Thanks for the followup!
There is a On System Event database method, but it doesn’t do anything:
C_LONGINT($1)
Case of
: ($1=On application background move)
//Do something
: ($1=On application foreground move)
//Do something else
End case
the "Apple" in "Apple Event Manager" has no correlation to the platform
operation system.
it could be interpreted more generically as the system event manager.
if you see this process popping up,
check your On System Event database method;
if a blank method exists, delete it completely.
if you
you can grow a collection implicitly using bracket notation.
quote:
If this element index is beyond the last existing element of the collection,
the collection is automatically resized and all new intermediary elements get
the null value
Indeed. This prompts to relay a quick anecdote - I worked on a 4D system
originally developed by Aparajita more than 22 years ago for an investment
bank. It used a plug-in that was probably little known at the time -
ObjectTools. Aparajita's always been far, far ahead of the curve. That 4D
Well gee, what does Aparajita know about object oriented stuff? 樂
Nicely put.
On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 1:23 PM Aparajita Fishman via 4D_Tech <
4d_tech@lists.4d.com> wrote:
> > Well my recommendation is not to use New formula ever.
>
> Translation: “I’m not sure I can use them properly, therefore
rofl ! That was a very inspiring post.
Ok I think thats pushed me over the edge. OO 4D here I come.
> On 16 Sep 2019, at 22:23, Aparajita Fishman via 4D_Tech
> <4d_tech@lists.4d.com> wrote:
>
>> Well my recommendation is not to use New formula ever.
>
> Translation: “I’m not sure I can use
> Well my recommendation is not to use New formula ever.
Translation: “I’m not sure I can use them properly, therefore no one should.”
> Even with properly
> encapsulated code structured in a way that makes sense, it's still
> impossible to get the context, source, or whether or not the
Fascinating stuff Kirk.
Thanks for posting.
Peter
> On 16 Sep 2019, at 17:10, Kirk Brooks via 4D_Tech <4d_tech@lists.4d.com>
> wrote:
>
> Not everyone is a fan and there are some good arguments to be made
**
4D Internet
Peter,
On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 1:58 AM Peter Jakobsson via 4D_Tech <
4d_tech@lists.4d.com> wrote:
> The key is the new “This” self-referencing function because it now lets
> you create an active object as a class.
It does.
> I realise OO purists may not regard it as a class,
They do not.
>
Eric:
To get what you have outlined (and much more) you just build your own within
4D. We had to have a very modern password system in our software since before
2000.
We have built our new shell with all of the password control in it. The nice
thing is that the System Administrator gets to
Hi
Just expanding on that last thread, (“Why does this not work") there do appear
to be some real object orientation aspects to the new 4D commands - at least
from the point of view of what’s needed and useful in a high level environment
like 4D.
The key is the new “This” self-referencing
Hi Tom,
….and a word of thanks too for your reply and the tip !
Regards,
Ronnie
Tarawerkz
> On 16 Sep 2019, at 4:34 PM, Tarawerkz wrote:
>
> Hi Tom,
>
> The current 4D version at the client’s site is v15.
> Through the various versions of upgrade from v11 to 13 to 15, there has not
>
Hi Tom,
The current 4D version at the client’s site is v15.
Through the various versions of upgrade from v11 to 13 to 15, there has not
been an issue with the SQL connection.
I suspect it could be some GPOs that were pushed down….so the subsequent
investigation are narrowing down to that.
Hi Ronnie,
My suspicion is that something around SSL on the external DB has changed.
Perhaps your app uses a version of 4D which supports TLS 1.0 and the external
DB was changed to use TLS 1.2? Or maybe the other way around? Just a guess.
Here’s 4D Tech Tip which can help determine what
14 matches
Mail list logo
