[Zope-dev] 2.9.4? reStructuredText support?
I think we should do a 2.9.4 release to incorporate the recent hot fix. This is easy for me to say, since I won't be doing it. :) Because this recent fix actually fixed the same problem that the previous hot fix was supposed to fix, I think someone needs to work up some decent tests. This is not a trivial task, bit it is necessary. If no one is willing to do this, I think we need to drop the TTW reStructuredText support from Zope 2, as it is too great a risk. BTW, I suspect that a less violent patch could be created, if anyone wants to champion TTW reStructuedText support in Zope 2. Personally, I'm for dropping it. Jim -- Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Python Powered! CTO (540) 361-1714 http://www.python.org Zope Corporationhttp://www.zope.com http://www.zope.org ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] 2.9.4? reStructuredText support?
Jim Fulton wrote: BTW, I suspect that a less violent patch could be created, if anyone wants to champion TTW reStructuedText support in Zope 2. Personally, I'm for dropping it. +1 on dropping it completely, but then I hate all types of structured text so I doubt I'm in the majority... Chris -- Simplistix - Content Management, Zope Python Consulting - http://www.simplistix.co.uk ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
[Zope-dev] Re: 2.9.4? reStructuredText support?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jim Fulton wrote: I think we should do a 2.9.4 release to incorporate the recent hot fix. This is easy for me to say, since I won't be doing it. :) Because this recent fix actually fixed the same problem that the previous hot fix was supposed to fix, I think someone needs to work up some decent tests. This is not a trivial task, bit it is necessary. If no one is willing to do this, I think we need to drop the TTW reStructuredText support from Zope 2, as it is too great a risk. BTW, I suspect that a less violent patch could be created, if anyone wants to champion TTW reStructuedText support in Zope 2. Personally, I'm for dropping it. I actually checked in a fix last night which disabled the 'include' directive completely, and blew out the 'raw' directive for the 'file' and 'url' options. The fix went into the 2.7, 2.8, 2.9, and 2.10 branches and the head. We neeed to do a Zope3 3.2.2 release to go along with 2.9.4 (and maybe a ZODB 3.4.x release as well). Tres. - -- === Tres Seaver +1 202-558-7113 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Palladion Software Excellence by Designhttp://palladion.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFErn3I+gerLs4ltQ4RAubeAJ9LmNhC1ucX9jgCMH2YNXy9uMQe6gCfQsDS 98DkWrI4a32Cqhc7LMu94yY= =frHO -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
[Zope-dev] Re: 2.9.4? reStructuredText support?
Chris Withers wrote: Jim Fulton wrote: BTW, I suspect that a less violent patch could be created, if anyone wants to champion TTW reStructuedText support in Zope 2. Personally, I'm for dropping it. +1 on dropping it completely, but then I hate all types of structured text so I doubt I'm in the majority... zwiki for example just recently switched to rst as default page type. how about making usage of directives configuable ? Michael -- http://zope.org/Members/d2m http://planetzope.org ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
[Zope-dev] Re: 2.9.4? reStructuredText support?
I'm not sure what effect disabling TTW RST would have on Zwiki. Definitely lots of Zwiki users using and enjoying RST. I think losing include is fine, raw will be missed, but oh well. Thanks for working on this, -Simon ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] 2.9.4? reStructuredText support?
On Jul 7, 2006, at 12:17 PM, Stefan H. Holek wrote: Tres' patch (removing 'include' and 'raw' altogether) looks fairly low on violence to me. No reason to drop reST from Zope, IMO. Well, I wouldn't want to apply the patch for Z3, as we use reST on the file system and include and raw have legitimate uses. In fact, I think include and maybe even include of system files could have use in some TTW applications. In fact, Tres' patch would make it hard to a well-written 3rd-party Zope 2 app to use raw in legitimate way. Don't get me wrong. I like Tres' patch. It was absolutely the best patch for the situation at hand. Jim -- Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Python Powered! CTO (540) 361-1714 http://www.python.org Zope Corporationhttp://www.zope.com http://www.zope.org ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
[Zope-dev] Re: 2.9.4? reStructuredText support?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Simon Michael wrote: I'm not sure what effect disabling TTW RST would have on Zwiki. Definitely lots of Zwiki users using and enjoying RST. I think losing include is fine, raw will be missed, but oh well. The hotfix disables raw: the fixed docutils in the checkin actually just disables 'file' and 'url' optoins for raw: http://svn.zope.org/docutils/tags/0.4.0-zope/ Tres. - -- === Tres Seaver +1 202-558-7113 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Palladion Software Excellence by Designhttp://palladion.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFErrnh+gerLs4ltQ4RAjibAJ0RLwVEkuqZBrFhDM68atof7Rh3ngCePgVB qXcGTg9YZTaLc2EGEvcijRU= =LEBG -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
[Zope-dev] buildbot failure in Zope branches 2.10 2.4 Linux zc-buildbot
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope branches 2.10 2.4 Linux zc-buildbot. Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/ Build Reason: changes Build Source Stamp: 6524 Blamelist: chrisw,hdima,oestermeier,philikon,srichter BUILD FAILED: failed test sincerely, -The Buildbot ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
[Zope-dev] Re: 2.9.4? reStructuredText support?
Tres Seaver wrote: We neeed to do a Zope3 3.2.2 release to go along with 2.9.4 Why? ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] 2.9.4? reStructuredText support?
--On 7. Juli 2006 11:03:06 -0400 Jim Fulton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think we should do a 2.9.4 release to incorporate the recent hot fix. This is easy for me to say, since I won't be doing it. :) Because this recent fix actually fixed the same problem that the previous hot fix was supposed to fix, I think someone needs to work up some decent tests. This is not a trivial task, bit it is necessary. If no one is willing to do this, I think we need to drop the TTW reStructuredText support from Zope 2, as it is too great a risk. Dropping TTW reST is absolutely not an option. I breaks backward compatibility. BTW, I suspect that a less violent patch could be created, if anyone wants to champion TTW reStructuedText support in Zope 2. Personally, I'm for dropping it. Tres' patch is looking in fine to me. I don't see a need right now for dropping reST with having file inclusing *removed*. -aj pgpUu9iidzc4Z.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
[Zope-dev] buildbot failure in Zope trunk 2.4 Linux zc-buildbot
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope trunk 2.4 Linux zc-buildbot. Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/ Build Reason: changes Build Source Stamp: 6527 Blamelist: chrisw,hdima,oestermeier,philikon,srichter,tseaver BUILD FAILED: failed test sincerely, -The Buildbot ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
[Zope-dev] buildbot failure in Zope trunk 2.4 Windows 2000 zc-bbwin6
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope trunk 2.4 Windows 2000 zc-bbwin6. Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/ Build Reason: changes Build Source Stamp: 6527 Blamelist: chrisw,hdima,oestermeier,philikon,srichter,tseaver BUILD FAILED: failed compile sincerely, -The Buildbot ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
