Hi Pat,
I'd suggest that you try using SMTP_Quicksend instead of the
lower-level SMTP functions. Read up on SMTP_Quicksend and I think
you'll find that you can do everything you need with that, and (in our
pretty thorough testing) it sends emails that are accepted by Outlook,
Yahoo, Gmail,
Hi Doug,
The latest post from Thomas Maul talking about Query By Formula that I find on
the forums is from June:
http://forums.4d.com/Post/EN/24801062/1/24823734#24823734
^ this post is restricted to people with access to the R-releases.
Here is a full list:
Tim:
Thanks for posting those but I was thinking that it was a posting on the 4D
Forum. He posts some gems there.
Good links. Something to read and re-read.
--
Douglas von Roeder
949-336-2902
On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 3:34 PM Timothy Penner wrote:
> > Thomas Maul posted a valuable, lengthy
> Thomas Maul posted a valuable, lengthy message about QbF on the 4D Forum that
> extolled its virtues. IIRC, he suggested using QbF if your query had two or
> more search clauses. (I've tried to find the posting recently and not been
> able to — if anyone finds it, it would be a great post to
Alan,
I'd suggest that you try using SMTP_Quicksend instead of the lower-level
SMTP functions. Read up on SMTP_Quicksend and I think you'll find that you
can do everything you need with that, and (in our pretty thorough testing)
it sends emails that are accepted by Outlook, Yahoo, Gmail, Mail, and
> BTW, I mimicked the OT GetArrayLong/Text/Date* commands and the Find in
> array command from Object Tools in my copy of OBJ_Module. The approach that
> I took was to extract the array from the object and do a find in array and
> I was thinking that, perhaps, that would incur a penalty. I don't
Thanks Doug, and Arnaud
The issue was one or more damaged indexes. After a repair everything
seems to be working as it should.
Thanks for the insight into QbF, I'll look into it.
Chip
On Wed, 3 Oct 2018 09:21:19 -0700, Douglas von Roeder via 4D_Tech wrote:
> If you check the checkboxes in the
Paul,
You touch on an excellent point about using objects. At the heart of it is
your naming convention. We haven't had to worry about naming too much in
the past. Variable names aren't case sensitive and you could always use the
COMPILER_ methods to document the IP and process variables. And the
We have not started using objects in our application but I can see how they
could be useful. However where I am struggling is how we are supposed to
keep documentation as to the object definition. With database structure you
can clearly see the definition of the table and fields and these are
> Le 2 oct. 2018 à 20:10, Chip Scheide via 4D_Tech <4d_tech@lists.4d.com> a
> écrit :
>
> [...]
>
> I ask because it is not, even after a restart of 4D
The doc says it should:
"The RELATE ONE SELECTION command creates a new selection of records for the
table oneTable, based on the selection
10 matches
Mail list logo
