On Wed, 2018-01-10 at 10:21 -0500, Mark Reynolds wrote:
>
> On 01/09/2018 07:25 PM, William Brown wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > It's time that I'm looking at:
> > https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49425
>
> +1 for 1.4.0!
Thank you! I'm glad you like this. I'm writing them up now (with test
Again a wonderful job William. I always feel proud to work with you and
This change surely deserves outstanding support.
I am thinking, we can publicize this by doing articles on Fedora Magazine
and Commblog.
Also, we should be mentioning about this change in one of our diversity
presentations to
On Thu, 2018-01-11 at 16:40 +, Brian (bex) Exelbierd wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > It's time that I'm looking at:
> > https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49425
> >
> > There are some great reasons to freshen up the default objects we
> > install. The current design isn't really reflective of
> Hi all,
>
> It's time that I'm looking at:
> https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49425
>
> There are some great reasons to freshen up the default objects we
> install. The current design isn't really reflective of modern directory
> usage, the aci's are not "great" examples, and it's not a
On Wed, 2018-01-10 at 12:17 -0500, Máirín Duffy wrote:
>
> On 01/10/2018 10:58 AM, Mark Reynolds wrote:
> > So you could do a filter like this for your example above:
> >
> > "(|(sn=*brown")(sn=*brown west"))"
>
> So the case I'm thinking of for the front end is a directory listing,
> in
>
On 01/10/2018 12:17 PM, Máirín Duffy wrote:
>
>
> On 01/10/2018 10:58 AM, Mark Reynolds wrote:
>> So you could do a filter like this for your example above:
>>
>> "(|(sn=*brown")(sn=*brown west"))"
>
> So the case I'm thinking of for the front end is a directory listing,
> in which case you
On 01/10/2018 10:58 AM, Mark Reynolds wrote:
So you could do a filter like this for your example above:
"(|(sn=*brown")(sn=*brown west"))"
So the case I'm thinking of for the front end is a directory listing, in
which case you wouldn't be so specific to know to add the West.
or
"(|(sn=*
On 01/10/2018 10:53 AM, Máirín Duffy wrote:
>
>
> On 01/10/2018 10:20 AM, Mark Reynolds wrote:
>>> Would this miss someone who had two surnames, say Sally Brown West,
>>> who chooses not to hyphenate?
>> "(sn=*brown*)"
>
> Wouldn't that also match Brownwyn James and Brown West Smith?
Yes it
On 01/10/2018 10:20 AM, Mark Reynolds wrote:
Would this miss someone who had two surnames, say Sally Brown West,
who chooses not to hyphenate?
"(sn=*brown*)"
Wouldn't that also match Brownwyn James and Brown West Smith?
~m
___
389-devel mailing
On 01/09/2018 07:25 PM, William Brown wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> It's time that I'm looking at:
> https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49425
+1 for 1.4.0!
>
> There are some great reasons to freshen up the default objects we
> install. The current design isn't really reflective of modern directory
>
On 01/10/2018 10:08 AM, Máirín Duffy wrote:
> Hi William,
>
>> With displayname you can only sort by "order of the displaynames".
>> So we can at least consistently sort this given the scenario above!
>
> Imagine a phone book sorted this way. In the US in any given town
> there would be 50
Hi William,
With displayname you can only sort by "order of the displaynames". So we can
at least consistently sort this given the scenario above!
Imagine a phone book sorted this way. In the US in any given town there
would be 50 pages of Johns, making wayfinding really difficult. Is
I think I agree with William, since the world is diverse and I don't think
we can cater to *everyone*.
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 3:44 PM, William Brown wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-01-10 at 04:26 +, Máirín Duffy wrote:
> > Hi William,
> >
> > I'm one of the Fedora UX designers
On Wed, 2018-01-10 at 04:26 +, Máirín Duffy wrote:
> Hi William,
>
> I'm one of the Fedora UX designers and was pointed to this thread by
> charcol on another list.
>
> I would like to express enthusiastic support for having by default a
> display name field and a legal name field. This is
Hi William,
I'm one of the Fedora UX designers and was pointed to this thread by charcol on
another list.
I would like to express enthusiastic support for having by default a display
name field and a legal name field. This is of particular benefit and interest
to women as you clearly
15 matches
Mail list logo