Re: [Zope-dev] I smell commercial interest: PLOPE
Andy McKay [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: We thought Plop was a better name that Plope btw ;) This would only cause confusion with Plob. All the good names are already taken :-) http://lki-www.informatik.uni-hamburg.de/~kirschke/diplom/ ___ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] XMLRPC and Basic Auth problems
Casey Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The server returns a 200 response status. Strangly, the response headers do include WWW-Authenticate. So, the xml-rpc code must be changing the response status. Yes. It's probably this piece in ZPublisher/xmlrpc.py: --cut-- # Do the damage. self.setBody(f) self._real.setStatus(200) --cut-- Damage, indeed :-) or better :-( ___ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] DISCUSS: Enhanced MailHost (was: Speaking of 2.6...)
Hello Brian. * Brian Lloyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-04-17 20:29]: Ok. I'd like to run the mbox thing by Jim to see if he has any The product now uses a Maildir-style approach to deal with concurrent writes. The creation of the file name uses time(), gethostname() and randint() to hopefully create enough uniqueness in the names. reservations about that (writing to the FS, potential effect on security, etc.) The flooding problem still is not solved. For production sites it's probably a good idea to turn off the backup to prevent DOS attacks. But for debugging it's a valuable tool. with MailHost up-to-date). Chris McDonough is nominally in charge of making sure doc updates are taken care of ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). You can send doc updates (or pointers to them) to him. Okay, I'll write it if the okay from the BDFL is here ;-) Cheers, Nils -- i.A. Nils Kassube Software Engineering c o m . u n i t G m b H online-schmiede seit 1994 http://www.comunit.de/ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Eiffestr. 598 20537 Hamburg | Germany Fon 040 | 21 11 05 25 Fax 040 | 21 11 05 26 ___ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] ZPL and GPL licensing issues
* Jim Penny [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001-06-20 19:12]: As far as I can tell you are wrong, but there are certainly gray areas. The last time this came up I wrote such a scenario up and tried to get FSF clarification. Nothing ever came back. I got a clarification from the FSF. It's in the mailing list archives at http://lists.zope.org/pipermail/zope/2000-September/118024.html Some topics never die :-) Cheers, Nils ___ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
