Hi Thierry > Betreff: [Zope3-Users] View or content provider > > Hi, > > I need very basic content providers to generate HTML contents > from a set of classes, inside pages templates. > Is there a huge difference between using views (and > "context/@@viewname" > syntax) and using content providers (with "provider:providername" > syntax), mainly in terms of performances, CPU usage and/or > memory usage ?? > > Thanks for any advise for this simple "problem", as both > methods work perfectly...
I do not recommend using views for content that is only used inside a template. Because "context/@@viewname" is also traversable as a real view and will probably show up in google. btw, I dislike everything like ++items++foobar which makes something in general traversable. This was the reason for me to implement contentprovider, z3c.pagelet, z3c.template, z3c.macro etc. This packages offer you real good patterns and allows you to develop with much control as possible. There is no need for making everything accessible as classic views anymore. Regards Roger Ineichen > Thierry Florac > -- > Chef de projet intranet/internet > Office National des Forêts - Département Informatique > 2, Avenue de Saint-Mandé > 75570 PARIS Cedex 12 > Mél : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Tél. : +33 01.40.19.59.64 > Fax. : +33 01.40.19.59.85 > > _______________________________________________ > Zope3-users mailing list > Zope3-users@zope.org > http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope3-users > _______________________________________________ Zope3-users mailing list Zope3-users@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope3-users
