> On 14 Jun 2019, at 11:25, Viktor Ashirov wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 9:28 AM William Brown wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 13 Jun 2019, at 16:09, Viktor Ashirov wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 3:26 PM William Brown wrote:
Is the test case *just* testing if binary
On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 9:28 AM William Brown wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 13 Jun 2019, at 16:09, Viktor Ashirov wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 3:26 PM William Brown wrote:
> >>
> >> Is the test case *just* testing if binary searching of attributes works?
> > The test was to check if we can
> On 13 Jun 2019, at 16:09, Viktor Ashirov wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 3:26 PM William Brown wrote:
>>
>> Is the test case *just* testing if binary searching of attributes works?
> The test was to check if we can query the server for
> userCertificate=, where is a string
On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 3:26 PM William Brown wrote:
>
> Is the test case *just* testing if binary searching of attributes works?
The test was to check if we can query the server for
userCertificate=, where is a string representation of a
base64 encoded x509 certificate. The original test was
base64 in ldap is just to transport binary ... so they are one and the same.
Either way, I think that you should check ensure str, and provide logs from
access and lib389 in verbose to show what the filter generator is doing,a nd
what the server is attempting to process so we can see where the
Main aim of the test case is filter user with binary search not the base64
.
(Pdb) six.ensure_str(crt)
*** UnicodeDecodeError: 'utf-8' codec can't decode byte 0x82 in position 1:
invalid start byte
On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 7:05 PM William Brown wrote:
> I'm really suspicious here that your
I'm really suspicious here that your escape bytes is not needed for ldap as
much as to prevent python state leaking into the string and the data. I'm
wondering if there is a better approach
Can ldap filters take base64 instead? Perhaps the issue with your filter atm is
that you are
Yes, it is. but with escape_bytes function only.
(Pdb) Accounts(standalone,
DEFAULT_SUFFIX).filter(f"(userCertificate={crt})")
*** ldap.FILTER_ERROR: {'desc': 'Bad search filter', 'errno': 2, 'info':
'No such file or directory'}
And finally .
Accounts(standalone,
Is the test case *just* testing if binary searching of attributes works?
> On 13 Jun 2019, at 15:25, Anuj Borah wrote:
>
> @William Brown
>
>
> This is my test case in bash form . Hope this helps.
>
> dn: uid=user4F, ou=People, dc=example, dc=com
> uid: user4F
> cn: User 4F
> sn:
@William Brown
This is my test case in bash form . Hope this helps.
dn: uid=user4F, ou=People, dc=example, dc=com
uid: user4F
cn: User 4F
sn:
givenName:
ou: People
objectClass: top
objectClass: person
objectClass: organizationalPerson
objectClass:
I'm sorry, you didn't answer my questions can you answer the below
questions, exactly and precisely, else I can't help you :(
>
> * WHAT is the test you are creating? What does it test? How? What steps from
> start to finish? Please list this exactly.
> * Use SSCA to make the user cert -
On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 6:05 PM William Brown wrote:
>
>
> > On 13 Jun 2019, at 14:27, Anuj Borah wrote:
> >
> >
>
> Okay, so:
>
> * WHAT is the test you are creating? What does it test? How? What steps
> from start to finish? Please list this exactly.
> * Use SSCA to make the user cert - it
> On 13 Jun 2019, at 14:27, Anuj Borah wrote:
>
>
Okay, so:
* WHAT is the test you are creating? What does it test? How? What steps from
start to finish? Please list this exactly.
* Use SSCA to make the user cert - it creates pem and der copies
* Have you looked at:
@William Brown
Please check the attached test case .
I want to put escape_bytes function to lib389 utils.py file .
Regards
Anuj Borah
On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 2:18 PM William Brown wrote:
>
>
> > On 9 Jun 2019, at 03:40, Anuj Borah wrote:
> >
> > @William Brown
> >
> > Yes, it does.
> >
>
> On 9 Jun 2019, at 03:40, Anuj Borah wrote:
>
> @William Brown
>
> Yes, it does.
>
> Currently i am porting this bug
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=170520
>
> I think with help of this script it will be impossible to port it .
I'm not authorised to view that bug. :)
I
@William Brown
Yes, it does.
Currently i am porting this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=170520
I think with help of this script it will be impossible to port it .
Do you have any advice .
Regards
Anuj Borah
On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 2:47 PM William Brown wrote:
> I haven't
I haven't read the link but maybe there is some confusion about TLS binding
here. You do the create_rsa_user and that only set's up the certificates.
> On 4 Jun 2019, at 17:51, Anuj Borah wrote:
>
> @William Brown
>
> Thanks , I am doing the same . Trying to follow it . (i have make this
@William Brown
Thanks , I am doing the same . Trying to follow it . (i have make this
script 99% pass)
But its way too old . It uses some like :
standalone.nss_ssl.create_rsa_user('testuser') not valid
(NssSsl(standalone).create_rsa_user('testuser'))
I'm currently traveling at the moment, but I can have a look later to update
this to work on latest lib389 etc.
You can read it and use it as an example though, even if it doesn't pass ...
> On 4 Jun 2019, at 16:32, Anuj Borah wrote:
>
> @William Brown
>
> This test script does not pass
@William Brown
This test script does not pass . Its too old .
Regards
Anuj Borah
On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 8:00 PM William Brown wrote:
> Have a look at this test case if you want to do usercertificate generation
> and authentication :)
>
>
>
Have a look at this test case if you want to do usercertificate generation and
authentication :)
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/blob/master/f/src/lib389/lib389/tests/tls_external_test.py
> On 4 Jun 2019, at 14:31, Anuj Borah wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Let say i want to create a user with
21 matches
Mail list logo
