]
Sent: Monday, July 05, 2004 8:11 PM
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: (313) discogs.com smoking crack rocks?
i submitted a couple reviews to discogs.com yesterday (they
finally got their sh*t together enough to send me my password
after having not been able to log in for a year because their lost
and
galactic life force tracks i was looking for a few months ago were the same
deal??
scotto
plaztikjezuz.com
- Original Message -
From: Thomas D. Cox, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Sent: Monday, July 05, 2004 3:11 PM
Subject: (313) discogs.com smoking crack rocks?
i submitted
@hyperreal.org
Sent: Monday, July 05, 2004 3:11 PM
Subject: (313) discogs.com smoking crack rocks?
i submitted a couple reviews to discogs.com yesterday (they
finally got their sh*t together enough to send me my password
after having not been able to log in for a year because their lost
password
It isn't in discogs, I have the red vinyl 12, not a 7.
Maybe you spelt chesire instead of Cheshire.
p
-Original Message-
From: Scotto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 July 2004 10:28
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: (313) discogs.com smoking crack rocks?
i tried to have to put
Scotto wrote on Tue, 6 Jul 2004 about following:
non-excistant record so i gave up at that point. it just makes me wounder
how many other releases they messed up. maybe that cosmic light force and
i don't have any figures but i think there's plenty of errors, and
the mods constantly tell to
forgot i had entered it. this was a while ago (1 1/2 yars
maybe??).
- Original Message -
From: placid [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Scotto' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313@hyperreal.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 5:37 AM
Subject: RE: (313) discogs.com smoking crack rocks?
It isn't in discogs, I
PROTECTED]
To: 313 313@hyperreal.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 7:18 AM
Subject: Re: (313) discogs.com smoking crack rocks?
Scotto wrote on Tue, 6 Jul 2004 about following:
non-excistant record so i gave up at that point. it just makes me
wounder
how many other releases they messed up. maybe
i submitted a couple reviews to discogs.com yesterday (they
finally got their sh*t together enough to send me my password
after having not been able to log in for a year because their lost
password thing didnt work). i got one back that was rejected on
the grounds of self-hype??!?!?! here was
perhaps you should not say when I played to a crowd, and you should
instead say when played to a crowd of it was accepted openly.
I can see the line that they don't want to cross. If they allowed reviews
like that, they'd have every bedroom dj in teh world sliding in quips
about how good a
