+1.
Thanks,
Jay
> On 10-Sep-2019, at 3:18 AM, Phil Race wrote:
>
> Approved.
>
> -phil.
>
> On 9/6/19 2:15 PM, Laurent Bourgès wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Please review this bug fix for the Marlin renderer (present in Pisces code
>> since JDK 6?):
>> JBS:
Hi Phil,
Is this fix trivial enough to have only one reviewer ?
So I can push asap.
Laurent
Le lun. 9 sept. 2019 à 23:50, Phil Race a écrit :
> Approved.
>
> -phil.
>
> On 9/6/19 2:15 PM, Laurent Bourgès wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Please review this bug fix for the Marlin renderer (present in Pisces
Hi, Alexey.
Thank you for the review, here is an updated version:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/8225372/webrev.03
- GridBagLayout.html: The text about "Figures 1 and 2" was changed
- componentProperties.html: The is added to some of the tables
- Modality.html: The was dropped from
Approved.
-phil.
On 9/6/19 2:15 PM, Laurent Bourgès wrote:
Hi,
Please review this bug fix for the Marlin renderer (present in Pisces
code since JDK 6?):
JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8230728
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~lbourges/marlin/marlin-8230728.0/
This patch
Approved.
-phil.
On 9/8/19 2:42 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
Hello.
Please review the fix for JDK 14.
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8229896
Fix: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/8229896/webrev.01
During developments of the early version of JavaFX some code
was added to the
Looks good to me. How did you spot this ? The error code path is
unlikely to be taken
so checking for JNI warnings presumably won't report it.
-phil
On 9/9/19 7:49 AM, Baesken, Matthias wrote:
Hello, please review the following webrev .
I noticed that in function BufImg_SetupICM, in
Hello, please review the following webrev .
I noticed that in function BufImg_SetupICM, in case of initCubemap returning
NULL we currently miss a ReleasePrimitiveArrayCritical call;
this should be added.
Bug/webrev :
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8230769
Hi Christoph, thanks for the review and further cleanup !
> Would be good if somebody from 2D could review this, though.
I agree !
Best regards, Matthias
From: Langer, Christoph
Sent: Freitag, 6. September 2019 15:42
To: Baesken, Matthias ; 2d-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: RE: RFR [XS] :