On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 5:58 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie <
magnus.ihse.bur...@oracle.com> wrote:
>
> On 2018-03-12 14:26, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
>
>> Yes, I am aware :( Long term I hope windows 32bit gets the same occasional
>> love as zero does. I can produce occasional patches if time allows.
>>
>> But
On 2018-03-12 14:26, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
Yes, I am aware :( Long term I hope windows 32bit gets the same occasional
love as zero does. I can produce occasional patches if time allows.
But in this case the error was in front of the computer, as Magnus pointed,
I may just have a broken build
On 2018-03-09 23:10, Phil Race wrote:
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8193017
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8193017/index.html
Looks good to me.
Thanks for fixing this Phil! Freetype has really been a constant pain in
building on all platforms except Linux. For once,
Ok, looks fine.
On 09/03/2018 15:52, Philip Race wrote:
It is correct as is ..
-phil.
On 3/9/18, 3:49 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
I am not an expert here, but the LICENSE.TXT is a little bit different.
It states that "This means that *you* must choose *one* of the two
licenses described
Yes, I am aware :( Long term I hope windows 32bit gets the same occasional
love as zero does. I can produce occasional patches if time allows.
But in this case the error was in front of the computer, as Magnus pointed,
I may just have a broken build env.
Thanks for your fix, btw! removing the
This is a tricky one. Since Oracle no longer ships 32 bit JDKs for any
platform for the new releases, then there aren't resources or effort being
put into making sure it still builds. Our build systems might still
support it, but for how long?
It might effectively have to become a "port" that
Hi Phil,
This is a nice change! And will make setting up the windows build env much
easier.
Change itself seems fine at a cursory glance. I also tested the build on
Win7 with VS2013 (before, I used to build with a hand-compiled version of
the freetypelib), and it worked fine.
I attempted to
It is correct as is ..
-phil.
On 3/9/18, 3:49 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
I am not an expert here, but the LICENSE.TXT is a little bit different.
It states that "This means that *you* must choose *one* of the two
licenses described below,.".
So I do not know should we select the license
I am not an expert here, but the LICENSE.TXT is a little bit different.
It states that "This means that *you* must choose *one* of the two
licenses described below,.".
So I do not know should we select the license and provide the text only
for one or for both.
On 09/03/2018 15:28,
Just to be clear, I mean we don't import it to each of the source files.
But it is there in the file legal/freetype.md in this webrev.
On 3/9/18, 3:26 PM, Philip Race wrote:
No.
-phil.
On 3/9/18, 3:23 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
Hi, Phil
Headers of the new files refer to LICENSE.TXT. Should
No.
-phil.
On 3/9/18, 3:23 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
Hi, Phil
Headers of the new files refer to LICENSE.TXT. Should we import it as
well?
On 09/03/2018 14:10, Phil Race wrote:
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8193017
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8193017/index.html
Hi, Phil
Headers of the new files refer to LICENSE.TXT. Should we import it as well?
On 09/03/2018 14:10, Phil Race wrote:
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8193017
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8193017/index.html
This fix is will make building openjdk somewhat easier as
Build changes look good.
/Erik
On 2018-03-09 14:10, Phil Race wrote:
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8193017
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8193017/index.html
This fix is will make building openjdk somewhat easier as it removes
the dependence on an OpenJDK developer on
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8193017
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8193017/index.html
This fix is will make building openjdk somewhat easier as it removes
the dependence on an OpenJDK developer on Windows or Mac going
off and downloading and building freetype source
14 matches
Mail list logo
