announces
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, Following the announces from Zope Corporation yesterday about their willingness to create a Zope Foundation (that would manage independently Zope 2 and Zope 3 projects) and to participate actively in the Z3ECM project, I would like to express briefly Nuxeo's position about all the news. First, we would like to thank Zope Corporation for Zope 2 and Zope 3 as Open Source software, they are amazing products ! For us as far as we know, the Zope Foundation is a really great news. This will probably solve the main issues we heard from people in the community and from some customers (brand and copyright security). It's really great news that Zope Corporation is now ready to go further on the community way and involvement. We are ready to help as much as needed in establishing the ZF as a vendor-neutral organisation with the mission to develop and promote a great technology (like the Apache or Eclipse Foundations). The Zope Foundation will, IOHO, a big step towards project 10X to establish Zope as a leading development platform for all kinds of web and internet applications. On the Z3ECM project, we are very glad that Zope Corporation wants to actively join the project ! We are certain that having ZC resources on this project will clearly help to build better products and solidify the platform. We will also support the move of the Z3ECM project to the ZF when the issues of copyright ownership will be discussed with the project stakeholders. It could definitely help unifying CMS zope community and will give more credibility to the platform from a customer point of view. We will also support the move of the Z3ECM project to the ZF when the issues of copyright ownership will be discussed with the project stakeholders In short, we are really happy and excited, and will definitely supports ZC to move forward on these topics with the other members of the Zope community. I'm pretty confident that the whole community will support this as well. Best regards, EB. - - -- ric Barroca, Tel: +33 6 21 74 77 64 (mobile). Nuxeo Collaborative Portal Server: http://www.nuxeo.com/cps Gestion de contenu web / portail collaboratif / groupware / open source! www.nuxeo.com - www.cps-project.org - www.indesko.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAkKxrw4ACgkQz/zbrAllSZ5JPwCdF2kqwrOI4VvjltxaceblHypf vFgAnjuFiQj7qxA09GTmbr68Ntp7VNJq =IJAS -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
[Zope-dev] Re: [Z3lab] Nuxeo supports Zope Corp announces
Eric Barroca wrote: Hello, Following the announces from Zope Corporation yesterday about their willingness to create a Zope Foundation (that would manage independently Zope 2 and Zope 3 projects) and to participate actively in the Z3ECM project, I would like to express briefly Nuxeo's position about all the news. First, we would like to thank Zope Corporation for Zope 2 and Zope 3 as Open Source software, they are amazing products ! For us as far as we know, the Zope Foundation is a really great news. This will probably solve the main issues we heard from people in the community and from some customers (brand and copyright security). It's really great news that Zope Corporation is now ready to go further on the community way and involvement. We are ready to help as much as needed in establishing the ZF as a vendor-neutral organisation with the mission to develop and promote a great technology (like the Apache or Eclipse Foundations). The Zope Foundation will, IOHO, a big step towards project 10X to establish Zope as a leading development platform for all kinds of web and internet applications. On the Z3ECM project, we are very glad that Zope Corporation wants to actively join the project ! We are certain that having ZC resources on this project will clearly help to build better products and solidify the platform. We will also support the move of the Z3ECM project to the ZF when the issues of copyright ownership will be discussed with the project stakeholders. It could definitely help unifying CMS zope community and will give more credibility to the platform from a customer point of view. We will also support the move of the Z3ECM project to the ZF when the issues of copyright ownership will be discussed with the project stakeholders In short, we are really happy and excited, and will definitely supports ZC to move forward on these topics with the other members of the Zope community. I'm pretty confident that the whole community will support this as well. Best regards, EB. -- ric Barroca, Tel: +33 6 21 74 77 64 (mobile). Nuxeo Collaborative Portal Server: http://www.nuxeo.com/cps Gestion de contenu web / portail collaboratif / groupware / open source! www.nuxeo.com - www.cps-project.org - www.indesko.com Hi! This is really great news! I am going to start working at getting Chalmers to be one of the key players in the foundation which would make the foundation even more vendor-neutral. I am confident that this will go through. regards /JM ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
