Say I want to create a nagios check when the lags are getting long. Obviously I
don’t want to use the directory manager’s account to retrieve the RUV
information. How can I create a user with read-only privileges for this data?
If you have a quick pointer, that should be sufficient.
Thank you!
>> Is that not a correct way to search for RUVs (both local and agreements’)? I
>> get the same results as in the code
> Right, entries under cn=config are not "special entries". Only the database
> tombstone/RUV entry is. So to see a backend database RUV you need to use
> "(&(nsuniqueid=
On 10/30/2017 02:06 PM, Sergei Gerasenko wrote:
>>> Question 1, in the script, the list of RUVs is retrieved like so:
>>>
>>> $ruv = $conn->search($replicaroot, "one",
>>>
>>>
>>> "(&(nsuniqueid=---)(objectClass=nsTombstone))",
>>>
>> Question 1, in the script, the list of RUVs is retrieved like so:
>>
>> $ruv = $conn->search($replicaroot, "one",
>>
>> "(&(nsuniqueid=---)(objectClass=nsTombstone))",
>>0, qw(nsds50ruv nsruvReplicaLastModified nsds5AgmtMaxCSN)
On 10/30/2017 01:03 PM, Sergei Gerasenko wrote:
>> Look for: nsDS5ReplicatedAttributeList
>>
>> nsDS5ReplicatedAttributeList: (objectclass=*) $ EXCLUDE memberof
>> idnssoaserial
>> entryusn krblastsuccessfulauth krblastfailedauth krbloginfailedcount
>>
>> In this case any update to any one of
> Look for: nsDS5ReplicatedAttributeList
>
> nsDS5ReplicatedAttributeList: (objectclass=*) $ EXCLUDE memberof idnssoaserial
> entryusn krblastsuccessfulauth krblastfailedauth krbloginfailedcount
>
> In this case any update to any one of these attributes is NOT replicated. So
> if you update
On 10/30/2017 12:37 PM, Sergei Gerasenko wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
>>> The replication is working. I wrote a script that makes a change on
>>> *each* member of the topology and verifies that it got to all the
>>> other members. So, it appears that all is good.
>>
>> Yup, the monitor output looks good
>
Hi Mark,
>> The replication is working. I wrote a script that makes a change on each
>> member of the topology and verifies that it got to all the other members.
>> So, it appears that all is good.
>
> Yup, the monitor output looks good
Cool!
> Okay, so FreeIPA uses fractional replication and
On 10/29/2017 10:11 PM, Sergei Gerasenko wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> Thank you for the quick response. I’m just beginning to unravel the
> mysteries of replication
Easier said than done...
> , so I really appreciate an expert’s help.
>
> As you can see in the screenshot,
There is no screenshot attached
Hi Mark,
Thank you for the quick response. I’m just beginning to unravel the mysteries
of replication, so I really appreciate an expert’s help.
As you can see in the screenshot, the max db csn is quite a bit ahead. Is that
an indication of a problem? Should the server not try to minimize the
d
On 10/29/2017 03:20 PM, Sergei Gerasenko wrote:
> My question now is: what’s the difference between the maxcsn of the
> agreement and the maxcsn in the RUV?
The maxcsn in the RUV is where the database is at, the agreement maxcsn
is what the repl agreement has processed.
__
After looking at the code for a couple of days, I finally see how the
difference is calculated:
Delta = Max Consumer CSN - Max Agreement CSN
Thus, instead of the max CSN of the RUV, the agreement's maxcsn is used?
My question now is: what’s the difference between the maxcsn of the agreement
an
12 matches
Mail list logo
