Re: [313] Oh Lordy...

2001-03-24 Thread beautiful individual
From: Mike Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], 313@hyperreal.org Subject: Re: [313] Oh Lordy... Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 13:14:58 -0500 I wonder how many people on this list would do thew same if they were in his shoes? How many people on this list are reading from corporate

RE: [313] Oh Lordy...

2001-03-23 Thread Gwendal Cobert
The way I see your explanation, the problem is not Moby - but MTV. Say they suddenly decide to label Duke Ellington as techno, and that's the only techno they show in their programs, will it change anything to the quality of Duke Ellington's music ? Should Duke Ellington be blamed because millions

RE: [313] Oh Lordy...

2001-03-23 Thread Gwendal Cobert
musical con-artist. Without the massive push of capital marketing machinery of companies like sony ( all the phonies who dole out music like so much fastfood)to back him up he'd collapse in a bewildered heap under the weight of his own self-delusions. What is funny is that Moby's label, at

Re: [313] Oh Lordy...

2001-03-23 Thread Jonny McIntosh
Should Duke Ellington be blamed because millions of stupid american teenagers will associate big band jazz with techno ? I would expect Duke Ellington, if he were alive to do so, wouldn't be so complicit in an attempted rewrite of musical history. It's not a case of taking sole responsibility

RE: [313] Oh Lordy...

2001-03-23 Thread Nick Walsh
That won't happen... Moby knows what sells... He tries to please the mainstream... Duke Ellington did what he wanted to do and his stuff has a place in music history... The difference between Ellington and Moby is that Duke Ellington isn't a sellout... People that sellout generally start making

RE: [313] Oh Lordy...

2001-03-23 Thread Jochem_Peteri
i´m lost... where did it all go wrong? tink i´mma go outside for a strawl. get some food, smoke a cig and when i´m back... maybe it ´ll make some sense... but for now.. 154

RE: [313] Oh Lordy...

2001-03-23 Thread Jochem_Peteri
cheers man! 8 D it´s not just me though. for info, there´s a billboard up at newworldaquarium.com still under some construction though

Re: [313] Oh Lordy...

2001-03-22 Thread Mike Taylor
I wonder how many people on this list would do thew same if they were in his shoes? How many people on this list are reading from corporate accounts? You sell you personal time like he sells his music. Are you any better than he is? Is he better paid than you are, who is the sucker? moby

Re: [313] Oh Lordy...

2001-03-22 Thread Erin Swenson-Healey
saying? I guess he's a role model of sorts, or a frontman at the very least, whether he'd like to be or not. -erin - Original Message - From: Mike Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313@hyperreal.org Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 10:14 AM Subject: Re: [313] Oh Lordy... I

Re: [313] Oh Lordy...

2001-03-22 Thread Jonny McIntosh
I wonder how many people on this list would do thew same if they were in his shoes? How many people on this list are reading from corporate accounts? You sell you personal time like he sells his music. Are you any better than he is? Is he better paid than you are, who is the sucker? moby

Re: [313] Oh Lordy...

2001-03-22 Thread RC
moby can retire tomorrow from the royalties and licencing fees he recived from that last record, can you afford to quit your job? I cannot believe there are some people on this list that still think, there is a direct correlation between the quality of the music and units sold. You are

Re: [313] Oh Lordy...

2001-03-22 Thread Charles Prince
Rc's words ring true. Exactly my point when I compared Moby to a clever musical con-artist. Without the massive push of capital marketing machinery of companies like sony ( all the phonies who dole out music like so much fastfood)to back him up he'd collapse in a bewildered heap under the weight