Hi Steven.
I understood your concern.
Your concern is reasonable.
I will leave it to your decision.
Thanks.
Akira Nakajima
On 2018/06/27 1:37, Steven R. Loomis wrote:
I would like to get some more review. Many experts met last week to
discuss the model further, and there was a 3 day intense
Hi Steven.
Sorry, I forgot read this E-Mail.
I will check this site next week.
> https://www.unicode.org/L2/topical/mongolian/
Thanks.
Akira Nakajima
On 2018/06/22 1:14, Steven R. Loomis wrote:
There is much discussion about the encoding of Mongolian- see
Hi Phil.
Thank you very much for advices.
In Mongolian, particular char + char transform to another char. (similar
as Arabic)
Harfbuzz supports it by using Arabic shaper (including FVS).
So this patch set Mongolian as complex to use Arabic shaper.
I created TestMongolian.java
and I posted
There is much discussion about the encoding of Mongolian- see
https://www.unicode.org/L2/topical/mongolian/
Is this discussion taken into account?
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 10:28 AM Phil Race wrote:
> It is not clear to me how this supports Free Variation Selectors for
> Mongolian as claimed.
>
It is not clear to me how this supports Free Variation Selectors for
Mongolian as claimed.
Mongolian has its own variation selectors 0X180B-D.
When applied on top of the previous patch, it might .. since with the
patch below
Mongolian will then always go through TextLayout, and the harfbuzz
Hi All.
Now, SWING does not display Mongolian correctly.
# See "Mongolian Glyph Convergence", etc..
http://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode10.0.0/ch13.pdf#G27803
This is patch for support Mongolian and FVS(Mongolian Free Variation
Selector).
# This patch is separated from JDK-8187100.
I
