Hi Thierry
Betreff: [Zope3-Users] View or content provider
Hi,
I need very basic content providers to generate HTML contents
from a set of classes, inside pages templates.
Is there a huge difference between using views (and
context/@@viewname
syntax) and using content providers (with provider:providername
syntax), mainly in terms of performances, CPU usage and/or
memory usage ??
Thanks for any advise for this simple problem, as both
methods work perfectly...
I do not recommend using views for content that is only
used inside a template. Because context/@@viewname
is also traversable as a real view and will probably show
up in google.
btw, I dislike everything like ++items++foobar which makes
something in general traversable. This was the reason for me to
implement contentprovider, z3c.pagelet, z3c.template, z3c.macro
etc. This packages offer you real good patterns and allows you
to develop with much control as possible. There is no need
for making everything accessible as classic views anymore.
Regards
Roger Ineichen
Thierry Florac
--
Chef de projet intranet/internet
Office National des Forêts - Département Informatique
2, Avenue de Saint-Mandé
75570 PARIS Cedex 12
Mél : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tél. : +33 01.40.19.59.64
Fax. : +33 01.40.19.59.85
___
Zope3-users mailing list
Zope3-users@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope3-users
___
Zope3-users mailing list
Zope3-users@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope3-users
