date:20111011

Re: [Zope-dev] Missing Zope2 tarballs

2011-10-11 Thread Jens Vagelpohl


On Oct 11, 2011, at 03:33 , Alex Clark wrote:

 Hi,
 
 Anyone notice these missing tarballs?
 
 - http://old.zope.org/Products/Zope/2.9.12/Zope-2.9.12-final.tgz/
 - http://old.zope.org/Products/Zope/2.10.13/Zope-2.10.13-final.tgz/
 - http://old.zope.org/Products/Zope/2.11.4/Zope-2.11.4-final.tgz/

Hi Alex,

With the help of Jim, who produced a tarball containing the spidered content of 
old.zope.org, the site has been converted to a static site. There will 
inevitably be issues here and there. I'll take a look to see if I can find the 
original files from the old app server.

jens


___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Re: [Zope-dev] Missing Zope2 tarballs

2011-10-11 Thread Andreas Jung

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

I can confirm this:

http://www.zope.org/Products/Zope/2.10.13/Zope-2.10.13-final.tgz

does not work.

Is this due because old.zope.org is now a static site?

Andreas

Alex Clark wrote:
 Hi,
 
 
 Anyone notice these missing tarballs?
 
 
 - http://old.zope.org/Products/Zope/2.9.12/Zope-2.9.12-final.tgz/ -
 http://old.zope.org/Products/Zope/2.10.13/Zope-2.10.13-final.tgz/ -
 http://old.zope.org/Products/Zope/2.11.4/Zope-2.11.4-final.tgz/
 
 
 
 (sorry for the redundant post, I posted this on plone-dev a bit
 earlier…)
 
 
 
 Alex
 
 
 
 
 

- -- 
ZOPYX Limited   | zopyx group
Charlottenstr. 37/1 | The full-service network for Zope  Plone
D-72070 Tübingen| Produce  Publish
www.zopyx.com   | www.produce-and-publish.com
- 
E-Publishing, Python, Zope  Plone development, Consulting


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=Sl40
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
attachment: lists.vcf___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Re: [Zope-dev] zope.schema and Python 3

2011-10-11 Thread Lennart Regebro

On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 10:22, Brian Sutherland br...@vanguardistas.net wrote:
 On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 01:14:26PM +0200, Brian Sutherland wrote:
 I've managed to port zope.schema to Python 3.2 on a branch
 (jinty-python3).

 One doubt which has just crept up on me is if these classes:

    ASCII, ASCIILine, URI, Id, DottedName

 should still inherit from Bytes on Python 3. It seems more logical that
 they should inherit from Text. I had to do some gymnastics to keep them
 bytes on python 3 and feel all dirty about it.

 DottedName, in particular, describes itself as Python-style dotted
 names. But in Python 3 this code works:

     from 漢語 import Español
     print(Español)
    class '漢語.Español'

 so a DottedName could be '漢語.Español' under Python 3. Definitely
 unicode and not Bytes.

 However, changing the behaviour of these classes between Python 2 and 3
 may be even more problematic.

 Another option is simply to have these classes raise NotImplementedError
 in their validate() methods under Python 3 and wait till the solution
 becomes more obvious.

 Anyone out there willing to assuage my doubts?

It seems to me that they should be `str`, all of them, except possibly
URI. I'm unsure exactly how that changes the behavior. ASCII/ASCIILine
should have validators to restrict them to ASCII only, reasonably, I
don't know if they already do.

//Lennart
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Re: [Zope-dev] zope.schema and Python 3

2011-10-11 Thread Brian Sutherland

On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 10:43:02AM +0200, Lennart Regebro wrote:
 On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 10:22, Brian Sutherland br...@vanguardistas.net 
 wrote:
  On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 01:14:26PM +0200, Brian Sutherland wrote:
  I've managed to port zope.schema to Python 3.2 on a branch
  (jinty-python3).
 
  One doubt which has just crept up on me is if these classes:
 
     ASCII, ASCIILine, URI, Id, DottedName
 
  should still inherit from Bytes on Python 3. It seems more logical that
  they should inherit from Text. I had to do some gymnastics to keep them
  bytes on python 3 and feel all dirty about it.
 
  DottedName, in particular, describes itself as Python-style dotted
  names. But in Python 3 this code works:
 
      from 漢語 import Español
      print(Español)
     class '漢語.Español'
 
  so a DottedName could be '漢語.Español' under Python 3. Definitely
  unicode and not Bytes.
 
  However, changing the behaviour of these classes between Python 2 and 3
  may be even more problematic.
 
  Another option is simply to have these classes raise NotImplementedError
  in their validate() methods under Python 3 and wait till the solution
  becomes more obvious.
 
  Anyone out there willing to assuage my doubts?
 
 It seems to me that they should be `str`, all of them, except possibly
 URI. 

Yeah, seems like it. I made this change to all except URI.

 I'm unsure exactly how that changes the behavior. ASCII/ASCIILine
 should have validators to restrict them to ASCII only, reasonably, I
 don't know if they already do.

It has this:

if not max(map(ord, value))  128:
raise InvalidValue

which seems like it's enough.

-- 
Brian Sutherland
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Re: [Zope-dev] Missing Zope2 tarballs

2011-10-11 Thread Alex Clark

On 10/11/11 3:17 AM, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:

 On Oct 11, 2011, at 03:33 , Alex Clark wrote:

 Hi,

 Anyone notice these missing tarballs?

 - http://old.zope.org/Products/Zope/2.9.12/Zope-2.9.12-final.tgz/
 - http://old.zope.org/Products/Zope/2.10.13/Zope-2.10.13-final.tgz/
 - http://old.zope.org/Products/Zope/2.11.4/Zope-2.11.4-final.tgz/

 Hi Alex,

 With the help of Jim, who produced a tarball containing the spidered content 
 of old.zope.org, the site has been converted to a static site. There will 
 inevitably be issues here and there. I'll take a look to see if I can find 
 the original files from the old app server.


Thanks Jens, I know I occasionally need to build old Plone sites, as far 
back as 2.1 but also sometimes 2.5.x and 3.{0,1,2}.x all of which use 
the old tarballs ranging from Zope 2.8 - 2.11 (I think). Building these 
sites will require at least the final from each series to continue 
working. Ultimately, I'd love to be able to access all the old tarballs 
e.g. similar to:

- http://dist.plone.org/archive/

But I realize this may require some significant bit of effort!


Thanks again for the effort,



Alex







 jens


 ___
 Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
 **  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
 (Related lists -
   https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
   https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )



-- 
Alex Clark · http://aclark.net

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Re: [Zope-dev] Missing Zope2 tarballs

2011-10-11 Thread Jens Vagelpohl


On Oct 11, 2011, at 17:14 , Alex Clark wrote:

 On 10/11/11 3:17 AM, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
 With the help of Jim, who produced a tarball containing the spidered content 
 of old.zope.org, the site has been converted to a static site. There will 
 inevitably be issues here and there. I'll take a look to see if I can find 
 the original files from the old app server.
 
 
 Thanks Jens, I know I occasionally need to build old Plone sites, as far 
 back as 2.1 but also sometimes 2.5.x and 3.{0,1,2}.x all of which use 
 the old tarballs ranging from Zope 2.8 - 2.11 (I think). Building these 
 sites will require at least the final from each series to continue 
 working. Ultimately, I'd love to be able to access all the old tarballs 
 e.g. similar to:
 
 - http://dist.plone.org/archive/
 
 But I realize this may require some significant bit of effort!

I'm in touch with Jim to find some solution.

jens



___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Re: [Zope-dev] Missing Zope2 tarballs

2011-10-11 Thread Wichert Akkerman

On 2011-10-11 17:14, Alex Clark wrote:
 On 10/11/11 3:17 AM, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:

 On Oct 11, 2011, at 03:33 , Alex Clark wrote:

 Hi,

 Anyone notice these missing tarballs?

 - http://old.zope.org/Products/Zope/2.9.12/Zope-2.9.12-final.tgz/
 - http://old.zope.org/Products/Zope/2.10.13/Zope-2.10.13-final.tgz/
 - http://old.zope.org/Products/Zope/2.11.4/Zope-2.11.4-final.tgz/

 Hi Alex,

 With the help of Jim, who produced a tarball containing the spidered content 
 of old.zope.org, the site has been converted to a static site. There will 
 inevitably be issues here and there. I'll take a look to see if I can find 
 the original files from the old app server.


 Thanks Jens, I know I occasionally need to build old Plone sites, as far
 back as 2.1 but also sometimes 2.5.x and 3.{0,1,2}.x all of which use
 the old tarballs ranging from Zope 2.8 - 2.11 (I think). Building these
 sites will require at least the final from each series to continue
 working. Ultimately, I'd love to be able to access all the old tarballs
 e.g. similar to:

I have a buildout that needs 
http://www.zope.org/Products/Zope/2.7.8/Zope-2.7.8-final.tgz still..

Wichert.

-- 
Wichert Akkerman wich...@wiggy.net   It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net/  It is hard to make things simple.
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

[Zope-dev] zope-tests - FAILED: 21, OK: 32

2011-10-11 Thread Zope tests summarizer

This is the summary for test reports received on the 
zope-tests list between 2011-10-10 00:00:00 UTC and 2011-10-11 00:00:00 UTC:

See the footnotes for test reports of unsuccessful builds.

An up-to date view of the builders is also available in our 
buildbot documentation: 
http://docs.zope.org/zopetoolkit/process/buildbots.html#the-nightly-builds

Reports received


[1]ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit
[2]ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit
[3]ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.6.5 Linux 64bit
[4]ZTK 1.1 / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit
[5]ZTK 1.1 / Python2.6.5 Linux 64bit
[6]ZTK 1.1 / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit
[7]ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit
[8]ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.6.5 Linux 64bit
[9]ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit
   Zope 3.4 KGS / Python2.4.6 64bit linux
   Zope 3.4 KGS / Python2.5.5 64bit linux
   Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.4-32bit-linux
   Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.4-64bit-linux
   Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.5-32bit-linux
   Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.5-64bit-linux
   Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
   Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
   Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.6 : Linux
   Zope-2.12-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux
   Zope-2.13 Python-2.6.6 : Linux
   Zope-2.13-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux
   Zope-trunk Python-2.6.6 : Linux
   Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux
   winbot / ZODB_dev py_254_win32
   winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win32
   winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win64
   winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win32
   winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win64
[10]   winbot / z3c.authenticator_py_265_32
[11]   winbot / z3c.baseregistry_py_265_32
[12]   winbot / z3c.contents_py_265_32
[13]   winbot / z3c.form_py_265_32
[14]   winbot / z3c.formui_py_265_32
[15]   winbot / z3c.jsontree_py_265_32
[16]   winbot / z3c.layer.pagelet_py_265_32
[17]   winbot / z3c.layer.ready2go_py_265_32
[18]   winbot / z3c.macro_py_265_32
[19]   winbot / z3c.pagelet_py_265_32
[20]   winbot / z3c.tabular_py_265_32
[21]   winbot / z3c.template_py_265_32
   winbot / ztk_10 py_254_win32
   winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win32
   winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win64
   winbot / ztk_11 py_254_win32
   winbot / ztk_11 py_265_win32
   winbot / ztk_11 py_265_win64
   winbot / ztk_11 py_270_win32
   winbot / ztk_11 py_270_win64
   winbot / ztk_dev py_254_win32
   winbot / ztk_dev py_265_win32
   winbot / ztk_dev py_265_win64
   winbot / ztk_dev py_270_win32
   winbot / ztk_dev py_270_win64

Non-OK results
--

[1]FAILED  ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-October/050933.html


[2]FAILED  ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-October/050935.html


[3]FAILED  ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.6.5 Linux 64bit
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-October/050934.html


[4]FAILED  ZTK 1.1 / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-October/050974.html


[5]FAILED  ZTK 1.1 / Python2.6.5 Linux 64bit
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-October/050973.html


[6]FAILED  ZTK 1.1 / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-October/050972.html


[7]FAILED  ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-October/050928.html


[8]FAILED  ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.6.5 Linux 64bit
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-October/050927.html


[9]FAILED  ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-October/050926.html


[10]   FAILED  winbot / z3c.authenticator_py_265_32
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-October/050944.html


[11]   FAILED  winbot / z3c.baseregistry_py_265_32
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-October/050941.html


[12]   FAILED  winbot / z3c.contents_py_265_32
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-October/050940.html


[13]   FAILED  winbot / z3c.form_py_265_32
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-October/050932.html


[14]   FAILED  winbot / z3c.formui_py_265_32
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-October/050936.html


[15]   FAILED  winbot / z3c.jsontree_py_265_32
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-October/050943.html


[16]   FAILED  winbot / z3c.layer.pagelet_py_265_32
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-October/050938.html


[17]   FAILED  winbot / z3c.layer.ready2go_py_265_32
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-October/050947.html


[18]   FAILED  winbot / z3c.macro_py_265_32
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-October/050945.html


[19]   FAILED  winbot / z3c.pagelet_py_265_32
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-October/050946.html


[20]   FAILED

Re: [Zope-dev] Missing Zope2 tarballs

Re: [Zope-dev] Missing Zope2 tarballs

Re: [Zope-dev] zope.schema and Python 3

Re: [Zope-dev] zope.schema and Python 3

Re: [Zope-dev] Missing Zope2 tarballs

Re: [Zope-dev] Missing Zope2 tarballs

Re: [Zope-dev] Missing Zope2 tarballs

[Zope-dev] zope-tests - FAILED: 21, OK: 32

8 matches

Site Navigation

Mail list logo

Footer information