On Thu, 1 Apr 2021 15:15:32 GMT, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
> Is it possible to automatically test it?
Yes, just added the test.
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/3308
> Dynamically change MTLLayer insets depending on FULL_WINDOW_CONTENT property.
> MTLLayer.h header cleanup.
Alexey Ushakov has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
8258788: incorrect response to change in window insets [lanai]
Added
On Fri, 2 Apr 2021 11:44:52 GMT, Alexey Ushakov wrote:
>> Dynamically change MTLLayer insets depending on FULL_WINDOW_CONTENT
>> property. MTLLayer.h header cleanup.
>
> Alexey Ushakov has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the last revision:
>
> 825878
> Dynamically change MTLLayer insets depending on FULL_WINDOW_CONTENT property.
> MTLLayer.h header cleanup.
Alexey Ushakov has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
8258788: incorrect response to change in window insets [lanai]
Correc
On Thu, 1 Apr 2021 20:27:37 GMT, Phil Race wrote:
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8255800 could have been a one line
>> spec clean up but
>> it didn't take a lot of looking to realize there were many more
>> inconsistencies between spec and implementation.
>> I've spent a lot of tim
On Mon, 8 Mar 2021 13:22:07 GMT, Alexander Zuev wrote:
> Fix updated after first round of review.
src/java.desktop/share/classes/javax/swing/filechooser/FileSystemView.java line
260:
> 258:
> 259:/**
> 260: * Icon for a file, directory, or folder as it would be displayed in
*Returns
On Fri, 2 Apr 2021 21:03:30 GMT, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
>> Phil Race has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> 8255800: Raster creation methods need some specification clean up
>
> Marked as reviewed by serb (Reviewer).
I updated
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8255800 could have been a one line
> spec clean up but
> it didn't take a lot of looking to realize there were many more
> inconsistencies between spec and implementation.
> I've spent a lot of time on what is just small number of factory methods in
> R
On Thu, 1 Apr 2021 15:50:50 GMT, Prasanta Sadhukhan
wrote:
>> Jayathirth D V has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Refactor code to use drawTex2Tex
>
> Marked as reviewed by psadhukhan (Reviewer).
Just curious how this new "r
On Fri, 2 Apr 2021 22:43:36 GMT, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
> Just curious how this new "round trip" will affect the performance when the
> clip is set and when not? is it cheap?
I am not getting what do you mean by 'new "round trip" '. Please elaborate.
Regarding performance metrics i have capture
On Sat, 3 Apr 2021 02:56:48 GMT, Jayathirth D V wrote:
> I am not getting what do you mean by 'new "round trip" '. Please elaborate.
> Regarding performance metrics i have captured the details in the bug and
> there is no degradation.
The new code path which takes care of the clip, if there is
On Sat, 3 Apr 2021 03:51:29 GMT, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
> > I am not getting what do you mean by 'new "round trip" '. Please elaborate.
> > Regarding performance metrics i have captured the details in the bug and
> > there is no degradation.
>
> The new code path which takes care of the clip, i
On Sat, 3 Apr 2021 05:02:24 GMT, Jayathirth D V wrote:
> We need to use appropriate encoder(where scissor is set) to honour clip in
> copyArea.
It is quite interesting that blitting with or without clipping does not have
any difference. thank you for confirmation. but probably our perf tests a
On Sat, 3 Apr 2021 05:30:12 GMT, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
> > We need to use appropriate encoder(where scissor is set) to honour clip in
> > copyArea.
>
> It is quite interesting that blitting with or without clipping does not have
> any difference. thank you for confirmation. but probably our p
14 matches
Mail list logo
