Hi All,
Need some help on a SQL connection issue….
A script that has been to access an SQL database (been deployed for years) has
suddenly stopped working and threw up the following error :
Error - [DBNETLIB][ConnectionOpen (SECCreateCredentials()).]SSL
Security error
In the cause
That was a very inspiring post.
> On 15 Sep 2019, at 21:44, Aparajita Fishman via 4D_Tech
> <4d_tech@lists.4d.com> wrote:
>
>> ORDA looks really interesting too but I haven't played with it yet, but I'm
>> looking forward to experimenting with it soon.
>
> It’s more than interesting, it’s
> ORDA looks really interesting too but I haven't played with it yet, but I'm
> looking forward to experimenting with it soon.
It’s more than interesting, it’s bringing 4D into the 21st century. It’s the
way DB access has been on other platforms for a long time, and it's just way,
way superior
4D v 16.6 I have the following dictionaries installed in the Hunspell folder
(.dic and .aff) on both Mac and Windows:
da_DK, en_GB, en_US, es_ES, fr-modern, nb_NO, nn_NO og pt_BR
Out of those I have personally installed da_DK, nb_NO and nn_NO. The rest is
installed by 4D as standard
> On 15 Sep 2019, at 14:32, Jeffrey Kain via 4D_Tech <4d_tech@lists.4d.com>
> wrote:
>
> Don't try to fit a square peg into a round hole just yet
Fair enough, Jeff. I won’t, and your advice is of course wise re. “the real
thing is coming”.
But it’s still interesting to explore the potential
I think you should stop thinking about dot notation as object orientation.
Concepts like classes and inheritance aren't supported yet, and saying
$animal:=$dog isn't inheritance -- it's just assigning one object's reference
to another and kind of backwards at that.
Don't try to fit a square
Hi Narinder
Thanks for posting your commentary. Very interesting.
Regards
Peter
> On 15 Sep 2019, at 13:58, Narinder Chandi via 4D_Tech <4d_tech@lists.4d.com>
> wrote:
>
> I think our coding style will need to undergo an evolution rather than
> revolution
I think our coding style will need to undergo an evolution rather than
revolution. We all probably have legacy codebases to maintain where the
existing code will mostly stay as-is, but newer code can be written using the
new features. Over time developers will no doubt "modernise" existing code
Thanks Narinder.
Doesn’t this imply we need to change our entire style and approach to coding ?
Language data structures, forms, the lot ?
Have you found you needed to do this ? (At least in terms of new code and
optimal approaches).
Having attended the last couple of summits and various
Peter,
Yes, for legacy structures that are converted to v17 you have to explicitly
enable Unicode support and also enable the "Use object notation..." setting
under Compatibility. This is assuming that your structure has a clean bill of
health in the MSC in regards to not using the period ( .
Hi Narinder
So it does. I created a brand new structure and it now works.
I did that example in a legacy upgraded structure so maybe there’s some
compatibility setting that I needed to change to fully support the new object
syntax.
Many thanks for taking the time to check it and respond !
Peter,
I just tested your code exactly as-is and all the variables have the expected
values. I used 17.2 on Mac. What version/platform did you test on? I've sent
you a screenshot directly.
Regards,
Narinder Chandi,
ToolBox Systems Ltd.
I am available for new consulting opportunities…
Hi
Using the v17 dot notation I was unable to get one object to inherit another’s
properties using the assignment operator. Also when I inspect $dog in the
debugger after assigning the first property, it appears empty.
Code is:
C_OBJECT($animal;$dog;$cat)
$dog:=New object
$cat:=New object
13 matches
Mail list logo
